Skip to main content
Log in

A systematic review of loss of independence in Parkinson’s disease

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Functional dependency (needing help with basic ADLs) is an important outcome in Parkinson’s disease (PD). “Death or dependency”, as opposed to being alive and independent, is a useful dichotomous indicator of poor outcome. We aimed to systematically review the progression to dependency in PD and what factors predicted development of dependency. Comprehensive searches were performed to identify observational studies of dependency in PD with follow-up of at least 3 years. Other forms of parkinsonism and highly selected cohorts were excluded. Descriptive analysis of included studies was performed and outcomes over time were plotted by type of cohort (inception/non-inception). Independent prognostic factors were identified. There were insufficient data for meta-analysis. Of 15,154 unique references identified, 14 studies were included. Most studies were of low quality. There was heterogeneity in definitions of dependency and the measured risk of dependency at similar time-points. Risk of dependency in inception studies was about 10–25 % at 5 years and about 20–50 % at 10 years; and risk of “death or dependency” in the inception studies was about 15–40 % at 5 years and about 35–70 % at ten years. More bradykinesia and older age were associated with more dependency, but there was little evidence for other prognostic factors. Few high-quality data on dependency are available. Heterogeneity in study populations, methodology and outcome reporting made data synthesis difficult. Few prognostic factors have been identified. Further data from representative inception studies are necessary to better understand the progression of dependency in PD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (1980) International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. World Health Organization, Geneva

  2. World Health Organization (2002) Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva

  3. Schwab RS, England AC (1969) Projection technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson’s disease. In: Gillingham FJ, Donaldson MC (eds) Third symposium on Parkinson’s disease. E & S Livingston, Edinburgh, pp 152–157

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wade DT, Collin C (1988) The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 10(2):64–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology 17(5):427–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marras C, Rochon P, Lang AE (2002) Predicting motor decline and disability in Parkinson disease: a systematic review. Arch Neurol 59(11):1724–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Post B, Merkus MP, de Haan RJ, Speelman JD, Group CS (2007) Prognostic factors for the progression of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Mov Disord 22(13):1839–1851

  8. Marinus J, van der Heeden JF, van Hilten JJ (2014) Calculating clinical progression rates in Parkinson’s disease: methods matter. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 20(11):1263–1267. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berlin JA (1997) Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? Lancet 350(9072):185–186. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62352-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chia LG, Liu LH (1992) Parkinson’s disease in Taiwan: an analysis of 215 patients. Neuroepidemiology 11(3):113–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hely MA, Reid WG, Adena MA, Halliday GM, Morris JG (2008) The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord 23(6):837–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoehn MM (1985) Result of chronic levodopa therapy and its modification by bromocriptine in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 71(2):97–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jasinska-Myga B, Heckman MG, Wider C, Putzke JD, Wszolek ZK, Uitti RJ (2012) Loss of ability to work and ability to live independently in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 18(2):130–135

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato K, Hatano T, Yamashiro K, Kagohashi M, Nishioka K, Izawa N, Mochizuki H, Hattori N, Mori H, Mizuno Y, Juntendo Parkinson Study G (2006) Prognosis of Parkinson’s disease: time to stage III, IV, V, and to motor fluctuations. Mov Disord 21(9):1384–1395

  15. Uitti RJ, Ahlskog JE, Maraganore DM, Muenter MD, Atkinson EJ, Cha RH, Obrien PC (1993) Levodopa therapy and survival in idiopathic Parkinsons-Disease—Olmsted County Project. Neurology 43(10):1918–1926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Velseboer DC, Broeders M, Post B, van Geloven N, Speelman JD, Schmand B, de Haan RJ, de Bie RM, Group CS (2013) Prognostic factors of motor impairment, disability, and quality of life in newly diagnosed PD. Neurology 80(7):627–633

  17. Scigliano G, Musicco M, Soliveri P, Girotti F, Giovannini P, Fetoni V, Caraceni T (1996) Progression and prognosis in Parkinson’s disease in relation to concomitant cerebral or peripheral vasculopathy. Adv Neurol 69:305–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aimard G, Henry E, Devic M (1984) Parkinson’s disease. Retrospective study of 302 clinical case records. Presse Med 13(15):919–922

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Auyeung M, Tsoi TH, Mok V, Cheung CM, Lee CN, Li R, Yeung E (2012) Ten year survival and outcomes in a prospective cohort of new onset Chinese Parkinson’s disease patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83(6):607–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guillard A, Chastang C, Fenelon G (1986) Long-term study of 416 cases of Parkinson disease. Prognostic factors and therapeutic implications. Rev Neurol (Paris) 142(3):207–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yahr MD (1976) Evaluation of long-term therapy in Parkinson’s disease: mortality and therapeutic efficacy. In: Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O (eds) Advances in Parkinsonism. Editiones Roche, Basle, pp 435–443

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rajput AH, Voll A, Rajput ML, Robinson CA, Rajput A (2009) Course in Parkinson disease subtypes: a 39-year clinicopathologic study. Neurology 73(3):206–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Laupacis A, Wells G, Richardson WS, Tugwell P (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosis. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 272(3):234–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saracci R (2007) Survival-related biases survive well. Int J Epidemiol 36(1):244–246. doi:10.1093/ije/dyl263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rybicki BA, Johnson CC, Gorell JM (1995) Demographic differences in referral rates to neurologists of patients with suspected Parkinson’s disease: implications for case-control study design. Neuroepidemiology 14(2):72–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Evans JR, Mason SL, Williams-Gray CH, Foltynie T, Brayne C, Robbins TW, Barker RA (2011) The natural history of treated Parkinson’s disease in an incident, community based cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82(10):1112–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alves G, Muller B, Herlofson K, HogenEsch I, Telstad W, Aarsland D, Tysnes OB, Larsen JP (2009) Incidence of Parkinson’s disease in Norway: the Norwegian ParkWest study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80(8):851–857. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.168211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Caslake R, Taylor K, Scott N, Gordon J, Harris C, Wilde K, Murray A, Counsell C (2013) Age-, gender-, and socioeconomic status-specific incidence of Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism in northeast Scotland: the PINE study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 19(5):515–521. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Linder J, Stenlund H, Forsgren L (2010) Incidence of Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism in northern Sweden: a population-based study. Mov Disord 25(3):341–348. doi:10.1002/mds.22987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Herlofson K, Lie SA, Arsland D, Larsen JP (2004) Mortality and Parkinson disease—a community based study. Neurology 62(6):937–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hemingway H, Croft P, Perel P, Hayden JA, Abrams K, Timmis A, Briggs A, Udumyan R, Moons KGM, Steyerberg EW, Roberts I, Schroter S, Altman DG, Riley RD (2013) Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: a framework for researching clinical outcomes. BMJ 346:e5595–e5595. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5595

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramaker C, Marinus J, Stiggelbout AM, Van Hilten BJ (2002) Systematic evaluation of rating scales for impairment and disability in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 17(5):867–876. doi:10.1002/mds.10248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Counsell C, Giladi N, Holloway RG, Moore CG, Wenning GK, Yahr MD, Seidl L (2004) Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations. Mov Disord 19(9):1020–1028. doi:10.1002/mds.20213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Morley D, Selai C, Thompson A (2012) The self-report Barthel Index: preliminary validation in people with Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurology 19(6):927–929. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03592.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Riley RD, Hayden JA, Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, Abrams K, Kyzas PA, Malats N, Briggs A, Schroter S, Altman DG, Hemingway H (2013) Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic Factor Research. PLoS Med 10(2):e1001380. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001380

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Macleod AD, Taylor KS, Counsell CE (2014) Mortality in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord 29(13):1615–1622. doi:10.1002/mds.25898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McGhee D, Parker A, Fielding S, Zajicek J, Counsell C (2015) Using ‘dead or dependent’ as an outcome measure in clinical trials in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86(2):180–185. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-307703

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Daan Velseboer for providing additional unpublished data for this review. We thank Dr Lorna Aucott for her comments on a draft of this paper. We are grateful for funding for this study from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government (Clinical Academic Fellowship CAF/12/05) and from Parkinson’s UK (Grant Number G-1302).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angus D. Macleod.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or original patient data.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Macleod, A.D., Grieve, J.W.K. & Counsell, C.E. A systematic review of loss of independence in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 263, 1–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7847-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7847-8

Keywords

Navigation