Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 17, 2017

Why Should Women Get Less? Evidence on the Gender Pay Gap from Multifactorial Survey Experiments

Abstract

Gender pay gaps likely persist in Western societies because both men and women consider somewhat lower earnings for female employees than for otherwise similar male employees to be fair. Two different theoretical approaches explain “legitimate” wage gaps: same-gender referent theory and reward expectations theory. The first approach states that women compare their lower earnings primarily with that of other underpaid women; the second approach argues that both men and women value gender as a status variable that yields lower expectations about how much each gender should be paid for otherwise equal work. This article is the first to analyze hypotheses contrasting the two theories using an experimental factorial survey design. In 2009, approximately 1,600 German residents rated more than 26,000 descriptions of fictitious employees. The labor market characteristics of each employee and the amount of information given about them were experimentally varied across all descriptions. The results primarily support reward expectations theory. Both men and women produced gender pay gaps in their fairness ratings (with the mean ratio of just female-to-male wages being .92). Respondents framed the just pay ratios by the gender inequalities they experienced in their own occupations, and some evidence of gender-specific evaluation standards emerged.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abbott Andrew. 2005. “Sociology of Work and Occupations.” Pp. 307–30 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Smelser N. J., Swedberg R. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Adams John Stacy. 1965. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” Pp. 267–99 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, edited by Berkowitz L. New York: Academic Press.
Aisenbrey Silke, Evertsson Marie, Grunow Daniela. 2009. “Is There a Career Penalty for Mothers’ Time Out? A Comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States.” Social Forces 88(2):573–605.
Akchurin Maria, Lee Cheol-Sung. 2013. “Pathways to Empowerment: Repertoires of Women’s Activism and Gender Earnings Equality.” American Sociological Review 78(4):679–701.
Akerlof George A., Yellen Janet L. 1990. “The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(2):255–83.
Altonji Joseph G., Pierret Charles R. 2001. “Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1):313–50.
Arrow Kenneth J. 1973. “The Theory of Discrimination.” Pp. 3–33 in Discrimination in Labor Markets, edited by Ashenfelter O., Rees A. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Arrow Kenneth J. 1998. “What Has Economics to Say about Racial Discrimination?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(2):91–100.
Auspurg Katrin, Hinz Thomas. 2015. Factorial Survey Experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Auspurg Katrin, Hinz Thomas, Stefan Liebig. 2009. “Complexity, Learning Effects, and Plausibility of Vignettes in Factorial Surveys.” Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association (ASA), San Francisco, CA.
Baron James N., Newman Andrew E. 1990. “For What It’s Worth: Organizations, Occupations, and the Value of Work Done by Women and Nonwhites.” American Sociological Review 55(2):155–75.
Becker Gary S. 1985. “Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor.” Journal of Labor Economics 3(1):S33–S58.
Berger Joseph, Fişek M. Hamit. 2006. “Diffuse Status Characteristics and the Spread of Status Value: A Formal Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 111(4):1038–79.
Berger Joseph, Fişek M. Hamit, Norman Robert Z., Wagner David G. 1985. “Formation of Reward Expectations in Status Situations.” Pp. 215–61 in Status, Rewards, and Influence: How Expectations Organize Behavior, edited by Berger J., Zelditch M. J. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Berger Joseph, Fişek M. Hamit, Norman Robert Z., Zelditch Jr. Morris 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
Berger Joseph, Wagner David G., Webster Murray Jr. 2014. “Expectation States Theory: Growth, Opportunities and Challenges.” Advances in Group Processes 31:19–55.
Berger Joseph, Webster Murray Jr. 2006. “Expectations, Status, and Behavior.” Pp. 268–300 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by Burke P. J. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bielby William T., Baron James N. 1986. “Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination.” American Journal of Sociology 91(4):759–99.
