Restricted access
Review article
Review article
The subtlety of simple eyes: the tuning of visual fields to perceptual challenges in birds
Published:19 February 2014https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0040
Abstract
Birds show interspecific variation both in the size of the fields of individual eyes and in the ways that these fields are brought together to produce the total visual field. Variation is found in the dimensions of all main parameters: binocular region, cyclopean field and blind areas. There is a phylogenetic signal with respect to maximum width of the binocular field in that passerine species have significantly broader field widths than non-passerines; broadest fields are found among crows (Corvidae). Among non-passerines, visual fields show considerable variation within families and even within some genera. It is argued that (i) the main drivers of differences in visual fields are associated with perceptual challenges that arise through different modes of foraging, and (ii) the primary function of binocularity in birds lies in the control of bill position rather than in the control of locomotion. The informational function of binocular vision does not lie in binocularity per se (two eyes receiving slightly different information simultaneously about the same objects from which higher-order depth information is extracted), but in the contralateral projection of the visual field of each eye. Contralateral projection ensures that each eye receives information from a symmetrically expanding optic flow-field from which direction of travel and time to contact targets can be extracted, particularly with respect to the control of bill position.
Footnotes
References
- 1
Walls GL . 1942 The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science. Google Scholar - 2
Rochon-Duvigneaud A . 1943 Les yeux et la vision des vertébrés. Paris, France: Masson. Google Scholar - 3
Warrant E& Nilsson D-E . 2006 Invertebrate vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar - 4
Lamb TD, Collin SP& Pugh EN . 2007 Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 960–976. (doi:10.1038/nrn2283). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 5
Brooke MdL, Hanley S& Laughlin SB . 1999 The scaling of eye size with body mass in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 405–412. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0652). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 6
Vorobyev M, Osorio D, Bennett ATD, Marshall NJ& Cuthill IC . 1998 Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours. J. Comp. Physiol. A 183, 621–633. (doi:10.1007/s003590050286). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 7
Endler JA& Mielke PW . 2005 Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86, 405–431. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00540.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 8
Moore BA, 2012 A novel method for comparative analysis of retinal specialization traits from topographic maps. J. Vis. 12, 13. 1–24. (doi:10.1167/12.12.13). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 9
Martin GR, Jarrett N& Williams M . 2007 Visual fields in blue ducks and pink-eared ducks: visual and tactile foraging. Ibis 149, 112–120. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00611.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 10
Martin GR& Piersma T . 2009 Vision and touch in relation to foraging and predator detection: insighful contrasts between a plover and a sandpiper. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 437–445. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1110). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 11
White CR, Day N, Butler PJ& Martin GR . 2007 Vision and foraging in cormorants: more like herons than hawks? PLoS ONE i2, e639. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000639). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 12
Guillemain M, Martin GR& Fritz H . 2002 Feeding methods, visual fields and vigilance in dabbling ducks (Anatidae). Funct. Ecol. 16, 522–529. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00652.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 13
Martin GR, Jarrett N, Tovey P& White CR . 2005 Visual fields in flamingos: chick-feeding versus filter-feeding. Naturwissenschaften 92, 351–354. (doi:10.1007/s00114-005-0010-0). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 14
Martin GR& Prince PA . 2001 Visual fields and foraging in procellariiform seabirds: sensory aspects of dietary segregation. Brain Behav. Evol. 57, 33–38. (doi:10.1159/000047224). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 15
Martin GR& Portugal SJ . 2011 Differences in foraging ecology determine variation in visual field in ibises and spoonbills (Threskiornithidae). Ibis 153, 662–671. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01151.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 16
- 17
Archer SN, Djamgoz MBA, Loew E, Partridge JC& Vallerga S . 1999 Adaptive mechanisms in the ecology of vision. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Crossref, Google Scholar - 18
- 19
- 20
Martin GR, Wilson KJ, Wild MJ, Parsons S, Kubke MF& Corfield J . 2007 Kiwi forego vision in the guidance of their nocturnal activities. PLoS ONE 2, e198. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000198). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 21
Gould SJ . 1980 Introduction. Dance of the tiger: a novel of the Ice Age (author B. Kurtén). New York, NY: Random House. Google Scholar - 22
Garland T, Bennet AF& Rezende EL . 2005 Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 3015–3035. (doi:10.1242/jeb.01745). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 23
Freckleton RP, Harvey PH& Pagel M . 2002 Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160, 712–726. (doi:10.1086/343873). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 24
Felsenstein J . 1985 Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15. (doi:10.1086/284325). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 25
Harvey PH& Pagel MD . 1991 The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar - 26
Gill F& Donsker D . 2012 IOC world bird list (v. 3.3). Available at http://www.worldbirdnames.org/. Google Scholar - 27
- 28
Hackett SJ, 2008 A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320, 1763–1768. (doi:10.1126/science.1157704). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 29
Livezey BC& Zusi RL . 2007 Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves : Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 149, 1–95. (doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 30
Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K& Mooers AO . 2012 The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448. (doi:10.1038/nature11631). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 31
Chiappe LM . 2006 The glorified dinosaurs : origins and early evolution of birds. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. Google Scholar - 32
Zheng X, Zhou Z, Wang X, Zhang F, Wang Y, Wei G, Wang S& Xu X . 2013 Hind wings in basal birds and the evolution of leg feathers. Science 339, 1309–1312. (doi:10.1126/science.1228753). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 33
Alonso PD, Milner AC, Ketcham RA, Cookson MJ& Rowe TB . 2004 The avian nature of the brain and inner ear of Archaeopteryx. Nature 430, 666–669. (doi:10.1038/nature02706). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 34
Bunce M, 2009 The evolutionary history of the extinct ratite moa and New Zealand Neogene paleogeography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20 641–20 646. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0906660106). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 35
Phillips MJ, Gibb GC, Crimp EA& Penny D . 2010 Tinamous and moa flock together: mitochondrial genome sequence analysis reveals independent losses of flight among ratites. Syst. Biol. 59, 90–107. (doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp079). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 36
King AS& King DZ . 1980 Avian morphology: general principles. Form and function in birds (eds, King AS& McLelland J ), pp. 10–89. London, UK: Academic Press. Google Scholar - 37
Weiner J . 1994 The beak of the finch: a story of evolution in our time. New York, NY: Alfred a Knopf. Google Scholar - 38
Grant PR& Grant BR . 2002 Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296, 707–711. (doi:10.1126/science.1070315). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 39
Sansom A, Lind J& Cresswell W . 2009 Individual behavior and survival: the roles of predator avoidance, foraging success, and vigilance. Behav. Ecol. 20, 1168–1174. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arp110). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 40
Cresswell W . 2011 Predation in bird populations. J. Ornithol. 152((Suppl. 1)), 251–263. (doi:10.1007/s10336-010-0638-1). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 41
Fernandez-Juricic E, Gall MD, Dolan T, O'Rourke C, Thomas S& Lynch JR . 2011 Visual systems and vigilance behaviour of two ground-foraging avian prey species: white-crowned sparrows and California towhees. Anim. Behav. 81, 705–713. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.014). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 42
Worthy TH& Holdaway RN . 2002 The lost world of the moa: prehistoric life in New Zealand. Christchurch, UK: Canterbury University Press. Google Scholar - 43
Wilson K-J . 2004 Flight of the huia: ecology and conservation of New Zealand‘s frogs, reptiles, birds and mammals. Christchurch, UK: Canterbury University Press. Google Scholar - 44
Davies NB, Krebs JR& West SA . 2012 An introduction to behavioural ecology , 4th edn. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar - 45
Endler JA, Westcott DA, Madden JR& Robson T . 2005 Animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns: sensory processing illuminates signal evolution. Evolution 59, 1795–1818. Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 46
Fernandez-Juricici E, Gall M, Dolan T, Tisdale V& Martin GR . 2008 The visual fields of two ground foraging birds, house finches and house sparrows, allow for simultaneous foraging and antipredator vigilance. Ibis 150, 779–787. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00860.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 47
Devereux CL, Whittingham MJ, Fernandez-Juricic E, Vickery JA& Krebs JR . 2006 Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk. Behav. Ecol. 17, 303–309. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arj032). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 48
Fernández-Juricic E, Erichsen JT& Kacelnik A . 2004 Visual perception and social foraging in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 25–31. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.003). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 49
Martin GR . 2012 Through birds’ eyes: insights into avian sensory ecology. J. Ornithol. 153((Suppl. 1)), S23–S48. (doi:10.1007/s10336-011-0771-5). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 50
Martin GR& Shaw JM . 2010 Bird collisions with power lines: failing to see the way ahead? Biol. Conserv. 143, 2695–2702. (doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.014). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 51
Jones J& Francis CM . 2003 The effects of light characteristics on avian mortality at lighthouses. J. Avian Biol. 34, 328–333. (doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2003.03183.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 52
Kerlinger P, Gehring JL, Erickson WP, Curry R, Jain A& Guarnaccia J . 2010 Night migrant fatalities and obstruction lighting at wind turbines in North America. Wilson J. Ornithol. 122, 744–754. (doi:10.1676/06-075.1). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 53
Gehring J, Kerlinger P& Manville AM . 2009 Communication towers, lights, and birds: successful methods of reducing the frequency of avian collisions. Ecol. Appl. 19, 505–514. (doi:10.1890/07-1708.1). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 54
Martin GR . 2011 Understanding bird collisions with man-made objects: a sensory ecology approach. Ibis 153, 239–254. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01117.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 55
Basbaum AI, Kaneko A, Shimizu T& Westheimer G . 2008 The senses: a comprehensive reference, vols 1 and 2. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. Google Scholar - 56
Lythgoe JN& Partridge JC . 1989 Visual pigments and the acquisition of visual information. J. Exp. Biol. 146, 1–20. Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 57
Ödeen A& Håstad O . 2013 The phylogenetic distribution of ultraviolet sensitivity in birds. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 36. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-36). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 58
Martin GR . 1999 Optical structure and visual field in birds: their relationship with foraging behaviour and ecology. Adaptive mechanisms in the ecology of vision (eds, Archer SN, Djamgoz MBA, Loew E, Partridge JC& Vallerga S ), pp. 485–507. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Crossref, Google Scholar - 59
Martin GR& Katzir G . 1999 Visual field in short-toed eagles Circaetus gallicus and the function of binocularity in birds. Brain Behav. Evol. 53, 55–66. (doi:10.1159/000006582). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 60
Martin GR . 2007 Visual fields and their functions in birds. J. Ornithol. 148((Suppl. 2)), 547–562. (doi:10.1007/s10336-007-0213-6). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 61
Martin GR& Osorio D . 2008 Vision in birds. The senses: a comprehensive reference, vol. 1 vision I (eds, Basbaum AI, Kaneko A, Shepherd GM& Westheimer G ), pp. 25–52. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. Google Scholar - 62
Martin GR . 2009 What is binocular vision for? A birds’ eye view. J. Vis. 9, 1–19. (doi:10.1167/9.11.14). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 63
Martin GR& Katzir G . 1994 Visual fields and eye movements in herons (Ardeidae). Brain Behav. Evol. 44, 74–85. (doi:10.1159/000113571). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 64
Martin GR, Portugal SJ& Murn CP . 2012 Visual fields, foraging and collision vulnerability in Gyps vultures. Ibis 154, 626–631. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2012.01227.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 65
Zeigler HP, Jager R& Palacios AG . 1993 Sensorimotor mechanisms and pecking in the pigeon. Vision, brain and behavior in birds (eds, Zeigler HP& Bischof H-J ), pp. 265–283. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar - 66
Martin GR& Coetzee HC . 2004 Visual fields in hornbills: precision-grasping and sunshades. Ibis 146, 18–26. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00211.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 67
Beecher WJ . 1978 Feeding adapations and evolution in the starlings. Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci. 11, 269–298. Google Scholar - 68
Martin GR, White CR& Butler PJ . 2008 Vision and the foraging technique of great cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo: pursuit or flush-foraging? Ibis 150, 39–48. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00808.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 69
Hunt GR . 1996 Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature 379, 249–251. (doi:10.1038/379249a0). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 70
Troscianko J, von Bayern AMP, Chaappell J, Rutz C& Martin GR . 2012 Extreme binocular vision and a straight bill facilitate tool use in New Caledonian crows. Nat. Commun. 3, 1110. (doi:10.1038/ncomms2111). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 71
Thorn F& Boynton RM . 1974 Human binocular summation at absolute threshold. Vision Res. 14, 445–458. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(74)90033-9). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 72
