Advertisement

Abstract

We used molecular markers to study genetic relationships in a diverse collection of 85 domestic dog breeds. Differences among breeds accounted for ∼30% of genetic variation. Microsatellite genotypes were used to correctly assign 99% of individual dogs to breeds. Phylogenetic analysis separated several breeds with ancient origins from the remaining breeds with modern European origins. We identified four genetic clusters, which predominantly contained breeds with similar geographic origin, morphology, or role in human activities. These results provide a genetic classification of dog breeds and will aid studies of the genetics of phenotypic breed differences.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (parker.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
J. Crowley, B. Adelman, Eds., The Complete Dog Book; Official Publication of the American Kennel Club (Howell Book House, New York, ed. 19, 1998).
2
D. F. Pattersonet al., J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.193, 1131 (1988).
3
E. A. Ostrander, L. Kruglyak, Genome Res.10, 1271 (2000).
4
C. Vilaet al., Science276, 1687 (1997).
5
P. Savolainen, Y. P. Zhang, J. Luo, J. Lundeberg, T. Leitner, Science298, 1610 (2002).
6
J. A. Leonardet al., Science298, 1613 (2002).
7
C. A. Rogers, A. H. Brace, The International Encyclopedia of Dogs (Howell Book House, New York, ed. 1, 1995).
8
B. Fogel, The Encyclopedia of the Dog (DK Publishing, New York, 1995).
9
M. T. Koskinen, Anim. Genet.34, 297 (2003).
10
D. N. Irionet al., J. Hered.94, 81 (2003).
11
J. K. Pritchard, M. Stephens, P. Donnelly, Genetics155, 945 (2000).
12
D. Falush, M. Stephens, J. K. Pritchard, Genetics164, 1567 (2003).
13
F. Tajima, M. Nei, Mol. Biol. Evol.1, 269 (1984).
14
R. Sachidanandamet al., Nature409, 928 (2001).
15
J. C. Venteret al., Science291, 1304 (2001).
16
L. Excoffier, P. E. Smouse, J. M. Quattro, Genetics131, 479 (1992).
17
N. A. Rosenberget al., Science298, 2381 (2002).
18
L. L. Cavelli-Sforza, P. Menozzi, A. Piazza, The History and Geography of Human Genes (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994).
19
D. E. MacHugh, R. T. Loftus, P. Cunningham, D. G. Bradley, Anim. Genet.29, 333 (1998).
20
G. Lavalet al., Genet. Sel. Evol.32, 187 (2000).
21
J. K. Pritchard, M. Stephens, N. A. Rosenberg, P. Donnelly, Am. J. Hum. Genet.67, 170 (2000).
22
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
23
T. Yamazaki, K. Yamazaki, Legacy of the Dog: The Ultimate Illustrated Guide to Over 200 Breeds (Chronicle Books, San Francisco, CA, 1995).
24
B. Wilcox, C. Walkowicz, Atlas of Dog Breeds of the World (TFH Publications, Neptune City, NJ, ed. 5, 1995).
25
D. Paetkau, W. Calvert, I. Stirling, C. Strobeck, Mol. Ecol.4, 347 (1995).
26
L. L. Cavalli-Sforza, A. W. Edwards, Evolution32, 550 (1967).
27
D. B. Goldstein, A. R. Linares, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza, M. W. Feldman, Genetics139, 463 (1995).
28
N. A. Rosenberget al., Genetics159, 699 (2001).
29
D. Falushet al., Science299, 1582 (2003).
30
M. V. Sablin, G. A. Khlopachev, Curr. Anthropol.43, 795 (2002).
31
Supported by the Burroughs Wellcome Innovation Award (E.A.O. and L.K.), grants from the AKC–Canine Health Foundation (G.S.J.), NIH training grant T32 HG00035 (H.G.P.), and a postdoctoral fellowship from the Waltham Foundation (N.B.S.). E.A.O. also acknowledges support from K05 CA90754. L.K. is a James S. McDonnell Centennial Fellow. We thank the many dog owners, researchers, and breeders who provided DNA samples for this work, especially G. Brewer, C. Gaiser, and K. Murphy; D. Lynch, A. Ziska, C. Ramirez, M. Langlois, and D. Akey for assistance with sample collection; M. Stephens for advice and assistance with the program structure; K. Markianos and J. Akey for helpful discussions; M. Eberle for computing assistance; H. Coller, E. Giniger, R. Wayne, and three anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript; and the AKC and C. Jierski for use of the canine artwork included in Fig. 3.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 304 | Issue 5674
21 May 2004

Submission history

Received: 2 March 2004
Accepted: 21 April 2004
Published in print: 21 May 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Supporting Online Material
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/304/5674/1160/DC1
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 and S2
Tables S1 to S5
References

Authors

Affiliations

Heidi G. Parker
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Box 357275, Seattle, WA 98195–7275, USA.
Lisa V. Kim
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351800, Seattle, WA 98195–7275, USA.
Nathan B. Sutter
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Scott Carlson
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Travis D. Lorentzen
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Tiffany B. Malek
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Box 357275, Seattle, WA 98195–7275, USA.
Gary S. Johnson
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Hawkins B. DeFrance
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Elaine A. Ostrander* [email protected]
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Box 357275, Seattle, WA 98195–7275, USA.
Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351800, Seattle, WA 98195–7275, USA.
Leonid Kruglyak
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Post Office Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.
Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Box 357275, Seattle, WA 98195–7275, USA.
Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351800, Seattle, WA 98195–7275, USA.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D4-100, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Identification of Genomic Signatures in Bullmastiff Dogs Using Composite Selection Signals Analysis of 23 Purebred Clades, Animals, 13, 7, (1149), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071149
    Crossref
  2. High Investment in Reproduction Is Associated with Reduced Life Span in Dogs, The American Naturalist, 201, 2, (163-174), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1086/722531
    Crossref
  3. The pulse of it: Dietary inclusion of up to 45% whole pulse ingredients with chicken meal and pea starch in a complete and balanced diet does not affect cardiac function, fasted sulfur amino acid status, or other gross measures of health in adult dogs., The Journal of Nutrition, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.03.027
    Crossref
  4. Introduction, The Perfect Puppy, (xvii-xxi), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99194-0.02001-9
    Crossref
  5. An update on animal models of intervertebral disc degeneration and low back pain: Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to improve research analysis and development of prospective therapeutics, JOR SPINE, 6, 1, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1230
    Crossref
  6. Fiber type and metabolic characteristics of skeletal muscle in 16 breeds of domestic dogs, The Anatomical Record, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.25207
    Crossref
  7. Balancing at the Borderline of a Breed: A Case Study of the Hungarian Short-Haired Vizsla Dog Breed, Definition of the Breed Profile Using Simple SNP-Based Methods, Genes, 13, 11, (2022), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112022
    Crossref
  8. Carrier Rate and Mutant Allele Frequency of GM1 Gangliosidosis in Miniature Shiba Inus (Mame Shiba): Population Screening of Breeding Dogs in Japan, Animals, 12, 10, (1242), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101242
    Crossref
  9. Canine osteosarcoma in comparative oncology: Molecular mechanisms through to treatment discovery, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, (2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.965391
    Crossref
  10. Bitter taste sensitivity in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and its relevance to bitter deterrents of ingestion, PLOS ONE, 17, 11, (e0277607), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277607
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media