Blau Francine D., Kahn Lawrence M. 2007. “The Gender Pay Gap.” The Economists’ Voice 4(4):1–6.
Bundesagentur für Arbeit. 2014. “Beschäftigungsstatistik. Sozialversicherungspflichtig Beschäftigte nach ausgewählten Merkmalen.” In Arbeitsmarkt in Zahlen, edited by Bundesagentur für Arbeit. Nuremberg. Retrieved March 23, 2015 (https://statistik.arbeitsagentur.de/Navigation/Statistik/Statistik-nach-Themen/Beschaeftigung/Beschaeftigung-Nav.html).
Bygren Magnus. 2004. “Pay Reference Standards and Pay Satisfaction: What Do Workers Evaluate Their Pay Against?” Social Science Research 33(2):206–24.
Bylsma Wayne H., Major Brenda. 1992. “Two Routes to Eliminating Gender Differences in Personal Entitlement: Social Comparisons and Performance Evaluations.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 16(2):193–200.
Bylsma Wayne H., Major Brenda. 1994. “Social Comparisons and Contentment: Exploring the Psychological Costs of the Gender Wage Gap.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 18(2):241–49.
Castillo Marco, Petrie Ragan. 2010. “Discrimination in the Lab: Does Information Trump Appearance?” Games and Economic Behavior 68(1):50–59.
Charles Maria, Grusky David B. 2004. Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cohen Jacob. 1969. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Colquitt Jason A., Conlon Donald E., Wesson Michael J., Porter Christopher O. L. H., Yee Ng K. 2001. “Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86(3):425–45.
Correll Shelley J., Benard Stephen. 2006. “Biased Estimators? Comparing Status and Statistical Theories of Gender Discrimination.” Advances in Group Processes 23:89–116.
Correll Shelley J., Benard Stephen, Paik In. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?” American Journal of Sociology 112(5): 1297–1338.
Correll Shelley J., Ridgeway Cecilia L. 2003. “Expectation States Theory.” Pp. 29–51 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Delamater J. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Davison H. Kristl. 2014. “The Paradox of the Contented Female Worker: Why Are Women Satisfied with Lower Pay?” Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 26(3):195–216.
Desmarais Serge, Curtis James. 2001. “Gender and Perceived Income Entitlement among Full-Time Workers: Analyses for Canadian National Samples, 1984 and 1994.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 23(3):157–68.
Deutsch Morton. 1985. Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Eagly Alice H., Karau Steven J. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109(3):573–98.
England Paula. 1992. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
European Commission. 2015. “Company Income Reports, Austria.” (Website managed by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers.) Luxembourg: European Commission. Retrieved February 21, 2016 (http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-pay-gap/depth-info/tools-gpg/reports-austria/index_en.htm).
Eurostat. 2015. “Gender Pay Gap in Unadjusted Form.” (Main Tables on Labour Market Earnings.) Luxembourg: European Commission. Retrieved November 11, 2016 (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/product?code=tsdsc340).
Faia Michael A. 1980. “The Vagaries of the Vignette World: A Comment on Alves and Rossi.” American Journal of Sociology 85(4):951–54.
Fang Hanming, Moro Andrea. 2011. “Theories of Statistical Discrimination and Affirmative Action: A Survey.” Pp. 133–200 in Handbook of Social Economics, Vol. 1A, edited by Benhabib J., Bisin A., Jackson M. O. Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier.
Fehr Ernst, Goette Lorenz, Zehnder Christian. 2009. “A Behavioral Account of the Labor Market: The Role of Fairness Concerns.” Annual Review of Economics 1:355–84.
Festinger Leon. 1954. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.” Human Relations 7(2):117–40.
Fişek M. Hamit, Hysom Stuart J. 2008. “Status Characteristics and Reward Expectations: A Test of a Theory of Justice in Two Cultures.” Social Science Research 37(3):769–86.
Fishbein Martin, Ajzen Icek. 2010. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
Foschi Martha. 1996. “Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59(3):237–54.
Foschi Martha. 2000. “Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:21–42.
Foschi Martha, Lai Larissa, Sigerson Kirsten. 1994. “Gender and Double Standards in the Assessment of Job Applicants.” Social Psychology Quarterly 57(4):326–39.
Gangl Markus, Ziefle Andrea. 2009. “Motherhood, Labor Force Behavior, and Women’s Careers: An Empirical Assessment of the Wage Penalty for Motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States.” Demography 46(2):341–69.
Ganzeboom Harry B. G., Treiman Donald J. 1996. “Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations.” Social Science Research 25(3):201–39.
Gartner Hermann, Hinz Thomas. 2009. “Geschlechtsspezifische Lohnungleichheit in Betrieben, Berufen und Jobzellen (1993–2006).” Berliner Journal für Soziologie 19(4):557–75.
Gatskova Kseniia. 2013. “Distributive Justice Attitudes in Ukraine: Need, Desert or Social Minimum?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 46(2):227–41.
Gibson Donald E., Lawrence Barbara S. 2010. “Women’s and Men’s Career Referents: How Gender Composition and Comparison Level Shape Career Expectations.” Organization Science 21(6):1159–75.
Hedström Peter, Swedberg Richard. 1998. “Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay.” Pp. 1–31 in Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by Hedström P., Swedberg R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Homans George C. 1973. “Fundamental Social Processes.” Pp. 549–94 in Sociology: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Edited by Smelser N. J. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Hox Joop J., Kreft Ita G. G., Hermkens Piet L. J. 1991. “The Analysis of Factorial Surveys.” Sociological Methods and Research 19(4):493–510.
Husted Bryan W., Folger Robert. 2004. “Fairness and Transaction Costs: The Contribution of Organizational Justice Theory to an Integrative Model of Economic Organization.” Organization Science 15(6):719–29.
Jann Ben. 2005. Erwerbsarbeit, Einkommen und Geschlecht. Studien zum Schweizer Arbeitsmarkt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Jasso Guillermina. 1980. “A New Theory of Distributive Justice.” American Sociological Review 45(1):3–32.
Jasso Guillermina. 1990. “Methods for the Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Comparison Processes.” Sociological Methodology 20:369–419.
Jasso Guillermina. 1996. “Exploring the Reciprocal Relations between Theoretical and Empirical Work: The Case of the Justice Evaluation Function (Paper in Honor of Robert K. Merton).” Sociological Methods and Research 24(3):253–303.
Jasso Guillermina. 2006. “Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and Judgments.” Sociological Methods and Research 34(3):334–423.
Jasso Guillermina. 2012. “Safeguarding Justice Research.” Sociological Methods and Research 41(1):217–39.
Jasso Guillermina, Rossi Peter H. 1977. “Distributive Justice and Earned Income.” American Sociological Review 42(4):639–51.
Jasso Guillermina, Webster Murray Jr. 1997. “Double Standards in Just Earnings for Male and Female Workers.” Social Psychology Quarterly 60(1):66–78.
Jasso Guillermina, Webster Murray Jr. 1999. “Assessing the Gender Gap in Just Earnings and Its Underlying Mechanisms.” Social Psychology Quarterly 62(4):367–80.
Kalkhoff Will, Thye Shane R. 2006. “Expectation States Theory and Research: New Observations from Meta-Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 35(2):219–49.
Kluegel James R., Smith Eliot R. 1986. Beliefs About Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Krysan Maria, Couper Mick P., Farley Reynolds, Forman Tyrone A. 2009. “Does Race Matter in Neighborhood Preferences? Results from a Video Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 115(2):527–59.
Major Brenda. 1989. “Gender Differences in Comparisons and Entitlement: Implications for Comparable Worth.” Journal of Social Issues 45(4):99–115.
Major Brenda. 1994. “From Social Inequality to Personal Entitlement: The Role of Social Comparisons, Legitimacy Appraisals, and Group Membership.” Pp. 293–355 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 26, edited by Zanna M. P. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Major Brenda, Forcey Blythe. 1985. “Social Comparisons and Pay Evaluations: Preferences for Same-Sex and Same-Job Wage Comparisons.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21(4):393–405.
Major Brenda, Konar Ellen. 1984. “An Investigation of Sex Differences in Pay Expectations and Their Possible Causes.” Academy of Management Journal 27(4):777–92.
Major Brenda, McFarlin Dean B., Gagnon Diana. 1984. “Overworked and Underpaid: On the Nature of Gender Differences in Personal Entitlement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(6):1399–1412.
Major Brenda, Testa Maria. 1989. “Social Comparison Processes and Judgments of Entitlement and Satisfaction.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25(2):101–20.
