Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integration von Individuum und Organisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organisation

  • 1762 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel thematisiert, wie Organisationsstrukturen Verhalten beeinflussen und umgekehrt, welchen Einfluss das Verhalten von Mitarbeitern auf die Strukturen von Organisationen hat. Die Integration von Individuum und Organisation ist ein Kernproblem moderner Organisationsgestaltung, bei der Fragen nach Motivation und einer bedürfnisgerechten Organisationsgestaltung im Mittelpunkt stehen. Die Frage, wie Strukturen zu gestalten sind, um die Motivation von Mitarbeitern optimal zu befördern steht daher im Kern dieses Kapitels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adler, P. S./Heckscher, C. (2006)(Hrsg.): The firm as a collaborative community: Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • AKNA (2000): Weiterentwicklung der Arbeitsorganisation (am Beispiel Gruppenarbeit) in der Fahrzeugmontage, in: IfaA (Hrsg.): Arbeitsorganisation in der Automobilindustrie – Stand und Ausblick, Köln, S. 186–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. (1972): Existence, relatedness and growth, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M./Imhof, S. (2013): Die Messung des Glücks von Arbeitnehmern im Rahmen von Mitarbeiterbefragungen. In: Domsch, M. E./ Ladwig, D. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Mitarbeiterbefragung, S. 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1957): Personality and organization, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1964): Integrating the individual and the organization, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1975): Das Individuum und die Organisation, in: Türk, K. (Hrsg.): Organisationstheorie, Hamburg, S. 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1976): Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (3), S. 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E./Clark, M. A./Fugate, M./Kreiner, G. E. (2007): Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint, in: Academy of Management Journal 50 (1), S. 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E./Kreiner, G. E. (1999): ’How Can You Do It?’: Dirty Work and the Challenge of Constructing a Positive Identity, in: Academy of Management Review 24 (3), S. 413–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T./Miner, A. S./Eesley, D. T. (2003): Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process, in: Research Policy 32 (2), S. 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991): Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, in: Journal of Management 17 (1), S. 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C./Ghoshal, S. (2013): Building competitive advantage through people, in: Sloan Management Review 43 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T. E./Plowman, D. A. (2013): Temporary, emergent interorganizational collaboration in unexpected circumstances: A study of the Columbia space shuttle response effort, in: Organization Science 25 (4), S. 1234–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. C. (2012): The emergence of clan control in a science-based firm: The case of Carl Zeiss, in: Buenstorf, G. (Hrsg.): Evolution, Organization and Economic Behavior, S. 131–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H. W./Herner, M. J. (1999): Arbeitsengagement aus freien Stücken: Zur Rolle der Führung, in: Schreyögg, G./Sydow, J. (Hrsg.): Managementforschung Bd. 9: Führung – neu gesehen, Berlin/New York, S. 55–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, K. H./Carlos, J. P./Randolph, W. A. (1996): Empowerment takes more than a minute, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C./Klotz, A. C./Turnley, W. H./Harvey, J. (2013): Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior 34 (4), S. 542–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D. E./Lawler, E. E. I. (1995): Empowering service employees, in: Sloan Management Review 36 (2), S. 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusoni, S./Prencipe, A./Pavitt, K. (2001): Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (4), S. 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S./Thompson, J. A. (2009): The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 54 (1), S. 32–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bungard, W./Jöns, I. (1997): Gruppenarbeit in Deutschland – Eine Zwischenbilanz, in: Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 41 (3), S. 104–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büssing, A. (2004): Organisationsdiagnose, in: Schuler, H. (Hrsg.): Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie, Bern, S. 557–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C. U. (1996): The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures and surprises, in: Organization Science 7 (2), S. 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R./Hardy, C. (1996): Organizations, organization and organizing, in: Clegg, S. R./Hardy, C./Nord, W. R. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Organization Studies, London, S. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M./Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), S. 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. (2004): Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, in: Schreyögg, G./Werder, A. v. (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch Unternehmensführung und Organisation, 4. Aufl., Stuttgart, S. 1101–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, J./Liu, Y./Hall, A./Ketchen, D. (2006): How much do high‐performance work practices matter? A meta‐analysis of their effects on organizational performance, in: Personnel Psychology 59 (3), S. 501–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costas, J. (2013): Problematizing mobility: A metaphor of stickiness, non-places and the kinetic elite, in Organization Studies 34 (10), S. 1467–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costas, J./Fleming, P. (2009): Beyond dis-identification: A discursive approach to self-alienation in contemporary organizations, in: Human Relations 62(3), S. 353–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. (2004): Theory Z: Opening the corporate door for participative management, in: The Academy of Management Executive 18 (4), S. 