Effect of a telephone and web-based problem-solving intervention for stroke caregivers on stroke patient activities of daily living: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective
To test for effects of a problem-solving intervention for stroke caregivers on stroke survivor activities of daily living.
Design
Two-arm parallel randomized clinical trial with repeated measures at 11 weeks and 19 weeks.
Setting
Medical centers for US military Veterans.
Subjects
Caregivers of stroke survivors.
Intervention
A registered nurse guided caregivers in using problem-solving strategies emphasizing creative thinking, optimism, planning, and expert information to address challenges associated with caregiving. Caregivers in the intervention completed one telephone orientation session followed by eight online, asynchronous messaging center sessions. The messaging center sessions involved (a) education on the Resources and Education for Stroke Caregivers’ Understanding and Empowerment website (https://www.stroke.cindrr.research.va.gov/en/), (b) supportive communication between the nurse and caregiver, (c) nurse and caregiver interactions to improve problem-solving, and (d) maintain adherence to discharge planning instructions.
Main Outcome
The Barthel Index was used to measure activities of daily living.
Results
174 participants (standard care n = 88, intervention n = 86) were enrolled at baseline. There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. Change scores in activities of daily living between baseline and 11 weeks were significantly higher in the intervention group than the standard care group (group difference = 6.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.28, 11.58). Group differences in change scores between baseline and 19 weeks were not statistically significant (group difference = 3.89, 95% confidence interval: −3.58, 11.36).
Conclusions
This web-based caregiver intervention improved stroke survivor activities of daily living by 11 weeks, but intervention effects were undetectable after 19 weeks.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18: 439–458.
2. Oliva-Moreno J, Peña-Longobardo LM, Mar J, et al. Determinants of informal care, burden, and risk of burnout in caregivers of stroke survivors: the CONOCES study. Stroke 2018; 49: 140–146.
3. Dewey HM, Thrift AG, Mihalopoulos C, et al. Informal care for stroke survivors: results from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2002; 33: 1028–1033.
4. Skolarus LE, Freedman VA, Feng C, et al. Care received by elderly US stroke survivors may be underestimated. Stroke 2016; 47: 2090–2095.
5. Skolarus LE, Burke JF, Brown DL, et al. Understanding stroke survivorship: expanding the concept of poststroke disability. Stroke 2014; 45: 224–230.
6. Joo H, Dunet DO, Fang J, et al. Cost of informal caregiving associated with stroke among the elderly in the United States. Neurology 2014; 83: 1831–1837.
7. Lambert SD, Bowe SJ, Livingston PM, et al. Impact of informal caregiving on older adults’ physical and mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional, secondary analysis based on the WHO’s study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMJ Open 2017; 7: e017236.
8. Kokorelias KM, Lu FKT, Santos JR, et al. “Caregiving is a full-time job” impacting stroke caregivers’ health and well-being: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Health Soc Care Community 2020; 28: 325–340.
9. Grant JS, Hunt CW, Steadman L. Common caregiver issues and nursing interventions after a stroke. Stroke 2014; 45: e151–e153.
10. Quinn K, Murray C, Malone C. Spousal experiences of coping with and adapting to caregiving for a partner who has a stroke: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36: 185–198.
11. Greenwood N, Mackenzie A, Cloud GC, et al. Informal primary carers of stroke survivors living at home-challenges, satisfactions and coping: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 337–351.
12. Haley WE, Roth DL, Hovater M, et al. Long-term impact of stroke on family caregiver well-being: a population-based case-control study. Neurology 2015; 84: 1323–1329.
13. Pucciarelli G, Vellone E, Savini S, et al. Roles of changing physical function and caregiver burden on quality of life in stroke: a longitudinal dyadic analysis. Stroke 2017; 48: 733–739.
14. Fu B, Mei Y, Lin B, et al. Effects of A benefit-finding intervention in stroke caregivers in communities. Clin Gerontol 2022; 45: 1317–1329.
15. Zhang L, Zhang T, Sun Y. A newly designed intensive caregiver education program reduces cognitive impairment, anxiety, and depression in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Braz J Med Biol Res 2019; 52: e8533.
16. Kalra L, Evans A, Perez I, et al. Training carers of stroke patients: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2004; 328: 1099.
17. Deyhoul N, Vasli P, Rohani C, et al. The effect of family-centered empowerment program on the family caregiver burden and the activities of daily living of Iranian patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32: 1343–1352.
18. Pitthayapong S, Thiangtam W, Powwattana A, et al. A community based program for family caregivers for post stroke survivors in Thailand. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2017; 11: 150–157.
19. Forster A, Dickerson J, Young J, et al. A structured training programme for caregivers of inpatients after stroke (TRACS): a cluster randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 2013; 382: 2069–2076.
20. Bakas T, McCarthy M, Miller ET. Update on the state of the evidence for stroke family caregiver and dyad interventions. Stroke 2017; 48: e122–e125.
21. Bakas T, Clark PC, Kelly-Hayes M, et al. Evidence for stroke family caregiver and dyad interventions: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014; 45: 2836–2852.
22. Bakas T, McCarthy MJ, Israel J, et al. Adapting the telephone assessment and skill-building kit to the telehealth technology preferences of stroke family caregivers. Res Nurs Health 2021; 44: 81–91.
23. Lorca-Cabrera J, Grau C, Martí-Arques R, et al. Effectiveness of health web-based and mobile app-based interventions designed to improve informal caregiver’s well-being and quality of life: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2020; 134: 104003.
24. Ploeg J, Ali MU, Markle-Reid M, et al. Caregiver-focused, web-based interventions: systematic review and meta-analysis (part 2). J Med Internet Res 2018; 20: e11247.
25. Pierce LL, Steiner VL, Khuder SA, et al. The effect of a web-based stroke intervention on carers’ well-being and survivors’ use of healthcare services. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 1676–1684.
26. LeLaurin JH, Lamba AH, Eliazar-Macke ND, et al. Postdischarge intervention for stroke caregivers: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9: e21799.
27. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 64–67.
28. Haun J, Noland-Dodd V, Varnes J, et al. Testing the BRIEF health literacy screening tool. Fed Pract 2009; 26: 24–31.
29. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983; 24: 385–396.
30. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975; 31: 103–115.
31. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385–401.
32. Aycock DM, Hayat MJ, Helvig A, et al. Essential considerations in developing attention control groups in behavioral research. Res Nurs Health 2018; 41: 320–328.
33. Freedland KE. Demanding attention. Psychosom Med 2013; 75: 100–102.
34. Houts PS, Nezu AM, Nezu CM, et al. The prepared family caregiver: a problem-solving approach to family caregiver education. Patient Educ Couns 1996; 27: 63–73.
35. Rivera PA, Elliott TR, Berry JW, et al. Problem-solving training for family caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 931–941.
36. McMillan SC, Small BJ, Weitzner M, et al. Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Cancer 2006; 106: 214–222.
37. Grant JS, Elliott TR, Weaver M, et al. Telephone intervention with family caregivers of stroke survivors after rehabilitation. Stroke 2002; 33: 2060–2065.
38. RESCUE Home - Resources and Education for Stroke Caregivers’ Understanding and Empowerment, https://www.stroke.cindrr.research.va.gov/en/ (accessed July 16, 2021).
39. LeLaurin JH, Sypniewski C, Wing K, et al. Development, usability testing, and promotion of the English- and spanish-language RESCUE stroke caregiver websites. American Journal of Health Education 2022; 53: 174–185.
40. Bendixen RM, Levy CE, Olive ES, et al. Cost effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program to support chronically ill and disabled elders in their homes. Telemed J E Health 2009; 15: 31–38.
41. Shinar D, Gross CR, Bronstein KS, et al. Reliability of the activities of daily living scale and its use in telephone interview. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1988; 8: 157.
42. Della Pietra GL, Savio K, Oddone E, et al. Validity and reliability of the barthel index administered by telephone. Stroke 2011; 42: 2077–2079.
43. Bell ML, Kenward MG, Fairclough DL, et al. Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not. Br Med J 2013; 346: e8668.
44. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice : multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 2011; 45: 1–67.
45. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Computer Software, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021.
46. Naqvi IA, Montiel TC, Bittar Y, et al. Internet access and usage among stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: cross-sectional study. JMIR Formativ Res 2021; 5: e25123.
47. Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, Wetterslev J, et al. When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017; 17: 162.
48. AARP and National Alliance for Caregiving. Caregiving in the United States 2020. Washington, DC: AARP, https://doi.org/10.26419/ppi.00103.001 (May 2020, accessed November 11, 2022). 2020.
49. Veterans Affairs. Community Care. https://www.va.gov/COMMUNITYCARE/programs/veterans/index.asp(accessed November 18, 2022).
50. Bakas T, McCarthy MJ, Miller EL. Systematic review of the evidence for stroke family caregiver and dyad interventions. Stroke 2022; 53: 2093–2102.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: February 27, 2023
Issue published: August 2023
Keywords
PubMed: 36847253
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Article usage*
Total views and downloads: 531
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 2 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 0
There are no citing articles to show.
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
