Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0312

We argue that our understanding of practice adoption has been limited by the prevailing view that variations in adoption stem from consciously made decisions. We counter this position by arguing that a key—and neglected—aspect of the adoption process concerns the level of conscious engagement of those involved. In so doing, we theorize that there are two distinct institutional dimensions necessary for understanding how practice adoption takes place: acceptance and implementation. We develop these dimensions to provide a framework showing that different within-organization responses will be associated with differing levels of acceptance of the need to adopt a practice—the acceptance dimension—and differing levels of conscious reflection during implementation of the practice—the implementation dimension. We then unpack this framework to explain how variations in discourse play a determining role in how practice adoption unfolds. This reveals an interesting institutional paradox: the discursive characteristics that make a practice more easily accepted also reduce the conscious engagement needed for its implementation. We spend the balance of the article developing the implications of our theorizing for understanding the process of practice adoption.

REFERENCES

  • Abrahamson E . 1996. Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21: 254–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abrahamson E. , Fairchild G . 1999. Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 708–740. Google Scholar
  • Alvesson M. , Karreman D . 2000. Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53: 1125–1149. Google Scholar
  • Amis J. , Slack T. , Hinings C. R . 2002. Values and organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38: 436–465. Google Scholar
  • Amis J. , Slack T. , Hinings C. R . 2004. The pace, sequence, and linearity of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 15–39.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari S. M. , Fiss P. C. , Zajac E. J . 2010. Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35: 67–92.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balogun J. , Johnson G . 2004. Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 523–549.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S . 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 78–108. Google Scholar
  • Bartunek J . 1984. Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 355–373. Google Scholar
  • Berger P. , Luckmann T . 1967. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books Doubleday. Google Scholar
  • Birkinshaw J. , Hamel G. , Mol M. J . 2008. Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33: 825–845.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Covaleski M. A. , Dirsmith M. W . 1988. An institutional perspective on the rise, social transformation, and the fall of a university budget category. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 562–588. Google Scholar
  • Creed W. E. D. , Scully M. A. , Austin J. R . 2002. Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13: 475–496. Google Scholar
  • Czarniawska B. , Joerges B . 1996. Travel of ideas. In Czarniawska B.Sevon G. (Eds.), Translating the organizational change: 13–48. New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  • Czarniawska B.Sevon G. (Eds.). 1996. Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  • David R. J. , Strang D . 2006. When fashion is fleeting: Transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM consulting. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 215–233.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J . 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Zucker L. G. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations, vol 1: 3–22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J . 1991. Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920–1940. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 267–292. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J. , Powell W. W . 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160. Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J. , Powell W. W . 1991. Introduction. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 1–40. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Douglas M . 1986. How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. Google Scholar
  • Edelman L. B . 1992. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97: 1531–1576. Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. , Bohmer R. M. , Pisano G. P . 2001. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 685–716. Google Scholar
  • Feldman M. S . 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11: 611–629. Google Scholar
  • Feldman M. S . 2004. Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science, 15: 295–309. Google Scholar
  • Fiss P. C. , Kennedy M. T. , Davis G. D . In press. How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organization Science. Google Scholar
  • Fiss P. C. , Zajac E. J . 2004. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non) adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 501–534. Google Scholar
  • Fiss P. C. , Zajac E. J . 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1173–1193.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Forssell A. , Jansson D . 1996. The logic of organizational transformation: On the conversion of non-business organizations. In Czarniawska B.Sevon G. (Eds.), Translating the organizational change: 93–115. New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  • Fox-Wolfgramm S. , Boal K. , Hunt J . 1998. Organizational adaptation to institutional change: A comparative study of first-order change in prospector and defender banks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 87–126. Google Scholar
  • Frenkel M . 2005. The politics of translation: How state level political relations affect the cross-national travel of ideas. Organization, 12: 275–301. Google Scholar
  • Friedland R. , Alford R . 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 337–360. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Goodrick E. , Salancik G. R . 1996. Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and cesarean births. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 1–28. Google Scholar
