Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 12, 2015

The social potency of affect: Identification and power in the immanent structuring of practice

Abstract

We address the centrality of affect in structuring social practices, including those of organizing and managing. Social practices, it is argued, are contingent upon actors’ affectively charged involvement in immanent, yet indeterminate social relations. To understand this generative involvement, we commend a temporally-sensitive, critically-oriented theoretical framework, grounded in an affect-based ontology of practice. We demonstrate the relevance and credibility of this proposal through an analysis of the interactions of Board members in a UK consulting company.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Adler P, Adler P (1999) The ethnographers’ ball – revisited. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28(5): 442–450.
Anderson B (2009) Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society 2(2): 77–81.
Barbalet J (2001) Emotion, Social Theory and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bhaskar R, Laclau E (1998) Discourse theory vs. critical realism. Alethia 1(1): 9–14.
Böhme G (2006) Architektur und Atmosphäre. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brief A, Weiss H (2002) Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology 53(1): 279–307.
Cederström K, Spicer A (2014) Discourse of the real kind: A post-foundational approach to organizational discourse analysis. Organization 21(2): 178–205.
Chia P, Mackay B (2007) Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice. Human Relations 60(1): 217–242.
Clarke M (2011) Talkin’ ‘bout a revolution: The social, political, and fantasmatic logics of education policy. Journal of Education Policy 27(2): 173–191.
Clough P (ed.) (2007) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Collins R, Munro R (2010) Exploring the sociological re-imagining of politics: A conversation. The Sociological Review 58(4): 548–562.
Corradi G, Gherardi S, Verzelloni L (2010) Ten good reasons for assuming a ‘practice lens’ in organization studies. Management Learning 41(3): 265–283.
Costas J, Fleming P (2009) Beyond dis-identification: A discursive approach to self-alienation in contemporary organizations. Human Relations 62(3): 353–378.
Ekman S (2013) Fantasies about work as limitless potential – how managers and employees seduce each other through dynamics of mutual recognition. Human Relations 66(9): 1159–1181.
Elfenbein H (2007) Emotion in organizations: A review in stages. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley, Working Paper 01–19–2007.
Fineman S (1993) Emotion in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Fineman S (2004) Getting the measure of emotion – and the cautionary tale of emotional intelligence. Human Relations 57(6): 719–740.
Fotaki M, Long S, Schwartz H (2012) What can psychoanalysis offer organization studies today? Taking stock of current developments and thinking about future directions. Organization Studies 33(9): 1105–1120.
Foucault M (2010) The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983 (ed., Davidson AI and trans., Burchell G). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Frosh S (2002) Key Concepts in Psychoanalysis. London: The British Library/New York: New York University Press.
Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gherardi S (2009) Introduction: The critical power of the practice lens. Management Learning. 40(2): 115–128.
Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Oxford: Polity Press.
Glynos J (2003) Self-transgression and freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6(2): 1–20.
Glynos J (2010) Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies 3(3): 309–335.
Glynos J, Howarth D (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
Glynos J, Howarth D (2008) Critical explanation in social science: A logics approach. Swiss Journal of Sociology 34(1): 5–35.
Glynos J, Stavrakakis Y (2008) Lacan and political subjectivity: Fantasy and enjoyment in psychoanalysis and political theory. Subjectivity 24(1): 256–274.
Glynos J, Howarth D, Norval A, Speed E (2009) Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review paper NCRM/014, National Centre for Research Methods.
Glynos J, Klimecki R, Willmott H (2012) Cooling out the marks: The identity and politics of the financial crisis. Journal of Cultural Economy 5(3): 297–320.
Glynos J, Klimecki R, Willmott H (2015) Logics in policy and practice: A critical nodal analysis of the UK banking reform process. Critical Policy Studies. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.009841.
Glynos J, Speed E, West K (2014) Logics of marginalisation in health and social care reform: Integration, choice, and provider-blind provision. Critical Social Policy 35(1): 45–68.
Goffman E (1968) Stigma. London: Penguin.
Grills S (ed.) (1998) Doing Ethnographic Research: Fieldwork Settings. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Herrera C (1999) Two arguments for ‘covert methods’ in social research. British Journal of Sociology 5(2): 331–343.
Holtzman R (2013) The enduring narrative of ‘socialized’ medicine: Oppositional rhetoric and Obama’s health care reform. Itineration: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Rhetoric, Media, and Culture, March 2013. Available at: http://tundra.csd.sc.edu/itineration/submission_pages/holtzman/Holtzman-Socialized-Medicine_vdesign_full_copy.pdf.
Howarth D (2012) Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies 3(3–4): 309–335.
Howarth D (2013) Poststructuralism and After: Structure, Subjectivity and Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hynes M (2013) Reconceptualizing resistance: Sociology and the affective dimension of resistance. The British Journal of Sociology 64(4): 559–577.
