Advertisement

Abstract

Theory predicts that small populations may be driven to extinction by random fluctuations in demography and loss of genetic diversity through drift. However, population size is a poor predictor of extinction in large carnivores inhabiting protected areas. Conflict with people on reserve borders is the major cause of mortality in such populations, so that border areas represent population sinks. The species most likely to disappear from small reserves are those that range widely—and are therefore most exposed to threats on reserve borders—irrespective of population size. Conservation efforts that combat only stochastic processes are therefore unlikely to avert extinction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (980867.xhtml)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

1
Lande R., Science241, 1455 (1988).
2
G. Caughley, J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 215 (1994).
3
W. D. Newmark, Cons. Biol. 9, 512 (1995); but see J. Berger, ibid., 4, 91 (1990).
4
Several intensive studies of carnivores have shown that deaths caused by people—especially harvesting—increase overall mortality and result in population decline. This impact of harvesting is marked in two species with low fecundity (black and grizzly bears) as well as one with high fecundity (gray wolf). For each species, the proportion of deaths of radio-collared adults caused by people, and sample sizes, are as follows: gray wolf, 79% (97); black bear, 90% (21); grizzly bear, 56% (16). Data sources: gray wolf: W. B. Ballard, J. S. Whitman, C. L. Gardner, Wildl. Monogr. 98, 1 (1987); W. B. Ballard, L. E. Ayres, P. R. Krausman, D. J. Reed, S. G. Fancy, ibid., 135, 1 (1997); black bear: R. A. Powell, J. W. Zimmerman, D. E. Seaman, J. F. Gilliam, Cons. Biol. 10, 224 (1996); grizzly bear: R. B. Wielgus and F. L. Bunnell,Biol. Cons. 67, 161 (1994).
5
Data from 22 intensive studies of large carnivores in protected areas indicate that 74% of 635 known-cause deaths were directly caused by people. Proportions and sample sizes for each species are as follows: African wild dog, 61% (105); gray wolf, 83% (86); lion, 50% (62); tiger, 67% (3); Iberian lynx, Felis pardina, 75% (24); spotted hyaena, 49% (56); black bear, 85% (41); grizzly bear, 89% (258). More detailed data are available at http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/980867.shl . These proportions are comparable with those recorded in populations known to be declining as a result of harvesting (4), indicating that human-caused mortality almost certainly affects the dynamics of populations in protected areas. In 20 of the studies, radiotelemetry was used to locate dead animals, making it unlikely that the data are strongly biased towards deaths caused by people. Most deaths occurred outside reserve borders, caused by legal and illegal hunting as well as road accidents and accidental snaring. Data on grizzly bears also include legal hunting and control of problem animals inside Yellowstone National Park, which together accounted for 130 of 250 deaths recorded there. Quantitative data are not available for jaguars, snow leopards, or dhole, but persecution outside reserves is recorded as a major threat to all three species. Data sources: African wild dog: R. Woodroffe, J. R. Ginsberg, D. W. Macdonald, The African Wild Dog: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan[International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), Gland, 1997]; gray wolf: G. J. Forbes and J. B. Theberge, and also D. K. Boyd et al., inEcology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World, L. N. Carbyn, Ed. (Canadian Circumpolar Institute, Edmonton, 1995); dhole: J. R. Ginsberg and D. W. Macdonald,Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs: An Action Plan for the Conservation of Canids (IUCN, Gland, 1990); lion: J. Rudnai,Afr. J. Ecol. 17, 85 (1979), C. Packer et al., in Reproductive Success, T. H. Clutton-Brock, Ed. (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988); G. B. Schaller, The Serengeti Lion: A Study of Predator–Prey Relations (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1972); P. E. Stander, Madoqua 18, 1 (1991); tiger: M. E. Sunquist, Smiths. Contrib. Zool. 336, 1 (1981); snow leopard and jaguar: K. Nowell and P. Jackson, Wild Cats—Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan(IUCN, Gland, 1996); Iberian lynx: P. Ferreras, J. J. Aldama, J. F. Beltrán, M. Delibes, Biol. Cons. 61, 197 (1992); spotted hyena: H. Hofer, M. L. East, K. L. I. Campbell, Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 65, 347 (1993), L. G. Frank, Anim. Behav. 34, 1500 (1986); H. Kruuk, The Spotted Hyaena (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1972); black bear: E. C. Hellgren and M. R. Vaughan, J. Wildl. Manage. 53, 969 (1989); R. A. Powell, J. W. Zimmerman, D. E. Seaman, J. F. Gilliam, Cons. Biol. 10, 224 (1996); D. L. Garshelis and M. R. Pelton,J. Wildl. Manage. 41, 912 (1981); grizzly bear: J. M. Peek, M. R. Pelton, H. D. Picton, J. W. Schoen, P. Zager, Wildl. Soc. Bull. 15, 160 (1987); S. T. Knick and W. Kasworm, ibid., 17, 11 (1989); R. B. Wielgus, F. L. Bunnell, W. L. Wakkinen, P. E. Zager, J. Wildl. Manage. 58, 266 (1994); Knight R. R., Eberhardt L. L., Ecology 66, 323 (1985).
6
IUCN, Protected Areas of the World: A Review of National Systems (IUCN, Gland, 1992). We included protected areas in categories I, II, and IV defined by the IUCN. These categories include national parks, reserves, and sanctuaries established with the primary aim of protecting wildlife.
7
A summary data set and data sources are available at http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/980867.shl.
8
D. R. Cox, The Analysis of Binary Data(Methuen, London, 1970). A model of the form p(reserve occupied) = {exp [A + B(log reserve area) + C(log reserve age)]}/{1 + exp [A + B(log reserve area) + C(log reserve age)]}, where A, B, and C are constants, was fitted to the data by using the Genstat statistical package [Genstat Committee, Genstat 5 Release 3 Reference Manual (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1993)]. Parameters were estimated by maximum likelihood to determine which significantly improved the fit of the model. The effects of reserve age and size were assessed by dropping each in turn from the model, to estimate the contribution of each to total deviance. The resulting changes in deviance are distributed as χ2, in this case with 1 df.
9
J. W. A. Grant, C. A. Chapman, K. S. Richardson, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31, 149 (1992).
10
Felsenstein J., Am. Nat.125, 1 (1985). . Independent contrasts were calculated by using the program CAIC [A. Purvis and A. Rambaut, Comparative Analysis by Independent Contrasts (CAIC), version 2 (Oxford University, Oxford, 1994)], and a composite phylogeny for the Carnivora (O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, J. L. Gittleman, A. Purvis, unpublished).
11
Full data on population densities and home range sizes, separated by study, are available at http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/980867.shl . Data sources: African wild dog (as in 10); gray wolf: T. K. Fuller,Wildl. Monogr 105, 1 (1989); ___ and L. B. Keith, J. Wildl. Manage. 44, 583 (1980); R. R. Bjorge and J. R. Gunson, Can. Field Nat. 103, 327 (1989); dhole: A. B. Venkataraman, R. Arumugam, R. Sukumar,J. Zool. Lond. 237, 543 (1995); lion: S. Creel and N. M. Creel, Afr. J. Ecol. 35, 83 (1997); K. G. van Ordsol, J. P. Hanby, J. D. Bygott, J. Zool. London 206, 97 (1985); tiger (as in 10); snow leopard: R. Jackson and G. Ahlborn, Nat. Geog. Res. 5, 161 (1989); jaguar: A. R. Rabinowitz and B. G. Nottingham Jr., J. Zool. London 210, 149 (1986); M. E. Tewes and D. J. Schmidly, in Wild Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America, M. Novak, J. A. Baker, M. E. Obbard, B. Malloch, Eds. (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, 1987); spotted hyena: L. G. Frank, Anim. Behav. 34, 1500 (1986); H. Kruuk, The Spotted Hyaena (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1972); C. Sillero-Zubiriand D. Gottelli, Afr. J. Ecol. 30, 292 (1992); S. R. Creel and N. M. Creel, Cons. Biol. 10, 1 (1996); H. Hofer, M. L. East, Anim. Behav. 46, 547 (1993); black bear: H. J. Novick and G. R. Stewart,Calif. Fish Game 68, 21 (1982); E. C. Hellgrenand M. R. Vaughan, J. Wildl. Manage. 53, 969 (1989); D. L. Doancrider and E. C. Hellgren,ibid., 60, 398 (1996); D. L. Garshelis and M. R. Pelton, ibid., 45, 912 (1981); A. J. Brody and M. R. Pelton, Wildl. Soc. Bull. 17, 5 (1989); G. B. Kolenosky and S. M. Strathearn, in Wild Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America, M. Novak, J. A. Baker, M. E. Obbard, B. Malloch, Eds. (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, 1987); grizzly bear: R. B. Wielgus and F. L. Bunnell, Biol. Cons. 67, 161 (1994); B. M. Blanchard and R. R. Knight, ibid., 58, 41 (1991); R. B. Wielgus, F. L. Bunnell, W. L. Wakkinen, P. E. Zager,J. Wildl. Manage. 58, 266 (1994); McLellan B. N., Can. J. Zool. 67, 1856 (1989); C. Servheen, J. Wildl. Manage. 47, 1026 (1983).
12
We thank S. Durant, L. Frank, G. Mace, J. Robinson, P. Rohani, and K. Rose for valuable comments and discussions.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 280 | Issue 5372
26 June 1998

Submission history

Received: 20 February 1998
Accepted: 13 May 1998
Published in print: 26 June 1998

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

R. Woodroffe, Department of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
J. R. Ginsberg, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY 10460–1099, USA.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Low-stress livestock handling protects cattle in a five-predator habitat, PeerJ, 11, (e14788), (2023).https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14788
    Crossref
  2. The Quality of Life and Perceived Human-Wildlife Conflicts among Forest Communities around the Mountain Gorilla’s Virunga Landscape in Africa, Sustainability, 15, 3, (2248), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032248
    Crossref
  3. Illegal Harvesting within a Protected Area: Spatial Distribution of Activities, Social Drivers of Wild Meat Consumption, and Wildlife Conservation, Animals, 13, 5, (771), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050771
    Crossref
  4. Fine-Scaled Selection of Resting and Hunting Habitat by Leopard Cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) in a Rural Human-Dominated Landscape in Taiwan, Animals, 13, 2, (234), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020234
    Crossref
  5. More trees with your coffee? Diversity and habitat associations of terrestrial medium- and large-sized mammals in shade-grown coffee plantations of the highlands of Guatemala, ACTA ZOOLÓGICA MEXICANA (N.S.), (1-20), (2023).https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2023.3912570
    Crossref
  6. Fear of large carnivores amplifies human-caused mortality for mesopredators, Science, 380, 6646, (754-758), (2023)./doi/10.1126/science.adf2472
    Abstract
  7. Spatial patterns of large African cats: a large‐scale study on density, home range size, and home range overlap of lions Panthera leo and leopards Panthera pardus , Mammal Review, 53, 2, (49-64), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12309
    Crossref
  8. Patterns and predictors of ungulate space use across an isolated Miombo woodland reserve, Journal of Zoology, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.13059
    Crossref
  9. Leveraging private lands to meet 2030 biodiversity targets in the United States, Conservation Science and Practice, 5, 4, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12897
    Crossref
  10. Conservation implications of range dynamics in endangered populations: An example with brown bears, Conservation Science and Practice, 5, 3, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12894
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media