Shift in predation regime mediates diversification of foraging behaviour in a dragonfly genus
Corresponding Author
Bin Jiang
Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Correspondence: Bin Jiang, Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Street 1–3, 14195 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorDirk J. Mikolajewski
Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Bin Jiang
Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Correspondence: Bin Jiang, Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Street 1–3, 14195 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorDirk J. Mikolajewski
Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
1. Behavioural adaptations to avoid and evade predators are common. Many studies have investigated population divergence in response to changes in predation regime within species, but studies exploring interspecific patterns are scant. Studies on interspecific divergence can infer common outcomes from evolutionary processes and highlight the role of environmental constraints in shaping species traits.
2. Species of the dragonfly genus Leucorrhinia underwent well-studied shifts from habitats being dominated by predatory fish (fish lakes) to habitat being dominated by predatory invertebrates (dragonfly lakes). This change in top predators resulted in a set of adaptive trait modifications in response to the different hunting styles of both predator types: whereas predatory fish actively search and pursue prey, invertebrate predator follow a sit-and-wait strategy, not pursuing prey.
3. Here it is shown that the habitat shift-related change in selection regime on larval Leucorrhinia caused species in dragonfly lakes to evolve increased larval foraging and activity, and results suggest that they lost the ability to recognise predatory fish.
4. The results of the present study highlight the impact of predators on behavioural trait diversification with habitat-specific predation regimes selecting for distinct behavioural expression.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
een12530-sup-0001-FileS1.docxWord 2007 document , 65.3 KB | File S1. Behavioural responses to predators in Daphnia pulex and Lambda values for behavioural principal compenents. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Abrams, P.A. (2000) Character shifts of prey species that share predators. American Naturalist, 156, S45–S61.
- Anholt, B.R. & Werner, E.E. (1995) Interaction between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive behavior. Ecology, 76, 2230–2234.
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R.H.B., Singmann, H., Dai, B., Grothendieck, G., Green, P., & Bolker, M.B. (2016) Package ‘lme4’. [WWW document]. URL http://pbil.univlyon1.fr/CRAN/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf.
- Benard, M.F. (2004) Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in organisms with complex life histories. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35, 651–673.
- Benke, A.C. (1970) A method for comparing individual growth rates of aquatic insects with special reference to the Odonata. Ecology, 51, 328–331.
- Blanckenhorn, W.U. (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Quarterly Review of Biology, 75, 385–407.
- Blumstein, D.T. & Daniel, J.C. (2002) Isolation from mammalian predators differentially affects two congeners. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 657–663.
- Bourdeau, P.E. & Johansson, F. (2012) Predator-induced morphological defences as by-products of prey behaviour: a review and prospectus. Oikos, 121, 1175–1190.
- Brodin, T. & Johansson, F. (2004) Conflicting selection pressures on the growth/predation risk trade-off in a damselfly. Ecology, 85, 2927–2932.
- Brown, J.M., McPeek, M.A. & May, M.L. (2000) A phylogenetic perspective on habitat shifts and diversity in the north American Enallagma damselflies. Systematic Biology, 49, 697–712.
- Chivers, D.P., Wisenden, B.D. & Smith, R.J.F. (1996) Damselfly larvae learn to recognize predators from chemical cues in the predator's diet. Animal Behaviour, 52, 315–320.
- Corbet, P.S. (1999) Dragonflies: behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, New York.
- De Block, M. & Stoks, R. (2003) Adaptive sex-specific life history plasticity to temperature and photoperiod in a damselfly. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 986–995.
- Dmitriew, C.M. (2011) The evolution of growth trajectories: what limits growth rate? Biological Reviews, 86, 97–116.
- Edgell, T.C., Lynch, B.R., Trussell, G.C. & Palmer, A.R. (2009) Experimental evidence for the rapid evolution of behavioral canalization in natural populations. The American Naturalist, 174, 434–440.
- Edmunds, M. (1974) Defence in animals: a survey of anti-predator defences. Longman, Harlow, U.K.
- Egea-Serrano, A., Hangartner, S., Laurila, A. & Räsänen, K. (2014) Multifarious selection through environmental change: acidity and predator-mediated adaptive divergence in the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20133266.
- Felsenstein, J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist, 125, 1–15.
- Ferrari, M.C.O., Sih, A. & Chivers, D.P. (2009) The paradox of risk allocation: a review and prospectus. Animal Behaviour, 78, 579–585.
- Garland, T., Bennett, A.F. & Rezende, E.L. (2005) Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208, 3015–3035.
- Gerritsen, J. & Strickler, J.R. (1977) Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada, 34, 73–82.
- Harmon, L.J., Weir, J.T., Brock, C.D., Glor, R.E. & Challenger, W. (2008) GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics, 24, 129–131.
- Harris, S., Eroukhmanoff, F., Green, K.K., Svensson, E.I. & Pettersson, L.B. (2011) Changes in behavioural trait integration following rapid ecotype divergence in an aquatic isopod. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 1887–1896.
- Hovmöller, R. & Johansson, F. (2004) A phylogenetic perspective on larval spine morphology in Leucorrhinia (Odonata: Libellulidae) based on ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 30, 653–662.
- Ingley, S.J., Billman, E.J., Belk, M.C. & Johnson, J.B. (2014) Morphological divergence driven by predation environment within and between species of Brachyrhaphis fishes. PLoS One, 9, e90274.
- Jeschke, J.M. (2006) Density-dependent effects of prey defenses and predator offenses. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 242, 900–907.
- Johansson, F. & Mikolajewski, D.J. (2008) Evolution of morphological defences. Dragonflies and Damselflies: Model Organisms for Ecological and Evolutionary Research (ed. by A. Cordoba-Aguilar), pp. 127–139. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, New York.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230693.003.0010 Google Scholar
- Johnson, P.T., Preu, E.R., Sutherland, D.R., Romansic, J.M., Han, B. & Blaustein, A.R. (2006) Adding infection to injury: synergistic effects of predation and parasitism on amphibian malformations. Ecology, 87, 2227–2235.
- Jolliffe, I. (2002) Principal Component Analysis. Springer, New York, New York.
- Katz, S.M., Pollock, F.J., Bourne, D.G. & Willis, B.L. (2014) Crown-of-thorns starfish predation and physical injuries promote brown band disease on corals. Coral Reefs, 33, 705–716.
- Labra, A. & Niemeyer, H.M. (2004) Variability in the assessment of snake predation risk by Liolaemus lizards. Ethology, 110, 649–662.
- Lenth, R. & Lenth, M.R. (2016) Package ‘lsmeans’.
- McPeek, M.A. (1990) Behavioral-differences between Enallagma species (Odonata) influencing differential vulnerability to predators. Ecology, 71, 1714–1726.
- Mikolajewski, D.J. & Johansson, F. (2004) Morphological and behavioral defenses in dragonfly larvae: trait compensation and cospecialization. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 614–620.
- Mikolajewski, D.J. & Rolff, J. (2004) Benefits of morphological defence demonstrated by direct manipulation in larval dragonflies. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 619–626.
- Mikolajewski, D.J., Johansson, F., Wohlfahrt, B. & Stoks, R. (2006) Invertebrate predation selects for the loss of a morphological antipredator trait. Evolution, 60, 1306–1310.
- Mikolajewski, D.J., De Block, M., Rolff, J., Johansson, F., Beckerman, A.P. & Stoks, R. (2010) Predator-driven trait diversification in a dragonfly genus: covariation in behavioral and morphological antipredator defense. Evolution, 64, 3327–3325.
- Mikolajewski, D.J., Wohlfahrt, B., Joop, G. & Beckerman, A.P. (2013) Sexual size dimorphism and the integration of phenotypically plastic traits. Ecological Entomology, 38, 418–428.
- Mikolajewski, D.J., De Block, M. & Stoks, R. (2015a) The interplay of adult and larval time constraints shapes species differences in larval life history. Ecology, 96, 1128–1138.
- Mikolajewski, D.J., Rusen, L., Mauersberger, R., Johansson, F. & Rolff, J. (2015b) Relaxed predation results in reduced phenotypic integration in a suite of dragonflies. Journal of Evolution Biology, 28, 1354–1363.
- Mikolajewski, D.J., Scharnweber, K., Jiang, B., Leicht, S., Mauersberger, R. & Johansson, F. (2016) Changing the habitat: the evolution of intercorrelated traits to escape from predators. Journal of Evolution Biology, 29, 1394–1405.
- Morin, P.J. (1985) Predation intensity, prey survival and injury frequency in an amphibian predator-prey interaction. Copeia, 1985, 638–644.
10.2307/1444755 Google Scholar
- Niemelä, P.T., Vainikka, A., Hedrick, A.V. & Kortet, R. (2012) Integrating behaviour with life history: boldness of the field cricket, Gryllus integer, during ontogeny. Functional Ecology, 26, 450–456.
- Pafilis, P., Foufopoulos, J., Poulakakis, N., Lymberakis, P. & Valakos, E.D. (2009) Tail shedding in island lizards [Lacertidae, Reptilia]: decline of antipredator defenses in relaxed predation environments. Evolution, 63, 1262–1278.
- Petrin, Z., Schilling, E.G., Loftin, C.S. & Johansson, F. (2010) Predators shape distribution and promote diversification of morphological defenses in Leucorrhinia, Odonata. Evolutionary Ecology, 24, 1003–1016.
- Relyea, R.A. (2001a) Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology, 82, 523–540.
- Relyea, R.A. (2001b) The relationship between predation risk and antipredator responses in larval anurans. Ecology, 82, 541–554.
- Revelle, W. (2016) psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois [WWW document]. URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version = 1.6.4.
- Richardson, J.M.L. (2001) A comparative study of activity levels in larval anurans and response to the presence of different predators. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 51–58.
- Runemark, A., Brydegaard, M. & Svensson, E. (2014) Does relaxed predation drive phenotypic divergence among insular populations? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27, 1676–1690.
- Schaffner, A.K. & Anholt, B.R. (1998) Influence of predator presence and prey density on behavior and growth of damselfly larvae (Ischnura elegans) (Odonata : Zygoptera). Journal of Insect Behavior, 11, 793–809.
- Scheiner, S.M. (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 24, 35–68.
- Semple, S., Cowlishaw, G. & Bennett, P.M. (2002) Immune system evolution among anthropoid primates: parasites, injuries and predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1031–1037.
- Sih, A. (1987) Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities, pp. 203–224. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
- Sih, A. (2004) A behavioral ecological view of phenotypic plasticity. Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches (ed. by T. J. DeWitt and S. M. Scheiner), pp. 112–126. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
- Stoks, R. & De Block, M. (2000) The influence of predator species and prey age on the immediate survival value of antipredator behaviours in a damselfly. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 147, 417–430.
- Stoks, R., McPeek, M. & Mitchell, J. (2003) Evolution of prey behavior in response to changes in predation regime: damselflies in fish and dragonfly lakes. Evolution, 57, 574–585.
- Stoks, R. & McPeek, M.A. (2006) A tale of two diversifications: reciprocal habitat shifts to fill ecological space along the pond permanence gradient. The American Naturalist, 168, S50–S72.
- Stoks, S., Swillen, I. & De Block, M. (2012) Behaviour and physiology shape the growth acceleations associated with predation risk, high temperatures and southern latitudes in Ischnura damselfly larvae. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81, 1034–1040.
- Stoks, R., Govaert, L., Pauwels, K., Jansen, B. & De Meester, L. (2016) Resurrecting complexity: the interplay of plasticity and rapid evolution in the multiple trait response to strong changes in predation pressure in the water flea Daphnia magna. Ecology Letters, 19, 180–190.
- Tollrian, R. & Harvell, C.D. (1999) The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- Vamosi, S.M. & Schluter, D. (2002) Impacts of trout predation on fitness of sympatric sticklebacks and their hybrids. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 269, 923–930.
- Vamosi, S.M. (2005) On the role of enemies in divergence and diversification of prey: a review and synthesis. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 894–910.
- Vervust, B., Grbac, I. & Van Damme, R. (2007) Differences in morphology, performance and behaviour between recently diverged populations of Podarcis sicula mirror differences in predation pressure. Oikos, 116, 1343–1352.
- Wellborn, G.A., Skelly, D.K. & Werner, E.E. (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 337–363.
- Wohlfahrt, B., Mikolajewski, D.J., Joop, G. & Suhling, F. (2006) Are behavioural traits in prey sensitive to the risk imposed by predatory fish? Freshwater Biology, 51, 76–84.
- Wund, M.A., Baker, J.A., Golub, J.L. & Foster, S.A. (2015) The evolution of antipredator behaviour following relaxed and reversed selection in Alaskan threespine stickleback fish. Animal Behaviour, 106, 181–189.