Martin GR . 1982 An owl's eye: schematic optics and visual performance in Strix aluco L. J. Comp. Physiol. A 145, 341–349. (doi:10.1007/BF00619338). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 73
Knudsen EI . 1980 Sound localisation in birds. Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates (eds, Popper AN& Fay RR ), pp. 289–322. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Crossref, Google Scholar - 74
Norberg RA . 1978 Skull asymmetry, ear structure and function and auditory localization in Tengmalm's owl, Aegolius funereus. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 282, 325–410. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1978.0014). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 75
Martin GR . 1999 Eye structure and foraging in king penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus. Ibis 141, 444–450. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1999.tb04413.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 76
Payne RS . 1971 Acoustic location of prey by barn owls. J. Exp. Biol. 54, 535–573. Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 77
Cleere N . 1999 Family Caprimulgidae (nightjars). Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 5. Barn-owls to hummingbirds (eds, del Hoyo J, Elliott A& Sargatal J ), pp. 302–386. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions. Google Scholar - 78
Martin GR, Rojas LM, Ramirez Y& McNeil R . 2004 The eyes of oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis): pushing at the limits of sensitivity. Naturwissenschaften 91, 26–29. (doi:10.1007/s00114-003-0495-3). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 79
Martin GR, Rojas LM, Ramirez Figueroa YM& McNeil R . 2004 Binocular vision and nocturnal activity in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis) and pauraques (Nyctidromus albicollis): Caprimulgiformes. Ornithol. Neotrop. 15((Suppl.)), 233–242. Google Scholar - 80
Marshall J . 1991 The effect of ultraviolet radiation and blue light on the eye. Vision and visual dysfunction (ed.& Marshall J ), pp. 54–66. London, UK: Macmillan. Google Scholar - 81
Sliney DH . 1991 Measurement of light exposure and the geometry of exposure of the human eye. Vision and visual dysfunction (ed.& Marshall J ), pp. 23–29. London, UK: Macmillan. Google Scholar - 82
Martin GR& Katzir G . 2000 Sun shades and eye size in birds. Brain Behav. Evol. 56, 340–344. (doi:10.1159/000047218). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 83
van den Hout P& Martin GR . 2011 Extreme head-tilting in shorebirds: predator detection and sun avoidance. Wader Study Group Bull. 118, 18–21. Google Scholar - 84
Dickinson CM . 1991 Optical aids for low vision. Vision and visual dysfunction (ed.& Charman WN ), pp. 183–228. London, UK: Macmillan. Google Scholar - 85
Rogers LJ . 2008 Development and function of lateralization in the avian brain. Brain Res. Bull. 76, 235–244. (doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.02.001). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 86
van der Willigen RF, Frost BF& Wagner H . 2003 How owls structure visual information. Anim. Cogn. 61, 39–45. (doi:10.1007/s10071-003-0161-3). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 87
Jager R& Zeigler HP . 1991 Visual fields and peck localization in the pigeon. Behav. Brain Res. 45, 65–69. (doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(05)80181-0). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 88
Lee DN& Lishman R . 1977 Visual control of locomotion. Scand. J. Psychol. 18, 224–230. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00281.x). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 89
Lee DN . 1980 The optic flow field: the foundation of vision. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 290, 169–179. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1980.0089). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 90
Lee DN, Reddish PE& Rand DT . 1991 Aerial docking by hummingbirds. Naturwissenschaften 78, 526–527. (doi:10.1007/BF01131406). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 91
Lee DN& Reddish PE . 1981 Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics. Nature 293, 293–294. (doi:10.1038/293293a0). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 92
Giolli RA, Blanks RH& Lui F . 2006 The accessory optic system: basic organization with an update on connectivity, neurochemistry, and function. Prog. Brain Res. 151, 407–440. (doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(05)51013-6). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 93
Gamlin PD . 2006 The pretectum: connections and oculomotor-related roles. Prog. Brain Res. 151, 379–405. (doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(05)51012-4). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 94
McKenna OC& Wallman J . 1985 Accessory optic system and pretectum of birds: comparisons with those of other vertebrates. Brain Behav. Evol. 26, 91–116. (doi:10.1159/000118770). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 95
Pakan JMP& Wylie DRW . 2006 Two optic flow pathways from the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali to the cerebellum in pigeons (Columba livia). J. Comp. Neurol. 499, 732–744. (doi:10.1002/cne.21108). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
