Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Other
First published online September 3, 2010

Creating ‘value’ beyond the point of production: branding, financialization and market capitalization

Abstract

The contemporary significance of branding as a source of value is explored by situating the creation and valorization of brand equity within ‘the full circuit of capital’. Conceived as a form of co-production occurring in the sphere of circulation (as well as production), brand-building is connected to: the surpluses generated by the labour of user-consumers as well as the designers and producers of branded products and services; the realization of surplus through control of revenues derived from sales of these products and services and the appropriation of surpluses, including the conversion of brand equity into brand value after deduction of costs. Contemporary investment in branding is related to the financialization of brands as intangibles that make a growing contribution to market capitalization. By attending to multiple facets of the circuit of capital, including the co-production brand equity by user-consumers, some pointers are proposed for developing a more ‘joined-up’ view of the ‘bigger picture’ of contemporary capitalist reproduction.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

1.
Earlier versions of the article were presented at the ‘Re-thinking Cultural Economy Conference’, Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change, University of Manchester, September 2007 and at seminar presentations at Cardiff, Cambridge, Lund and Nottingham Trent Universities. I am grateful for comments and conversations arising from these presentations that have enabled me to develop the article. The article has also greatly benefitted from comments provided by referees and the editors of this special issue.
2.
1 For example, contemporary commentaries on differences in propositions about ‘value creation’ are inclined to suggest that these speak to its ‘different dimensions’ (Lepak et al., 2007: 181).
3.
2 See also note 30.
4.
3 For reasons of space, discussion of the critical tradition is confined to Marxian analysis which, arguably, has been particularly influential in studies of economic organization including labour process studies.
5.
4 This is not to suggest that the ‘object’, such as ‘brand value’, is reducible to the framework. On the contrary, objects always escape efforts of theory to disclose their features (see Glynos and Haworth, 2007). What we know about ‘objects’ is incorrigibly limited by the interpretive frameworks deployed to characterize and examine them. From this standpoint, objects of analysis are elusive as they cannot be disentangled from what gives the ‘object’ visibility and significance (see Barud, 2007, especially chapter 8) within particular ethico-political complexes.
6.
5 See, for example, the Research Priorities (2006—8) of the Marketing Science Institute at http://www.msi. org/pdf/MSI_RP06-08.pdf accessed 29 December 2007.
7.
6 For a fuller history of branding, see Moor (2007).
8.
7 The example is given by Thompson et al. (2007). They describe a branding agency specializing in ‘truly holistic identities’ that was used to create an image for Keane, a British popular music band—something that is alleged to have been kept secret because it contravened conventional ideas of rock authenticity, This view assumes a touching degree of naivety and/or concern amongst Keane fans but it also projects upon them a set of values (e.g. about the inappropriateness of involving professional image generators) with which they may not identify. As it happens, Keane themselves clearly did take exception to the allegation and issued a spirited and stinging rebuttal of any suggestion that Moving Brands, the branding agency, had manufactured their image. See http://www.keaneshaped.co.uk/faq/#stylist. The existence of this public domain rebuttal, which would seem to cast further doubt upon the band’s desire to hush it up, seems to have escaped the attention of Thompson et al. (2007) who make no reference to it.
9.
8 The purchase of Kraft by Philip Morris in 1988 is widely regarded as a pivotal moment when most of the purchase price of $12.6m was attributed to ‘the cost of the word “Kraft”’. Instead of being regarded as an ‘add-on’ to the core business of production and sales, ‘a huge dollar value had been assigned to something that had previously been abstract and unquantifiable—a brand name’ (Klein, 2000: 7—8).
10.
9 The neologism is intended to resonate with ‘securitization’, the latter being the key driver of contemporary financialized capital asset growth characterized by some as ‘fictitious capital’ .
11.
10 The term ‘post-consumer’ does not imply that consumption stops or even declines but, rather, that it is sustained and driven on by processes of financialization, most notably by developing ingenious ways of expanding credit for purposes of consumption.
12.
11 As a thought experiment, imagine how the brand equity, and ultimately the market capitalization, of Ebay would be damaged if all information provided by sellers and buyers was erased or if the company was obliged to compensate those providing feedback.
13.
12 Virgin’s brand-centric stratagem is particularly ‘clever’ as so much of the brand equity is acquired cheaply by engaging in media stunts, often ending in heroic failure, that attract global publicity.
14.
13 Branson, the CEO of Virgin, has defined his empire as ‘a leading branded venture capital organization’, seeking 30 per cent internal rates of return on investments. ‘The Value of Virgin’, Daily Telegraph 3 December 2007. Available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/12/02/ ccrock102.xml. See also Osborne (2007).
15.
14 To which the growth of speculative corporate treasury activity within companies has significantly contributed.
16.
