Volume 19, Issue 3 p. 273-295
Special Issue

Individual-level Foci of Identification at Work: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Doyin Atewologun

Corresponding Author

Doyin Atewologun

School of Business and Management, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS UK

Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Roxanne Kutzer

Roxanne Kutzer

Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL UK

Search for more papers by this author
Elena Doldor

Elena Doldor

School of Business and Management, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS UK

Search for more papers by this author
Deirdre Anderson

Deirdre Anderson

Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS UK

Search for more papers by this author
Ruth Sealy

Ruth Sealy

University of Exeter Business School, Exeter, EX4 4PU UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 July 2017
Citations: 33

The authors are grateful to the editorial team of this special issue (Sandra Corlett, Christine Coupland, Peter McInnes and Matthew Sheep) for their guidance and support throughout the review process. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review of individual-level targets (or foci) of identification, that is, the bases by which one derives a sense of self as a unique being in the context of work. We reviewed 253 articles from over 30 top management journals between 2005 and 2016. In examining foci types, definitions, underpinning theoretical and philosophical assumptions, we catalogue nine categories of individual-level identification foci (manager, leader, follower, team, organization, occupation-specific, professional, career and work), finding a dominance of functionalist meta-theoretical orientations (comprising over half the sample, with interpretivist approaches comprising about a third of studies). Further, we enhance construct clarity in the field; we identify conceptual challenges with extant definitions of key foci, and offer integrative definitions by specifying scope conditions for each identity focus and semantic relationships between various identity foci. We contextualize our discussion of construct clarity to different research orientations in the field and offer possibilities for theoretical developments therein. Third, we offer an integrative framework for positioning work in the field by scope of interest (identity content or context) and identity construction assumptions (stable or evolving), suggesting directions for future research.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.