Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Other
First published online April 3, 2009

“Boys Will Be Boys” and Other Gendered Accounts: An Exploration of Victims' Excuses and Justifications for Unwanted Sexual Contact and Coercion

Abstract

An examination of 944 victim narratives from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) finds that one in five women who reveal an incident of sexual victimization to the NCVS excuse or justify their situations, largely by drawing on social vocabularies that suggest male sexual aggression is natural, normal within dating relationships, or the victim's fault. The study's findings substantiate the influence that rape myths and gender stereotypes have on victims' perceptions of their own unwanted sexual situations and demonstrate the ways in which cultural language delimits victims' recognition of sexual victimization as crime and inhibits reporting to the police.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

1.
1. The term victim is used to refer to anyone who acknowledges a situation of victimization, regardless of whether they consider the incident to be a crime, identify as a crime victim, or report the incident to the police.
2.
2. Sykes and Matza (1957) use the term techniques of neutralization to refer to the various rationalizations employed by individuals engaged in deviant behavior to deflect blame and avoid negative consequences. Scott and Lyman (1968) borrow considerably from this earlier work.
3.
3. Rape convictions up until recently required evidence of victims' resistance based on the idea that women did not know what they wanted, did not say what they meant, and were intentionally dishonest. It was not until the 1980s that rape reform legislation modified resistance requirements (Estrich, 1987).
4.
4. The NCVS survey instrument was revised in 1992, due in part to criticisms that questions regarding sexual victimization and intimate partner violence were too limited (Bachman & Saltzman, 1995).
5.
5. The distinction between classifying and nonclassifying cases is primarily determined by whether a respondent acknowledges within a series of structured questions that she has experienced an attack, attempted attack, or threat of attack. When respondents answer “no” to this sequence of questions, incidents are coded as unwanted sexual contacts, a category that falls outside the range of classifying crimes and is thus excluded from reported sexual assault rates published in BJS statistical reports. For more detail on the process and descriptions of nonclassifying sexual incidents, see Weiss (2004, 2006).

References

Amir, M. (1971). Patterns of forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L.E. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey (BJS Special Report, NCJ 154348). Available from the Bureau of Justice Statistics Clearinghouse.
Basile, K.C. (1999). Rape by acquiescence: The ways in which women "give in" to unwanted sex with their husbands. Violence Against Women, 5, 1036-1058.
Baumer, E.P., Felson, R.B., & Messner, S.F. (2003). Changes in police notification for rape, 1973-2000 . Criminology, 41, 841-873.
Bechhofer, L., & Parrot, A. (1991). What is acquaintance rape? In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 9-25). New York: John Wiley.
Bell, S.T., Kuriloff, P.J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification and students' social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1719-1734.
Bennett-Herbert, T., Silver, R.C., & Ellard, J.H. (1991). Coping with an abusive relationship: How and why do women stay? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 311-325.
Benson, M.L. (1985). Denying the guilty mind: Accounting for involvement in a white-collar crime. Criminology, 23, 583-607.
Bergen, R.K. (1998). The reality of wife rape: Women's experiences of sexual violence in marriage. In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 237-250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bohner, G., Reinhard, M., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257-268.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Women, men and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Burt, M.R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
Burt, M.R. (1991). Rape myths and acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 251-269). New York: John Wiley.
Carmody, D.C., & Washington, L.M. (2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 424-436.
Clay-Warner, J., & Burt, C.H. (2005). Rape reporting after reforms: Have times really changed? Violence Against Women, 11, 150-176.
Connell, R.W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cook, S.L. (1995). Acceptance and expectation of sexual aggression in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 181-194.
Cowan, G. (2000). Women's hostility toward women and rape and sexual harassment myths. Violence Against Women, 6, 238-246.
Currie, D.H. (1998). Violent men or violent women? Whose definition counts? In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 97-110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eigenberg, H. (2003). Victim blaming. In L. J. Moriarty (Ed.), Controversies in victimology (pp. 15-24). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ferraro, K.J., & Johnson, J.M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Problems, 30, 325-339.
Finkelhor, D., & Yllö, K. (1985). License to rape: Sexual abuse of wives. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
Fischer, G.J. (1986). College student attitudes toward forcible date rape: Cognitive predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 457-467.
Fisher, B.S., Cullen, F.T., & Turner, M.G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Frazier, P.A., & Seales, L.M. (1997). Acquaintance rape is real rape. In M. D. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women (pp. 54-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Friedland, S.I. (1991). Date rape and the culture of acceptance. Florida Law Review, 43, 488-527.
Frohmann, L. (1991). Discrediting victims' allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38, 213-226.
Gavey, N. (1999). "I wasn't raped, but . . .": Revisiting definitional problems in sexual victimization. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 57-81). New York: New York University Press.
Goodchilds, J.D., Zellman, G.L., Johnson, P.B., & Giarrusso, R. (1988). Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions . In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault II (pp. 245-269). New York: Garland.
Jackson, S. (1995). The social context of rape: Sexual scripts and motivation. In P. Searles & R. J. Berger (Eds.), Rape and society (pp. 16-27). San Francisco: Westview.
Kahn, A.S., Mathie, V.A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53-66.
Kanin, E.J. (1984). Date rape: Unofficial criminals and victims. Victimology, 9, 95-108.
Konradi, A. (1996). Understanding rape survivors' preparations for court. Violence Against Women, 2, 25-62.
Koss, M.P., & Cook, S.L. (1993). Date and acquaintance rape are significant problems for women. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 104-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Koss, M.P., Dinero, T.E., Seibel, C.A., & Cox, S.L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victims' experiences? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1-24.
Koss, M.P., Gidycz, C.A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
LaFree, G.D. (1989). Rape and criminal justice: The social construction of sexual assault. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Layman, M.J., Gidycz, C.A., & Lynn, S.J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 124-131.
Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1994). Rape myths in review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711.
Mahoney, P., & Williams, L.M. (1998). Sexual assault in marriage: Prevalence, consequences, and treatment of wife rape. In J. L. Jasinski & L. M. Williams (Eds.), Partner violence (pp. 113-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Malamuth, N.M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138-157.
Malamuth, N.M., & Check, J.V.P. (1985). The effects of aggressive pornography on beliefs in rape myths: Individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 299-320.
Marshall, A. (2003). Injustice frames, legality, and the everyday construction of sexual harassment. Law and Social Inquiry, 28, 659-689.
Martin, P.Y., & Hummer, R.A. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender & Society, 3, 457-473.
Martin, P.Y., & Powell, R.M. (1994). Accounting for the "second assault": Legal organizations' framing of rape victims. Law and Social Inquiry, 19, 853-890.
Miller, B., & Marshall, J. (1987). Coercive sex on the university campus. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 38-47.
Mills, R.B., & Malley-Morrison, K. (1998). Emotional commitment, normative acceptability and attributions for abusive partner behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 682-700.
Muehlenhard, C.L., & Hollabaugh, L.C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872-879.
Muehlenhard, C.L., & Linton, M.A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.
Payne, D.L., Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.
Ptacek, J. (1998). Why do men batter their wives? In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 181-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pugh, M.D. (1983). Contributory fault and rape convictions: Loglinear models for blaming the victim. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 233-242.
Quinn, B.A. (2000). The paradox of complaining: Law, humor, and harassment in the everyday work world. Law and Social Inquiry, 25, 1151-1185.
Sanday, P.R. (1990). Fraternity gang rape. New York : New York University Press.
Schultz, L.G., & DeSavage, J. (1975). Rape and rape attitudes on a college campus. In L. G. Schultz (Ed.), Rape victimology (pp. 77-90). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Schwartz, M.D., & DeKeseredy, W.S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
Scott, M.B., & Lyman, S.M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.
Scully, D. (1990). Understanding sexual violence. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists' vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31, 530-544.
Shotland, R.L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220-232.
Spohn, C., & Spears, J. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 649-679.
Sykes, G.M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency . American Sociological Review, 22, 664-670.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2000). National Crime Victimization Survey interviewing manual for field representatives. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2004). National Crime Victimization Survey [Computer file]. Conducted by U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [Producer and Distributor]. Retrieved February 15, 2008, from www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/ncvs104.pdf.andwww.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/ncvs204.pdf
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Introduction. In National Crime Victimization Survey, 1992-2000 (pp. 1-30) [Computer file]. Conducted by U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [Producer and Distributor].
Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape: The Ms. report on recognizing, fighting and surviving date and acquaintance rape. New York: Ms. Foundation/Harper & Row.
Weis, K., & Borges, S.S. (1973). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 8, 71-115.
Weiss, K.G. (2004, March). Expanding the empirical scope of sexual victimization: An analysis of nonclassifying incidents utilizing National Crime Victimization Survey narratives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, New York.
Weiss, K.G. (2006). (Re)defining sexual victimization: An analysis of victims' excuses and justifications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University, New York.
Williams, L. S. (1984). The classic rape: When do victims report? Social Problems, 31, 459-467. Yescavage, K. (1999). Teaching women a lesson: Sexually aggressive and sexually nonaggressive men's perceptions of acquaintance and date rape. Violence Against Women, 5, 796-812.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 3, 2009
Issue published: July 2009

Keywords

  1. excuses
  2. gender stereotypes
  3. justifications
  4. rape myths
  5. sexual victimization

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 19346446

Authors

Affiliations

Karen G. Weiss
West Virginia University

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Violence Against Women.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 3181

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 114 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 100

  1. Acceptance and rejection of “morally challenging” behaviour in online ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. “Wherever There's Men, it can Happen”: Constructions of Violence Again...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  3. Gatekeeping Rape Culture: Kenyan News Coverage of Sexual Abuse and Fem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. “‘I am a Man. How Could I Possibly Have Been Raped?’ Men Making Sense ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  5. Exploring the Experiences of Sexual Violence/Abuse Survivors Attending...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Neutralizations, Altercasting, and Online Romance Fraud Victimizations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Experiences of Online Sexual Violence: Interviews With Swedish Teenage...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. ‘I’m Not Victim-Blaming, But . . .’: Young People’s Discourses in Unde...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Student-Athlete Male-Perpetrated Sexual Assault Against Men: Racial Di...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. The Impact of Sexual Harassment on Job Satisfaction in Newsrooms
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. It Takes Two to Tango: Links Between Traditional Beliefs About both Me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. ‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’: Exploring Discourses of Me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. “Jocks Gone Wild”: Masculinity, Sexual Bullying, and the Legal Normali...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Reporting on Rape Culture in Sub-Saharan Africa During the #MeToo Era
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Perceptions of Sexual Assault at Music Festivals
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Kissing, Grabbing and Grinding: Young Australians’ Personal and Social...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. ‘They talked completely about straight couples only’: schooling, sexua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Evidence That Nine Autistic Women Out of Ten Have Been Victims of Sexu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. “A Playing Field Where Patriarchy Plays”: Addressing Sexism in South A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. ‘They’re you know, their audience’: How women are (ab)used to cement t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Gender-based violence against women users of public transport in Salti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Investigating Rape Culture in News Coverage of the Anita Hill and Chri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  23. Facing dominant master narratives on gender and sexuality: Identity re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Bars as a Drinking Context for Sexual Aggression
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. “When a Girl Says No, You Should Be Persistent Until She Says Yes”: Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  26. Improving the Quality of Survey Data on College Campus Woman Abuse: Th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  27. Valorizing Trump’s Masculine Self: Constructing Political Allegiance d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Is it Actually Violence? Framing Technolog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Reassessing balance: News coverage of Donald Trump’s Access Hollywood ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Trans Women and Public Restrooms: The Legal Discourse and Its Violence
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. ‘Locker room talk’: male bonding and sexual degradation in drinking st...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Service-Women’s Responses to Sexual Harassment: The Importance of Iden...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  33. No man’s land: the denial of victimisation in male statutory rape case...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. The freshman swimmer and the intoxicated woman
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Barriers in seeking support: Perspectives of service providers who are...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Sexual Violence Prevention with Young Adult Males
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Which Tactics of Sexual Violence Predict Leaving the Relationship? The...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. A metasynthesis of qualitative studies on girls' and women's labeling ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Presidential framing in the Christine Blasey Ford and Anita Hill cases
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Bars as a Drinking Context for Sexual Aggression
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. ¿Por qué se Cometen Agresiones Sexuales en Grupo? Una Revisión de las ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. S’agit-il d’une situation de violence sexuelle ?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Critical Masculinity Studies and Research on Violence Against Women: A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  44. “As I Was Walking Down the Street, Four Strange Guys Came and Took Me ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  45. A critical realist exploration of the vulnerability of staff to sexual...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Mitos sobre la Agresión Sexual: Validación de una Escala en Universita...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Nightlife Patrons’ Personal and Descriptive Norms Regarding Sexual Beh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. ‘If a girl’s photo gets sent around, that’s a way bigger deal than if ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Protecting the Ladies: Benevolent Sexism, Heteronormativity, and Parti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Myths, masterplots and sexual harassment in Egypt
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. “She didn’t want to…and I’d obviously insist”: Canadian University Men...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Traditional Sex and Gender Stereotypes in the Relationships of Non-Dis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Non-consensual condom removal, reported by patients at a sexual health...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. “Fights Happen . . . It’s Just What Drunks Do”: Alcohol and the Situat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Exploring Definitions and Prevalence of Verbal Sexual Coercion and Its...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. The construction of allegedly abused children’s narratives in Scottish...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Comparing Help-Seeking Behavior of Male and Female Survivors of Sexual...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  58. Shameful “Victims” and Angry “Survivors”: Emotion, Mental Health, and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Rape Myths in the Criminal Justice System
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. False Accusations, Moral Panics, and the Manufacture of Victimhood
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. When Women Do Not Want It: Young Female Bargoers’ Experiences With and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  62. Speaking of Stigma and the Silence of Shame...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. “He Didn’t Necessarily Force Himself Upon Me, But . . . ”: Women’s Liv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  64. ‘Staff can't be the ones that play judge and jury’: Young adults’ sugg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Silencing survivors: how news coverage neglects the women accusing Don...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. “It Happens to Girls All the Time”: Examining Sexual Assault Survivors...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Scripting Sexual Consent: Internalized Traditional Sexual Scripts and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. The Neutralization and Denial of Sexual Violence in College Party Subc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Bystander Intervention Among College Men...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  70. Penetrating spaces: a social semiotic, multimodal analysis of performa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Reporting rape: Language, neoliberalism, and the media
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. “I thought I’d be safe there”: Pre-empting blame in the talk of women ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Rape Myths, Rape Scripts, and Common Rape Experiences of College Women...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  74. “Police Wouldn’t Give You No Help”...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  75. Beyond Difference: Gender as a Quality of Social Settings
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Through the Looking Glass...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  77. Resolving Negative Affect and Restoring Meaning...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. There Are No “Innocent Victims”...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  79. “The Penal Couple”: An Examination of the Relationship Between Victimi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Police Sexual Misconduct: Arrested Officers and Their Victims
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Informal and Formal Help-Seeking Decisions of Stalking Victims in the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Navigating Ambivalence: How Heterosexual Young Adults Make Sense of De...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Overcoming Stereotypes Through the Other Women’s Communicative Daily L...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Young women's risk of sexual aggression in bars: The roles of intoxica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Thinking Differently about ‘False Allegations’ in Cases of Rape: The S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Bystander’s Willingness to Report Theft, Physical Assault, and Sexual ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  87. Rape Myth Attitudes in Rural Kenya...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  88. Victim Blaming Others: Rape Myth Acceptance and the Just World Belief
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Addressing Sexual Assault within Social Systems: System Justification ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Exploring Rape Myths, Gendered Norms, Group Processing, and the Social...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  91. A Profile of Double Victims: Sexual Coercion by a Dating Partner and a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. The Continuum of Sexual Violence...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. “You Just Don’t Report That Kind of Stuff”: Investigating Teens’ Ambiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Sexuality Through a Gendered Lens
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Gender Differences in Cognitive and Affective Responses to Sexual Coer...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  96. Neutralizing sexual victimization: A typology of victims’ non-reportin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Advancing the Study of Violence Against Women Using Mixed Methods: Int...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  98. Gender Differences in Acknowledgment of Stalking Victimization: Result...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. The stalking victim's decision to contact the police: A test of Gottfr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Roofies, Mickies and Cautionary Tales: Examining the Persistence of th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub