Words matter: The use of generic “you” in expressive writing in an oncology setting
Abstract
The use of generic “you” (GY) in writing samples fosters psychological distancing and functions as a linguistic mechanism to facilitate emotion regulation. This method of creating psychological distance from the traumatic experience of cancer may be used by patients processing emotions. We used behavioral coding to analyze expressive writing samples collected from 138 cancer patients to examine the association between the use of “you” and cancer-related symptoms and psychological outcomes. Occurrences of GY were low, but our qualitative results showed how the use of GY could create a universal experience of cancer. The use of GY was not associated with cancer-related symptoms and depressive symptoms, but longitudinal analyses revealed that those using GY had fewer intrusive thoughts and avoidance behaviors across the follow-up period of 1, 4, and 10 months after the intervention. The development of psychological self-distancing prompts to use in writing interventions or as a clinical tool for cancer patients should be explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
Data availability statement
The current article is accompanied by the relevant raw data generated during and/or analysed during the study, including files detailing the analyses and either the complete database or other relevant raw data. These files are available in the Figshare repository and accessible as Supplemental Material via the sage Journals platform. Ethical approval, participant permissions, and all other relevant approvals were granted for this data sharing.
References
Applebaum AJ, Panjwani AA, Buda K, et al. (2020) Emotion regulation therapy for cancer caregivers-an open trial of a mechanism-targeted approach to addressing caregiver distress. Translational Behavioral Medicine 10(2): 413–422.
Ayduk O, Kross E (2009) Asking ‘why’ from a distance facilitates emotional processing: A reanalysis of Wimalaweera and Moulds (2008). Behavior Research Therapy 47(1): 88–92.
Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS, et al. (2000) Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer 89(7): 1634–1646.
Conley CC, Bishop BT, Andersen BL (2016) Emotions and emotion regulation in breast cancer survivorship. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 4(3): 56.
Denny BT, Ochsner KN (2014) Behavioral effects of longitudinal training in cognitive reappraisal. Emotion 14(2): 425–433.
DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW (2000) Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: Meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Archives of Internal Medicine 160(14): 2101–2107.
Downs TM, Schultzel M, Shi H, et al. (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: Risk assessment and prognostic factors for newly diagnosed patients. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 70(1): 59–70.
Draeger DL, Sievert KD, Hakenberg OW (2018) Analysis of psychosocial stress factors in patients with renal cancer. Therapeutic Advances in Urology 10(6): 175–182.
Greup SR, Kaal SEJ, Jansen R, et al. (2018) Post-traumatic growth and resilience in adolescent and young adult cancer patients: An overview. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology 7(1): 1–14.
Gross JJ (1998) The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology 2(3): 271–299.
Haase JE (2004) The adolescent resilience model as a guide to interventions. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 21(5): 289–299.
Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W (1979) Impact of events scale: Measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine 41: 209–218.
Kendall J, Glaze K, Oakland S, et al. (2011) What do 1281 distress screeners tell us about cancer patients in a community cancer center? Psychooncology 20(6): 594–600.
Kross E, Ayduk O (2017) Self-distancing: Theory, research, and current directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 55: 81–136.
Linden W, Vodermaier A, Mackenzie R, et al. (2012) Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: Prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. Journal of Affective Disorders 141(2–3): 343–351.
Milbury K, Lopez G, Spelman A, et al. (2017) Examination of moderators of expressive writing in patients with renal cell carcinoma: The role of depression and social support. Psychooncology 26(9): 1361–1368.
Ng CS, Wood CG, Silverman PM, et al. (2008) Renal cell carcinoma: Diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. American Journal of Roentgenology 191(4): 1220–1232.
Nook EC, Schleider JL, Somerville LH (2017) A linguistic signature of psychological distancing in emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 146(3): 337–346.
Oginska-Bulik N, Michalska P (2020) The relationship between emotional processing deficits and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among breast cancer patients: The mediating role of rumination. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 27(1): 11–21.
Orvell A, Ayduk Ö, Moser JS, et al. (2019) Linguistic shifts: A relatively effortless route to emotion regulation? Current Directions in Psychological Science 28(6): 567–573.
Orvell A, Kross E, Gelman SA (2017) How “you” makes meaning. Science 355(6331): 1299–1302.
Park J, Ayduk O, Kross E (2016) Stepping back to move forward: Expressive writing promotes self-distancing. Emotion 16(3): 349–364.
Parker PA, Swartz R, Fellman B, et al. (2012) Comprehensive assessment of quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in patients with renal tumors undergoing open, laparoscopic and nephron sparing surgery. Journal of Urology 187(3): 822–826.
Peh CX, Liu J, Bishop GD, et al. (2017) Emotion regulation and emotional distress: The mediating role of hope on reappraisal and anxiety/depression in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Psychooncology 26(8): 1191–1197.
Pennebaker JW, Beall SK (1986) Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 95(3): 274–281.
Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Boyd RL, et al. (2007) Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2007 [Computer software]. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
Pinquart M, Duberstein PR (2010) Depression and cancer mortality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine 40(11): 1797–1810.
Poulakis V, Witzsch U, de Vries R, et al. (2003) Quality of life after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: Comparison between radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery. Urology 62(5): 814–820.
Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: A new self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1: 385–401.
Satin JR, Linden W, Phillips MJ (2009) Depression as a predictor of disease progression and mortality in cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Cancer 115(22): 5349–5361.
Shahane AD, Denny BT (2019) Predicting emotional health indicators from linguistic evidence of psychological distancing. Stress and Health 35(2): 200–210.
Stark D, Kiely M, Smith A, et al. (2002) Anxiety disorders in cancer patients: Their nature, associations, and relation to quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology 20(14): 3137–3148.
Tackman AM, Sbarra DA, Carey AL, et al. (2019) Depression, negative emotionality, and self-referential language: A multi-lab, multi-measure, and multi-language-task research synthesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 116(5): 817–834.
Vaughan E, Koczwara B, Kemp E, et al. (2019) Exploring emotion regulation as a mediator of the relationship between resilience and distress in cancer. Psychooncology 28(7): 1506–1512.
Wolfer R, Sang C (1995) Comparing the SAS GLM and MIXED procedures for repeated measures. In: Proceedings of the twentieth annual SAS users group conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Zimmermann J, Brockmeyer T, Hunn M, et al. (2017) First-person pronoun use in spoken language as a predictor of future depressive symptoms: Preliminary evidence from a clinical sample of depressed patients. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 24(2): 384–391.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: June 26, 2023
Issue published: January 2024
Keywords
Data availability statement
Data is available for this article. View more information
PubMed: 37358056
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of Health Psychology.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 174
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 1 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 0
There are no citing articles to show.
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
