“Men Cannot Be Raped”: Correlates of Male Rape Myth Acceptance
Abstract
Despite the increased attention surrounding rape and sexual assault, research on male victims remains limited, particularly concerning the adherence to rape myths. Rape myths, which are false beliefs that are widely accepted, contribute to the justification and normalization of sexual violence by offenders and focus on the actions and behavior of victims while minimizing the harm. Addressing the gaps in the research, the present study examines how demographics, personal experiences with rape (i.e., being or knowing a survivor), and belief systems relate to rape myth adherence for male victims. The sample consisted of 1,220 adults in the United States who completed an online survey via Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk). The number of myths endorsed ranged from 0 to 21 with a mean of 4.1 (SD = 4.7). In the final model of the hierarchical regression, results indicate rape myth acceptance was positively associated with individuals who were male, older, and more likely to believe males falsely report rapes to law enforcement at a high rate. Of the gender and sexuality attitudinal scales, individuals who adhered to female rape myths, held negative attitudes toward homosexuals, accepted traditional sexual double standards, and believed in traditional social gender roles were more likely to adhere to male rape myths. Findings demonstrate that rape myths operate similarly for male and female victims. Sexual assault programming and interventions need to address that males can be victims of sexual violence and the myths associated with male victimization in addition to generally challenging the adverse belief systems that serve as the foundation for rape myths generally.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Anderson I., Quinn A. (2009). Gender differences in medical students’ attitudes towards male and female rape victims. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 14, 105-110.
Baber K. M., Tucker C. J. (2006). The social roles questionnaire: A new approach to measuring attitudes toward gender. Sex Roles, 54, 459-467.
Banyard V. L., Ward S., Cohn E. S., Plante E. G., Moorhead C., Walsh W. (2007). Unwanted sexual contact on campus: A comparison of women’s and men’s experiences. Violence & Victims, 22, 52-70.
Basile K. C., Chen J., Black M. C., Saltzman L. E. (2007). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence victimization among U.S. adults, 2001-2003. Violence & Victims, 22, 437-448.
Behrend T. S., Sharek D. J., Meade A. W., Wiebe E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 800-813.
Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289-300.
Benoit K. (2011). Linear regression models with logarithmic transformations. London, England: London School of Economics.
Berinsky A. J., Huber G. A., Lenz G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368.
Berinsky A. J., Margolis M. F., Sances M. W. (2014). Separating the shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 739-753.
Bierie D. M., Davis-Siegel J. C. (2015). Measurement matters: Comparing old and new definitions of rape in federal statistical reporting. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27, 443-459.
Black M. C., Basile K. C., Breiding M. J., Smith S. G., Walters M. L., Merrick M. T., . . . Stevens M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Brownmiller S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Buhrmester M., Kwang T., Gosling S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
Bullock C. M., Beckson M. (2011). Male victims of sexual assault: Phenomenology, psychology, physiology. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 197-205.
Burt M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
Caron S. L., Davis C. M., Halteman W. A., Stickle M. (1993). Predictors of condom-related behaviors among first-year college students. The Journal of Sex Research, 30, 252-259.
Champely S. (2017). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis (R Package Version, 12-1). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr
Chapleau K. M., Oswald D. L., Russell B. L. (2008). Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 600-615.
Chen Y., Ullman S. E. (2010). Women’s reporting of sexual and physical assaults to police in the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 16, 262-279.
Cohn A., Zinzow H. M., Resnick H. S., Kilpatrick D. G. (2013). Correlates of reasons for not reporting rape to police: Results from a national telephone household probability sample of women with forcible or drug-or-alcohol facilitated/incapacitated rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 455-473.
Cook C. L., Lane J. (2017). Blaming the victim: Perceptions about incarcerated sexual assault victim culpability among a sample of jail correctional officers. Victims & Offenders, 12, 347-380.
Crowne D. P., Marlowe D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
Davies M., Gilston J., Rogers P. (2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2807-2823.
Davies M., McCartney S. (2003). Effects of gender and sexuality on judgements of victim blame and rape myth acceptance in a depicted male rape. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 391-398.
Debowska A., Boduszek D., Dhingra K., Kola S., Meller-Prunska A. (2015). The role of psychopathy and exposure to violence in rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2751-2770.
Donnelly D. A., Kenyon S. (1996). “Honey, we don’t do men”: Gender stereotypes and the provision of services to sexually assaulted males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 441-448.
Elliott D. M., Mok D. S., Briere J. (2004). Adult sexual assault: Prevalence, symptomatology, and sex differences in the general population. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 203-211.
Estrich S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2004). Uniform Crime Reporting handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Fisher N. L., Pina A. (2013). An overview of the literature on female-perpetrated adult male sexual victimization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 54-61.
Fox J., Weisberg S. (2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fuchs S. F. (2004). Male sexual assault: Issues of arousal and consent. Cleveland State Law Review, 51, 93-122.
Graham R. (2006). Male rape and the careful construction of the male victim. Social & Legal Studies, 15, 187-208.
Hayes R. M., Lorenz K., Bell K. A. (2013). Victim blaming others: Rape myth acceptance and the just world belief. Feminist Criminology, 8, 202-220.
Herek G. M. (1984). Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A factor-analytic study. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 1-21.
Javaid A. (2017). Forgotten victims: Students’ attitudes towards and responses to male sexual victimisation. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23, 338-350.
Kassing L. R., Beesley D., Frey L. L. (2005). Gender role conflict, homophobia, age, and education as predictors of male rape myth acceptance. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27, 311-328.
Kassing L. R., Prieto L. R. (2003). The rape myth and blame-based beliefs of counselors-in-training toward male victims of rape. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81, 455-461.
Kimerling R., Rellini A., Kelly V., Judson P. L., Learman L. A. (2002). Gender differences in victim and crime characteristics of sexual assaults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 526-532.
Kreuter F., Presser S., Tourangeau R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: The effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847-865.
Larsen M. L., Hilden M. (2016). Male victims of sexual assault; 10 years’ experience from a Danish assault center. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 43, 8-11.
Lonsway K. A. (2010). Trying to move the elephant in the living room: Responding to the challenge of false rape reports. Violence Against Women, 16, 1356-1371.
Lonsway K. A., Fitzgerald L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
Mason W., Suri S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1-23.
McMahon S., Farmer G. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35, 71-81.
Melanson P. K. (1998). Belief in male rape myths: A test of two competing theories (Doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 5620.
Mezey G. C., King M. B. (1989). The effects of sexual assault on men: A survey of 22 victims. Psychological Medicine, 19, 205-209.
Nalavany B. A., Abell N. (2004). An initial validation of a measure of personal and social perceptions of the sexual abuse of males. Research on Social Work Practice, 14, 368-378.
National Research Council. (2014). Estimating the incidence of rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Navarro J. C., Tewksbury R. (2019). National comparisons of rape myth acceptance predictors between nonathletes and athletes from multi-institutional settings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 31(5), 543-559.
Page A. D. (2010). True colors: Police officers and rape myth acceptance. Feminist Criminology, 5, 315-334.
Paolacci G., Chandler J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184-188.
Payne D. L., Lonsway K. A., Fitzgerald L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.
Peterson Z. D., Voller E. K., Polusny M. A., Murdoch M. (2011). Prevalence and consequences of adult sexual assault of men: Review of empirical findings and state of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 1-24.
Piccigallo J. R., Lilley T. G., Miller S. L. (2012). “It’s cool to care about sexual violence”: Men’s experiences with sexual assault prevention. Men and Masculinities, 15, 507-525.
Pino N. W., Meier R. F. (1999). Gender differences in rape reporting. Sex Roles, 40, 979-990.
R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
Rosenstein J. E. (2015). Military sexual assault prevention and male rape myth acceptance. Military Behavioral Health, 3, 207-211.
Rosenstein J. E., Carroll M. H. (2015). Male rape myths, female rape myths, and intent to intervene as a bystander. Violence and Gender, 2, 204-208.
Rumney P. (2007). In defence of gender neutrality within rape. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 6, 481-526.
Sarrel P. M., Masters W. H. (1982). Sexual molestation of men by women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11, 117-131.
Scarce M. (1997). Male on male rape: The hidden toll of stigma and shame. New York, NY: Insight Books.
Shapiro D. N., Chandler J., Mueller P. A. (2013). Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 213-220.
Shechory M., Idisis Y. (2006). Rape myths and social distance toward sex offenders and victims among therapists and students. Sex Roles, 54, 651-658.
Shen A. C., Chiu M. Y., Gao J. (2012). Predictors of dating violence among Chinese adolescents: The role of gender-role beliefs and justification of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1066-1089.
Sleath E., Bull R. (2010). Male rape victim and perpetrator blaming. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 969-988.
Sorenson S. B., Stein J. A., Siegel J. M., Golding J. M., Burnam M. A. (1987). The prevalence of adult sexual assault: The Los Angeles Epidemiologic Catchment Area Project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 126, 1154-1164.
Spohn C., Tellis K. (2012). The criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 169-192.
Stemple L., Meyer I. H. (2014). The sexual victimization of men in America: New data challenge old assumptions. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 19-27.
Strahan R., Gerbasi K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191-193.
Struckman-Johnson C., Struckman-Johnson D. (1992). Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women. Sex Roles, 27, 85-100.
Suarez E., Gadalla T. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010-2035.
Tewksbury R. (2007). Effects of sexual assaults on men: Physical, mental, and sexual consequences. International Journal of Men’s Health, 6, 22-35.
Tjaden P., Thoennes N. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Turchik J. A., Edwards K. M. (2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 211-226.
Walker J., Archer J., Davies M. (2005). Effects of rape on men: A descriptive analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 69-80.
Whatley M. A., Riggio R. E. (1993). Gender differences in attributions of blame for male rape victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 502-511.
Zeileis A., Hothorn T. A. (2002). Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News, 2, 7-10.
Biographies
Scott M. Walfield is an assistant professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at East Carolina University. His primary research interests include crime clearance, victim reporting, rape/sexual assault, and sex offender registration and notification. He has published in various venues, including Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment; Psychology, Public Policy, and Law; and Justice Research and Policy, among others. He was the winner of the 2015 Association of Criminal Justice Sciences (ACJS) Michael C. Braswell/Anderson Publishing Outstanding Student Paper Award.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: December 17, 2018
Issue published: July 2021
Keywords
PubMed: 30556453
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 13871
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 66 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 47
-
Male Victims’ Acknowledgement of Sexual Assault and Their Help-Seeking...
-
Culturally Diverse Students’ Perspectives on Sexual Violence Policies:...
-
Male Victims of Sexual Violence and Factors Associated With Reporting ...
-
Men Too? Victim Advocates’ Perceptions of the Inclusion of Survivors w...
-
Blame and Severity Attributions in Vignette-Based Female-On-Male Rape:...
-
Nonconsensual Sexual Experience Histories of Incarcerated Men: A Mixed...
-
“‘I am a Man. How Could I Possibly Have Been Raped?’ Men Making Sense ...
-
Everyday Sadism as a Predictor of Rape Myth Acceptance and Perception ...
-
Constructing hierarchies of victimhood: Queer male survivors' evaluati...
-
Understanding the Decision to Officially Report Sexual Assaults in Pri...
-
Unjust Desserts! Unravelling the Gender-Specific Dimensions of Female ...
-
Examining the Roles of Prior Victimization, Perpetrator Identity and t...
-
Men’s Self-Reported and Psychophysiological Affective Responses to Sex...
-
Psychosocial Health Factors Among Men Reporting Recent Sexual Assault
-
Perceptions and experiences of sexual violence among Chinese men who h...
-
Male Victims of Sexual Assault: A Review of the Literature
-
The Role of Binge Eating Concerns and Suicidal Thinking for Recent Sex...
-
Sexual Violence in Military Service Members/Veterans Individual and In...
-
Do community females display a propensity towards sexual aggression? A...
-
Male Rape Myths
-
Psychometric properties of the polish updated Illinois rape myth accep...
-
Familial Support and Disclosure: A Two-Sample Study of LGBT Sexual Ass...
-
Judgments About Male Victims of Sexual Assault by Women: A 35-Year Rep...
-
An exploratory qualitative analysis of rape myths in India
-
“I Didn’t Feel I Was A Victim”: A Phenomenological Analysis of the Exp...
-
Additive interactions between sex and forced sexual intercourse victim...
-
The Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale—Subtle Version: Using an Adapt...
-
No Less of a Man: Inducing Empathy to Reduce Male Rape Myth Acceptance
-
Purchasers and Perpetrators: A Theoretical Synthesis of The Risk Facto...
-
What guy wouldn't want it? Male victimization experiences with female‐...
-
Ownership, Enjoyment, Arousal Troubles, and Robust Education: Pleasure...
-
Understanding Case Outcomes for Male Victims of Forcible Sexual Assaul...
-
Sexual Victimization Among Men: A Qualitative Analysis of the Twitter ...
-
The Role of Gender Stereotypes, Sexual Myths, and Professional Experie...
-
Authentic Empathy and the Role of Victim Service Providers in (De)stig...
-
Are Feminists Empowered Activists or Entitled Whiners? A Thematic Anal...
-
Men’s Rights Activism and the Manosphere
-
Additive Interactions between Sex and Forced Sexual Intercourse Victim...
-
Ambiguous Sex in Critical Receptions to Ari Aster’s Midsommar
-
Kadın Cinsel İstismarcılar
-
Typologies of Sexual Double Standard Adherence in Spanish Population
-
“Can You Hear Me? I’m Right Here”: Voluntary Sector’s Treatment of Rap...
-
Attitudes about victims of workplace sexual harassment based on sex
-
No man’s land: the denial of victimisation in male statutory rape case...
-
San fermines #la manada case: An exploratory analysis of social suppor...
-
<p>Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Among Refugees and Internally Disp...
-
Does Sex of the Victim Matter? A Comparison of Rape Scripts Involving ...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
