Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online December 8, 2015

Dual Effects of Job Complexity on Proactive and Responsive Creativity: Moderating Role of Employee Ambiguity Tolerance

Abstract

Departing from existing studies based on general notion of creativity, we highlight the driver or initiating force behind creative engagement in organizations. To this end, we distinguish between proactive and responsive creativity and provide a nuanced perspective on the processes underlying distinct types of employee creativity. We propose that job complexity indirectly affects proactive and responsive creativity of employees by promoting psychological empowerment and cognitive overload, respectively. The ambiguity tolerance of employees is hypothesized to moderate the indirect effects of job complexity on the two types of creativity. Data collected from 143 employee–supervisor dyads in various companies in Sweden and Korea supported most of our hypotheses. For employees with high ambiguity tolerance, job complexity exhibited a significant indirect effect on proactive creativity through psychological empowerment. For employees with low ambiguity tolerance, job complexity exerted a significant indirect effect on responsive creativity via cognitive overload. By revealing distinct psychological paths toward different types of creativity and identifying a boundary condition for such processes, the present study provides an ecologically valid explanation regarding creativity in organizations.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Amabile T. M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., Herron M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 5, 1154-1184.
Anderson N., Potočnik K., Zhou J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297-1333.
Bakker A. B., Schaufeli W. B., Leiter M. P., Taris T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 22, 187-200.
Brislin R. (1981). Cross–cultural encounters: Face-to-face interaction. New York, NY: Pergamon.
Brown S. R. (1986). Q technique and method: Principles and procedures. In Berry W. E., Lewis-Beck M. S. (Eds.), New tools for social scientists (pp. 57-76). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Byron K., Khazanchi S., Nazarian D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta–analysis examining competing theoretical models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 201-212.
Chen G., Farh J. L., Campbell-Bush E. M., Wu Z. (2013). Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 1018-1027.
Choi J. N., Sung S. Y., Cho T. S. (2014). Creative contribution as the creative performance of individuals in groups: Effects of goal orientation and participative safety. Social Behavior and Personality, 42, 407-422.
Czikszentmihalyi M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
De Stobbeleir K. E. M., Ashford S. J., Buyens D. (2011). Self–regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback–seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 811-831.
Edwards J. R., Lambert L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.
Elsbach K. D., Hargadon A. B. (2006). Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organization Science, 17, 470-483.
Fox S., Spector P. E., Goh A., Bruursema K., Kessler S. R. (2012). The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 199-220.
Frese M., Garst H., Fay D. (2007). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four–wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1084-1102.
Furnham A., Marks J. (2013). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the recent literature. Psychology, 4, 717-728.
Furnham A., Ribchester T. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Current Psychology, 14, 179-199.
Gagne M., Senecal C., Koestner R. (1997). Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: A multidimensional model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1222-1240.
George J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 439-477.
Gilson L., Lim H. S., D’Innocenzo L., Moye N. (2012). One size does not fit all: Managing radical and incremental creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 168-191.
Gorgievsky M. J., Hobfoll S. E. (2008). Work can burn us out and fire us up: Conservation of resources in burnout and engagement. In Halbesleben J. R. B. (Ed.), Handbook of stress and burnout in healthcare (pp. 7-22). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
Grant A. M., Berry J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective–taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73-96.
Grant A. M., Parker S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 317-375.
Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R. (1975). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
Haerem T., Rau D. (2007). The influence of degree of expertise and objective task complexity on perceived task complexity and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1320-1331.
Hallowell E. M. (2005). Overloaded circuits: Why smart people underperform. Harvard Business Review, 83, 1-9.
Hart S. G., Staveland L. E. (1988). Development of a multi–dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock P. A., Meshkati N. (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Hofstede G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Humphrey S. E., Nahrgang J. D., Morgeson F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta–analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332-1356.
Judge T. A., Zapata C. P. (2015). The person-situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1149-1179.
Katrichis J. (1993). The conceptual implications of data centering in interactive regression models. Journal of the Market Research Society, 35, 183-192.
Kaufman J. C., Beghetto R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12.
Kaufmann G. (2004). Two kinds of creativity—But which ones? Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 154-165.
Lazarus R. S., Folkman S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
Lepine J. A., Podsakoff N. P., Lepine M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor—hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764-775.
MacKinnon D. P., Fairchild A. J., Fritz M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.
Madjar N., Greenberg E., Chen Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730-743.
Merrotsy P. (2013). Tolerance of ambiguity: A trait of the creative personality? Creativity Research Journal, 25, 232-237.
Morgeson F. P., Humphrey S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321-1339.
Mumford M. D., Gustafson S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
Nonaka I., Krogh G. (2009). Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20, 635–652.
Oldham G. R., Cummings A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.
Oldham G. R., Hackman J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 463-479.
Paas F., Renkl A., Sweller J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1-8.
Parker P. A., Kulik J. A. (1995). Burnout, self-and supervisor-related job performance, and absenteeism among nurses. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 581-599.
Preacher K. J., Rucker D. D., Hayes A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
Price R. H., Choi J. N., Vinokur D. A. (2002). Links in the chain of diversity following job loss: How financial strain and loss of personal control lead to depression, impaired functioning, and poor health. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 302-312.
Sacramento C. A., Fay D., West M. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 141-157.
Scott S. G., Bruce R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
Seibert S. E., Wang G., Courtright S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 981-1003.
Shalley C. E., Gilson L. L., Blum T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self–reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489-505.
Shalley C. E., Zhou J., Oldham G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933-958.
Spreitzer G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Construct definition, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
Sternberg R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sung S. Y., Choi J. N. (2012). Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 4-13.
Teichner W. H., Arees E., Reilly R. (1963). Noise and human performance: A psychophysiological approach. Ergonomics, 6, 83-97.
Thomas K., Velthouse B. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
To M. L., Fisher C. D., Ashkanasy N. M., Rowe P. A. (2012). Within–person relationships between mood and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 599-612.
Unsworth K. L. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 2, 289-297.
Unsworth K. L., Wall T. D., Carter A. J. (2005). Creativity requirement: A neglected construct in the field of employee creativity. Group & Organization Management, 30, 541-560.
Wat D., Shaffer M. A. (2005). Development and test of a social exchange model of OCB: The mediating role of trust in supervisor and empowerment. Personnel Review, 34, 406-422.
Wright B. M., Cordery J. L. (1999). Production uncertainty as a contextual moderator of employee reactions to job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 456-463.
Xie J. L., Johns G. (1995). Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1288-1309.
Zhang X. M., Bartol K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107-128.

