Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 30, 2019

Cyber Dating Abuse Victimization: Links With Psychosocial Functioning

Abstract

It is well established that technology can be used to enact intimate partner violence (IPV). However, less is known about how cyber dating abuse (CDA) is associated with psychosocial functioning, especially when accounting for other forms of frequently co-occurring IPV victimization. The current study sought to determine the unique associations of CDA victimization when controlling for multiple forms of in-person IPV victimization. Two hundred seventy-eight men and women between 17 and 25 years of age (M = 20.5, SD = 1.9) who were currently in an intimate relationship for at least 3 months participated in this study. Participants completed questionnaires about their IPV and CDA victimization, as well as a range of indices of psychosocial well-being. Experiencing CDA victimization was related to increased alcohol use for both men and women, and increased fear of partner for women, even after controlling for in-person IPV. For depression, perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, quality of life, social support, and post-traumatic stress, CDA victimization did not predict levels above in-person IPV victimization. Although these results suggest some unique associations between CDA victimization and aspects of psychosocial well-being that require further attention, they also highlight that CDA often occurs within a broader pattern of abuse that includes in-person IPV. These results suggest that the need for prevention and treatment for relationships that involve in-person abuse is still most salient, and that a narrow focus on CDA may limit the utility of prevention and treatment efforts. Further work is needed to integrate research on in-person and CDA victimization, rather than to create a new field of research and practice based solely on CDA.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Amanor-Boadu Y., Stith S. M., Miller M. S., Cook J., Allen L. (2011). Impact of dating violence on male and female college students. Partner Abuse, 2, 323-343.
Arnett J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
Barter C., Stanley N., Wood M., Lanau A., Aghtaie N., Overlin C. (2017). Young people’s online and face-to-face experiences of interpersonal violence and abuse and their subjective impact across five European countries. Psychology of Violence, 7, 375-384.
Bates S. (2016). Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology, 12, 22-42.
Bennett D. C., Guran E. L., Ramos M. C., Margolin G. (2011). College students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence and Victims, 26, 410-429.
Blevins C. A., Weathers F. W., Davis M. T., Witte T. K., Domino J. L. (2015). The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28, 489-498.
Borrajo E., Gámez-Guadix M., Pereda N., Calvete E. (2015). The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 358-365.
Brown C., Hegarty K. (2018). Digital dating abuse measures: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 44-59.
Capaldi D. M., Knoble N. B., Shortt J. W., Kim H. K. (2012). A systematic review of risk factors for intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 3, 231-267.
Carlson R. G., Fripp J., Cook C., Kelchner V. (2015). Examining intimate partner violence, stress, and technology use among young adults. The Professional Counselor, 5, 365-378.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Intimate partner violence: Definitions. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/definitions.html
Chaulk K., Jones T. (2011). Online obsessive relational intrusion: Further concerns about Facebook. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 245-254.
Cohen S., Kamarck T., Mermelstein R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396.
Crosswhite J. M., Rice D., Asay S. M. (2014). Texting among United States young adults: An exploratory study on texting and its use within families. The Social Science Journal, 51, 70-78.
Drebing H., Bailer J., Anders A., Wagner H., Gallas C. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: Prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 61-66.
Fox K. A., Nobles M. R., Fisher B. S. (2011). Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 74-84.
Funk J. L., Rogge R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572-583.
Harrison M. A., Gilmore A. L. (2012). U txt WHEN? College students’ social contexts of text messaging. The Social Science Journal, 49, 513-518.
Henry N., Powell A. (2016). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19, 195-208.
Howard D. E., Debnam K. J., Strausser A. (2017). “I’m a stalker and proud of it”: Adolescent girls’ perceptions of the mixed utilities associated with Internet and social networking use in their dating relationships. Youth & Society, 51, 773-792.
Jenaro C., Flores N., Frías C. P. (2018). Systematic review of empirical studies on cyberbullying in adults: What we know and what we should investigate. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 38, 113-122.
Jones R. (2017, October 31). How technology is ruining modern romance. London Evening Standard. Retrieved from https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/how-technology-is-ruining-modern-romance-a3672521.html
Kar H., O’Leary K. D. (2010). Gender symmetry or asymmetry in intimate partner victimization? Not an either/or answer. Partner Abuse, 1, 152-166.
Katerndahl D., Burge S., Ferrer R., Becho J., Wood R. (2013). Differences in social network structure and support among women in violent relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 1948-1964.
Kaura S. A., Lohman B. J. (2007). Dating violence victimization, relationship satisfaction, mental health problems, and acceptability of violence: A comparison of men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 367-381.
