Volume 38, Issue 1 p. 95-134

Channeling frustrations: institutions, economic fluctuations, and political behavior

Michaell A. Taylor

Corresponding Author

Michaell A. Taylor

Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Correspondence to: Michaell A. Taylor, Economics Research Group, Reis, 5 West 37th St., New York, NY 10018, USA Phone: (212) 921–1122; Fax: (212) 921–2533; [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 November 2003
Citations: 24

Abstract

Abstract While the literature suggests that clear lines of responsibility lead to greater incumbent dependence on economic conditions for support, little has been said about how electorates channel frustrations in systems characterized by ‘fuzzy’ lines of responsibility, i.e., the shape and status of parliamentary government in relation to possible choice of electors open to them. The argument presented here is that fuzzy lines of responsibility result in lower incentives to participate in political processes and greater system dissatisfaction given economic circumstances. This decline is greater in systems in which incumbent responsibility is less easily identified by the individual citizen. To test this, data are collected from eight European nations over the period 1975–1992. Split sample and slope intervention models with robust estimation are employed at the individual level. System level aggregates are analyzed using pooled time–series analysis to confirm individual level findings. Finally, election turnout data are also analyzed to obtain election level verification of survey findings. Evidence suggests that participation is more heavily influenced by economic conditions in fuzzy settings. Coupled with existing literature, this suggests that while clear settings encourage punishment of the incumbent unclear settings tend to cause individuals to become more withdrawn and alienated. However, economic conditions are also important to overall system effects. The findings herein suggest that unclear or fuzzy settings increase the role of economic conditions in determination of system affect.