  • Green S. E . 2004. A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29: 653–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green S. E , Li Y. , Nohria N . 2009. Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 11–36.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R. , Hinings C. R . 1996. Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1052–1081. Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R. , Suddaby R. , Hinings C. R . 2002. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 58–80.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinings C. R. , Greenwood R . 1988. The dynamics of strategic change. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  • Hirsh P. , Lounsbury M . 1997. Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40: 406–419. Google Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J . 2005. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16: 618–636. Google Scholar
  • Isabella L. A . 1990. Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 7–41.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg K. C . 2009. Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115: 657–711. Google Scholar
  • Kennedy M. T. , Fiss P. C . 2009. Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U.S. hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 897–918.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraatz M. S. , Zajac E. J . 1996. Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61: 812–836. Google Scholar
  • Meyer J. , Rowan B . 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363. Google Scholar
  • Meyer J. , Scott W. R. , Strang D . 1987. Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 186–201. Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H . 1973. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
  • Oakes L. S. , Townley B. , Cooper D. J . 1998. Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 43: 257–292. Google Scholar
  • Oliver C . 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16: 145–179.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J . 1992. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3: 398–427. Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J . 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11: 404–428. Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J . 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13: 249–273. Google Scholar
  • Phillips N. , Lawrence T. B. , Hardy C . 2004. Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 635–652.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W . 1991. Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 183–203. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Rogers E. M . 1962. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
  • Sahlin K. , Wedlin L . 2008. Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin-Andersson K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The handbook of organizational institutionalism: 218–242. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Sahlin-Andersson K . 1996. Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In Czarniawska B.Sevon G. (Eds.), Translating organizational change: 69–92. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  • Schutz A . 1962. Collected papers: The problems of social reality. The Hague: Marinuw Nijhorr. Google Scholar
  • Selznick P . 1949. TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  • Selznick P . 1957. Leadership and administration. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson. Google Scholar
  • Seo M. , Creed W. E. D . 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27: 222–247.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sherer P. D. , Lee K . 2002. Institutional change in large law firms: A resource dependency and institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 102–119.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L . 1997. On the virtues of the old institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 1–18. Google Scholar
  • Strang D . 2010. Learning by example: Imitation and innovation at a global bank. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  • Strang D. , Meyer J. W . 1993. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22: 487–511. Google Scholar
  • Strang D. , Soule S . 1998. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 265–290. Google Scholar
  • Suddaby R . 2010. Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19: 14–20. Google Scholar
  • Suddaby R. , Elsbach K. D. , Greenwood R. , Meyer J. W. , Zilber T. B . 2010. Organizations and their institutional environments—Bringing meaning, values, and culture back in: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1234–1240.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tolbert P. S. , Zucker L. G . 1983. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: Diffusion of civil service reform, 1800-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 22–39. Google Scholar
  • Tolbert P. S. , Zucker L. G . 1996. The institutionalization of institutional theory. In Clegg S. R.Hardy C.Nord W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies: 175–190. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Townley B. , Cooper D. J. , Oakes L. S . 2003. Performance measures and the rationalization of organizations. Organization Studies, 24: 1045–1071. Google Scholar
  • Tyre M. J. , Orlikowski W. J . 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5: 98–118. Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. , Sutcliffe K. M . 2001. Managing the unexpected. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. , Sutcliffe K. M . 2006. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science, 17: 514–524. Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. , Sutcliffe K. M. , Obstfeld D . 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16: 409–421. Google Scholar
  • Westphal J. D. , Gulati R. , Shortell S. M . 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 366–394. Google Scholar
  • Westphal J. D. , Zajac E. J . 1994. Substance and symbolism in CEO's long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 367–390. Google Scholar
  • Westphal J. D. , Zajac E. J . 1998. The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 127–153. Google Scholar
  • Westphal J. D. , Zajac E. J . 2001. Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 202–228. Google Scholar
  • Yates J. , Orlikowski W. J . 2002. Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communication norms. Journal of Business Communication, 39: 13–35. Google Scholar
  • Zbaracki M . 1998. The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 602–636. Google Scholar
  • Zilber T . 2006. The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli high tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 281–303.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L . 1977. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42: 726–743. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900