Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 22, 2013

Regulatory Authority Approaches to Deploying Quality Improvement Standards to Community Pharmacies: Insights From the SafetyNET-RX Program

Abstract

Background:

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) programs provide an effective means to improve the safety and quality of community pharmacy practice. The role of formal support processes in ensuring the success of these CQI programs is explored in this research using the SafetyNET-Rx project.

Objective:

The primary objectives of this research were to determine how knowledge of, and confidence in, mandated CQI standards differs among pharmacies with access to formal support mechanisms and those without and the challenges faced by both.

Methods:

A survey questionnaire was mailed to 179 community pharmacies in Nova Scotia, Canada, in spring 2011. Quantitative results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data. Qualitative open-ended responses were analyzed using content analysis.

Results:

Performing the Mann-Whitney U test indicated that a number of differences exist between the 2 groups with respect to: (1) staff knowledge of reporting quality-related events (QREs) to an anonymous database; (2) conducting annual pharmacy safety self-assessments; (3) confidence in meeting these 2 elements; and (4) documenting changes to address QREs. A number of challenges were identified by respondents through the open-ended questions.

Conclusions:

This research highlights the value of the active provision of formal support when developing standards related to quality improvement.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Boyle TA, Ho C, MacKinnon NJ, et al. Safety implications of standardized continuous quality improvement programs in community pharmacy. J Pharm Pract. 2013;26(3):228–236. doi:10.1177/0897190012452312
2. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. Medication error reporting: CQI programs offer avenue to vital follow-up; 2012. http://www.nabp.net/news/medication-error-reporting-cqi-programs-offer-avenue-to-vital-follow-up/. Accessed September 18, 2012.
3. Nau DP. Measuring pharmacy quality. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2009;49(2):154–163.
4. Nau DP, Brushwood DB. State pharmacy regulators’ opinions on regulating pharmaceutical care outcomes. Ann Pharmacother. 1998;32(6):642–647.
5. Boyle TA, MacKinnon N, Mahaffey T, et al. Challenges of standardized continuous quality improvement programs in community pharmacies: the case of SafetyNET-Rx. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012;8(6):499–508.
6. Jakubik M. Experiencing collaborative knowledge creation processes. Learn Organ. 2008;15(1):5–25.
7. Tsoukas H. A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ Sci. 2009;20(6):941–957.
8. Holsti OR. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1969.
9. Brashier LW, Sower VE, Motawni J, et al. Implementation of TQM/CQI in the health-care industry: a comprehensive model. Benchmark Int J. 1996;3(2):31–50.
10. Kaplan HC, Brady PW, Dritz MC, et al. The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of literature. Milbank Q. 2010;88(4):500–559.
11. Huq Z, Martin TN. Workforce cultural factors in TQM/CQI implementation in hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev. 2000;25(3):80–93.
12. Ahire SL, Rana DS. Selection of TQM pilot projects using an MCDM approach. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 1995;12(1):61–81.
13. Kuipers P, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, et al. Collaborative review of pilot projects to inform policy: a methodological remedy for pilotitis? Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2008;5:17. doi:10.1186/1743-8462-5-17.
14. Steinecke R. The end of self-regulation of the legal profession in England. Grey areas; 2008:126. http://www.sml-law.com/publications/newsletters-detail.asp?DocID=5824. Accessed September 17, 2012.
15. Newell D, Dale BG. The introduction and development of quality improvement process: a study. Int J Prod Res. 1991;29(9):1747–1760.
16. Blumenthal D, Kilo C. A report card on continuous quality improvement. Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):625–648.
17. Weiner BJ, Shortell SM, Alexander JA. Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: the effects of top management, board, and physician leadership. Health Serv Res. 1997;32(4):491–510.
18. Mahajan RP. Critical incident reporting and learning. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(1):69–75.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 22, 2013
Issue published: April 2014

Keyword

  1. medication safety

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2013.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 24150487

Authors

Affiliations

Todd A. Boyle, PhD
Schwartz School of Business, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada
Andrea C. Bishop, PhD
SafetyNET-Rx, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada
Chris Hillier, BBA
Schwartz School of Business, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada
Thomas Mahaffey, PhD
Schwartz School of Business, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada
Neil J. MacKinnon, PhD
Public Health Policy & Management, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Bev Zwicker, BSc(Pharm)
Nova Scotia College of Pharmacists, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Notes

Todd A. Boyle, St. Francis Xavier University, PO Box 5000, Antigonish, NS Nova Scotia B2G2W5, Canada. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 121

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

  1. Innovations in Dispensing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text