15 The contingency of brand-building means that consumers may drain brands of value as well as infuse them with worth—as is evident in the (temporary?) loss of ‘coolness’ of brands such as Gap as well as McDonalds and Starbucks (see Thompson et al., 2006) and also in the subversive, culture-jamming activities pursued by campaigning groups like ‘Adbusters’ (see Holt, 2002).
17.
16 An illustrative example is the extensive but divided involvement of a Lego ‘brand community’ in the development of its product Mindstorm. Its user-consumers were key initiators and facilitators of product development but they were also resistant to aspects of it (see www.fbtb.com) The interested reader is encouraged to turn to Kornberger (in press) and Antorini (2007). Recognition of such resistance points to the emergence of other, potentially more subversive, forms of co-produced value creation (see Bauwens, 2009)—in the form of peer-to-peer production that escapes private appropriation as it is protected by a general public license that, our course, also makes it available to commercial users.
18.
17 Linux is a prominent example.
19.
18 As participants in the ‘ethical economy’, user-consumers, such as ‘the programmer who decides to spend his evening hours coding away at the Linux kernel’ (Arvidsson, 2009: 22), are seen to engage in co-production to create and elaborate their identities, life-styles and friendship networks. Attentiveness to how ‘self-organized forms of production’, mediated by ICTs ‘contain(ing) the possibility of a new, rational way of organizing social and economic processes’ (Arvidsson, 2009: 14), offers a useful corrective to labour process analysts’ myopic focus upon paid labour in workplaces (see O’Doherty and Willmott, 2009). It also suggests how ICT-mediated, commons-oriented, peer production of value unleashes what Marx terms ‘General Intellect’—in the form of ‘networks, tacit knowledge and social organization’ on ‘a societal scale, which is difficult to control and measure’ (Arvidsson, nd). In the field of organization studies, Land and Böhm (2009) offer the most developed discussion of Arvidsson’s ‘ethical economy’ thesis. They follow Arvidsson’s (2006) debt to Lazzarato’s (1997, 2007) notion of the ‘political entrepreneur’ who, in contrast to the economic entrepreneur, is conceived to mobilize ‘community, affect and communicative flows’ (Arvidsson, 2006: 89). Of most direct relevance for the present focus upon branding, the idea of ‘political entrepreneurship’ is assessed by Land and Böhm (2009) to be useful in appreciating how marketing has been extended from a ‘technique for selling’ into a ‘mechanism’, notably in the form of brand management, ‘that is constitutive of social relations, information and values for the market’ (Lazzarato, 2007: 92 cited in Land and Böhm, 2009: 10). Such entrepreneurship is characterized as ‘political’ because it is not directly economic in any established sense: it involves the production of meaning and subjectivity rather than the manufacture of goods. Land and Böhm (2009) largely overlook post-Bravermanian labour process analysis, especially that influenced by Foucault, which addresses the production of meaning and subjectivity in the manufacture of goods and services (see O’Doherty and Willmott, 2009). Also conspicuously absent from their discussion is any reference to the formation of capital and, more specifically, consideration of how capital is accumulated through the translation of brand equity into brand value. The closest they come is when, in passing, they note that ‘brand management continuously seeks to govern the production of immaterial value so as to realize it as economic value’ (Land and Böhm: 14). There is no direct recognition of how the co-produced brand equity contributes to market capitalization—something that, as noted earlier, becomes most apparent when companies (e.g. Kraft, YouTube) are acquired.
20.
19 As noted earlier, the chief exception to this private appropriation of the brand value generated by unpaid labour is where production is governed by a general public license. This licence ensures that brand equity cannot be directly monetized, although, as Bauwens (2009: 125) observes, companies ‘can do many things to indirectly capture the value created by peer-producing communities’.
21.
20 It seems doubtful that the architects of YouTube ever conceived of themselves as engaging in a community service, or a charitable venture, devised to facilitate the donation of ‘ethical labour’ for socially beneficial purposes. If they did, then their venture did not remain charitable for long (see http://www. nytimes.com/2007/02/07/technology/07cnd-google.html?ex=1328504400&en=96fcc0326d0a7ef6&ei= 5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss).
22.
21 In a recent review of these studies, de Beijer (2008) notes that: ‘Barth et al. (1998) estimate the association between FinancialWorld brand value estimates and share prices over the period 1991 to 1996. They find a significant positive association. Kerin and Sethuraman (1998) study US consumer goods companies on the 1995 and 1996 FinancialWorld’s Most-Valued Brands list and report a positive relation between brand value estimates and firm value. They also find some indications that increases in brand values are more likely to be reflected in firm value than are decreases in brand values. Custodio and Rosario (2007) and Delcoure (2008) also find a positive association between brand value estimates and firm value for US companies. Pahud de Mortanges and van Riel (2003) measure brand equity for Dutch corporate brands using Young and Rubicam’s Brand Asset Valuator. They find a significant association between this brand value indicator and various shareholder value measures’.
23.
