Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T11:46:56.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1987

Robert W. Jackman*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University

Abstract

Differences in voter turnout among industrial democracies are a function of political institutions and electoral law. Specifically, the presence of nationally competitive electoral districts provides incentives for parties and candidates to mobilize voters everywhere, thereby increasing turnout. Disproportionality in the translation of votes into legislative seats provides a disincentive to voting, which lowers turnout. Multipartyism assigns elections a less decisive role in government formation, depressing turnout. By generating more decisive governments, unicameralism provides a clearer link between elections and legislation, increasing turnout. Finally, mandatory voting laws produce a disincentive to not vote. Empirical analyses of average voter-turnout levels in the 1970s and 1960s across 19 democracies are consistent with these expectations, although Switzerland and the United States appear to be outliers. The results have major implications for the way we interpret national differences in voter-turnout rates.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H.. 1982. The Decline of Electoral Participation in America. American Political Science Review 76:502–21.10.1017/S0003055400188379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, Robert R. 1964. Party and Society: The Anglo-American Democracies. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, George W. 1958. Techniques of Population Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Belsley, David A., Kuh, Edwin, and Welsch, Roy E.. 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/0471725153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. 1983. Conclusion: Electoral Systems and Party Systems. In Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, ed. Bogdanor, Vernon and Butler, David, 247–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, Bogdanor, and Butler, David, eds. 1983. Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems an Their Political Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1980. Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy. American Sociological Review 45:370–90.10.2307/2095172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Jackman, Robert W.. 1985. Regression Diagnostics: An Expository Treatment of Outliers and Influential Cases. Sociological Methods and Research 13:510–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1981. Electoral Participation. In Democracy at the Polls: A Comparative Study of Competitive National Elections, ed. Butler, David, Penniman, Howard R., and Ranney, Austin, 216–63. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1966. Patterns of Opposition. In Political Oppositions in Western Democracies, ed. author, 332–47. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, trans. Barbara, and North, Robert. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1966. Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gosnell, Harold F. 1930. Why Europe Votes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1974. Postindustrial Politics: How Benign Will It Be? Comparative Politics 6:163–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P., and Nelson, Joan M.. 1976. No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Office. 1977. Labour Force Estimates and Projections, 1950–2000. Geneva: author.Google Scholar
Jackman, Robert W. 1973. On the Relation of Economic Development to Democratic Performance. American Journal of Political Science 17:611–21.10.2307/2110747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert W. 1980. A Note on the Measurement of Growth Rates in Cross-National Research. American Journal of Sociology 86:604–17.10.1086/227283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. 1972. Econometric Methods, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12:327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2tCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T., and Rose, Richard. 1982. The International Almanac of Electoral History, 2d ed. New York: Facts on File.10.1007/978-1-349-06321-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris-Jones, W. H. 1954. In Defence of Apathy: Some Doubts on the Duty to Vote. Political Studies 2:2537.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1954.tb01011.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C., and Murrell, Peter. 1986. Interest Groups and the Size of Government. Public Choice 48:125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 1983. Getting Out the Vote: Participation in Gubernatorial Elections. American Political Science Review 77:675–89.10.2307/1957267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1980. Voting Turnout in Thirty Democracies: Partisan, Legal, and Socio-Economic Influences. In Electoral Participation: A Comparative Analysis, ed. Rose, Richard, 534. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1982. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1986. American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review 80:1743.10.2307/1957082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothro, James W., and Grigg, Charles M.. 1960. Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement. Journal of Politics 22:276–94.10.2307/2127359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert, Nanetti, Raffaella Y., and Pavoncello, Franco. 1983. Explaining Institutional Success: The Case of Italian Regional Government. American Political Science Review 77:5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, Lucian W. 1972. Culture and Political Science: Problems in the Evaluation of the Concept of Political Culture. Social Science Quarterly 53:285–96.Google Scholar
Rabushka, Alvin, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1972. Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas W. 1971a. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 2d ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas W. 1971b. An Estimate for the Decisiveness of Election Outcomes. In Social Choice, ed. Lieberman, Bernhardt, 379–92. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas W., and Taylor, Michael. 1970. The Analysis of Political Cleavages. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1973. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rusk, Jerrold G. 1970. The Effect of the Australian Ballot Reform on Split-Ticket Voting: 1876–1908. American Political Science Review 64:12201238.10.2307/1958367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Seton-Watson, Christopher. 1983. Italy. In Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, ed. Bogdanor, Vernon and Butler, David, 110–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jurg. 1974. Amicable Agreement versus Majority Rule: Conflict Resolution in Switzerland. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Strom, Kaare. 1984. Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies 17:199227.10.1177/0010414084017002004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingsten, Herbert. 1937. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. London: P. S. King & Son.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1984. Demographic Yearbook, 1983. New York: author.Google Scholar
Velleman, Paul F., and Welsch, Roy E.. 1981. Efficient Computing of Regression Diagnostics. American Statistician 35:234–42.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney. 1965. Conclusion: Comparative Political Culture. In Political Culture and Political Development, ed. Pye, Lucian W. and Verba, Sidney, 512–60. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400875320-013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-On. 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Francis G. 1930. The Pragmatic Electorate. American Political Science Review 24:1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Francis G. 1936. The Inactive Electorate and Social Revolution. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly 16:7384.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., Glass, David P., and Squire, Peverill. 1985. Predictors of Electoral Turnout: An International Comparison. Presented at the 13th World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Paris.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1983. World Tables, 3d ed., vol. 2. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar