Local Context and Democratization in Mexico
Abstract
While democratization is often seen as a national-level process, we argue that there is important scope for local effects. Through analysis of Mexican public opinion data collected on the eve of that country's historic 2000 elections, we demonstrate that local context greatly affects evaluations of the legitimacy of the system, and these evaluations, in turn, help to shape the willingness of citizens to engage with the system. Citizens are more willing to participate in politics if they think the process is fair, and direct evidence of the fairness of the system is provided by the local political context. This local connection, then, becomes critical in the process of individuals becoming, in Almond and Verba's classic term, “participatory” citizens (1963).
References
- Aldrich, John A. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 246–78.
- Alduncín, Abitia Enrique. 1986. Los valores de los mexicanos. Mexico City : Fomento Cultural Banamex, A.C.
- Alianza Civica. 2003. “ Informes de Transparencia Electoral.” (Accessed March, 2003 at http://www.laneta.apc.org/alianza/page8.html.)
- Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400874569 Google Scholar
- Alonso, Jorge. 1993. El rito electoral en Jalisco (1940-1992). Zapopan , Jalisco : El Colegio de Jalisco.
- Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine A. Guillory. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems. American Political Science Review 91(1): 66–81.
- Blais, Andre, and Richard Nadeau. 1993. “Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect of Participation on Losers' Consent. British Journal of Political Science 23(4): 553–63.
10.1017/S0007123400006736 Google Scholar
- Booth, John A., and Mitchell A. Seligson. 1984. “The Political Culture of Authoritarianism in Mexico: A Reexamination. Latin American Research Review 19(1): 106–24.
- Booth, John A., and Mitchell A. Seligson. 1993. “Political Culture and Regime Type: Evidence from Nicaragua and Costa Rica. Journal of Politics 55(August): 777–92.
- Camp, Roderic Ai. 1999. Politics in Mexico: The Decline of Authoritarianism. New York : Oxford University Press.
- Roderic Ai Camp, ed. 2001. Citizen Views of Democracy in Latin America. Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Camp, Roderic Ai. 2003. Politics in Mexico: The Democratic Transformation. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- Canache, Damarys. 1996. “Looking out My Backdoor: The Neighborhood Context and Perceptions of Relative Deprivation. Political Research Quarterly 49(September): 547–71.
- Canache, Damarys. 2002. “From Bullets to Ballots: The Emergence of Popular Support for Hugo Chávez. Latin American Politics and Society 44(1): 69–90.
- Canache, Damarys, J. J. Mondak, and M. A. Seligson. 2001. “Meaning and Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 506–28.
- Clarke, Harold D., Nitish Dutt, and Allan Kornberg. 1993. “The Political Economy of Attitudes Toward Polity and Society in Western European Democracies. Journal of Politics 55(4): 998–1021.
- Consejo Nacional de Población. 1993. Indicadores Socioeconómicos e Indice de Marginación Social 1990. México : Consejo Nacional de Población.
- Cornelius, Wayne A. 1999. “ Subnational Politics and Democratization: Tensions between Center and Periphery in the Mexican Political System.”In Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico, ed. Wayne Cornelius et al. La Jolla : Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies , University of California, San Diego, pp. 3–16.
- Cornelius, Wayne A., Todd A. Eisenstadt, and Jane Hindley. 1999. Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico. La Jolla : Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies , University of California, San Diego.
- Cox, Gary W. 2002. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. New York : Cambridge University Press.
- Craig, Ann L., and Wayne A. Cornelius. 1980. “ Political Culture in Mexico: Continuities and Revisionist Interpretations.”In The Civic Culture Revisited, ed. A. Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba. Boston : Little Brown , pp. 325–93.
- Crespo, Jose Antonio. 1996. Votar en los estados: Análisis comparado de las legislaciones electorales estatales en México. Mexico , D.F. : Fundación Friedrich Naumann y Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas .
- Dalton, Russell. 1996. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Western Democracies. New York : Chatham House.
- De Remes, Alain. 2000. Municipal Electoral Processes in Latin America and Mexico. Mexico City : Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas .
- Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.56021/9780801860140 Google Scholar
- Dietz, Henry. 1998. Urban Poverty, Political Participation, and the State. Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Domínguez, Jorge I., and James A. McCann. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore : The Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Jorge I. Domínguez, and Alejandro Poiré, eds. 1999. Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion. New York : Routledge.
- Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science 5(October): 435–57.
- Elizondo, Carlos. 2003. “ After the Second of July: Challenges and Opportunities for the Fox Administration.”In Mexico's Politics and Society in Transition, ed. Joseph S. Tulchin and Andrew D. Selee. Boulder : Lynne Rienner Press, pp. 29–53.