22 Accounting specialists are reluctant to include intangibles on the balance sheet even though their absence places in question the claimed ‘representational faithfulness’ of financial statements. The exclusion of intangibles is defended on the grounds that measures of intangible value lack the reliability attributed to those used to value tangible assets. This justification is contested by others who suggest that the valuation of tangible assets presents comparable difficulties: ‘it is well known that allocations, such as depreciation, are often arbitrary [and] the allocation of value between land and buildings is well accepted despite its indeterminate nature’ (Power, 1992: 49). From this perspective, the ‘unreliability of measures’ argument is viewed as something of a smokescreen for a failure of collective will to agree a conception of reliability that will support a common measure of a brand’s value: ‘If what “accountants are currently prepared to recognise” is a contingent matter, then any attempt to shift the consensus of accepted practice is “political” in the sense that the widespread credibility of a new body of “expert” recognition knowledge must be established’ (Power, 1992: 51). The problem is that, politically, a substantial measure of agreement on the measurement of tangibles has been brokered but has not (yet) been extended to the valuation of intangibles.
24.
23 As indicated in the previous note, accountants are strongly inclined to use and defend a method of valuation, underpinned by a particular conception of reliability, that predates the era of the intangible asset.
25.
24 The methodology for calculating the contribution of brand value to market capitalization is contested. A number of consultancies offer rival methodologies although Interbrand is by far the most influential. In essence, the Interbrand methodology strips out operating costs, taxes, and charges for the capital employed to arrive at the earnings attributable to intangible assets. The contribution of the brand is estimated within those earnings in relation to other intangible assets (e.g. patents and management strength). Future earnings are discounted to arrive at a net present value. Interbrand discounts against current interest rates and also against the brand’s overall risk profile so as to factor-in brand strength. See http://www. businessweek.com/pdfs/2007/0732_globalbrands.pdf. See also Kerin and Suthuraman (1998: 271—2)
26.
25 See Lury and Moor (2010) for a sociologically informed discussion.
27.
26 ‘So-called’ because their apparent bedrock solidity is precarious. In common with all measures of value, tangible assets rely upon the buoyancy of confidence to sustain their worth.
28.
27 This is evident, for example, in a frequently downloaded home video that criticizes one of Samsung’s viral marketing campaigns. See http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/us-to-samsung-viral-marketingdoesnt-work-please-stop-168495.php (accessed 4 November 2009).
29.
28 See http://www.molinu.org/samsung_global_strategy_group (accessed 4 November 2009).
30.
29 See http://www.samsung.com/co/aboutsamsung/samsunggroup/annualreport/downloads/2003/SAMAR04_ 01_10p.pdf (accessed 4 November 2009).
31.
30 Other attempts to do something similar include Thompson (2003) and Littler (2009).

References

Akasia, J.F. ( 2000) ‘Ford’s Model E’, Forbes 17 July, pp. 30-34.
Alvarez, L. H. R and Stenbacka, R., (2007) ‘Partial Outsourcing: A Real Options Perspective’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 25(1): 91-102.
Antorini, Y.M. ( 2007) ‘Brand Community Innovation: An Intrinsic Case Study of the Adult Fans of the LEGO Community’, Unpublished PhD, Copenhagen Business School.
Arrington, M. ( 2006) Google Has Acquired YouTube [Online]. TechCrunch. Available at: http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/09/google-has-acquired-youtube/ (accessed 9 October 2006).
Arvidsson, A. (n.d.) ‘ Crisis of Value and the Ethical Economy’ available at: http://p2pfoundation.net/Crisis_of_Value_and_the_Ethical_Economy (accessed 3 November 2009).
Arvidsson, A. ( 2005) ‘Brands: A Critical Perspective’, Journal of Consumer Culture 5(2): 235-58.
Arvidsson, A. ( 2006) Brands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture. London: Routledge.
Arvidsson, A. ( 2007) ‘Crisis of Value and the Ethical Economy’ available at: http://p2pfoundation.net/Crisis_of_Value_and_the_Ethical_Economy (accessed 27 October 2009).
Arvidsson, A. ( 2008) ‘The Ethical Economy of Customer Coproduction’, Journal of Macromarketing 28(4): 326-38.
Arvidsson, A. ( 2009) ‘The Ethical Economy: Towards a Post-Capitalist Theory of Value’, New Left Review 97: 13-29.
Baldi, F. and Trigeorgis, L. ( 2008) ‘A Real Options Approach to Valuing Brand Leveraging Options: How much is Starbucks Brand Equity Worth?’, working paper, available at: http://69.175.2.130/~finman/Reno/Papers/StarbucksBrandValuation.pdf (accessed 4 November 2009 ).
Ballow, J.J., Burgman, R.J., Roos, G. and Molnar, M.J. ( 2004) ‘A New Strategy for Managing for Shareholder Value: Intangibles, Future Value and Investment Decisions’, Journal of Business Strategy 25(3): 26-34.
