Structured Reporting: Patient Care Enhancement or Productivity Nightmare?

References

• 1 Lodwick M . St. Lawrence: martyr and patron of the poor. In: The gallery companion: understanding Western art. London, England: Thames & Hudson, 2002. Google Scholar
• 2 Introduction: the evolution of the radiology report and the development of speech recognition. In: Reiner B, Siegel E, Weiss D, eds. Electronic reporting in the digital medical enterprise. Great Falls, Va: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology, 2003; 1–7. Google Scholar
• 3 Mehta A , Dreyer KJ, Schweitzer A, Couris J, Rosenthal D. Voice recognition: an emerging necessity within radiology—experiences of the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Digit Imaging 1998; 11(4 suppl 2): 20–23. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 4 Ramaswamy MR , Chaljub G, Esch O, Fanning DD, vanSonnenberg E. Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: advantages, disadvantages, and impact. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174(3): 617–622. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 5 Gale B , Safriel Y, Lukban A, Kalowitz J, Fleischer J, Gordon D. Radiology report production times: voice recognition vs. transcription. Radiol Manage 2001; 23(2): 18–22. Google Scholar
• 6 Hayt DB , Alexander S. The pros and cons of implementing PACS and speech recognition systems. J Digit Imaging 2001; 14(3): 149–157. Medline, Google Scholar
• 7 Pendergrass HP , Greenes RA, Barnett GO, Poitras JW, Pappalardo AN, Marble CW. An on-line computer facility for systematized input of radiology reports. Radiology 1969; 92(4): 709–713. Link, Google Scholar
• 8 Greenes RA , Barnett GO, Klein SW, Robbins A, Prior RE. Recording, retrieval, and review of medical data by physician computer interaction. N Engl J Med 1970; 282(6): 307–315. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 9 Bell DS , Greenes RA. Evaluation of UltraSTAR: performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994; 216–222. Google Scholar
• 10 Liu D , Zucherman M, Tulloss WB Jr. Six characteristics of effective structured reporting and the inevitable integration with speech recognition. J Digit Imaging 2006; 19(1): 98–104. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 11 Sistrom CL , Langlotz CP. A framework for improving radiology reporting. J Am Coll Radiol 2005; 2(2): 159–167. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 12 Naik SS , Hanbidge A, Wilson SR. Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176(3): 591–598. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 13 Mammography Quality Standards Act, 62 Federal Register 55988 (1997). Google Scholar
• 14 Khorasani R , Bates DW, Teeger S, Rothschild JM, Adams DF, Seltzer SE. Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports? Acad Radiol 2003; 10(6): 685–688. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 15 Kong A , Barnett GO, Mosteller F, Youtz C. How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. N Engl J Med 1986; 315(12): 740–744. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 16 American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2006. Google Scholar
• 17 Lazarus E , Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 2006; 239(2): 385–391. Link, Google Scholar
• 18 Orel SG , Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999; 211(3): 845–850. Link, Google Scholar
• 19 Reiner BI , Knight N, Siegel EL. Radiology reporting, past, present, and future: the radiologist's perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4(5): 313–319. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 20 Sistrom CL , Honeyman-Buck J. Free text versus structured format: information transfer efficiency of radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185(3): 804–812. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 21 Reinus WR . Economics of radiology report editing using voice recognition technology. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4(12): 890–894. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 22 Langlotz CP , Meininger L. Enhancing the expressiveness and usability of structured image reporting systems. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 467–471. Google Scholar
• 23 Kundel HL , Nodine CF, Krupinski EA. Searching for lung nodules: visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions. Invest Radiol 1989; 24(6): 472–478. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 24 Krupinski EA , Lund PJ. Differences in time to interpretation for evaluation of bone radiographs with monitor and film viewing. Acad Radiol 1997; 4(3): 177–182. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 25 Atkins MS , Moise A, Rohling R. An application of eyegaze tracking for designing radiologists' workstations: insights for comparative visual search tasks. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2006; 3(2): 136–151. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 26 Weiss DL , Siddiqui K, Scopelliti J. Radiologist assessment of PACS user interface devices. J Am Coll Radiol 2006; 3(4): 265–273. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 27 Langlotz CP . RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. RadioGraphics 2006; 26(6): 1595–1597. Link, Google Scholar
• 28 Yam CS , Kruskal J, Sitek A, Larson M. A Web-based ACR index for radiological diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183(5): 1517–1521. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 29 SNOMED CT . International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation Web site. http://www.ihtsdo.org/our-standards/. Accessed May 20, 2008. Google Scholar
• 30 The unified medical language system. National Library of Medicine Web site. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/about_umls.html. Accessed May 20, 2008. Google Scholar
• 31 Hansell DM , Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 2008; 246(3): 697–722. Link, Google Scholar
• 32 Clunie DA . DICOM structured reporting. Bangor, Pa: PixelMed, 2000. Google Scholar
