Volume 56, Issue 3 p. 699-729

INVESTMENT IN WORK AND FAMILY ROLES: A TEST OF IDENTITY AND UTILITARIAN MOTIVES

NANCY P. ROTHBARD

Corresponding Author

NANCY P. ROTHBARD

Management Department, The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania

and requests for reprints should be addressed to Nancy P. Rothbard, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Suite 2000 Steinberg Hall-Dietrich Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6370; [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
JEFFREY R. EDWARDS

JEFFREY R. EDWARDS

Management Department, Kenan-Flager School of Business University of North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 December 2006
Citations: 162

We thank Susan J. Ashford, Regina M. O'Neill, Sandy K. Piderit, Steffanie Wilk, and seminar participants at the Center for Executive Women, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University for their helpful comments on previous drafts of this paper. We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Finally, we thank the University of Michigan Business School for their financial support of this research.

Abstract

This study compared identity and utilitarian motives as predictors of time investment in work and family roles, using structural equation modeling with a sample of 623 working men and women. We tested within-role and cross-role relationships as well as the reciprocal effects of time invested in one role on time invested in the other role. As predicted, identification with a role was positively related to time invested in that role. However, findings for role utility were more complex. Time investment was positively related to both the pleasure and displeasure associated with a role. These findings suggest that people not only seek pleasure from roles but also invest time coping with role displeasure. The cross-role findings supported resource drain and accommodation but not compensation as explanations of work-family linking mechanisms. Gender analyses suggested that, for men, increased work time investment reduced time devoted to family, but increased family time investment did not affect time devoted to work. However, for women, increased time investment in either work or family reduced time devoted to the other role. These findings suggest that men may have greater reserves of time from roles other than work and family that make it unnecessary for them to draw from work time to meet increased family demands.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.