Barth, M.E., Clement, M.B., Foster, G. and Kasznik, R. ( 1998) ‘Brand Values and Market Capitalization’, Review of Accounting Studies 3(1-2): 41-68.
Barud, K. ( 2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Batchelor, A. ( 1998) ‘Brands as Financial Assets’ in S. Hart and J. Murphy (eds) Brands: The New Wealth Creators. London: Macmillan Business/ Interbrand.
Baudrillard, J. ( 1981) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St. Louis: Telos.
Bauwens, M. (n.d.) Dornbirn Manifesto Available at http://p2pfoundation.net/Dornbirn_Manifesto (accessed 4 November 2009).
Bauwens, M. ( 2009) ‘Class and Capital in Peer Production’, New Left Review 97: 121-41.
Berger, P. ( 1967) The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York, NY: Doubleday .
Brubaker, R. ( 1984) The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Burawoy, M. ( 1986) The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verson.
Business Week ( 2005) ‘Global Brands’, 1 August, available at: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_31/b3945098.htm (accessed 3 November 2009).
Business Week ( 2006) ‘Crowdsourcing: Consumers as Creators’, 13 July, available at: http://www.business-week.com/innovate/content/jul2006/id20060713_755844.htm (accessed 2 November 2009).
Business Week (2007) ‘The 100 Top Brands-Here’s how Interbrand calculates the power in a name’, available at: http://www.businessweek.com/pdfs/2007/0732_globalbrands.pdf (accessed 3 November 2009).
Chu, S. and Keh, H.T. ( 2006) ‘Brand Value Creation: Analysis of the Interbrand-Business Week Brand Value Rankings’, Marketing Letters 17: 323-31.
Cook, S. ( 2008) ‘The Contribution Revolution: Letting Volunteers Build Your Business’, Harvard Business Review, October, 60-69.
Coombe, R. ( 1988) The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Corstjens, M. and Merrihue, J. ( 2003) ‘Optimal Marketing’, Harvard Business Review 81: 114-21.
Cova, B. and Dalli, D. (2009) ‘Working Consumers : The Next Step in Marketing Theory?, Marketing Theory 9(3): 315-39.
Custodio, C. and J. Rosario ( 2007) ‘Corporate Brand and Firm Value’, working paper, London School of Economics.
Crane, D. and Bovone, L. ( 2006) ‘Approaches to Material Culture: The Sociology of Fashion and Clothing’, Poetics 34(6): 319-33.
Davis, G.F. ( 2009) ‘The Rise and Fall of Finance and the End of the Society of Organizations’, Academy of Management Perspectives 23(3): 27-44.
De Beijer, D., DeKimple, M., Dutordoir, M. and Verbeeten, F.H.M. ( 2008) ‘The Impact of Brand Value Announcements on Firm Value’, working paper, Rotterdam School of Management, The Netherlands. Also available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344535 (accessed 3 November 2009 ).
Delcoure, N. ( 2008) ‘Corporate Branding and Shareholders’ Wealth’, working paper, Sam Houston State University .
Dore, R. ( 2000) Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism: Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons (Japan Business and Economics Series). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dore, R. ( 2008) Financialization of the Global Economy, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(6): 1097-112.
Du Gay, P. Hall, S., Janes, L. and Mackay, H. ( 1996) Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman . London: Sage.
Epstein, G.A. ( 2005) ‘Introduction’, in G.A. Epstein (ed.) Financialization and the World Economy . London: Edward Elgar.
Erturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A. and Williams, K. ( 2007) ‘General Introduction: Financialization, Coupon Pool and Conjecture’ (mimeo) subsequently published in I. Erturk, J. Froud, S. Johal, A. Leaver and K. Williams (eds) Financialization at Work: Key Texts and Commentary. London: Routledge.
Ezzamel, M., Willmott, H.C. and Worthington, F. (2009) ‘Manufacturing Shareholder Value: The Role of Accounting in Organizational Transformation’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(2-3): 107-40.
Feldwick, P. ( 1996) ‘What is Brand Equity Anyway, and How Do You Measure It’, Journal of the Market Research Society 38(2): 85-105.
Fernández, P. ( 2001) ‘Valuation of Brands and Intellectual Capital’, working paper IESE Business School. Available at: http://www.avaliacaodeempresas.com.br/artigos3/Valuatin%20of%20Brands%20and%20Intellectual%20Capital.pdf (accessed 3 November 2009).
Fernández, P. ( 2002) Valuation Methods and Shareholder Value. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Foster, R.J. ( 2007) ‘The Work of the New Economy: Consumers, Brands and Value Creation’, Cultural Antrhopology 22(4): 707-31.
Foster, R.J. ( 2008) ‘Commodities, Brands, Love and Kula: Comparative Notes on Value Creation in Honor of Nancy Munn’ , Anthropological Theory 8(1): 9-25.
Frieder, L. ( 2004) ‘Brand Perceptions and the Market for Common Stock’, working paper, The Anderson School , UCLA subsequently published in Journal of Financial and Qualitative Analysis 40(1): 57-85.