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, F. R. C./Greer, L. L./Jehn, K. A. (2012): The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis, in: Journal of Applied Psychology 97 (2), S. 360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1975): Intrinsic motivation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L./Ryan, R. M. (1985): Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, D./Wellman, B. (2015): Networked work and network research. New forms of teamwork in the triple revolution, in: American Behavioral Scientist 59 (4), S. 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A./Gadde, L.-E. (2002): The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation, in: Construction Management & Economics 20 (7), S. 621–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldstad, Ø. D./Snow, C. C./Miles, R. E./Lettl, C. (2012): The architecture of collaboration, in: Strategic Management Journal 33 (6), S. 734–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B./Osterloh, M. (1997): Sanktionen oder Seelenmassage? Motivationale Grundlagen der Unternehmensführung, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft 57 (3), S. 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B./Osterloh, M. (2002)(Hrsg.): Managing Motivation: Wie Sie die neue Motivationforschung für Ihr Unternehmen nutzen können, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, E. (1995): Ordnung und Macht, Dynamik organisierten Handelns, Frankfurt a. M. et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R./Lawler, E. E. I. (1993): Organizing for the future: The new logic for managing complex organizations, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R./Kumaraswamy, A./Langlois, R. (Hrsg.) (2009): Managing in the modular age: Architectures, networks, and organizations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerum, E. (1981): Grundfragen der Arbeitsgestaltungspolitik, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerum, E./Schäfer, I./Schober, H. (1996): Empowerment – viel Lärm um nichts?, in: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 25 (10), S. 498–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassmann, R. B. (1973): Persistence and loose coupling in living systems, in: Behavioral Science 18 (2), S. 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J. (2004): A critical assessment of the high‐performance paradigm, in: British Journal of Industrial Relations 42 (2), S. 349–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, L. (2007): Hot spots: Why some teams, workplaces, and organizations buzz with energy – and others don’t, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, T./Koch, M. (2007): Computer-supported cooperative work, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, R. J./Oldham, G. R. (1980): Work redesign, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadida, A. L./Tarvainen, W. (2014): Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework, in: International Journal of Management Reviews (im Erscheinen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, A. (2003). Managing employment relationships in flexible labour markets: The case of German repertory theatres, in: Human Relations 56 (8), S. 899–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, C. (1994): Defining the post-bureaucratic type, in: Heckscher, C./Donnellon, A. (Hrsg.): The post-bureaucratic organization: New perspectives on organizational change, Thousand Oaks, S. 14–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentze, J./Kammel, A. (1992): Lean Production: Personalwirtschaftliche Aspekte der „schlanken“ Unternehmung, in: Die Unternehmung 46 (5), S. 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuskel, D./Book, M./Strack, R. (2004): Unternehmensberatung, Organisation und Steuerung, in: Schreyögg, G./Werder, A. v. (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch Unternehmensführung und Organisation, 4. Aufl., Stuttgart, S. 1497–1510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoetker, G./Mellewigt, T. (2009): Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type, in: Strategic Management Journal 30 (10), S. 1025–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howaldt, J./Jürgenhake, U./Kopp, R. (2000): Personal- und Organisationsdiagnose. Ein Instrument für wettbewerbsfähige Personal- und Organisationsstrukturen, Eschborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S. E./Nahrgang, J. D./Morgeson, F. P. (2007): Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature, in: Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (5), S. 1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995): The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, in: Academy of Management Journal 38 (3), S. 638–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, V. H./Adams, G. B. (1992): The tacit organization, Greenwich, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, S./Ringlstetter, M. J. (Hrsg.) (2010): Work-Life Balance, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamlah, W./Lorenzen, P. (1973): Logische Propädeutik, 2. Aufl., Mannheim/Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R. (1992): Work motivation: New direction in theory and research, in: Cooper, C. L./Robertson, J. T. (Hrsg.): International Review of Industrial and Organizational Theory, Bd. 7, Chichester, S. 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1983): The change masters, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, R. R./Wright, P. M. (2013): The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors, in: Journal of Management 39 (2), S. 366–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. T. (1986): Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations, in: Academy of Management Journal 29 (4), S. 715–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krell, G./Weiskopf, R. (2006): Die Anordnung der Leidenschaften, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S.-W./Adler, P. S. (2014): Social capital: Maturation of a field of research, in: Academy of Management Review 39 (4), S. 412–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. J./Becker, W. S. (1987): Motivation theory reconsidered, in: Staw, B. M./Cummings, L. L. (Hrsg.): Research in Organizational Behavior, Bd. 9, S. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, R. (2007): Individuum und Organisation – Revisited: Neue Konturen eines organisationswissenschaftlichen Forschungsfeldes? In: Lang, R./ Schmidt, A. (Hrsg.): Individuum und Organisation, S. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. (2002): Modularity in technology and organization, in: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 49 (1), S. 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. (1986): High-involvement management, San Francisco/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E./Mohrman, S. A./Ledford, G. E. (1995): Creating High Performance Organizations, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E./Ulrich, D. (2008): Talent: Making People Your Competitive Advantage, San Fransisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, G. (2008): Gruppenarbeit in Deutschland – Instrument zur Requalifizierung der Industriearbeit oder leere Worthülse?, in: Arbeit 17 (1), S. 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, A. Y./Massini, S./Peeters, C. (2011): Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines, in: Organization Science 22 (1), S. 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1961): New patterns of management, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R./Araki, C. T. (1986): Managing without a boss: System 5, in: Leadership & Organisation Development Journal 7 (3), S. 17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A./Schweiger, D. M. (1979): Participation in decision-making: One more look, in: Staw, B. M. (Hrsg.): Research in organizational behavior, Greenwich, Conn., S. 265–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. (1987): Lehrbuch der konstruktiven Wissenschaftstheorie, Mannheim et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J. W./Morse, J. J. (1974): Organizations and their members: A contingency approach, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loth, U. (1995): Das Gore-Modell: Eigenständige Gruppen, Selbstverantwortung und natürliche Führung in dynamischer Unternehmenskultur, Materialien zum Vortrag auf dem 1. AWZ-Praxis-Symposium, Berlin 10.11.1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C./Sims, H. P. (1987): Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 32 (1), S. 106–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (2002): Motivation und Persönlichkeit, Neudruck, Reinbek bei Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960): The human side of enterprise, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E./Rosenberg, H. R. (1982): The human resources approach to management: Second-generation issues, in: Organizational Dynamics 10 (3), S. 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbert, S. L. (2007): Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research, in: Strategic Management Journal 28 (2), S. 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord, W. R./Brief, A. P./Alich, J. M./Doherty, E. M. (1988): Work values and the conduct of organizational behavior, in: Staw, B. M./Cummings, L. L. (Hrsg.): Research in Organizational Behavior, Bd. 10, S. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord, W. R./Durand, D. E. (1978): What’s wrong with the human resources approach to management?, in: Organizational Dynamics 6 (3), S. 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T. (1993): Das Toyota-Produktionssystem, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R./Hackman, J. R. (2010): Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior 31 2‐3, S. 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, M. B./Mortensen, M./Woolley, A. W. (2011): Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams, in: Academy of Management Review 36 (3), S. 461–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988): Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J./Hofman, J. D. (1997): An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technologies, in: Sloan Management Review 38 (2), S. 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortlieb, R./Sieben, B. (2008): Diversity strategies focused on employees with a migration background: An empirical investigation based on resource dependence theory, in: Management Revue, S. 70–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D./Weick, K. E. (1990): Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization, in: Academy of Management Review 15 (2), S. 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M. (1983): Handlungsspielräume und Informationsverarbeitung, Bern et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (2000): Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: Trends in diffusion and effects on employee welfare, in: Industrial & Labor Relations Review 53 (2), S. 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswick, C. (2015): Engaging with employee engagement in HRD theory and practice, in: Human Resource Development Review 14 (1), S. 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980): Markets, bureaucracies, and clans, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (1), S. 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981): Theory Z, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G./Jaeger, A. M. (1978): Type Z organization: Stability in the midst of mobility, in: Academy of Management Review 3 (2), S. 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padillaa, A./Hogan, R./Kaiser, R. B. (2007): The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments, in: The Leadership Quarterly 18 (3), S. 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelzmann, S./Strümpf, B. (2013): Organisationsdiagnose, in: Pelzmann, S./ Strümpf, B. (Hrsg.): Integrative Tools für die Team- und Organisationsdiagnose. Wirksam beraten, Wiesbaden, S. 