Publication Cover
Bioacoustics
The International Journal of Animal Sound and its Recording
Volume 32, 2023 - Issue 3
102
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Caterpillar sonic defences: mechanisms and diversity of mandible stridulation in silk and hawk moth (Bombycoidea) larvae

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 348-372 | Received 16 Apr 2022, Accepted 20 Sep 2022, Published online: 09 Nov 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Silk and hawk moth caterpillars produce a variety of defence sounds described as clicking, chirping, whistling, and vocalising. Such diversity provides opportunity to test hypotheses on the functions and evolution of insect defence sounds using comparative analyses. A key step to conducting comparative analyses is to categorise different phenotypes. Here, we describe mandible sounds of 20 species of late instar Bombycoidea caterpillars and establish objective criteria for differentiating between sound-producing mechanisms. First, we assess how the two mandibular mechanisms – clicking and chirping – differ from one another using two reference species: Antheraea polyphemus (clicker) and Saturnia pyri (chirper). In these references, clicks are produced by ridged and serrated mandibles and have short duration units with few pulses, whereas chirps are produced by scalloped mandibles and have longer duration units with more pulses. Second, we characterise acoustic and morphological traits of 18 additional species. These are categorised as clickers (13 species), chirpers (4 species), or other (1 species) using diagnostic features identified from the reference species. Third, these categorisations are tested using a predictive logistic regression model. The results of this study contribute to our understanding of acoustically mediated defences in caterpillars and provide necessary criteria for conducting further comparative studies.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all those who helped us obtain specimens for this study: D. Janzen, W. Hallwachs, the parataxonomists at Area de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG), A. Fleming, B. Oehlke, A. Kawahara, A. Dookie, M. Collins, and Worldwide Butterflies. We thank Tom Sherratt for his feedback during this manuscript’s development and K. Brzezinski for the line drawings in .

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

For access to acoustic data from this study, please contact the corresponding author at jayneyack@cunet.carleton.ca.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2022.2128876.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN 2014-05947 and RGPIN-2020-07056] to JEY, and a Postgraduate Scholarship (Doctoral program) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [PGSD3-518236- 2018] to MLL.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 254.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.