Surveys as cultural artefacts: Applying the International Self-Report Delinquency Study to Latin American adolescents
Abstract
Survey instruments are often watermarked with the language, thought patterns, experience and expectations of their designers’ cultural world. This creates some evident challenges when using surveys in international research projects (for example, in finding equivalent terms in translation), but also some less evident ones deriving from potentially hidden local variations in social experience, values and cognition. Using examples from the International Self-Report Delinquency Study, this article identifies several potential challenges to measurement that arise when an instrument designed with the youth of industrialized democracies in mind is presented to adolescents in a Latin American country (Venezuela). Some strategies for addressing these challenges are outlined.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Aebi MF (2009) Self-reported delinquency surveys in Europe. In: Zauberman R (ed.) Self-Reported Crime and Deviance Studies in Europe. Brussels: VUBPRESS Brussels University Press, 11–49.
Alonso A (1998) Urban graffiti on the city landscape. Paper presented at Western Geography Graduate Conference, San Diego State University, 14 February. URL (accessed 28 March 2015): http://www.asu.edu/courses/aph294/total-readings/alonso%20–%20urbangraffiti.pdf.
Ardila A (2007) The impact of culture on neuropsychological test performance. In: Uzell B, Ponton M, Ardila A (eds) International Handbook of Cross-Cultural Neuropsychology. London: Eurospan, 23–44.
Banville D, Desrosiers P, Genet-Volet Y (2000) Translating questionnaires and inventories using a cross-cultural translation technique. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 19: 374–387.
Beaman L, Dillon A (2012) Do household definitions matter in survey design? Results from a randomized survey experiment in Mali. Journal of Development Economics 98: 124–135.
Berry JW, et al. (2002) Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bovenkerk F, Wolf T (2010) Surinam. In: Junger-Tas J, et al. (eds) Juvenile Delinquency in Europe and Beyond: Results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study. New York: Springer-Verlag, 399–407.
Casasanto DJ, et al. (2004) How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. In: Forbus K, Gentner D, Regier T (eds) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 186–191.
Child Trends (2014) World Family Map 2014: Mapping Family Change and Child Well-Being Outcomes. URL (accessed 28 March 2015): http://worldfamilymap.org/2014/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/WFM-2014-Final_ForWeb.pdf.
Cheung FM, Van der Vijver FJR, Leong FTL (2011) Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist 66(7): 593–603.
Church AT (2000) Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality 68(4): 651–703.
Das J, Hammer J, Sánchez-Paramo C (2012) The impact of recall periods on reported morbidity and health seeking behavior. Journal of Development Economics 98: 76–88.
De Lima B, Sánchez Y (2008) Redes femeninas, familia popular y ancianidad en Venezuela. Perspectivas Sociales 10(1). URL (accessed 28 March 2015): http://www.perspectivassociales.uanl.mx/index.php/pers/article/view/50.
Elliott DS, Huizinga D (1989) Improving self-reported measures of delinquency. In: Klein M (ed.) Cross-National Research in Self-Reported Crime and Delinquency. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 155–186.
El Universal (2009) Cuál es tu opinión acerca de los graffitis? Caracas, 19 October. URL (accessed 28 March 2015): http://www.eluniversal.com/2009/10/19/dbvia_esp_cual-es-tu-opinion_19A2920371.
El Universal (2011) Cultura del graffiti es cada vez más difícil de detener. Caracas, 10 July. URL (accessed 28 March 2015): http://www.eluniversal.com/2011/07/10/imp_cultura-del-graffiti-es-cada-vez-mas-dificil-de-detener.
Felce-DiPaula ME (2000) Venezuela: Advantaged and non-advantaged youth in Caracas. In: Gibson-Cline J (ed.) Youth and Coping in Twelve Nations: Surveys of 18–20-Year-Old Young People. New York: Routledge, 189–200.
Freitez A, et al. (2014) Encuesta Nacional de Juventud 2013. La Juventud Venezolana Protagonista de la Democracia. Caracas: Universidad Católica Andrés Bello. URL (accessed 28 March 2015): http://proyectojuventud.ucab.edu.ve/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Resumen-para-la-prensa.pdf.
Fulmer CA, Crosby B, Gelfland MJ (2014) Cross-cultural perspectives on time. In: Shipp AJ, Fried Y (eds) Time and Work, Volume 2: How Time Impacts Groups, Organizations and Methodological Choices. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 53–75.
Grasmick H, et al. (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30(1): 5–29.
Greenfield PM (1997) You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American Psychologist 52(10): 1115–1124.
Haen-Marshall I (2010) ‘Pourquoi pas?’ versus ‘Absolutely not!’ Cross-national differences in access to schools and pupils for survey research. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 16: 89–109.
Hall ET (1976) Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday.
Hall ET (1983) The Dance of Life, The Other Dimension of Time. New York: Doubleday.
Hall ET, Hall M (1990) Hidden Differences: Doing Business with the Japanese. New York: Doubleday.