Koss M. P., Oros C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455-457.
Leung T. W., Leung W. C., Ng E. H. Y., Ho P. C. (2005). Quality of life of victims of intimate partner violence. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 90, 258-262.
Lucero J. L., Weisz A. N., Smith-Darden J., Lucero S. M. (2014). Exploring gender differences: Socially interactive technology use/abuse among dating teens. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 29, 478-491.
Marganski A., Melander L. (2015). Intimate partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 1071-1095.
Mishna F., Regehr C., Lacombe-Duncan A., Daciuk J., Fearing G., Van Wert M. (2018). Social media, cyber-aggression and student mental health on a university campus. Journal of Mental Health, 27, 222-229.
O’Leary K. D., Foran H., Cohen S. (2013). Validation of Fear of Partner Scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39, 502-514.
Olweus D. (2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 520-538.
Próspero M. (2009). Sex-symmetric effects of coercive behaviors on mental health? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 128-146.
Radloff L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from https://www.R-project.org/
Reed L. A., Tolman R. M., Ward M. (2017). Gender matters: Experiences and consequences of digital dating abuse victimization in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 59, 79-89.
Reifman A., Keyton K. (2010). Winsorize. In Salkind N. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 1637-1638). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Rinaldi L. (2015, September 5). Is technology ruining your relationship? Reader’s Digest. Retrieved from http://www.readersdigest.ca/health/relationships/is-technology-ruining-your-relationship/view-all/
Runions K., Shapka J. D., Dooley J., Modecki K. (2013). Cyber-aggression and victimization and social information processing: Integrating the medium and the message. Psychology of Violence, 3, 9-26.
Saunders J. B., Aasland O. G., Babor T. F., De La Fuente J. R., Grant M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791-804.
Schenk A. M., Fremouw W. J. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. Journal of School Violence, 11, 21-37.
Selkie E. M., Kota R., Chan Y., Moreno M. (2015). Cyberbullying, depression, and problem alcohol use in female college students: A multisite study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 79-84.
Short E., Linford S., Wheatcroft J. M., Maple C. (2014). The impact of cyberstalking: The lived experience—A thematic analysis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 199, 133-137.
Straus M. A., Hamby S. L., Boney-McCoy S., Sugarman D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
Strauss C. V., Haynes E. E., Cornelius T. L., Shorey R. C. (2016). Stalking victimization and substance use in college dating relationships: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 2878-2896.
Subrahmanyan K., Reich S. M., Waechter N., Espinoza G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420-433.
Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Taylor S., Xia Y. (2018). Cyber partner abuse: A systematic review. Violence and Victims, 33, 983-1007.
Temple J. R., Choi H. J., Brem M., Wolford-Clevenger C., Stuart G., Elmquist J. (2016). The temporal association between traditional and cyber dating abuse among adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 340-349.
Testa M., VanZile-Tamsen C., Livingston J. A., Koss M. P. (2004). Assessing women’s experiences of sexual aggression using the sexual experiences survey: Evidence for validity and implications for research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 256-265.
Tsui V., Cheung M., Leung P. (2010). Help-seeking among male victims of partner abuse: Men’s hard times. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 769-780.
Van Ouytsel J., Ponnet K., Walrave M., Temple J. R. (2016). Adolescent cyber dating abuse victimization and its association with substance use, and sexual behaviors. Public Health, 135, 147-151.
Van Ouytsel J., Torres E., Choi H. J., Ponnet K., Walrave M., Temple J. R. (2017). The associations between substance use, sexual behaviors, bullying, deviant behaviors, health, and cyber dating abuse perpetration. The Journal of School Nursing, 33, 116-122.
Vaux A., Phillips J., Holly L., Thomson B., Williams D., Stewart D. (1986). The Social Support Appraisals (SS-A) Scale: Studies of reliability and validity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 195-217.
Watkins L. E., Maldonado R. C., DiLillo D. (2016). The Cyber Aggression in Relationships Scale: A new multidimensional measure of technology-based intimate partner aggression. Assessment, 25, 608-626.
Weathers F. W., Litz B. T., Keane T. M., Palmieri P. A., Marx B. P., Schnurr P. P. (2013). The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Retrieved from http://www.ptsd.va.gov
Whitaker M. P. (2013). Centrality of control-seeking in men’s intimate partner violence perpetration. Prevention Science, 14, 513-523.
White H. R., McMorris B. J., Catalano R. F., Fleming C. B., Haggerty K. P., Abbott R. D. (2006). Increases in alcohol and marijuana use during the transition out of high school into emerging adulthood: The effects of leaving home, going to college, and high school protective factors. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 67, 810-822.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551-558.
Wolford-Clevenger C., Zapor H., Brasfield H., Febres J., Elmquist J., Stuart G. L. (2016). An examination of the partner cyber abuse questionnaire in a college student sample. Psychology of Violence, 6, 156-162.
Woodlock D. (2016). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23, 584-602.
Zweig J. M., Lachman P., Yahner J., Dank M. (2014). Correlates of cyber dating abuse among teens. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1306-1321.

