A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts
Abstract
We propose that interdependence in a work context determines to what extent work roles are embedded within a broader social system and, further, that uncertainty determines whether work roles can be formalized or whether they emerge through adaptive and proactive behavior. Cross-classification of task, team member, and organization member behaviors with proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity produced nine subdimensions of work role performance. Ratings from 491 supervisors from 32 organizations and self-ratings from employees in two organizations (n's = 1,228 and 927) supported the proposed distinctions. Self-reports of proactivity were positively correlated with two external measures of proactivity.
REFERENCES
- Allen and Meyer's 1990 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1–18. Google Scholar
- Anderson and West 1994 1994. The Team Climate Inventory: Manual and user's guide. Windsor, U.K.: ASE/NFER-Nelson Press. Google Scholar
- Aragon-Correa, 1998 1998. Strategic proactivity and form approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 55–567. Google Scholar
- Axtell et al., 2000 2000. Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 73: 265–285. Google Scholar
- Becker and Kernan 2003 2003. Matching commitment to supervisors and organizations to in-role and extra-role performance. Human Performance, 16: 327–348. Google Scholar
- Borman et al.'s 2001 2001. An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 965–973. Google Scholar
- Borman and Motowidlo 1993 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt N.Borman W. C. associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations: 71–98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
- Burns & Stalker, 1961 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock. Google Scholar
- Campbell, 2000 2000. The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Executive, 14(3): 52–66.Abstract , Google Scholar
- Campbell, McCloy, Oppler, & Sager, 1993 1993. A theory of performance. In Schmitt N.Borman W. C.
and associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations: 35–69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar - Chan, 1998 1998. Functional relationships among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234–246. Google Scholar
- Colquitt, Noe, & Jackson, 2002 2002. Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55: 83–109. Google Scholar
- Costa and McCrae's 1989 1989. NEO-PI/FFI. Odessa, FL: PAR. Google Scholar
- Crant, 2000 2000. Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26: 435–462. Google Scholar
- Cummings & Blumberg, 1987 1987. Advanced manufacturing technology and work design. In Wall T.Clegg C.Kemp N. (Eds.). The human side of advanced manufacturing technology: 37–60. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley. Google Scholar
- Duncan, 1972 1972. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 313–327. Google Scholar
- Eisenberger, Fasolo, & Davis-LaMastro, 1990 1990. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 51–59. Google Scholar
- Farh & Dobbins, 1989 1989. Effects of comparative performance information on the accuracy of self-ratings and agreement between self- and supervisor ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 606–610. Google Scholar
- Frese & Fay, 2001 2001. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In Staw B. M.Sutton R. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 23: 133–187. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
- Frese, Kring, Soose, & Zempel, 1996 1996. Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 37–63.Link , Google Scholar
- Harris & Schaubroeck, 1988 1988. A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41: 43–62. Google Scholar
- Hart, Wearing, Conn, Carter, & Dingle, 2000 2000. Development of the School Organisational Health Questionnaire: A measure for assessing teacher morale and school organisational climate. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70: 211–228. Google Scholar
- Hattrup & Jackson, 1996 1996. Learning about individual differences by taking situations seriously. In Murphy K. R. (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations: 507–547. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
- Hesketh & Neal, 1999 1999. Technology and performance. In Ilgen D. R.Pulakos E. D. (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development: 21–55. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
- Hoffman, Nathan, & Holden, 1991 1991. A comparison of validation criteria: Objective versus subjective performance measures and self- versus supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 44: 601–620. Google Scholar
- Howard, 1995 (Ed.). 1995. The changing nature of work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
- Hu & Bentler, 1999 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 1–55. Google Scholar
- Ilgen & Hollenbeck, 1991 1991. The structure of work: Job design and roles. In Dunnette M. D.Hough L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology (2nd ed.): 165–207. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press. Google Scholar
- Ilgen & Pulakos, 1999 1999. Employee performance in today's organizations. In Ilgen D. R.Pulakos E. D. (Eds.), The changing nature of perfomance: Implications for staffing, motivation, an development: 21–55. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
