gldA, gldF, and gldG are not present in the gliding bacteria C. algicola and Maribacter sp. HTCC2170.
gldA,
gldF, and
gldG are required for
F. johnsoniae gliding but were not found in all gliding bacteroidetes. GldA, GldF, and GldG are components of a predicted ABC transporter whose exact role in gliding is not known (
7,
8). GldA is the soluble, cytoplasmic, ATP-binding component of the transporter and shares sequence similarity with many other ATP-binding components of ABC transporters. GldF and GldG are cytoplasmic membrane protein components of the complex. Homologs of GldF and GldG are common in members of the phylum
Bacteroidetes, but they are not common outside this phylum (
8). Most of the known gliding members of the phylum had orthologs for
gldA,
gldF, and
gldG, but
C. algicola and
Maribacter sp. HTCC2170, which exhibit active gliding motility, did not (
Fig. 2; see also Movie S1 in the supplemental material). Gliding of
C. algicola cells resulted in the formation of spreading colonies, whereas gliding of
Maribacter sp. HTCC2170 did not (
Fig. 3). Formation of nonspreading colonies is not unique to
Maribacter sp. HTCC2170, since many other gliding bacteria also fail to form spreading colonies on agar (
42), so examination of colony morphology is not sufficient to demonstrate absence of gliding motility.
It was possible that the strains used for genome sequencing had recently lost gldA, gldF, and gldG and that the sequenced strains were nonmotile mutants. In C. lytica, and in many other members of the class Flavobacteriia, the region containing gldF and gldG is flanked by a gene encoding a predicted S-adenosyl-l-methionine hydroxide adenosyltransferase and by dnaN. These genes are also adjacent to each other in the C. algicola and Maribacter sp. HTCC2170 genomes, but gldF and gldG are missing. We amplified and sequenced the regions between these genes from our motile strains of C. algicola and Maribacter sp. HTCC2170 and demonstrated that gldF and gldG were absent. The absence of gldA, gldF, and gldG in C. algicola and Maribacter sp. HTCC2170 suggests that the ABC transporter required for F. johnsoniae gliding may not have a central and irreplaceable role in bacteroidete gliding motility. ABC transporters are common in most organisms, and not surprisingly, C. algicola and Maribacter sp. HTCC2170 have other ABC transporters. In each case, one of these may replace the GldA-GldF-GldG transporter, thus allowing gliding in its absence. Alternatively, C. algicola and Maribacter sp. HTCC2170 gliding may not require the assistance of an ABC transporter.
Gliding motility genes, and gliding motility, are widespread among members of the phylum Bacteroidetes.
Of the remaining 25 completed genome sequences of members of the phylum
Bacteroidetes, all but one belong to bacteria that had been described as nongliding. The one exception was
Flavobacteriaceae bacterium 3519-10, for which no information regarding motility was available. These 25 genomes were examined for the presence of gliding motility genes (
Fig. 2; see also Table S2 in the supplemental material). Eleven species (
C. atlanticus,
D. fermentans,
Flavobacteriaceae bacterium 3519-10, “
G. forsetii,”
L. byssophila,
P. propionicigenes,
R. anatipestifer,
R. biformata,
S. linguale,
W. virosa, and
Z. profunda) had each of the core gliding motility genes.
We examined each of the 11 bacteria listed above, with the exception of
Flavobacteriaceae bacterium 3519-10, which was not available for study, by phase-contrast microscopy and demonstrated that at least 5 of them (
C. atlanticus, “
G. forsetii,”
P. propionicigenes,
R. anatipestifer, and
R. biformata) exhibited gliding motility (
Fig. 4; see also Movies S2 to S6 in the supplemental material).
C. atlanticus,
R. biformata, and
P. propionicigenes exhibited rapid gliding on glass that was easily observed in real time in tunnel slides or wet mounts (see Movies S2, S3, and S6 in the supplemental material). The movements exhibited by these bacteria were similar to those observed for
F. johnsoniae and other gliding members of the phylum and included pivoting and flipping movements in addition to smooth translocation over the surface. Cells of
R. biformata and
P. propionicigenes also moved on agar (see Movies S3 and S6 in the supplemental material), whereas cells of
C. atlanticus did not. Cells of “
G. forsetii” and
R. anatipestifer moved less rapidly, requiring time-lapse studies for detection. Cells of
R. anatipestifer moved slowly on agar or glass, whereas cells of “
G. forsetii” failed to move on glass but exhibited slow movements on agar (see Movies S4 and S5 in the supplemental material). Note that none of these five bacteria formed spreading colonies on agar growth media, so they would not have been recognized as gliding bacteria by simple examination of colony morphology. Despite extensive efforts, we did not observe motility of the other five species (
D. fermentans,
L. byssophila,
S. linguale,
W. virosa, and
Z. profunda) that had each of the core gliding motility genes. These bacteria may be nonmotile, or they may glide under conditions that we did not examine.