Mandel Hadas, Semyonov Moshe. 2005. “Family Policies, Wage Structures, and Gender Gaps: Sources of Earnings Inequality in 20 Countries.” American Sociological Review 70(6):949–67.
Markovsky Barry, Eriksson Kimmo. 2012. “Comparing Direct and Indirect Measures of Just Rewards.” Sociological Methods and Research 41(1):199–216.
Martell Richard F., Lane David M., Emrich Cynthia. 1996. “Male-Female Differences: A Computer Simulation.” American Psychologist 51(2):157–58.
McPherson Miller, Smith-Lovin Lynn, Cook James M. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27:415–44.
Melamed David. 2012. “Deriving Equity from Expectations: A Cross-Cultural Evaluation.” Social Science Research 41(1):170–81.
Mincer Jacob. 1974. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, Vol. 2. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Moore Dahlia. 1991. “Entitlement and Justice Evaluations: Who Should Get More, and Why.” Social Psychology Quarterly 54(3):208–23.
Mueller Charles W., Kim Sang-Wook. 2008. “The Contented Female Worker: Still a Paradox?” Advances in Group Processes 25:117–49.
Mutz Diana C. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Neumark David. 2012. “Detecting Discrimination in Audit and Correspondence Studies.” Journal of Human Resources 47(4):1128–57.
Nielsen Helena Skyt, Simonsen Marianne, Verner Mette. 2004. “Does the Gap in Family-Friendly Policies Drive the Family Gap?” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106(4):721–44.
Pager Devah, Quillian Lincoln. 2005. “Walking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do.” American Sociological Review 70(3):355–80.
Phelps Edmund S. 1972. “The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism.” American Economic Review 62(4):659–61.
Quillian Lincoln. 2006. “New Approaches to Understanding Racial Prejudice and Discrimination.” Annual Review of Sociology 32:299–328.
Rashotte Lisa Slattery, Webster Murray Jr. 2005. “Gender Status Beliefs.” Social Science Research 34(3):618–33.
Ridgeway Cecilia L. 1997. “Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment.” American Sociological Review 62(2):218–35.
Ridgeway Cecilia L. 2001. “Gender, Status, and Leadership.” Journal of Social Issues 57(4):637–55.
Ridgeway Cecilia L. 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ridgeway Cecilia L., Correll Shelley J. 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender and Society 18(4):510–31.
Sauer Carsten, Auspurg Katrin, Hinz Thomas, Liebig Stefan. 2011. “The Application of Factorial Surveys in General Population Samples: The Effects of Respondent Age and Education on Response Times and Response Consistency.” Survey Research Methods 5(3):89–102.
Sauer Carsten, Auspurg Katrin, Hinz Thomas, Liebig Stefan, Schupp Jürgen. 2014. “Method Effects in Factorial Surveys: An Analysis of Respondents’ Comments, Interviewers’ Assessments, and Response Behavior.” SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research # 629. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW).
Schaeffer Nora Cate. 1991. “Hardly Ever or Constantly? Group Comparisons Using Vague Quantifiers.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55(3):395–423.
Schauer Frederick F. 2003. Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Shamon Hawal, Dülmer Hermann. 2014. “Raising the Question on ‘Who Should Get What?’ Again: On the Importance of Ideal and Existential Standards.” Social Justice Research 27(3):340–68.
Shepelak Norma J., Alwin Duane F. 1986. “Beliefs about Inequality and Perceptions of Distributive Justice.” American Sociological Review 51(1):30–46.
Smolny Werner, Kirbach Matthias. 2011. “Wage Differentials between East and West Germany: Are They Related to the Location or to the People?” Applied Economics Letters 18(9):873–79.
Steele Claude M., Aronson Joshua. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(5):797–811.
Thébaud Sarah. 2015. “Status Beliefs and the Spirit of Capitalism: Accounting for Gender Biases in Entrepreneurship and Innovation.” Social Forces 94(1):61–86.
Tomaskovic-Devey Donald, Skaggs Sheryl. 1999. “An Establishment-Level Test of the Statistical Discrimination Hypothesis.” Work and Occupations 26(4):422–45.
Wagner Gert G., Frick Joachim R., Schupp Jürgen. 2007. “The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) – Scope, Evolution and Enhancements.” Schmollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Science Studies 127(1):139–69.
Walster Elaine, Berscheid Ellen, Walster G. William. 1973. “New Directions in Equity Research.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25(2):151–76.
Wooldridge Jeffrey M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Biographies