- Schuler & Jackson, 1995 1995. Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. In Spence J. T.Darley J. M.Foss J. (Eds.) Annual review of psychology, vol. 46: 237–264. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Google Scholar
- Johnson, 2003 2003. Toward a better understanding of the relationship between personality and individual job performance. In Barrick M. R.Ryan A. M. (Eds.), Personality and work: 83–120. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
- Katz & Kahn, 1978 1978. The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
- Kozlowski, Gully, Nason, and Smith 1999 1999. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In Ilgen D. R.Pulakos E. D. (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development: 240–292. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
- Lance, Teachout, & Donnelly, 1992 1992. Specification of the criterion construct space: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 437–452. Google Scholar
- LePine, Erez, and Johnson 2002 2002. The nature of dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 52–65. Google Scholar
- Liberman, Idson, Chen, Camacho, & Higgins, 1999 1999. Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 1135–1145. Google Scholar
- Marks, Mathieu, and Zaccaro 2001 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356–376.Link , Google Scholar
- Miller, Johnson, and Grau 1994 1994. Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 59–80. Google Scholar
- Moon and coauthors 2004 2004. Asymmetric adaptability: Dynamic team structures as one-way streets. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 681–695.Link , Google Scholar
- Morgeson, Delaney-Klinger, & Hemingway, 2005 2005. The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 399–406. Google Scholar
- Morrison 1996 1996. Organizational citizenship behavior as a critical link between HRM practices and service quality. Human Resource Management, 35: 493–512. Google Scholar
- Morrison & Phelps, 1999 1999. Taking charge at work: Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 403–419.Link , Google Scholar
- Murphy and Jackson 1999 1999. Managing work-role performance: Challenges for 21st century organizations and employees. In Ilgen D. R.Pulakos E. D. (Eds.), The changing nature of work performance: 325–365. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
- Organ, 1988 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Google Scholar
- Parker, 1998 1998. Role breadth self-efficacy: Relationship with work enrichment and other organizational practices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 835–852. Google Scholar
- Parker 2000 2000. From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49: 447–469. Google Scholar
- Parker, Williams, & Turner, 2006 2006. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 636–652. Google Scholar
- Perrow, 1967 1967. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32: 194–208. Google Scholar
- Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Paine, & Bachrach, 2000 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: Critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26: 513–563. Google Scholar
- Pulakos and colleagues' 2000 2000. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 612–624. Google Scholar
- Rotundo and Sackett 2002 2002. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 66–80. Google Scholar
- Schmitt, Cortina, Ingerick, and Wiechmann 2003 2003. Personnel selection and employee performance. In Borman W. C.Ilgen D. R.Klimoski R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 12: 565–593. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar
- Schuler & Jackson, 1987 1987. Organizational strategy and organization level as determinants of human resource management practices. Human Resource Planning, 10(3): 125–141. Google Scholar
- Schwartz & Bilsky, 1990 1990. Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58: 878–891. Google Scholar
- Scott, 1987 1987. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
- Smith et al., 1983 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 653–663. Google Scholar
- Stryker & Statham, 1985 1985. Symbolic interaction and role theory. In Lindzey C.Aronson E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: 311–378. New York: Random House. Google Scholar
- Thompson, 1967 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
- Trist, 1981 1981. The evolution of sociotechnical systems. In Van de Ven A.Boyce W. (Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior: 19–75. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
- Van Dyne & LePine, 1998 1998. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 108–119.Link , Google Scholar
- Van Scotter and Motowidlo 1996 1996. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 525–531. Google Scholar
- Wall, Cordery, & Clegg, 2002 2002. Empowerment, performance, and operational uncertainty. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51: 146–169. Google Scholar
- Welbourne et al., 1998 1998. The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 540–555.Link , Google Scholar
- Woehr, 1994 1994. Understanding frame-of-reference training: The impact of training on the recall of performance information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 525–534. Google Scholar
- Wrzesniewski & Dutton, 2001 2001. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26: 179–201.Link , Google Scholar