Biographies

Sun Young Sung is assistant professor at Nanjing University, China. She earned her PhD in international business from Seoul National University, South Korea. Her research interests include knowledge management in teams and organizations, organizational demography, and innovative performance at multiple levels of analysis.
Andreas Antefelt is a human resource manager at Samsung Electronics, Korea. He earned his master’s degree in organizational behavior from Seoul National University.
Jin Nam Choi is professor of management at Seoul National University, South Korea. He earned his PhD in organizational psychology from the University of Michigan. His research interests include innovation implementation, organizational creativity, and multilevel processes of human behavior in organizations.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: December 8, 2015
Issue published: June 2017

Keywords

  1. job complexity
  2. ambiguity tolerance
  3. psychological empowerment
  4. cognitive overload
  5. proactive creativity
  6. responsive creativity

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2015.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sun Young Sung
Nanjing University, China
Andreas Antefelt
Samsung Electronics, Suwon, South Korea
Jin Nam Choi
Seoul National University, South Korea

Notes

Jin Nam Choi, Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-916, South Korea. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Group & Organization Management.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2628

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 43 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. Employee mobility as a knowledge development strategy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Ethical leadership and employee creativity among engineering employees...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Multilevel outcomes of creativity in organizations: An integrative rev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Daily Idea Generation and Employee Creative Performance: Effect of Day...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The interplay between psychological empowerment and employee engagemen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Upward social comparison toward proactive and reactive knowledge shari...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Effect of paradoxical leadership on employee innovation behavior in a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Frugal innovation embedded in business and political ties: transformat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Collaborative Creativity in International Social Pedagogy Educational ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Designing work for change and its unintended side effects
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. How job complexity fosters employee creativity: a contextualized growt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The Moderating Effect of Burnout in Relationship Between Job Complexit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Developing a tool for disability accommodation complexity: A sequentia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. The Effects of Routinization on Radical and Incremental Creativity: Th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Destination personality effects on tourists’ attitude: the role of sel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. How to Translate Creative Ideas into Innovation?Differential Resources...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Integrating Intelligence, Creativity, Wisdom: The Role of Emotions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Rewards and creativity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Job design and creativity: Lessons learnt and new schools of thought
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Interpersonal justice and creativity: testing the underlying cognitive...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Cool down emotion, don’t be fickle! The role of paradoxical leadership...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Managerial Networking and Frugal Innovation: Situational Leadership Pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Translating proactive and responsive creativity to innovation implemen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Affect stability and employee creativity: the roles of work-related po...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Should we be "challenging" employees? A study of job complexity and jo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. The Influence of Performance-Contingent Rewards on Proactive and Respo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. The Effect of Proactive Personality on Creativity: The Mediating Role ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Examining Job Complexity on Job Crafting Within Conservation of Resour...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. A Systematic Literature Review of Organizational Factors Influencing 2...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Do you value or worry about feedback? Tradeoffs between cost and value...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Team Psychological Needs and Radical versus Incremental Creativity of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Empirical Study on the Relationship between Effective Following Behavi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Enjoy the pain that you cannot avoid: Investigation on the relationshi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Ambidextrous Leadership for SMEs in the COVID-19 Era
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Extrinsic rewards and creative performance syndrome: The mediating mec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Developing operational problem solvers: the role of job design decisio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Dual pathways of emotional competence towards incremental and radical ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Different Moods Lead to Different Creativity: Mediating Roles of Ambig...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Distinct effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards on radi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. How Humble Leadership Influences the Innovation of Technology Standard...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Capitalizing on women’s entrepreneurial alertness
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Transformational leadership and creativity: A meta‐analytic review and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Resources Matter: Combined Influence of Job Demands and Job Control on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Routinization, free cognitive resources and creativity: The role of in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Contextualizing the effects of job complexity on creativity and task p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Rewards and Creativity: Past, Present, and Future
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text