C. atlanticus, “
G. forsetii,” and
R. biformata are marine bacteria that are thought to play important roles in the digestion of macromolecules (
43–45). As with other marine bacteroidetes, these bacteria are probably enriched on surfaces such as algal cells or organic detritus particles known as “marine snow,” and the ability to glide over these surfaces may be important for their survival (
46).
R. anatipestifer is an important poultry pathogen (
47), and motility may play a role in pathogenesis.
P. propionicigenes, which was isolated from an anoxic rice field (
48), has not been studied extensively, and the importance of gliding motility in its lifestyle is unclear.
In addition to the 22 finished genome sequences for members of the classes Flavobacteriia, Cytophagia, and Sphingobacteriia described above, draft genome sequences were available for another 27 members of these classes (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). We analyzed these and determined that all contained the 11 core gliding motility genes (gldB, gldD, gldH, gldJ, gldK, gldL, gldM, gldN, sprA, sprE, and sprT). Included in this list were Algoriphagus sp. strain PR1, Chryseobacterium gleum F93T, Kordia algicida OT-1T, Krokinobacter sp. strain 4H-3-7-5, Lacinutrix sp. strain 5H-3-7-4, Mucilaginibacter paludis TPT56T, Polaribacter irgensii 23-PT, Sphingobacterium spiritivorum ATCC 33861T, and Ulvibacter sp. strain SCB49, which have each been described as nonmotile. Given the results presented above, it is likely that some of these have the ability to glide.
Of the members of the phylum
Bacteroidetes for which finished and draft genomes are available, only
F. johnsoniae appears to have been selected for sequencing because of its gliding motility (
17). With this in mind, the presence of gliding motility genes in each of the 49 free-living members of the classes
Flavobacteriia,
Cytophagia, and
Sphingobacteriia with sequenced genomes suggests that gliding motility is more common among these large and diverse groups of bacteria than was previously suspected. Gliding motility is much less common among members of the final class of the phylum,
Bacteroidia, but as demonstrated above for
P. propionicigenes, it also occurs in some members of that group.
Bernardet and Bowman recently reported that gliding was underreported for members of the genus
Flavobacterium. They demonstrated that four species of the genus
Flavobacterium (
Flavobacterium antarcticum,
Flavobacterium degerlachei,
Flavobacterium frigoris, and
Flavobacterium indicum) that had been described as nonmotile exhibit gliding motility and that the type strain of
Flavobacterium gelidilacus, which was reported to be nonmotile, also glided (
49). We also examined
F. indicum and observed rapid gliding motility. Our results confirm and extend those of Bernardet and Bowman and suggest that gliding is underreported not only for members of the genus
Flavobacterium but also for many genera and species within the phylum
Bacteroidetes.
Gliding motility is found in members of many bacterial phyla, but genes similar in sequence to the core bacteroidete gliding motility genes are uncommon outside the phylum
Bacteroidetes. BLASTP searches (cutoffs at 10% identity and 0.01 E value) were performed with each of the core gliding motility proteins against translated products from the genomes of gliding bacteria from five different phyla, including
Myxococcus xanthus DK1622,
Mycoplasma mobile 163K,
Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102,
Chloroflexus aurantiacus J-10-fl, and
Chloroherpeton thalassium ATCC 35110.
C. aurantiacus,
M. mobile, and
N. punctiforme had no orthologs for the
F. johnsoniae core gliding motility proteins.
C. aurantiacus had an ortholog for SprA (Ctha_1407) but lacked orthologs to GldB, GldD, GldH, GldJ, GldK, GldL, GldM, GldN, SprE, and SprT.
M. xanthus had an ortholog for GldK (MXAN_3455) but lacked orthologs to the other 10 proteins. Neither Ctha_1407 nor MXAN_3455 has been linked to motility, and we do not know the functions of these proteins in their respective organisms. The scarcity of orthologs to
F. johnsoniae motility proteins among these diverse gliding bacteria suggests that they employ gliding machineries that are not closely related to the
F. johnsoniae gliding apparatus. Components of the
M. xanthus and
M. mobile gliding motility machineries have been identified (
50–55), and most of these do not have orthologs in
F. johnsoniae (
5), further supporting this suggestion.
The Sec and Tat protein export pathways are common among members of the phylum Bacteroidetes.
In Gram-negative bacteria, “protein export” describes the movement of proteins into or across the cytoplasmic membrane. In contrast, “protein secretion,” discussed above, refers to movement across the outer membrane (
22). Some protein secretion systems transport proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane and the outer membrane, whereas others only facilitate transport across the outer membrane. The PorSS is thought to secrete proteins from the periplasm across the outer membrane (
14) and thus requires a protein export system to deliver the proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane. In other bacteria, the Sec and Tat systems perform this function, and genes associated with both systems were present in most of the bacteroidete genomes analyzed (see Table S4 in the supplemental material).