• 33 Quint DJ . Voice-recognition: ready for prime time? J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4(10): 667–669. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 34 Mehta A , McLoud TC. Voice recognition. J Thorac Imaging 2003; 18(3): 178–182. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 35 History of speech recognition and transcription software. http://www.dragon-medical-transcription.com/historyspeechrecognition.html. Accessed November 13, 2007. Google Scholar
• 36 Hendel RC , Wackers FJ, Berman DS, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: reporting of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2006; 13(6): e152–e156. Medline, Google Scholar
• 37 Moorman PW , van Ginneken AM, Siersema PD, van der Lei J, van Bemmel JH. Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1995; 2(6): 365–373. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 38 Mathie AG , Strickland NH. Interpretation of CT scans with PACS image display in stack mode. Radiology 1997; 203(1): 207–209. Link, Google Scholar
• 39 Bennett WF , Vaswani KK, Mendiola JA, Spigos DG. PACS monitors: an evolution of radiologist's viewing techniques. J Digit Imaging 2002; 15(suppl 1): 171–174. Google Scholar
• 40 Kim YJ , Han JK, Kim SH, et al. Small-bowel obstruction in a phantom model of ex vivo porcine intestine: comparison of PACS stack and tile modes for CT interpretation. Radiology 2005; 236(3): 867–871. Link, Google Scholar
• 41 Dunnick NR , Langlotz CP. The radiology report of the future: a summary of the 2007 Intersociety Conference. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5(5): 626–629. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 42 Uchitelle L . Measuring productivity in the 90s: optimists vs. skeptics. New York Times. August 2, 1997; http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B04E0D9143DF931A3575BC0A961958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print. Accessed January 7, 2008. Google Scholar
• 43 Lu Y , Arenson RL. The academic radiologist's clinical productivity: an update. Acad Radiol 2005; 12(9): 1211–1223. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 44 Sunshine JH , Cypel YS, Schepps B. Diagnostic radiologists in 2000: basic characteristics, practices, and issues related to the radiologist shortage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178(2): 291–301. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 45 Sunshine JH , Meghea C. How could the radiologist shortage have eased? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187(5): 1160–1165. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 46 Geis JR . Medical imaging informatics: how it improves radiology practice today. J Digit Imaging 2007; 20(2): 99–104. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 47 Lepanto L , Paré G, Aubry D, Robillard P, Lesage J. Impact of PACS on dictation and turnaround time and productivity. J Digit Imaging 2006; 19(1): 92–97. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 48 van Ooijen PM , Koesoema AP, Oudkerk M. User questionnaire to evaluate the radiological workspace. J Digit Imaging 2006; 19(suppl 1): 52–59. Medline, Google Scholar
• 49 Cooper A . About face: the essentials of user interface design. Foster City, Calif: IDG Books Worldwide, 1995. Google Scholar
• 50 Sistrom CL . Conceptual approach for the design of radiology reporting interfaces: the talking template. J Digit Imaging 2005; 18(3): 176–187. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 51 Bettermann H , von Bonin D, Fruhwirth M, Cysarz D, Moser M. Effects of speech therapy with poetry on heart rate rhythmicity and cardiorespiratory coordination. Int J Cardiol 2002; 84(1): 77–88. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 52 Berg M . Practices of reading and writing: the constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociol Health Illn 1996; 18(4): 499–524. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 53 Thomas EL , Lansdown EL. Visual search patterns of radiologists in training. Radiology 1963; 81: 288–291. Link, Google Scholar
• 54 Bankowitz RA , McNeil MA, Challinor SM, Parker RC, Kapoor WN, Miller RA. A computer-assisted medical diagnostic consultation service: implementation and prospective evaluation of a prototype. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110(10): 824–832. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 55 Hripcsak G , Austin JH, Alderson PO, Friedman C. Use of natural language processing to translate clinical information from a database of 889,921 chest radiographic reports. Radiology 2002; 224(1): 157–163. Link, Google Scholar
• 56 Langlotz CP . Automatic structuring of radiology reports: harbinger of a second information revolution in radiology. Radiology 2002; 224(1): 5–7. Link, Google Scholar
• 57 Jurafsky D , Martin JH. Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000. Google Scholar
• 58 Chapman WW , Bridewell W, Hanbury P, Cooper GF, Buchanan BG. A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries. J Biomed Inform 2001; 34(5): 301–310. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 59 Dreyer KJ , Kalra MK, Maher MM, et al. Application of recently developed computer algorithm for automatic classification of unstructured radiology reports: validation study. Radiology 2005; 234(2): 323–329. Link, Google Scholar
• 60 De Jager P . Resistance to change: a new view of an old problem. The Futurist. May–June 2001:24–27. http://www.gfoa.org/services/documents/dunham3.pdf. Accessed January 7, 2008. Google Scholar
• 61 Khorasani R . Technology requirements for the optimal communication of critical test results. J Am Coll Radiol 2006; 3(10): 742–743. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 62 Kahn CE Jr . Improving outcomes in radiology: bringing computer-based decision support and education to the point of care. Acad Radiol 2005; 12(4): 409–414. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 63 Burnside ES , Rubin DL, Fine JP, Shachter RD, Sisney GA, Leung WK. Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience. Radiology 2006; 240(3): 666–673. Link, Google Scholar