Hirschi T (1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hofstede G ([1980] 2001) Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hui HH, Triandis HC (1986) Individualism–collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Cross-Cultural Psychology 17(2): 225–248.
Hurtado S (2003) La participación discordante en la familia y los niveles de su transformación simbólica. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales 9(1): 61–83.
INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística) (2012) Procesamiento de Microdatos Censales. URL (accessed 28 March 2015): http://www.redatam.ine.gob.ve/Censo2011/index.html.
Inglehart R, Carballo M (1997) Does Latin America exist? (And is there a Confucian culture?): A global analysis of cross-cultural differences. PS: Political Science and Politics 30(1): 34–47.
Jelin E, Díaz-Muñoz AR (2003) Major Trends Affecting Families: South America in Perspective. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Junger-Tas J (2010) The significance of the International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD). European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 16: 71–87.
Junger-Tas J, Haen-Marshall I (1999) The self-report method in crime research. Crime and Justice 25: 291–367.
Junger-Tas J, Haen-Marshall I, Ribeaud D (2003) Delinquency in an International Perspective: The International Self-Reported Delinquency Study (ISRD). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Junger-Tas J, et al. (eds) (2010) Juvenile Delinquency in Europe and Beyond: Results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study. New York: Springer.
Klein MW (ed.) (1989) Cross-National Research in Self-Reported Crime and Delinquency. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
La Patilla (2012) Venezuela: El país donde reina la piratería. 8 August.
Levine R (2006) A Geography of Time: The Temporal Misadventures of a Social Psychologist; or How Every Culture Keeps Time Just a Little Bit Differently. Oxford: Oneworld.
Lugo J, Sampson T (2008) E-informality in Venezuela: The ‘other path’ of technology. Bulletin of Latin American Research 27(1): 102–118.
Lynch JP, Addington LA (2010) Identifying and addressing response errors in self-report surveys. In: Piquero AR, Weisburd D (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. New York: Springer, 251–272.
Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Cultural variation in self-concept. In: Strauss J, Goethals GR (eds) The Self: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag, 18–48.
Messner SF, Rosenfeld R (2007) Crime and the American Dream. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Moreno A (2002) Buscando Padre. Historia de Vida de Pedro Luis Luna. Valencia, Venezuela: Edición Universidad de Carabobo.
Nonis SA, Teng JK, Ford CW (2005) A cross-cultural investigation of time management practices and job outcomes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 29: 409–428.
Otálora-Montenegro C, Mora-Salas L (2004) La familia popular venezolana: El significado de la infidelidad en el contexto de la pobreza. Cuadernos del CENDES 21(55): 75–100.
Parrado EA (2002) Socioeconomic context, family regimes, and women’s early labor market experience: The case of Colombia and Venezuela. World Development 30(5): 799–816.
Rocque M, Posick, Marshall IH, et al. (2015) A comparative, cross-cultural criminal career analysis. European Journal of Criminology 12: 400–419.
Ssamula M (1995) Kampala (Uganda). In: Zvekic U, Alvazzi del Frate A (eds) Criminal Victimisation in the Developing World. Rome: United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute, 379–410.
Thornberry T, Krohn M (2000) The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In: Duffee D, et al. (eds) Criminal Justice 2000: Volume 4: Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, 33–83.
Tittle CR, Ward DA, Grasmick HG (2003) Self-control and crime/deviance: Cognitive vs. behavioral measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 19(4): 333–365.
Triandis HC (1989) The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review 96(3): 506–520.
Triandis HC, et al. (1988) Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self–ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(2): 323–338.
Tyler TR (2006) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Van Dijk J (2015) The case for survey-based comparative measures of crime. European Journal of Criminology 12: 437–456.
Watkins D, et al. (1998) Cultural dimensions, gender, and the nature of self-concept: A fourteen-country study. International Journal of Psychology 33(1): 17–31.
Wikström POH (2009) Situational Action Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: May 8, 2015
Issue published: July 2015
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in European Journal of Criminology.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 393
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 12 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 0
-
Systematic literature review on the nexus of food waste, food loss and...
-
Can We Compare Attitudes Towards Crime Around the World? Assessing Mea...
-
Does national moral context make a difference? A comparative test of S...
-
Researching the Roma in Criminology and Legal Studies: Experiences fro...
-
More Offenders, More Crime: Estimating the Size of the Offender Popula...
-
Victimisation et délinquance des jeunes Roms roumains en Suisse
-
How Exceptional Is India? A Test of Situational Action Theory
-
A Global View on Youth Crime and Victimization: Results From the Inter...
-
What May Be Learned about Crime in Europe (and Beyond) from Internatio...
-
The International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD)
-
Methodology and Description of the Sample
-
Perceptions of Neighbourhood Safety and Policy Response: A Qualitative...
-
A comparative, cross-cultural criminal career analysis
-
Cross-national comparative research on criminal careers, risk factors,...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
