Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online July 9, 2016

Gender-Blind Sexism and Rape Myth Acceptance

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore whether gender-blind sexism, as an extension of Bonilla-Silva’s racialized social system theory, is an appropriate theoretical framework for understanding the creation and continued prevalence of rape myth acceptance. Specifically, we hypothesize that individuals who hold attitudes consistent with the frames of gender-blind sexism are more likely to accept common rape myths. Data for this article come from an online survey administered to the entire undergraduate student body at a large Midwestern institution (N = 1,401). Regression analysis showed strong support for the effects of gender-blind sexism on rape myth acceptance.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

About Know Your IX. (2013). Available from http://www.knowyourix.org
Adams A., Abarbanel G. (1988). Sexual assault on campus: What colleges can do? Santa Monica, CA: Rape Treatment Center at Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center.
Ahrens C., Campbell R., Ternier-Thames K., Wasco S., Sefl T. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of rape survivors’ first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 38-49.
Anderson J. (2007). Rape myths. Research & Advocacy Digest, 9, 1-9.
Anderson N. (2014, May 1). 55 colleges under Title IX inquiry for their handling of sexual violence claims [Supplemental material]. Washington Post. Available from http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Aosved A. C., Long P. J. (2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55, 481-492.
Bachman R., Paternoster R., Ward S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law & Society Review, 26, 343-372.
Basow S., Minieri A. (2011). “You owe me”: Effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 479-497.
Baugher S., Elhai J., Monroe J., Gray M. (2010). Rape myth acceptance, sexual trauma history, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2036-2053.
Benokraitis N. V., Feagin J. R. (1986). Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bobbitt-Zeher D. (2007). The gender income gap and the role of education. Sociology of Education, 80, 1-22.
Bonilla-Silva E. (1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62, 465-480.
Bonilla-Silva E. (2001). White supremacy and racism in the post-civil rights era. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Bonilla-Silva E. (2003). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bonilla-Silva E. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Buddie A. M., Miller A. G. (2001). Beyond rape myths: A more complex view of perceptions of rape victims. Sex Roles, 45, 139-160.
Burt M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
Campbell B., Schellenberg E. G., Senn C. Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 89-102.
Carmody D. C., Washington L. M. (2001). Racial differences in rape myth acceptance among college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 424-436.
Chapleau K. M., Oswald D. L., Russell B. L. (2008). Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 600-615.
Chiroro P., Bohner G., Tendayi Viki G., Jarvis C. I. (2004). Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity: Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 427-442.
Colander D., Holmes J. (2007). Gender and graduate economics education in the U.S. Feminist Economics, 13, 93-116.
Connell R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.
Cortina J. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
Davies M., McCartney S. (2003). Effects of gender and sexuality on judgments of victim blame and rape myth acceptance in a depicted male rape. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 391-398.
Devdas N. R., Rubin L. J. (2007). Rape myth acceptance among first- and second-generation South Asian American women. Sex Roles, 56, 701-705.
Dixon J., Levine M. (Eds.). (2012). Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards K. M., Turchik J. A., Dardis C. M., Reynolds N., Gidycz C. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761-773.
Eyssel F., Bohner G. (2011). Schema effects of rape myth acceptance on judgments of guilt and blame in rape cases: The role of perceived entitlement to judge. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1579-1605.
Farrey T., Noren N. (2014, March 1). Mizzou did not pursue alleged assault [Supplemental material]. ESPN. Available from http://www.espn.go.com/
Fisher B. S., Sloan J. J. III. (2003). Unraveling the fear of victimization among college women: Is the “shadow of sexual assault hypothesis” supported? Justice Quarterly, 20, 633-660.
Franiuk R., Seefelt J. L., Vandello J. A. (2008). Prevalence of rape myths in headlines and their effects on attitudes toward rape. Sex Roles, 58, 790-801.
Franiuk R., Shain E. A. (2011). Beyond Christianity: The status of women and rape myths. Sex Roles, 65, 783-791.
Freymeyer R. H. (1997). Rape myths and religiosity. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 473-489.
Giacopassi D. J., Dull R. T. (1986). Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15, 63-75.
Glick P., Fiske S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
Gonzalez T. (2013, November 15). Vanderbilt University slammed by female students over handling of sexual assault [Supplemental material]. USA Today. Available from http://www.usatoday.com/
Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Iconis R. (2008). Rape myth acceptance in college students: A literature review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 1, 47-52.
Kahlor L., Eastin M. S. (2011). Television’s role in the culture of violence toward women: A study of television viewing and the cultivation of rape myth acceptance in the United States. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 215-231.
Kassing L. R., Beesley D., Frey L. L. (2005). Gender role conflict, homophobia, age, and education as predictors of male rape myth acceptance. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27, 311-328.
Kassing L. R., Prieto L. R. (2003). The rape myth and blame-based beliefs of counselors-in-training toward male victims of rape. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81, 455-461.
Kingkade T. (2014, January 31). These are the colleges accused of mishandling sexual assault cases [Supplemental material]. Huffington Post. Available from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
Kramer K. M. (1994). Rule by myth: The social and legal dynamics governing alcohol-related acquaintance rapes. Stanford Law Review, 47, 115-160.
Krebs C. P., Lindquist C. H., Warner T. D., Fisher B. S., Martin S. L. (2007). The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study. Retrieved from http://www.nij.gov/nij/topics/crime/rape-sexual-violence/campus/welcome.htm
Kress V. E., Shepherd J. B., Anderson R. I., Petuch A. J., Nolan J. M., Thiemeke D. (2006). Evaluation of the impact of a coeducational sexual assault prevention program on college students’ rape myth attitudes. Journal of College Counseling, 9, 148-157.
Lonsway K. A., Fitzgerald L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
Lorber J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McMahon S. (2007). Understanding community-specific rape myths: Exploring student athlete culture. Affilia, 22, 357-370.
McMahon S. (2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59, 3-11.
Mori L., Bernat J., Glenn P., Selle L., Zarate M. (1995). Attitudes toward rape: Gender and ethnic differences across Asian and Caucasian college students. Sex Roles, 32, 457-467.
Nulty D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 301-314.
Page A. D. (2010). True colors: Police officers and rape myth acceptance. Feminist Criminology, 5, 315-334.
Payne D. L., Lonsway K. A., Fitzgerald L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.
Pérez-Peña R., Taylor K. (2014, May 4). Fight against sexual assaults holds colleges to account [Supplemental material]. New York Times. Available from http://www.nytimes.com/
Peterson Z. D., Muehlenhard C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129-144.
Remick L. A. (1993). Read her lips: An argument for a verbal consent standard in rape. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 141, 1103-1151.
Risman B. (1998). Gender vertigo. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sanday P. R. (2007). Fraternity gang rape. New York: New York University Press.
Sawyer R. G., Thompson E. E., Chicorelli A. M. (2002). Rape myth acceptance among intercollegiate student athletes: A preliminary examination. American Journal of Health Studies, 18(1), 19-25.
Sax L. (2005). Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Sheffield C. J. (2007). Sexual terrorism. In O’Toole L. L., Schiffman J. R., Kitere Edwards M. L. (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 111-130). New York: New York University Press.
Sheldon J. P., Parent S. L. (2002). Clergy’s attitudes and attributions of blame toward female rape victims. Violence Against Women, 8, 233-256.
Sivakumaran S. (2005). Male/male rape and the “taint” of homosexuality. Human Rights Quarterly, 27, 1274-1306.
Stoll L. C. (2013). Race and gender in the classroom: Teachers, privilege, and enduring social inequalities. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Suarez E., Gadalla T. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010-2035.
Swim J. K., Aikin K. J., Hall W. S., Hunter B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
Tavakol M., Bennick R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
Tougas F., Brown R., Beaton A. M., Joly S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ca change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
Ward S. K., Chapman K., Cohn E., White S., Williams K. (1991). Acquaintance rape and the college social scene. Family Relations, 40, 65-71.
Warr M. (1985). Fear of rape among urban women. Social Problems, 32, 238-250.
Wetherell M., Potter J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism. London, England: Sage.
White B. H., Robinson Kurpius S. E. (2002). Effects of victim sex and sexual orientation on perceptions of rape. Sex Roles, 46, 191-200.
White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault. (2014, April). Not alone: The first report of the White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/report_0.pdf
Yamawaki N., Tschanz B. T. (2005). Rape perception differences between Japanese and American college students: On the mediating influence of gender role traditionality. Sex Roles, 52, 379-392.
Yodanis C. L. (2004). Gender inequality, violence against women, and fear: A cross-national test of the feminist theory of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 655-675.

Biographies

Laurie Cooper Stoll is an assistant professor in the Department of Sociology and the founding director of the Institute for Social Justice at the University of Wisconsin–La Crosse. Her research explores inequalities related to race, class, gender, and sexuality in the context of social institutions, particularly education.
Terry Glenn Lilley is an assistant professor in the Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at the University of Wisconsin–La Crosse. His research focuses on issues of social justice with a specific emphasis on gendered violence and organized responses to inequality in a neo-liberal context.
Kelly Pinter is an adjunct professor at the College of Lake County and Harper College in Illinois. Her research explores the intersections of sexual violence and institutional structures in higher education.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: July 9, 2016
Issue published: January 2017

Keywords

  1. rape myth acceptance
  2. gender-blind sexism
  3. color-blind racism

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2016.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 26944715

Authors

Affiliations

Laurie Cooper Stoll
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA
Terry Glenn Lilley
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA
Kelly Pinter
College of Lake County, Grayslake, IL, USA

Notes

Laurie Cooper Stoll, University of Wisconsin–La Crosse, 1725 State Street, 432C Wimberly Hall, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Violence Against Women.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 6581

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 27 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. Female Police Officers’ Cultural Perceptions of the External Work Envi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Undergraduate Students’ Definitions of Sexual Violence Labels Across t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Officer gender and opportunities for mentoring and advancement in poli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The Impacts of Conservatism, Social Dominance, and Rape Myth Acceptanc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  5. Sexism without sexists: Gender‐blind frames in police work
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Tackling Oppressive Beliefs and Sexual Violence on College Campuses: E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  7. Examining the Roles of Prior Victimization, Perpetrator Identity and t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Bystander Intervention in Intimate Partner Violence: An Audio Vignette...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  9. Decolonization from Prescriptive Gender Roles and Sexism: Living Gende...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Patriarchy and Its Handmaid—Sexism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Psychometric properties of the polish updated Illinois rape myth accep...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Dark Tetrad, Acceptance of Sexual Violence, and Sexism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. A Systematic Literature Review of Specialist Policing of Rape and Seri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Anatomy of a rape: Sexual violence and secondary victimization scripts...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Predictors of College Women’s Rape Myth Acceptance and Bystander Attit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Are College Students’ Attitudes Related to Their Application of Sancti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  17. The role of rape myths in contributing to sexual aggression: Theory, r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Changes in Female Rape Myth Acceptance Among College Students: A 20-Ye...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Revisiting Eigenberg's prison rape model with criminal justice majors
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. The Effects of Gender-Blind Sexism on Rape Myth Acceptance: Results Fr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  21. Experiences of Gender-Based Violence at a South African University: Pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  22. Seeing and Doing Gender at Work: A Qualitative Analysis of Canadian Ma...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Bitchifying Hillary: Trump Supporters’ Vilification of Clinton during ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Predicting Bystander Intention to Intervene: The Role of Gender-Specif...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Supporting Survivors: The Roles of Rape Myths and Feminism in Universi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Reimagining the Study of Campus Sexual Assault
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Reimagining the Study of Campus Sexual Assault
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Better Together: A Model for Women and LGBTQ Equality in the Workplace
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. “From Fizzle to Sizzle!” Televised Sports News and the Production of G...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text