Katrin Auspurg holds a full professorship in sociology (specializing in quantitative empirical research) at the Department of Sociology at the LMU Munich, Germany. She is co-author of Factorial Survey Experiments (Sage Publications, Series Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences). She investigates how inequalities in the labor market and the family intersect and reinforce each other. In addition, her current projects advance innovative experimental or survey methods that allow the testing of mechanisms that cause social inequalities or subtle forms of discrimination.
Thomas Hinz holds a full professorship in empirical social research and survey methodology at the Department of Sociology at the University of Konstanz, Germany. His research interests include social inequalities and discrimination in markets. He has investigated the development of the gender wage gap in Germany in cooperation with the Institute of Employment Research. He is co-author of Factorial Survey Experiments (Sage Publications, Series Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences).
Carsten Sauer is a Radboud Excellence Initiative Fellow (postdoc) at the Department of Sociology at Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands. His research interests include the explanation of behavior, social inequality and justice, and quantitative research methods (especially factorial surveys).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 17, 2017
Issue published: February 2017

Keywords

  1. gender pay gap
  2. same-gender referent theory
  3. reward expectations theory
  4. double standard theory
  5. factorial survey experiment

Rights and permissions

© American Sociological Association 2017.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Thomas Hinz
University of Konstanz
Carsten Sauer
Radboud University Nijmegen

Notes

Katrin Auspurg, Department of Sociology, LMU Munich, Konradstr. 6, DE-80801 Munich, Germany E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in American Sociological Review.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 38871

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 133 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. Examining double standards in layoff preferences and expectations for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Intelligence can grow in all dimensions: findings from an experiment i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Board's informal hierarchy: influences on enterprise innovation qualit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The ethnic penalty in welfare deservingness: A factorial survey experi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Characteristics or Returns: Understanding Gender Pay Inequality among ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Remote Work Penalties: Work Location and Career Rewards
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Sustainability of gender employment and pay gap types regarding female...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Do working parents in the United States expect work location to impact...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. The materiality of non-financial tax disclosure: Experimental evidence
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Family ideals in an era of low fertility
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Board Gender Diversity and Nonprofit CEO Compensation: Implications fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Endorsement of wage discrimination against immigrants: Results from a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Effect of gender equality on financial stability and financial inclusi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Examining the gender wage gap in logistics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Status and Just Gender Pay Gaps: Results of a Vignette Study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Distributive Justice Concerns When Combating Air Pollution: The Joint ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Unions, Occupational Career Change, and Gender Inequality: Using Curre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Legitimation of earnings inequality between regular and non-regular wo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Employer Value Propositions for Different Target Groups and Organizati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Gender pay-gap: exploring the school-to-work transition of graduates i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Gender‐ethnicity intersectional variation in work–family dynamics: Fam...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Employees’ perceptions of co-workers’ internal promotion penalties: th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Intersectional Complexity in Stereotype Content
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Gender and Gender-Role Attitudes in Wage Negotiations: Evidence from a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Pay-for-performance, job attraction, and the prospects of bureaucratic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Variations of Gender Gaps in the Labour Market Outcomes of Graduates a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. A partial least squares analysis of gender inequality, occupational se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Unequal but just? Experimental evidence on (gendered) distributive jus...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. It’s Not the Message, It’s The Messenger: Organizational Identity and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Costly mistakes: Why and when spelling errors in resumes jeopardise in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. An Empirical Study of the Numerical Proportions of Women Academics in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. The predominance of investment in girls’ after-school education in Chi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Local migrant kin or floating grandmother? Reflections on mobility and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Employees’ reaction to gender pay transparency: an online experiment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Unpacking the logics of gendered educational choices: 10th graders’ ev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Tools and data for the analysis of gender policies: A review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Employer preferences for vocational over general education: evidence f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Perceptions of Pay Satisfaction and Pay Justice: Two Sides of the Same...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Ability or luck: A systematic review of interpersonal attributions of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Do women evaluate their lower earnings still to be fair? Findings on t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Attractive People Make Better Music? How Gender and Perceived Attracti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. How Personal Relationships Affect Employment Outcomes: On the Role of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Gender differences in fairness evaluations of own earnings in 28 Europ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Do Organizational Policies Narrow Gender Inequality? Novel Evidence fr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Diskriminierung auf dem Arbeitsmarkt
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. The effect of parental leave duration on early‐career wage growth
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Application of Data Analytics for Proving the Existence of Gender Pay ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Cash Transfers and Violent Crime in Indonesia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Diskriminierung auf dem Arbeitsmarkt
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. ACTing Like a Lawyer: An Affect Control Theory Explanation of Gender G...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Can the legal framework for prostitution influence the acceptability o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Perception and privilege
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. The Impact of Mandated Pay Gap Transparency on Firms’ Reputations as E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. The impacts of COVID-19 on LGBTQ+ foster youth alumni
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. The past, present, and future of experimental methods in the social sc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Introducing a vignette experiment to study mechanisms of ethnic discri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. The gender pay gap in university student employment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Investigating the relationship between selected organisational factors...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. No matter what the name, we’re all the same? Examining ethnic online d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Hohe Kompetenzerwartungen – bessere Einstellungschancen? Studienausste...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. „Evaluative Diskriminierung“: Arbeitsbewertung als blinder Fleck in de...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. The motherhood wage gap and trade-offs between family and work: A test...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Culture and Durable Inequality
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. The Prevalence and Implications of Gender Blindness in Quantitative Po...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Hope, Emotional Charges, and Online Action: An Experimental Study of t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Avoiding Bias in the Search for Implicit Bias
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Status, masculinity, and femininity at the intersection of age and gen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. It's only discrimination when they do it t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. The influence of pay transparency on (gender) inequity, inequality and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. How Does the Provision of Childcare Services Affect Mothers’ Employmen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. In analyses of the gender pay gap, job analysis, and O*NET don’t get a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Feminist Planning and Urbanism: Understanding the Past for an Inclusiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Management of Equity and Diversity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Technology, Gender and Organizations: A Systematic Mapping Study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. The Norm of Wage Negotiations in the United States
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. A Critical Analysis of the Systems Engineering Leadership Pipeline: Cl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Setting Adequate Wages for Workers: Managers' Work Experience, Incenti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Diving in the Minds of Recruiters: What Triggers Gender Stereotypes in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Marginalisation and Misperception: Perceiving Gender and Racial Wage G...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. As if it weren’t hard enough already: Breaking down hiring discriminat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Categorical Distinctions and Claims-Making: Opportunity, Agency, and R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Can Regional Gender Ideologies Account for Variation of Gender Pay Gap...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Gendered Dignity at Work
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. The roots of the gender pay gap for nonprofit CEOs
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. What You Want Is Not Always What You Get: Gender Differences in Employ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. What Does a Job Candidate's Age Signal to Employers?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Facilitators and barriers to women’s access to top management position...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Erken Çocukluk Dönemi Bağlamında Geleceğin Öğretmenlerinin Cinsiyetçi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Making a case for more feminist approaches in quantitative research: H...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Measuring Perceptions of Economic Inequality and Justice: An Empirical...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Downloaded Work, Sideloaded Work, and Financial Circumstances: The Con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Friend or FOE? CEO gender, political ideology, and gender-pay disparit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Lohngerechtigkeit und Geschlechternormen: Erhalten Männer eine Heirats...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. Workplace Healthy Lifestyle Determinants and Wellbeing Needs across th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Attitudes towards euro area reforms: Evidence from a randomized survey...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. The gendered consequences of skill-discounting for migrants
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. Sex Differences in Willingness to Participate in Research Based on Stu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Gender and policy response to COVID-19 in Canada and Scotland
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Gender Wage Gap and Gender Attitudes in Ukraine
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. Feminist Planning and Urbanism: Understanding the Past for an Inclusiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Management of Equity and Diversity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Proměna role vzdělání v době čtvrté průmyslové revoluce
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. We’ve Come a Long Way, But We Could Be Doing Better: Gendered Commenta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. Entwicklungslinien und Herausforderungen soziologischer Ungleichheitsf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. Dismissing contemporary prejudice is a science denialism issue: Social...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Do higher skill levels lead to better outcomes? The disproportionality...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. The state as regulator? The ‘dual-track’ system of employment in the C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Occupations and Inequality: Theoretical Perspectives and Mechanisms
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. The Segregation Premium: How Gender Shapes the Symbolic Valuation Proc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. Job Pressure, the Work-Family Interface, and the Sense of Distributive...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. Bridging the Gender Wage Gap: Gendered Cultural Sentiments, Sex Segreg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. Mind the Income Gaps? Experimental Evidence of Information’s Lasting E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. Gender Segregation, Occupational Sorting, and Growth of Wage Dispariti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Parenting and management skills: The mediator role of empathy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  117. The cultural code of antifeminist communication: Voicing opposition to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. Gender Bias in Justice Evaluations of Earnings: Evidence From Three Su...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  119. The Hidden Cost of Flexibility: A Factorial Survey Experiment on Job P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  120. Bold or reckless? The impact of workplace risk-taking on attributions ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  121. Using Factorial Survey Experiments to Measure Attitudes, Social Norms,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  122. Workplace Gender Pay Gaps: Does Gender Matter Less the Longer Employee...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  123. Discrimination in the hiring of older jobseekers: Combining a survey e...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  124. What do the upwardly mobile think they deserve, and why? A multi-metho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  125. The just gender pay gap in Germany revisited: The male breadwinner mod...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  126. Examining discrimination in everyday life: a stated choice experiment ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  127. What Does a Job Candidate's Age Signal to Employers?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  128. The Influence of Pay Transparency on Inequity, Inequality, and the Per...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  129. As If it Weren't Hard Enough Already: Breaking Down Hiring Discriminat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  130. Are Factorial Survey Experiments Prone to Survey Mode Effects?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  131. Overwork, Specialization, and Wealth
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  132. Assessing and Blocking Double Standards for Competence
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  133. Prejudiced and unaware of it: Evidence for the Dunning-Kruger model in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  134. Who Differentiates by Skin Color? Status Attributions and Skin Pigment...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  135. How Factorial Survey Analysis Improves Our Understanding of Employer P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  136. Conditional legitimacy: How turnout, majority size, and outcome affect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  137. The Gender Wage Gap Opens Long before Motherhood. Panel Evidence on Ea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  138. Management gender composition and the gender pay gap: Evidence from Br...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  139. Feministische Ökonomik als Gegenprogramm zur Standardökonomik
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  140. The Signal of Applying for a Job Under a Vacancy Referral Scheme
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  141. How impartial are the observers of justice theory?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  142. Do citizens make inferences from political candidate characteristics w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  143. People Make the Same Bayesian Judgment They Criticize in Others
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  144. Wissenschaftsmarketing im Spannungsfeld der Herausforderungen für Führ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  145. Relative Pay, Rank and Happiness: A Comparison Between Genders and Par...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  146. A latent class analysis towards stability and changes in breadwinning ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  147. Tightening early childcare choices – gender and social class inequalit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  148. Wann würden Frauen für Tarifkommissionen kandidieren? Befunde aus eine...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  149. Do Women Ask?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  150. Entrepreneurs' propensity for corruption: A vignette-based factorial s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  151. Social Structure and the Paradox of the Contented Female Worker: How O...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  152. Occupational Career Change and Gender Wage Inequality
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  153. The Corporatist Regime, Welfare State Employment, and Gender Pay Inequ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  154. Methoden der Arbeitsmarktforschung
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  155. Theorien des Arbeitsmarktes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  156. Diskriminierung – (k)ein neuer Aspekt des chinesischen Arbeitsmarktes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  157. Status Characteristics and the Provision of Public Goods: Experimental...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  158. ‘Can’t Have It All’: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Effect of Parental...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  159. Gender Differences in Relation to Organization Sources of Power
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  160. The Signal of Applying for a Job Under a Vacancy Referral Scheme
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  161. Status, identity, and ability in the formation of trust
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  162. The wage penalty for motherhood: Evidence on discrimination from panel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  163. Is there a Glass Ceiling over Germany?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  164. Can Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  165. Gender Differences in Relation to Organization Sources of Power
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

ASA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

ASA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text