Jansson N (2013) Organizational change as practice: A critical analysis. Organizational Change Management 26(6): 1003–1019.
Jorgensen D (1989) Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Kemp C (2010) Building bridges between structure and agency: Exploring the theoretical potential for a synthesis between habitus and reflexivity. Essex Graduate Journal of Sociology 10: 4–12.
King D (2009) Journeys into critical thinking: Intersecting Foucault into the organizational practice debate. In: Wolfram Cox J, LeTrent-Jones T, Voronov M, Weir D (eds) Critical Management Studies at Work. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 130–143.
Knights D, Willmott H (1989) Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology 23(4): 535–558.
Laclau E (1993) Discourse. In: Goodin RE, Pettit P (eds) A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 431–437.
Laclau E (1995) The time is out of joint. Diacritics 25(2): 86–96.
Laclau E (2000) Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In: Butler J, Laclau E, Zizek S (eds) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (Phronesis). London: Verso, 44–89.
Laclau E, Mouffe C (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lok J, De Rond M (2013) On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns and the Cambridge University boat club. Academy of Management Journal 56(1): 185–207.
Lok J, Willmott H (2013) Identities and identifications in organizations: Dynamics of antipathy, deadlock, and alliance. Journal of Management Enquiry 23(3): 215–230
Lugosi P (2006) Between overt and covert research: Concealment and disclosure in an ethnographic study of commercial hospitality. Qualitative Inquiry 12(3): 541–561.
Lukes S (1974) Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Middleton D, Brown SD (2005) The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting. London: SAGE.
Miller JM (2001) Covert participant observation: Reconsidering the least used method. In: Miller JM, Tewksbury R (eds) Extreme Methods: Innovative Approaches to Social Science Research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 13–21.
Nicolini D (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Orum AM, Feagin JR, Sjoberg G (1991) The nature of the case study. In: Feagin JR, Orum AM, Sjoberg G (eds) A Case for the Case Study. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Rouse J (2001) Two concepts of practices. In: Schatzki TR, Knorr-Cetina K, Von Savigny E (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, 189–198.
Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: Theorising through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review 36(2): 338–360.
Schmidt D, Gibson D (2010) Emotions in ethics and the workplace: How can feelings be integrated into business pedagogy? In: 13th Annual Colleagues in Jesuit Business Education (CJBE) Conference. Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Shotter J (2011) Reflections on sociomateriality and dialogicality in organization studies: From ‘inter-’ to ‘intra-thinking’… in performing practices. Paper for submission to the book series Perspectives on Process Organization Studies (P-PROS), Volume 3, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Process Organization Studies in Corfu, 16–18 June.
Sieben B (2007) Doing research on emotion and virtual work: A compass to assist orientation. Human Relations 60(4): 561–580.
Sieben B, Wettergren Å (2010) Emotionalizing Organizations and Organizing Emotions. New York: Palgrave. Macmillan.
Simpson B, Marshall N (2010) The mutuality of emotions and learning in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry 19(4): 351–365.
Stake RE (1978) The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher 7: 5–8.
Stenner P (2008) A.N. Whitehead and subjectivity. Subjectivity 22(1): 90–109.
Stern D (2004) The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life. New York: Norton.
Sturdy A (2003) Knowing the unknowable? A discussion of methodological and theoretical issues in emotion research and organization studies. Organization 10(1): 81–105.
Thompson M (2011) Ontological shift or ontological drift? Reality claims, epistemological frameworks and theory generation in organization studies. Academy of Management Review 36(4): 754–773.
Thompson M (2012) People, practice, and technology: Restoring Giddens’ broader philosophy to the study of information systems. Information and Organization 22(3): 188–207.
Thrift N (2008) Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. Abingdon: Routledge.
Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organization becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science 13(5): 567–582.
Van Maanen J (1988) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Voronov M, Vince R (2012) Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review 37(1): 58–81.
Wagenaar H (2011) Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Walkerdine V (2010) Communal beingness and affect: An exploration of trauma in an ex-industrial community. Body & Society 16(1): 91–116.
Webster J (2008) Establishing the ‘truth’ of the matter: Confessional reflexivity as introspection and avowal. Psychology & Society 1(1): 65–76.
West K (2011) Articulating discursive and materialist conceptions of practice in the logics approach to critical policy analysis. Critical Policy Studies 5(4): 414–433.
Wetherell M (2012) Affect and Emotion. London: SAGE.
Willmott HC (1986) Unconscious sources of motivation in the theory of the subject: An exploration and critique of Giddens’ dualistic models of action and personality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 16(1): 105–122.
Zienkowski J (2012) Overcoming the post-structuralist methodological deficit – metapragmatic markers and interpretive logics in a critique of the Bologna process. Pragmatics 22(3): 501–534.
Žĭzek S (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