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1970): Organizational analysis: A sociological view, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J. (1993): Jenseits der Hierarchien, Liberation Management (Übers. a. d. Engl.), Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1997): New directions for organization theory: Problems and prospects, New York, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1998): The human equation: Building profits by putting people first, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J./Salancik, G. R. (1978): The external control of organizations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J./Sabel, C. F. (1985): Das Ende der Massenproduktion. Studie über die Requalifizierung der Arbeit und die Rückkehr der Ökonomie in die Gesellschaft, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W./White, D. R./Koput, K. W./Owen‐Smith, J. (2005): Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences, in: American Journal of Sociology 110 (4), S. 1132–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quitmann, H. (1985): Humanistische Psychologie: Zentrale Konzepte und philosophischer Hintergrund, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridder, H.-G./Conrad, P./Schirmer, F./Bruns, H.-J. (2001): Strategisches Personalmanagement. Mitarbeiter führen, integrieren und Wandel gestalten, Landsberg am Lech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1973): Entwicklung der Persönlichkeit (Übers. a. d. Engl.), Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (2012): The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M./Deci, E. L. (2000): Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, in: American Psychologist 55 (1), S. 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R. (2000): Modular architectures, knowledge assets and organizational learning: New management processes for product creation, in: International Journal of Technology Management 19 (6), S. 610–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. A./Steensma, H. K. (2001): The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis, in: Academy of Management Journal 44 (6), S. 1149–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, B./Adams, J. (2008): Motivation in project management: The project manager's perspective, in: Project Management Journal 39 (2), S. 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Eberl, M. (2015): Organisationale Kompetenzen. Grundlagen – Modelle – Fallbeispiele, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Noss, C. (1994): Hat sich das Organisieren überlebt? Grundfragen der Unternehmenssteuerung in neuem Licht, in: Die Unternehmung 48 (1), S. 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. A./Neider, L. L. (2006)(Hrsg.): Power and influence in organizations: New empirical and theoretical perspectives, Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sey, A. (2001): Gruppenarbeit in Japan: Stereotyp und Wirklichkeit, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipper, F./Manz, C. C. (1992): An alternative road to empowerment, in: Organizational Dynamics 21 (3), S. 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1945): Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995): Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation, in: Academy of Management Journal 38 (5), S. 1442–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (2006): Leadership development lessons from positive organizational studies, in: Organizational Dynamics 35 (4), S. 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H./Heinrich, M./Schreyögg, G. (1976): Theorie und Praxis selbststeuernder Arbeitsgruppen, Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. S. (1969): Social psychology of the work organization, Belmont/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. M./Perry, J. L. (2006): Collaboration processes: Inside the black box, in: Public Administration Review 66 (1), S. 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1991): Team organization, Chichester u.a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulich, E./Groskurth, P./Bruggemann, A. (1973): Neue Formen der Arbeitsgestaltung – Möglichkeiten und Probleme einer Verbesserung der Qualität des Arbeitslebens, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völker, U. (1980) (Hrsg.): Humanistische Psychologie, Weinheim/Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L./Graham, J. W./Dienesch, R. M. (1994): Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation, in: Academy of Management Journal 37 (4), S. 765–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. P. (2013): Groupware und neues Management: Einsatz geeigneter Softwaresysteme für flexiblere Organisationen, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T. D./Wood, S. J. (2005): The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science, in: Human Relations 58 (4), S. 429–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976): Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1), S. 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1993): Strength is ignorance, slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations, in: Journal of Management Studies 30 (4), S. 515–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P./Jones, D. T./Roos, D. (1992): Die zweite Revolution in der Automobilindustrie (Übers. a. d. Engl.), Frankfurt a. M. et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaeger, T./Sorensen, P. F./Minahan, M. (2011): McGregor's legacy: the evolution and current application of Theory Y management, in: Journal of Management History 17 (2), S. 178–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zatzick, C. D./Iverson, R. D. (2006): High-Involvement management and workforce reduction: Competitive advantage or disadvantage?, in: Academy of Management Journal 49 (5), S. 999–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenger, T. R./Hesterley, W. S. (1997): The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives, and molecular units, in: Organization Science 8 (3), S. 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Georg Schreyögg

  2. Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Daniel Geiger

Authors
  1. Georg Schreyögg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Geiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schreyögg, G., Geiger, D. (2024). Integration von Individuum und Organisation. In: Organisation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43439-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43439-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-43438-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-43439-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation