Dynamic Stereotyping Across Occupations. How Management Academics and Practitioners Negotiate the Knower-Doer Stereotype in Interaction
Abstract
Despite the growing debate on the difficult relationship between management theory and practice, we still know little about what happens when academics and practitioners meet in liminal contexts, and how they deal with perceived differences. We study a corporate executive program where management academics and R&D managers draw on the ‘knower-doer’ stereotype to exchange knowledge about technology innovation management. We introduce the concept of dynamic stereotyping -i.e. using readily available occupational images to engage immediately in temporary and fluid exchanges with members of other occupations. Dynamic stereotyping (anticipation, reaction and reversal) can help reduce the relational insecurity experienced by academics and practitioners when they meet and promote the transition from abstracted to more embodied and realistic views of each other. We contribute to the theory-practice debate and to the literatures on stereotypes and occupations by providing a process-based view on stereotyping and the conditions favoring dynamic versus rigid stereotyping.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Aguinis H., Cummings C., Ramani R. S., Cummings T. G. (2020). “An A is an A”: The new bottom line for valuing academic research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(1), 135‐154. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0193
Allport G. W., Clark K., Pettigrew T. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Anteby M., Chan C. K., DiBenigno J. (2016). Three lenses on occupations and professions in organizations: Becoming, doing, and relating. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 183‐244. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1120962
Astley W. G., Zammuto R. F. (1992). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3(4), 443‐460. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.4.443
Baldridge D. C., Floyd S. W., Markoczy L. (2004). Are managers from Mars and academicians from Venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance. Strategic Management Journal, 25(11), 1063‐1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.406
Barends E., Villenueva J., Rousseau D. M., Briner R., Jepsen D. M., Houghton E., Ten Have S (2017). Managers’ attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence-based management an international survey. PLoS One, 12, 0184594.
Barley S. R. (1996). Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 404‐441. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393937
Barley S. R., Bechky B. A., Milliken F. J. (2017). The changing nature of work: Careers, identities, and work lives in the 21st century. Academy of Management.
Barley S. R., Kunda G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1), 76‐95. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122
Bartunek J. M. (2020). Accomplishing impact by performing our theories: It can be done, though not easily. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(1), 11‐31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319885451
Bartunek J. M., Rynes S. L. (2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike the paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1181-1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314529160
Batteau A. W. (2000). Negations and ambiguities in the cultures of organization. American Anthropologist, 102(4), 726‐740. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2000.102.4.726
Bechky B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312‐330. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
Beech N., MacIntosh R., MacLean D. (2010). Dialogues between academics and practitioners: The role of generative dialogic encounters. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1341‐1367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610374396
Bennis W. G., O’Toole J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96‐104. https:// .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15929407.
Beyer J. M. (2011). Research utilization: Bridging a cultural gap between communities. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(4), 385‐391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492611432797
Beyer J. M., Trice H. M. (1982). The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 591‐622. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392533
Blair I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242‐261. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
Boland R. J. (1982). Myth and technology in the American accounting profession. Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 109‐127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00063.x
Bucher S. V., Chreim S., Langley A., Reay T. (2016). Contestation about collaboration: Discursive boundary work among professions. Organization Studies, 37(4), 497‐522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615622067
Carton G., Ungureanu P. (2018). Bridging the research–practice divide: A study of scholar-practitioners’ multiple role management strategies and knowledge spillovers across roles. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(4), 436‐453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617696890
Chambers R. (1980). The myths and the science of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(1), 167‐180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90033-1
Cicourel A. V. (1981). The role of cognitive-linguistic concepts in understanding everyday social interactions. Annual Review of Sociology, 7(1), 87‐106. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.07.080181.000511
Czarniawska B., Mazza C. (2003). Consulting as a liminal space. Human Relations, 56(3), 267‐290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056003612
De Dreu C. K., Gelfand M. J. (Eds.) (2008). The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (pp. 3-54). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fine G. A. (1996). Justifying work: Occupational rhetorics as resources in restaurant kitchens. Administrative Science Quarterly, 90‐115. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393987
Fiske S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In Gilbert D. T., Fiske S. T., Lindzey G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Fournier V. (2002). Boundary work and the (un) making of the professions. In Professionalism, boundaries and the workplace (pp. 77‐96). Routledge.