Biographies

Mark Thompson (PhD University of Cambridge) is Senior Lecturer in Information Systems at Cambridge Judge Business School, UK, and Visiting Professor at Surrey Business School. His research interests include exploring the affective implications of a practice perspective on people, organizations and technology, as well as digital service innovation in the public sector. He is a regular reviewer for a broad range of journals across the organizational and information systems fields. Full details can be found on Mark’s Faculty page: http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/faculty-research/faculty-a-z/mark-thompson/. [Email: [email protected]]
Hugh Willmott (PhD University of Manchester; Honorary PhD, Lund University) is Professor of Management at Cass Business School Research, City University and Research Professor in Organization Studies, Cardiff Business School, UK. He received his PhD from University of Manchester and previously held professorial appointments at UMIST (now Manchester Business School) and the Judge Business School, Cambridge and visiting appointments at the Universities of Lund, Uppsala, Sydney, Innsbruck and University of Technology Sydney. He has researched diverse aspects of organizations including managerial work, culture, control, corporate governance, management education, ethics, regulation and alternative organizations. He is currently Associate Editor of Academy of Management Review and was previously an Associate Editor of Organization. He has also served on the editorial boards of Accounting, Organizations and Society, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability and a range of management and organization journals including Journal of Management Studies and Organization Studies. Full details can be found on his homepage: https://sites.google.com/site/hughwillmottshomepage. [Email: [email protected]]

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 12, 2015
Issue published: February 2016

Keywords

  1. affect
  2. conflict
  3. emotion in organizations
  4. identity
  5. motivation
  6. ontology
  7. organizational theory
  8. practice

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2015.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mark Thompson
Hugh Willmott

Notes

Mark Thompson, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1AG, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Human Relations.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1034

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 25 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. Analyzing Social Interaction in Organizations: A Roadmap for Reflexive...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. In pursuit of (post-)bureaucratic promises: Analyzing the logics of ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Affect and relational agency: How a negative ontology can broaden our ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthrop...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The Atmospherics of Creativity: Affective and spatial materiality in a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. To Catch a Predator: The Lived Experience of Extreme Practices
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A new lease for life? The return of vitalism in management and organiz...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Labour Market Demands, Employability and Authenticity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Understanding the human in stakeholder theory: a phenomenological appr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Institutional work through empathic engagement
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Peer Collaboration as a Relational Practice: Theorizing Affective Osci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Compassion capability in resource-limited organizations in South Afric...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Emotions in Organization Theory
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Accounting and passionate interests: The case of a Swedish football cl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Value, affect and beauty: The Weird Sisters of institutionalist theory...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Understanding Institutional Endurance: The Role of Dynamic Form, Harmo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. “I have to go the extra mile”. How fat female employees manage their s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Who will I be when I retire? Introducing a Lacanian typology at the in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Drawing on the discursive resources from psychological contracts to co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Knowledge Management, Power and Conflict
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Positive emotion in workplace impact
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. One turn … and now another one: Do the turn to practice and the turn t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led unive...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. The Heart of Institutions: Emotional Competence and Institutional Acto...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Ideological Materiality at Work: A Lacanian Approach
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text