Biographies

Kari N. Duerksen, MSc, is a doctoral student in the Department of Psychology at the University of Victoria. Her research focuses on problematic patterns of aggression and control in close relationships, including how technology intersects with these patterns. She is interested in the various roles that close relationships can play in mental health and well-being.
Erica M. Woodin is an associate professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Victoria. Her research focuses on issues of behavioral dysregulation (e.g., aggression, substance use) in the context of close relationships, including the impact of these behaviors on family functioning as well as the effectiveness of prevention and treatment programs to improve family well-being.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 30, 2019
Issue published: October 2021

Keywords

  1. technology
  2. intimate partner violence
  3. psychosocial functioning
  4. dating abuse

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2019.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 31466491

Authors

Affiliations

Kari N. Duerksen
Erica M. Woodin
University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Notes

Kari N. Duerksen, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 2Y2. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1443

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 26 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. Longitudinal Effects of Electronic Dating Violence on Depressive Sympt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  2. The Cyber Intimate Partner Violence: Prevalence, Context, and Relation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Barriers to domestic violence education in Northern Ireland: Pupils' v...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Problem Drinking is Associated with Intimate Partner Cyber Abuse Perpe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Cyber Dating Abuse Victimization and Experiential Avoidance Among Chin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  6. Validity of a three-item dating abuse victimization screening tool in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Patterns, Risk Factors, and Mental Health Correlates of Cyber Intimate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Examining the perceived harms of digital dating abuse:a university sam...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Epidemiology of Cyber Dating Abuse Victimization in Adolescence and It...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Same Personality, New Ways to Abuse: How Dark Tetrad Personalities Are...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  11. Does Cyber Dating Abuse Victimization Increase Depressive Symptoms or ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  12. The Psychometric Properties of the Measure of Adolescent Relationship ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  13. College Students’ Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence: The Effect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  14. Relación entre el abuso cara a cara y digital en el noviazgo con la ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. A Systematic Review of Cyberstalking Victimization and Offending Behav...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. The Role of Individual Differences in Cyber Dating Abuse Perpetration
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text