Friga P. N., Bettis R. A., Sullivan R. S. (2003). Changes in graduate management education and new business school strategies for the 21st century. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(3), 233‐249. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2003.10932123
Gioia D. A., Corley K. G. (2002). Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 107‐120. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.7373729
Goffman E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Gorman E. H., Sandefur R. L. (2011). Golden age,” quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-based work. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 275‐302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411417565
Gulati R. (2007). Tent Poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 775‐782. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279170
Hambrick D. C. (1994). What if the academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11‐16. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410122006
Haslam S. A., Turner J. C., Oakes P. J., Reynolds K. J., Eggins R. A., Nolan M., Tweedie J. (1998). When do stereotypes become really consensual? Investigating the group-based dynamics of the consensualization process. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(5), 755‐776. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199809/10)28:5%3C755::AID-EJSP891%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
Hay G., Heracleous L. (2009). “Bridging the scholar-practitioner divide” special issue. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(3), 345‐347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886309345136
He J. C., Kang S. K., Tse K., Toh S. M. (2019). Stereotypes at work: Occupational stereotypes predict race and gender segregation in the workforce. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103318
Hodgkinson G. P., Rousseau D. M. (2009). Bridging the rigour–relevance gap in management research: It’s already happening!. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 534‐546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00832.x
Ireland R. D. (2012). Management research and managerial practice: A complex and controversial relationship. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 263‐271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0090
Jost J. T., Hamilton D. L. (2005). Stereotypes in our culture. In Dovidio J., Glick P., Rudman L. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after allport (pp. 208‐224). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Kawakami K., Dovidio J. F., Moll J., Hermsen S., Russin A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 871. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871
Kellogg K. C. (2019). Subordinate activation tactics: Semi-professionals and micro-level institutional change in professional organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 928‐975. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218804527
Kieser A., Nicolai A., Seidl D. (2015). The practical relevance of management research: Turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 143‐233. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1011853
Koveshnikov A., Vaara E., Ehrnrooth M. (2016). Stereotype-based managerial identity work in multinational corporations. Organization Studies, 37(9), 1353-1379.
Langley A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691‐710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
Leavitt H. J. (1989). Educating our MBAs: On teaching what we haven’t taught. California Management Review, 31(3), 38‐50. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166569
Macrae C. N., Bodenhausen G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 93‐120. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93
Markides C. (2010). Crossing the chasm: How to convert relevant research into managerially useful research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/0021886310388162
Mintzberg H. (2004). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Mohrman S. A., Gibson C. B., Mohrman A. M. Jr (2001). Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 357‐375.
Morrell K., Learmonth M., Heracleous L. (2015). An archaeological critique of ‘evidence-based management’: One digression after another. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 529‐543. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12109
Petriglieri G., Petriglieri J. L. (2010). Identity workspaces: The case of business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 44‐60. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.1.zqr44
Pfeffer J., Fong C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 78‐95. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.7373679
Pfeffer J., Fong C. T. (2004). The business school ‘business’: Some lessons from the US experience*. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1501‐1520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00484.x
Rousseau D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256‐269. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208679
Rousseau D. M., Manning J., Denyer D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 475‐515. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211651
Rynes S. L., Bartunek J. M., Daft R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340‐355. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069460
Sandberg J., Tsoukas H. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338‐360. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0183
Skovgaard-Smith I., Soekijad M., Down S. (2019). The other side of ‘us’: Alterity construction and identification work in the context of planned change. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719872525
Splitter V., Seidl D. (2011). Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a bourdieusian perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(1), 98‐120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310396322
Starkey K., Hatchuel A., Tempest S. (2009). Management research and the new logics of discovery and engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 547‐558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00833.x
Starkey K., Madan P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12(s1), S3‐S26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.2
Strauss A., Corbin J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss A. L. (1997). Mirrors and masks: The search for identity. Transaction Pub.
Trank C. Q., Rynes S. L. (2003). Who moved our cheese? Reclaiming professionalism in business education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(2), 189‐205. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2003.9901678
Trice H. M. (1993). Occupational subcultures in the workplace. Cornell University Press.
Trieschmann J. S., Dennis A. R., Northcraft G. B., Nieme A. W. (2000). Serving constituencies in business schools: MBA program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1130‐1141. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556341
Tushman M. L., O’Reilly C., Fenollosa A., Kleinbaum A. M., McGrath D. (2007). Relevance and rigor: Executive education as a lever in shaping practice and research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(3), 345‐362. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.26361625
Ungureanu P., Bertolotti F. (2016). Beyond boundaries. A relational study of knowledge exchanges between management scholars and business practitioners in executive classrooms. Paper presented at the 76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2016, 1393-1398. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.110
Ungureanu P., Bertolotti F. (2020). From gaps to tangles: A relational framework for the future of the theory-practice debate. Futures, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102532
Ungureanu P., Fabiola B., Massimo P. (2019). What drives alignment between offered and perceived well-being initiatives in organizations? A cross-case analysis of employer–employee shared strategic intentionality. European Management Journal, 37(6), 742-759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.03.005
Van de Ven A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. OUP Oxford.
Weick K. E. (2003). Theory and practice in the real world. In Tsoukas H., & Knudsen C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (pp. 453‐475). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weisbord M. R. (1974). The gap between OD practice and theory and publication. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10(4), 476‐484. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637401000401.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: April 12, 2022
Issue published: March 2024
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 239
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 0
There are no citing articles to show.
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
NTL members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
NTL members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