Proteins secreted by the PorSSs of
F. johnsoniae and
P. gingivalis have N-terminal signal peptides that are typical of those exported by the Sec system, suggesting that the Sec system exports the PorSS cargo proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane prior to their secretion by the PorSS. Targeting of these proteins to the PorSS may involve conserved C-terminal domains (CTDs) that are found on proteins known to be secreted by PorSSs (
14,
57–61). Consistent with this, each of the genomes of the organisms predicted to have PorSSs encoded many proteins with conserved PorSS-type CTDs identified by the TIGRFAMs, TIGR04131 and TIGR04183, whereas all but two of the remaining bacteria had few, if any, genes encoding proteins with these conserved domains. The two exceptions were
Rhodothermus marinus and
Salinibacter ruber, which each had numerous genes matching TIGR04183.
R. marinus and
S. ruber lack many of the PorSS genes, but they have
sprA and
sprE homologs, suggesting the possibility that the CTD proteins in these bacteria may interact with the outer membrane protein SprA and/or the lipoprotein SprE.
Other genes predicted to be involved in protein secretion.
Secretion of proteins across Gram-negative bacterial outer membranes is mediated by a variety of different secretion systems (
20–24). T1SSs, T3SSs, T4SSs, and T6SSs transport proteins from the cytoplasm across both membranes of the cell, whereas T2SSs, T5SSs, the ENP pathway involved in biogenesis of curli (T8SS), and the chaperone-usher pathway involved in pilus assembly only facilitate secretion across the outer membrane. The 37 bacteroidete genomes were analyzed for the presence of key genes of each system. Only 5 of the 37 genomes encoded the core components of T2SSs, and the other secretion systems also appeared to be rare in this phylum (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). The only T3SS genes identified were in the flagellar operons of
R. marinus and
S. ruber. Bacterial flagella have dedicated T3SSs involved in their assembly, and this is the likely role of the
R. marinus and
S. ruber T3SSs. Genes encoding VirB4-like and VirD4-like components associated with T4SSs were identified in 13 of the genomes, but other components typically associated with T4SSs were absent. Several of the T4SS genes were associated with known conjugative transposons (
62,
63), and the others may also be involved in conjugative transfer of DNA. Genes associated with possible T1SSs, T5SSs, and T8SSs were detected in a few species, whereas T6SSs, T7SSs, and chaperone-usher pathway genes were not detected in any. It should be noted that the COGs, PFAMs, and TIGRFAMs used to detect genes involved in T1SSs, T4SSs, T5SSs, T6SSs, T8SSs, and chaperone-usher secretion systems were based primarily on secretion system genes from proteobacteria and thus might have missed divergent secretion systems distantly related to these. For example, predicted outer membrane efflux proteins with some similarity to TolC were found in each genome. These could be components of novel T1SSs, or they could be involved in efflux of small molecules.
The analyses described above suggest that most bacterial protein secretion systems are uncommon in members of the phylum Bacteroidetes, whereas the Bacteroidetes-specific PorSS is found in members of most genera and species of this phylum for which genome sequences are available. The known components of the PorSS are not similar in sequence to components of the type I to type VIII protein secretion systems, and we thus suggest that the PorSS could be referred to as the type IX secretion system (T9SS) to highlight this distinction.
Near-universal presence of gldB and gldH in members of the phylum Bacteroidetes.
Two gliding motility genes,
gldB and
gldH, were unusual in that they were found in almost all members of the phylum
Bacteroidetes, even those that lacked other gliding motility and PorSS genes (
Fig. 2). The only exceptions were
Bacteroides helcogenes and
Odoribacter splanchnicus, which lacked
gldB, and
Alistipes shahii,
R. marinus, and
S. ruber, which lacked
gldB and
gldH. Disruption of either
gldB or
gldH of
F. johnsoniae eliminates gliding motility, but the cells do not exhibit growth defects, so these genes are not essential. However, their presence in nearly all members suggests that they may perform some important function, and it is possible that the motility defects are a secondary effect of loss of this function. Disruption of the
P. gingivalis gldB ortholog had no effect on secretion of gingipains (K. Sato and K. Nakayama, unpublished data), so a central role in the PorSS is unlikely. GldB and GldH are essential for
F. johnsoniae gliding, but their exact roles in
F. johnsoniae, and the functions of the orthologs in nongliding members of the phylum, remain unknown.
The phylum
Bacteroidetes is large, and its members are diverse. This study reveals the high prevalence of gliding motility and PorSS (T9SS) genes among members of the phylum, and it necessitates modification of the descriptions of several genera and species that were previously described as nongliding. Some of the bacteria described here are pathogens of animals (
33,
47) or humans (
64,
65), and motility and/or secretion may be important in interaction with their respective hosts. Many members of the phylum use novel enzymes to digest recalcitrant polysaccharides such as cellulose, hemicelluloses, chitin, or algal polysaccharides (
17,
41,
66–68). The
F. johnsoniae PorSS secretes a chitinase that is required for chitin digestion. It is likely that other polysaccharide-digesting enzymes produced by
F. johnsoniae and by other members of the phylum are secreted by the same route. Proteins required for bacteroidete gliding motility and protein secretion have been identified, but we are just beginning to ask questions regarding the mechanisms underlying these processes. With many genetic tools now available, the answers to these questions are within reach.