- Fox, Jonathan. 1994a. “The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico. World Politics 46(January): 151–84.
- Fox, Jonathan. 1994b. “Latin America's Emerging Local Politics. Journal of Democracy 5(2): 105–16.
- Fox, Jonathan. 1996. “ National Electoral Choices in Rural Mexico.”In The Reform of the Mexican Agrarian Reform, ed. Laura Randall. Armonk : M.E. Sharpe, pp. 185–209.
- Grindle, Merilee S. 2000. Audacious Reforms: Institutional Invention and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Heller, Patrick. 2000. “Degrees of Democracy: Some Comparative Lessons from India. World Politics 52(July): 484–519.
- Hiskey, Jonathan T., and Mitchell A. Seligson. 2003. “Pitfalls of Power to the People: Decentralization, Local Government Performance, and System Support in Bolivia. Studies in Comparative International Development 37(4): 64–88.
- Huckfeldt, Robert. 1986. Politics in Context: Assimilation and Conflict in Urban Neighborhoods. New York : Agathon Press.
- Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Post-modernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9780691214429 Google Scholar
- Klesner, Joseph L. 1987. “ Changing Patterns of Electoral Participation and Official Party Support in Mexico.”In Mexican Politics in Transition, ed. Judith Gentleman. Boulder : Westview Press, pp. 95–152.
- Klesner, Joseph L. 1998. “An Electoral Route to Democracy? Mexico's Transition in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics 30(4): 477–97.
10.2307/422335 Google Scholar
- Klesner, Joseph L. 2001. “The End of Mexico's One-Party Regime. PS: Political Science and Politics 34(1): 107–14.
- Klesner, Joseph L., and Chappell Lawson. 2001. “Adiós to the PRI: Changing Voter Turnout in Mexico's Political Transition. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 17(1): 17–39.
- Lanoue, David J., and Shaun Bowler. 1992. “The Sources of Tactical Voting in British National Elections. Political Behavior 14(2): 141–57.
10.1007/BF00992239 Google Scholar
- Lawson, Chappell. 2000. “Mexico's Unfinished Transition: Democratization and Authoritarian Enclaves in Mexico. Mexican Studies 16(2): 267–88.
- Lind, E. Allan, and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York : Plenum Press.
10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 Google Scholar
- Lipset, Seymour M., Kyoung-Ryung Seong, and John Charles Torres. 1993. “A Comparative Analysis of the Social Requisites of Democracy. International Social Science Journal 136(May): 15–75.
- Listhaug, Ola, and Matti Wiberg. 1995. “ Confidence in Political and Private Institutions.”In Citizens and the State, ed. Hans-Dieter Klingemann and D. Fuchs. Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 298–322.
- Listhaug Ola, Bernt Aardal, and Ingunn Opheim Ellis. 2002. “ Institutional Variation and Political Support: An Analysis of CSES Data from 23 Countries. Delivered at the conference on the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, WZB Berlin .
- McCann, James A., and Jorge I. Domínguez. 1998. “Mexicans React to Electoral Fraud and Political Corruption: An Assessment of Public Opinion and Voting Behavior. Electoral Studies 17(4): 483–503.
- Molinar, Juan. 1991. “Counting the Number of Parties: An Alternative Index. American Political Science Review 85(4): 1383–91.
- Morris, Stephen D. 1995. Political Reformism in Mexico: An Overview of Contemporary Mexican Politics. Boulder : Lynn Rienner.
- Nickson, R. Andrew. 1995. Local Government in Latin America. Boulder : Lynn Rienner.
- Pippa Norris, ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0198295685.001.0001 Google Scholar
- O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1993. “On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Post-communist Countries. World Development 21(8): 1355–69.
- Rodríguez, Victoria E. 1997. Decentralization in Mexico: From Reforma Municipal to Solidaridad to Nuevo Federalismo. Boulder : Westview Press.
- Rose, Richard, William Mishler, and Christian Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.56021/9780801860379 Google Scholar
- Rose, Richard, Doh C. Shin, and Neil Munro. 1999. “ Tensions between the Democratic Ideal and Reality: South Korea.”In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, ed. P. Norris. Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 146–65.
10.1093/0198295685.003.0007 Google Scholar
- Snyder, Richard O. 2001. Politics after Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511612817 Google Scholar
- Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven : Yale University Press.
- Verba, Sidney, Henry Brady, and Kay Schlozman. 1996. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Boston : Harvard University Press.
- Vetter, Angelika. 2002. “Local Political Competence in Europe: A Resource of Legitimacy for Higher Levels of Government? International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14(1): 3–18.
- Weatherford, Stephen M. 1987. “How Does Government Performance Influence Political Support? Political Behavior 9: 5–28.
10.1007/BF00987276 Google Scholar