The Eroding Effect of Corruption on System Support in Sweden
Abstract
Sweden is consistently found at the top in international indices of corruption. In recent years, however, several instances of corruption have been exposed, and surveys show that large shares of Swedish citizens harbor perceptions that public corruption is widespread. Drawing on recent surveys, two questions are asked. First, to what extent do Swedish citizens believe that corruption constitutes a serious problem? Second, how do citizens' evaluations of the extent of public corruption affect support for the democratic system? Approaching the issue from a comparative Nordic perspective, the data indicate that Swedes are considerably more prone to believe that politicians and public officials are corrupt than their Nordic counterparts. The analysis also suggests that such perceptions constitute an important determinant of support for the democratic system. Thus, even in a least likely case of corruption, such as Sweden, growing concerns about corruption has a potential to affect democratic legitimacy negatively.
References
- Adserà, Alícia, Carles Boix, and Mark Payne. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 19 (2): 445–490.
- Agrast, Mark David, Juan Carlos Botero, and Alejandro Ponce. 2010. Rule of Law Index 2010. Washington, DC: The World Justice Project.
- Agrast, Mark David, Juan Carlos Botero, and Alejandro Ponce. 2011. Rule of Law Index 2011. Washington, DC: The World Justice Project.
- Anderson, Christopher J. 2002. Good Questions, Dubious Inferences, and Bad Solutions: Some Further Thoughts on Satisfaction with Democracy. Center on Democratic Performance, Binghamton University Working Paper No. 116.
- Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine A. Guillory. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 66–81.
- Anderson, Christopher J., and Yuliva V. Tverdova. 2001. “Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies.” International Political Science Review 22 (4): 321–338.
- Anderson, Christopher J., and Yuliva V. Tverdova. 2003. “Corruption, Political Allegiances and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 91–109.
- Anderson, Christopher J., André Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug. 2005. Loser's Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0199276382.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Andersson, Staffan. 2008. Exploring Corruption in Sweden—Types of Corruption, Danger Zones and Control Mechanisms. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
- Andersson, Staffan, and Gissur Ó. Erlingsson. 2012. “ New Public Management and Danger Zones for Corruption.” In The Social Construction of Corruption in Europe, ed. Dirk Tanzler et al. London: Ashgate.
- Blais, André, and François Gélineau. 2007. “Winning, Losing, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Political Studies 55 (2): 425–441.
- Booth, John A., and Mitchell A. Seligson. 2009. The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Political Support and Democracy in Eight Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bowler, Shaun, and Jeffrey A. Karp. 2004. “Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government.” Political Studies 26 (3): 271–287.
- Canache, Damarys, Jeffrey J. Mondak, and Mitchell A. Seligson. 2001. “Meaning and Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 506–528.
- Charron, Nicholas, and Victor Lapuente. 2010. “Does Democracy Produce Quality of Government?” European Journal of Political Research 49 (4): 443–470.
- Clarke, Harold D., Nitish Dutt, and Allan Kornberg. 1993. “The Political Economy of Attitudes toward Polity and Society in Western European Democracies.” Journal of Politics 55 (4): 998–1021.
- Dagens Samhälle. 2010. “Var sjätte chef har erbjudits muta.” November 3.
- Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001 Google Scholar
- della Porta, Donatella, and Alberto Vanucci. 1997. “The Perverse Effects of Political Corruption.” Political Studies 45 (4): 516–538.
- Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.
- Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435–457.
- Erlingsson, Gissur Ó., Andreas Bergh, and Mats Sjölin. 2008. “Public Corruption in Swedish Municipalities: Trouble Looming on the Horizon?” Local Government Studies 34 (5): 595–608.
- Esaiasson, Peter. 2010. “Will Citizens Take No for an Answer? What Government Officials Can Do to Enhance Decision Acceptance.” European Political Science Review 2 (3): 351–371.
- Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitefield. 1995. “The Politics and Economics of Democratic Commitment: Support for Democracy in Transition Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 485–514.
- Finkel, Steven E., Edward N. Muller, and Mitchell A. Seligson. 1989. “Economic Crisis, Incumbent Performance and Regime Support: A Comparison of Longitudinal Data from West Germany and Costa Rica.” British Journal of Political Science 19 (3): 329–351.
- Fuchs, Dieter, Giovanna Guidorossi, and Palle Svensson. 1995. “ Support for the Democratic System.” In Citizens and the State, ed. Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gilley, Bruce. 2009. The Right to Rule: How States Win and Lose Legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Global Corruption Barometer. 2003. “ The Transparency International Global Corruption Barometer.” Berlin: Transparency International. <http://archive.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2003>.
- Global Corruption Barometer. 2007. “ Report on the Transparency International Global Corruption Barometer 2007.” Berlin: Transparency International. <http://archive.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2007>.
- Goudie, Andrew W., and David Stasavage. 1998. “A Framework for the Analysis of Corruption.” Crime, Law and Social Change 29 (2–3): 113–159.
- Group of States against Corruption. 2001. First Evaluation Round: Evaluational Report on Sweden. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
- Hagevi, Magnus. 2010. “ Survey 2009: Teknisk Rapport [Survey 2009: Technical Report].” In Avstamp. Svenska Folkets Värden Och Syn På Brännande Samhällsfrågor, ed. Magnus Hagevi. Växjö: Linneaus University Press.
- Hofferbert, Richard I., and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1999. “Remembering the Bad Old Days: Human Rights, Economic Conditions, and Democratic Performance in Transitional Regimes.” European Journal of Political Research 36 (2): 155–174.
- Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Jain, Arvind K. 2001. “Corruption: A Review.” Journal of Economic Surveys 15 (1): 71–121.
- Kumlin, Staffan. 2004. The Personal and the Political: How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology. Houndsmills: Palgrave.
- Kumlin, Staffan. 2007. “ The Welfare State: Values, Policy, Preferences, and Performance Evaluations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kumlin, Staffan, and Bo Rothstein. 2005. “Making and Breaking Social Capital: The Impact of Welfare-State Institutions.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (4): 339–365.
- Kunioka, Todd, and Gary M. Woller. 1999. “In (a) Democracy We Trust: Social and Economic Determinants of Support for Democratic Procedures in Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of Socio-Economics 28: 577–596.
10.1016/S1053-5357(99)00035-9 Google Scholar
- Kurer, Oskar. 2005. “Corruption: An Alternative Approach to Its Definition and Measurement.” Political Studies 53: 222–239.
- La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Schleifer, and Robert Vishny. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15 (1): 222–279.
- Lind, E. Allan, and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 Google Scholar
- Linde, Jonas. 2012. “Why Feed the Hand That Bites You? Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and System Support in Post-Communist Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (3): 410–434.
- Linde, Jonas, and Joakim Ekman. 2003. “Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (3): 391–408.
- Mattes, Robert, and Michael Bratton. 2007. “Learning about Democracy in Africa: Awareness, Performance, and Experience.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 192–217.
- Miller, Arthur, and Ola Listhaug. 1999. “ Political Performance and Institutional Trust.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0198295685.003.0010 Google Scholar
- Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2006. “Corruption: Diagnosis and Treatment.” Journal of Democracy 17 (3): 86–99.
- Norris, Pippa. 1999. “ Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Rose, Richard, and William Mishler. 1994. “Mass Reaction to Regime Change in Eastern Europe: Polarization or Leaders and Laggards?” British Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 159–182.
- Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rothstein, Bo. 2011. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226729589.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Rothstein, Bo, and Jan Teorell. 2008. “What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions.” Governance 21 (2): 165–190.
- Sandholtz, Wayne, and William Koetzle. 2000. “Accounting for Corruption: Economic Structure, Democracy, and Trade.” International Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 31–50.
- Seligson, Mitchell A. 2002. “The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries.” Journal of Politics 62 (2): 408–433.
10.1111/1468-2508.00132 Google Scholar
- Sveriges Radio. 2010. ”Flera kommuner misstänker oegentligheter.” November 9.
- Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics 76 (3): 399–457.
- Tyler, Tom R. 1994. “Governing Amid Diversity: The Effect of Fair Decisionmaking Procedures on the Legitimacy of Government.” Law and Society Review 28 (4): 809–832.
- Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400828609 Google Scholar
- Tyler, Tom R., Jonathan D. Caspar, and Bonnie Fisher. 1989. “Maintaining Allegiance toward Political Authorities: The Role of Prior Attitudes and the Use of Fair Procedures.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (3): 629–652.
- Uslaner, Eric M. 2008. Corruption, Inequality, and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wagner, Alexander F., Friedrich Schneider, and Martin Halla. 2008. “The Quality of Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe: A Panel Analysis.” European Journal of Political Economy 25 (1): 30–41.
- Warren, Mark E. 2003. Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.