Frieder, L. and Subrahmanyam, A. ( 2004) ‘Brand Perceptions and the Market for Common Stock’, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=299522, subsequently published in Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 40(1): 57-85.
Froud, J., Johal, S. and Williams, K. ( 2002) ‘Financialisation and the Coupon Pool’, Capital and Class 78: 119-51.
Gamble, A. ( 2009) The Spectre at the Feast: Capitalist Crisis and the Politics of Recession. London: Palgrave Macmillan .
Glyn, A. ( 2006) Capitalism Unleashed: Finance, Globalization and Welfare . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Glynos, J. and Howarth, D. ( 2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
Goldman, P. (nd) ‘Advertising and the Production of Commodity Signs’, available at http://legacy.lclark.edu/~goldman/contradictions/poleconsv3.html (accessed 5 January 2009).
Goldman, R. and Papson, S. ( 2006) ‘Capital’s Brandscapes’, Journal of Consumer Culture 6(3): 327-53.
Graham, P. ( 2002) ‘Hypercapitalism: Language, New Media and Social Perceptions of Value’, Discourse and Society 13(2): 227-49.
Graham, P. and Jones, S. ( 2005) Hypercapitalism: New Media, Language, and Social Perceptions of Value. Bern: Peter Lang.
Haigh, D. ( 1998) Brand Valuation: Understanding, Exploiting and Communicating Brand Values. London: Financial Times Retail and Consumer.
Harvey, D. ( 2001) ‘The Art of Rent: Globalization, Monopoly and the Commodification of Culture’, in L. Panitch and C. Leys (eds) Socialist Register 2002: A World of Contradictions. London : Merlin Press.
Harvey, D. ( 2005) A Brief History of Neo-Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. ( 2005) Taking Brand Initiative: How Companies Can Align Strategy, Culture, and Identity Through Corporate Branding. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Glynos, J. and Howarth, D. ( 2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
Helft, M. ( 2007) ‘YouTube’s Payoff: Hundreds of Millions for the Founders The New York Times’, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/07/technology/07cnd-google.html?ex=1328504400&en=96fcc0326d0a7ef6&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss (accessed 3 November 2009).
Holt, D. ( 2002) ‘Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding’, Journal of Consumer Research 29: 70-90.
Holt, D. ( 2004) How Brands Become Icons. Boston, MA : Harvard Business School Press.
Holt, D. ( 2006) ‘Toward as Sociology of Branding’, Journal of Consumer Culture 6(3): 299-302.
IUF (2006) Feeding Financial Markets: Financialization and Restructuring in Nestlé, Kraft and Unilever, (International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, 1 Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations). Available at: http://asianfoodworker.net/tnc/financializing-foodTNCs.pdf (accessed 3 November 2009).
Jhally, S. and Livant, B. ( 1986) ‘Watching as Working: The Valorization of Audience Consciousness’, Journal of Communication 36(3): 124-43.
Keller, K.L. ( 1993) ‘Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity’, Journal of Marketing 57: 1-22.
Kerin, R.A. and Sethuraman, R. ( 1998) ‘Exploring the Brand-Value-Shareholder-Value Nexus for Consumer Goods Companies’, Journal of Academic Marketing Science 26(4): 260-73.
Kimbrough, M.D. and McAlister, L. ( 2008) ‘Linking Marketing Actions to Value Creation and Firm Value: Insights from Accounting Research; A Commentary on Shuba Srinivasan and Dominique M. Hanssens’ "Marketing and Firm Value: Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Directions"’, Journal of Marketing Research, forthcoming. Available at: http://www.marketingpower.com/ResourceLibrary/Documents/JMRForthcoming/Linking%20Marketing%20Actions%20(COM).pdf (accessed 4 November 2009).
Kindleberger, C.P. and Aliber, R. ( 2005) Manias, Panics and Crashes; A History of Financial Crises . New York, NY: Wiley.
Klein, N. ( 2000 ) No Logo. London: Flamingo.
Klimecki, R. and Willmott, H.C. ( 2009) ‘From Demutualization to Meltdown: A Tale of Two Wannabe Banks’, Critical Perspective in International Business 5(1/2): 120-40.
Kornberger, M. (in press) The Brand Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kozinets, R.V., Hemetsberger, A. and Schau, H.J. ( 2008) ‘The Wisdom of Consumer Crowds: Collective Innovation in the Age of Networked Marketing’, Journal of Macromarketing 28(4): 339-54.
Krippner, G.R. ( 2005) ‘The Financialization of the American Economy’, Socio-Economic Review 3(2): 173-208.
Land, C. and Böhm, S., (2009) ‘The New "Hidden Abode": Reflections on Value and Labour in the New Economy’, Working Paper, Essex Business School, University of Essex.
Lazzarato, M. ( 1997) Lavoro immateriale, Verona: Ombre Corte.
