Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Radiographic Appearances and Pattern of Progression in 138 Patients
Abstract
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the radiographic appearances and pattern of progression of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chest radiographs obtained at clinical presentation and during treatment in 138 patients with confirmed SARS (66 men, 72 women; mean age, 39 years; age range, 20–83 years) were assessed. Radiographic appearances of pulmonary parenchymal abnormality, distribution, and extent of involvement on initial chest radiographs were documented. Recognizable patterns of radiographic progression were determined by comparing the overall mean percentage of lung involvement for each patient on serial radiographs.
RESULTS: Initial chest radiographs were abnormal in 108 of 138 (78.3%) patients and showed air-space opacity. Lower lung zone (70 of 108, 64.8%) and right lung (82 of 108, 75.9%) were more commonly involved. In most patients, peripheral lung involvement was more common (81 of 108, 75.0%). Unifocal involvement (59 of 108, 54.6%) was more common than multifocal or bilateral involvement. No cavitation, lymphadenopathy, or pleural effusion was demonstrated. Four patterns of radiographic progression were recognized: type 1 (initial radiographic deterioration to peak level followed by radiographic improvement) in 97 of 138 patients (70.3%), type 2 (fluctuating radiographic changes) in 24 patients (17.4%), type 3 (static radiographic appearance) in 10 patients (7.3%), and type 4 (progressive radiographic deterioration) in seven patients (5.1%). Initial focal air-space opacity in 44 of 59 patients (74.6%) progressed to unilateral multifocal or bilateral involvement during treatment.
CONCLUSION: Predominant peripheral location; common progression pattern from unilateral focal air-space opacity to unilateral multifocal or bilateral involvement during treatment; and lack of cavitation, lymphadenopathy, and pleural effusion are the more distinctive radiographic findings of SARS.
© RSNA, 2003
References
- 1 World Health Organization. Cumulative number of reported cases (SARS) from 1 February to 27 March 2003. Available at: www.who.int/csr/sarscountry/2003_04_11. Accessed April 12 2003. Google Scholar
- 2 Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, et al. A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med [serial online]. April 14 2003. Available at: nejm.org/earlyrelease/sars.asp. Google Scholar
- 3 World Health Organization. Case definitions for surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Available at: www.who.int/csr/sars/casedefinition/en/. Accessed April 12 2003. Google Scholar
- 4 Update: outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome—worldwide, 2003.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2003; 52:241-248. Medline, Google Scholar
- 5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated interim domestic infection control guidance in the health care and community setting for patients with suspected SARS. Available at: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/infectioncontrol.htm. Accessed April 4 2003. Google Scholar
- 6 Wong KT, Antonio GE, Hui DSC, et al. Thin-section CT of severe acute respiratory syndrome: evaluation of 73 patients exposed to or with the disease. Radiology 2003; 228:395-400. Link, Google Scholar
- 7 Goodman LR, Goren RA, Teptick SK. The radiographic evaluation of pulmonary infection. Med Clin North Am 1980; 64:553-574. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 8 Macfarlane JT, Miller AC, Roderick Smith WH, Morris AH, Rose DH. Comparative radiographic features of community acquired Legionnaires disease, pneumococcal pneumonia, mycoplasma pneumonia, and psittacosis. Thorax 1984; 39:28-33. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 9 Kim EA, Lee KS, Primack SL, et al. Viral pneumonias in adults: radiologic and pathologic findings. RadioGraphics 2002; 22(spec issue):137S-149S. Link, Google Scholar
