Volume 110, Issue 7 p. 1525-1536
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The ecological drivers of growth form evolution in flowering plants

Adam Klimeš

Corresponding Author

Adam Klimeš

Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Department of Functional Ecology, Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic

Correspondence

Adam Klimeš

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Irena Šímová

Irena Šímová

Center for Theoretical Study, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
Alexander Zizka

Alexander Zizka

German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig (iDiv), Leipzig, Germany

Department of Biology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Alexandre Antonelli

Alexandre Antonelli

Royal Botanic Gardens, UK

Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Tomáš Herben

Tomáš Herben

Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Department of Population Ecology, Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 April 2022
Citations: 3

Handling Editor: Peter J Bellingham

Abstract

  1. In flowering plants (angiosperms), the herbaceous habit has evolved repeatedly from the ancestral woody state and herbs evolved repeatedly back to woody plants. Yet, how common these transitions were and which ecological conditions promote the herbaceous habit is poorly known. Several hypotheses exist, postulating an advantage of the herbaceous growth form to better cope with frost, drought, fire and shade and in allowing a fast life strategy, but their evaluation has been hitherto limited and support equivocal. We aim to evaluate these hypotheses by testing the difference between woody plants and herbs for a set of variables related to these hypotheses.
  2. We compiled and integrated data for up to 21,581 species representing 359 families from public databases. We estimated the minimum number of evolutionary transitions between both growth forms. We assembled data on frost, drought, fire and shade tolerances, clonality and specific leaf area and we tested individual hypotheses by comparing herbaceous and woody angiosperm growth forms globally and within selected biomes and clades using phylogenetic comparative analyses.
  3. We found 1656 evolutionary transitions from woody towards herbaceous growth form and 2111 transitions in the opposite direction. In agreement with our expectations, herbs were more tolerant to frost and shade than woody plants and had higher specific leaf area. However, the growth forms did not differ in their fire tolerance and clonality. Furthermore, contrary to our expectation, woody plants were more drought tolerant than herbs. The majority of the differences were robust to the choice of biome or clade.
  4. Synthesis. Both herbaceous and woody habits evolved many times making the evolution of growth forms a well-replicated event and suggesting that conditions favourable for either of the growth forms emerge often and plants respond to them. Apart from standard explanation by low temperatures, the success of herbs was likely enabled also by biotic interactions—by their fast life strategy, which is beneficial in seasonal and early successional habitats, and by their ability to tolerate shade.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/1365-2745.13888.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All used datasets are publicly available (see Section 2). Composed dataset and code for analyses is published on GitHub 10.5281/zenodo.6389681 (Klimeš et al., 2022).