Lazzarato, M. ( 2007) ‘Strategies of the Political Entrepreneur’, SubStance 36(1): 87-97.
Lee, Y.W. ( 2007) Samsung CEO Message. Available at: http://www.samsung.com/us/aboutsamsung/ir/ceomessage/IR_CEOMessage.html (accessed 5 January 2009).
Lepak, D.P., Smith, K.G. and Taylor, M.S. ( 2007) ‘Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 32(1): 18-195.
Lev, B. ( 2001) Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Lindemann, J. ( 2004) ‘The Financial Value of Brands’ in Clifton, R. Simmons, J. and Ahmad, S . (eds) Brands and Branding. London: Economist Books.
Littler, C. ( 2009) ‘The Current Global Crisis as a Context for Labour and Industry in the Twenty-First Century’, Labour and Industry 19(3): 5-28.
Low, G.S. and Fullerton, R.A. ( 1994) ‘Brands, Brand Management and the Brand Manager System: A Critical-Historical Evaluation’, Journal of Marketing Research XXXI (May): 173-90.
Lukas, B.A., Whitwell, G.J. and Doyle, P. ( 2005) ‘How Can a Shareholder Value Approach Improve Marketing’s Strategic Influence?’, Journal of Business Research 58(4): 414-42.
Lury, C. ( 2004) Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy. London: Routledge.
Lury, C. and Moor, L. ( 2010) ‘Brand Valuation and Topological Culture’, in M. Aronczyk and D. Powers (eds) Blowing up the Brand. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
MacKenzie, D. ( 2009) Material Markets: How Economic Agents are Constructed . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Madden, T.J., Fehle, F. and Fournier, S. ( 2006) ‘Brands Matter: An Empirical Demonstration of the Creation of Shareholder Value Through Branding’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2): 224-35.
Marazzi, C. ( 2010) The Violence of Financial Capitalism. New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
Marketing Science Institute (2007) Research Priorities of the Marketing Science Institute (2006-2008) . Available at: http://www.msi.org/pdf/MSI_RP06-08.pdf (accessed 29 December 2007).
Martin, R. ( 2002) Financialization of Daily Life (Labor in Crisis) . Philadephia, PA: Temple University Press.
Moor, L. ( 2007) The Rise of Brands. Oxford: Berg .
Muniz, A.M. and O’Guinn, T.C. ( 2001) ‘Brand Community’, Journal of Consumer Research 27: 412-32. Nicholai, A. T., Schulz, A-C. and Thomas, T. W. (2009) ‘What Wall Street Wants-Exploring the Role of Security Analysts in the Evolution and Spread of Management Concepts’, Journal of Management Studies, 47(1): 162-89.
Nixon, S. ( 2002) ‘Re-Imagining the Ad Agency: The Cultural Connotations of Economic Forms’ in P. Du Gay and M. Pryke (eds) Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life. London: Sage.
O’Doherty, D. and Willmott, H. ( 2009) ‘The Decline of Labour Process Analysis and the Future Sociology of Work’, Sociology 43(5): 931-51.
O’Neill, P. ( 2001) ‘Financial Narratives of the Modern Corporation’, Journal of Economic Geography 1: 181-99.
Orhangazi, O. ( 2008) Financialization and the US Economy. London: Edward Elgar.
Osborne, A. ( 2007) ‘The Value of Virgin’, Daily Telegraph 3 December 2007.
Pahud de Mortanges, C. and van Riel, A. ( 2003) ‘Brand Equity and Shareholder Value’, European Management Journal 21(4): 521-27.
Pike, A. and Pollard, J. (2010) ‘Economic Geographies of Financialization’, Economic Geography 86(1): 29-51.
Power, M. ( 1992) ‘The Politics of Brand Accounting in the United Kingdom’, European Accounting Review 1: 39-68.
Raggio, R.D. and Leone, R.P. ( 2007) ‘The Theoretical Separation of Brand Equity and Brand Value: Managerial Implications for Strategic Planning’, Journal of Brand Management 14: 380-95.
Raggio, R.D. and Leone, R.P. (2009) ‘Chasing Brand Value: Fully Leveraging Brand Equity To Maximise Brand Value’, Journal of Brand Management 16: 248-63.
Rao, V.R., Agarwal, M.K. and Dahlhoff, D. ( 2004) ‘How is Manifest Branding Strategy Related to the Intangible Value of the Corporation?’, Journal of Marketing 68: 126-41.
Roslender, R. and Hart, S.J. ( 2006) ‘Interfunctional Cooperation in Progressing Accounting for Brands’, Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change 2(3): 229-47.
Rust, R.T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G.S., Kumar, V. and Srivastava, R.K. ( 1994) ‘Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions’, Journal of Marketing 68(4): 76-89.
Salzer-Mörling, M. and Strannegård, L. ( 2004) ‘Silence of the Brands’, European Journal of Marketing 38(1): 224-38.
Schultz, M., Hatch, M.J. and Larsen, M.H. ( 2000) The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation and the Corporate Brand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schulz, M., Antorini, Y.M. and Csaba, F.F. ( 2005) Corporate Branding: Purpose/People/Process. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Serfati, C., (2008) ‘Financial Dimensions of Transnational Corporations, Global Value Chain and Technological Innovation’, Journal of Innovation Economics 2(2): 35-61.
Samsung Global Strategy (S. G. S.) (2009) Samsung Global Strategy Group. Samsung Global Strategy Group. Available at: http://www.molinu.org/samsung_global_strategy_group (accessed 4 November 2009).
Simon, C.J. and Sullivan, M.W. ( 1993) ‘The Measurment and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach’, Marketing Science 12(1): 28-52.
Srinivasan, S. and Hanssens, D.M. ( 2008) ‘Marketing and Firm Value Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Directions’, Journal of Marketing Research, forthcoming. Available at http://www.marketingpower.com/ResourceLibrary/Documents/JMRForthcoming/Marketing%20and%20Firm%20Value.pdf (accessed 4 November 2009).
Smythe, D.W. ( 1977) ‘Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism’ in T. Guback (ed.) Counterclockwise: Perspectives on Communication, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Stalk, G. and Lachenauer, R. ( 2004) Hardball: Are You Playing to Play or Playing to Win?. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Taylor, R.L., Becerra, R., Stuart, P. and Case, S. A (2009) ‘Securitization of Brand Names: Basic Concepts and its Use in Practice’, The Journal of Brand Management 17(1): 62-83.
Thompson, C.J. Rindfleisch, A. and Arsel, Z. ( 2006) ‘Emotional Branding and the Strategic Value of the Doppelgänger Brand Image’, Journal of Marketing 70(January): 50-64.
Thompson, P. ( 2003) ‘Disconnected Capitalism: Or Why Employers Can’t Keep Their Side of the Bargain’, Work, Employment and Society 17(3): 359-78.
Thompson, P., Jones, M. and Warhurst, C. ( 2007) ‘From Conception to Consumption: Creativity and the Missing Managerial Link’, Journal of Organizational Behaviour 28: 625-40.
Thompson, P. and Smith, C. (2009) ‘Labour Power and Labour Process: Contesting the Marginality of the Sociology of Work’, Sociology 43(5): 913-30.
Tollington, T. ( 2001) ‘UK Brand Asset Recognition Beyond "Transactions or Events"’, Long Range Planning 34(4): 463-87.
Weber, M. ( 1946) ‘Politics as a Vocation’ in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. and ed. H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wernick, A. ( 1991) Promotional Culture: Advertising, Ideology and Symbolic Expression. London: Sage .
Whitwell, S. ( 2005) ‘Brands on the Balance Sheet’, available at: http://www.intangiblebusiness.com/Brandservices/Financial-services/Press-coverage/Brands-on-the-balance-sheet~299.html (accessed 23 November 2007).

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Pages: 517 - 542
Article first published online: September 3, 2010
Issue published: September 2010

Keywords

  1. brand equity
  2. co-production
  3. ethical surplus
  4. financialization
  5. full circuit of capital
  6. intangibles
  7. Samsung
  8. social networking
  9. valorization

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2010.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hugh Willmott
Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK, [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Organization.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2195

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 89 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. A Research Paper on the Design of a Business Model Framework for Digit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. How social media expedites the crisis spillover effect: A case study o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Digital financialization and surveillance capitalism in the Global Sou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Platform sabotage
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Brand Valuation: Recognizing the brands as strategical assets in the b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Affect and Capital: Discourse, General Intellect, and Affective Capita...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Are the most influential websites peer-produced or price-incentivized?...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Infrastructures for media ‘extension’: licensing trade expos and the p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. " Some of my Customers […] Take off Their Rolex Prior to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Critical Inquiry
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The Scouring of Wellywood
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Lack of reform in Israeli local government and its impact on modern de...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Share a little of that human touch: The marketable ordinariness of sec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. What is organizational inequality? Why is it increasing as macroeconom...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Corporate social performance (CSP) in time of economic crisis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Analyzing the Characteristics of Green Bond Markets to Facilitate Gree...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Branding the university: building up meaning through ideological oppos...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Critical Inquiry: Power and Language in Organization and Management St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Hiding in the Spotlight: Commodifying Nature and Geographies of Dissoc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Motivations to Use Different Social Media Types and Their Impact on Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. The geographies of the institutional and industrial constraints on the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Marcas e divisão de trabalho na rede de produção automobilística: o ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Sustainable development drivers of companies: An international and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Theorizing Struggle in the Social Factory
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Lemmy Kilmister and milk from Finland: On remembering, online spaces a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on Brand Equit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Brand co-creation in multichannel media environments: a narrative appr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Sites of contestation in global fur networks
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Mediating Social Media's Ambivalences in the Context of Informational ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Jamming the jamming: Brazilian protests as an illustration of a new po...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Financialization and the macroeconomy. Theory and empirical evidence
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Close encounters and the illusion of accountability in the sharing eco...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Chapter 9 Varieties of Value in Mergers and Acquisitions: Time For a N...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Geographies of dissociation: Value creation, ‘dark’ places, and ‘missi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Tensions between Value Capture and Value Slippage: The Case of Brand C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Ethico-economic analysis of impact finance: The case of Green Bonds
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Utopia, Labor, and Informational Capitalism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Ethics of ambivalence in corporate branding
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Unlocking customer accounting’s potential: a service-dominant logic ap...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Ethical branding as a discoursive resource for employee identity work:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Faculty responses to business school branding: a discursive approach
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Transnational degree program franchising and the challenge of commerci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. The destructive side of branding: A heuristic model for analyzing the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. ‘Brandspeak’: Metaphors and the rhetorical construction of internal br...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Managing Brands in the Age of DIY-Branding: The COBRA approach
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Introduction
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. High Performers:
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Evaluating Humans:
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Reducing Costs:
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Training Value:
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Client Sites:
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Building a Paradise:
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Conspicuous Ethicizing:
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Conclusion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Notes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. The silver bullet of branding: Fantasies and practices of organization...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. The Digital Journey: Reflected Learnings and Emerging Challenges
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. A post-Marxist approach in development finance: PMF or production mutu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Brands and Branding
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Origination: A response to the reviews
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Crowdsourcing as a business model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Digging deeper towards capricious management: ‘Personal traits become ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Developing a Communicative Imagination Under Contemporary Capitalism...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. The need for an alternative to shareholder value creation? The Ethomed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Actually Existing Capitalism: Some Digital Delusions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Ethico-Economic Analysis of Impact Finance: The Case of Green Bonds
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. La finance comme commun : un idéal-type pour des émancipations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Organizing beyond organization: Branding, discourse, and communicative...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. An Alternative to Shareholder Value Creation: Subverting the Dominatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Brand Value Creation versus Destruction: The Relationship between Cons...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Grandiosity in contemporary management and education
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. The liminality of branding...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Origination: The Geographies of Brands and Branding
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. (Co)-Contamination as the Dark Side of Co-Production: Public value fai...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Occupational branding for diversity: managing discursive contradiction...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Value slippage in brand transformation: a conceptualization
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. The iconography of universities as institutional narratives
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Managing Brands in the Age of DIY-Branding: The COBRA approach
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. World cities under conditions of financialized globalization...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Big Data et quantification de soi : La gouvernementalité algorithmique...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. How Legends Become Brands: The Culture Industry in the Second Enclosur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Marketing with working consumers: The case of a carmaker and its brand...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Organisations as producers of consumers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Crowdsourcing: Global search and the twisted roles of consumers and pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  86. Organizations and their consumers: Bridging work and consumption
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. The Rise of the 1%: An Organizational Explanation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Revisiting Marx's Value Theory: Elements of a Critical Theory of Immat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Potential and Pitfalls of Ethnic Marketing in Financial Services in Be...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Utopia, Labor, and Informational Capitalism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Chapitre 1. Une alternative à la création de valeur actionnariale. Pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Value Logic of Affective Labor and Exploitation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. The Organizing of Monopoly Rent and Cultural Processes in the Financia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Interpretationen und Rekonstruktionen einer Arbeitgebermarke durch unt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. Google’s Affective Economy: The Mobilization and Appropriation of the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Private property and collective action: co-operation instead of compet...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Postface à l’édition de 2014
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. What Is Critical Marketing Studies? Reading Macro, Social, and Critica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. An Alternative to the Creation of Shareholder Value. The Production of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Free software production as critical social practice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. Managing from the echo chamber
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Quality, difference and regional advantage: The case of the winter spo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Economic Geographies of Brands and Branding
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. Contested imaginaries and the cultural political economy of climate ch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. Branding in the sacrificial mode – A study of the consumptive side of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. ‘The exploding plastic inevitable’: ‘Branding being’, brand Warhol & t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. In search of consensus: The role of accounting in the definition and r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. Value Capture and Brand Community Management
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Penser L’Entreprise Hors La Société (Think Firm and Not Corporate)
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. Enterprise Beyond the Firm
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. Regional Blocks and Imperial Legacies: Mapping the Global Offshore FDI...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. Value creation versus destruction: The relationship between consumers,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. Beneath the Radar? A Critical Realist Analysis of ‘The Knowledge Econo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. The New ‘Hidden Abode’: Reflections on Value and Labour in the New Eco...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Value in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  117. Propriété Privée et Action Collective : De La Coopération Comme Réappr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. Private Property and Collective Action: Cooperation as a Means of Reap...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  119. MAKING AND MEASURING VALUE
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  120. Enron narrative
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  121. How to Enhance Value? A Comparative Approach between Marketing and Fin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub