Journal list menu
Trajectories of vegetation-based indicators used to assess wetland restoration progress
Corresponding Author
Jeffrey W. Matthews
Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois 61820 USA, and
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA
E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorGreg Spyreas
Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois 61820 USA, and
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA
Search for more papers by this authorAnton G. Endress
Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois 61820 USA, and
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeffrey W. Matthews
Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois 61820 USA, and
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA
E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorGreg Spyreas
Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois 61820 USA, and
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA
Search for more papers by this authorAnton G. Endress
Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois 61820 USA, and
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Editor: J. C. Callaway.
Abstract
Temporal trends in attributes of restored ecosystems have been described conceptually as restoration trajectories. Measures describing the maturity or ecological integrity of a restoration site are often assumed to follow monotonically increasing trajectories over time and to eventually reach an asymptote representative of a reference ecosystem. This assumption of simple, predictable restoration trajectories underpins federal and state policies in the United States that mandate wetland restoration as compensation for wetlands damaged during development. We evaluated the validity of this assumption by tracking changes in 11 indicators of floristic integrity, often used to determine legal compliance, in 29 mitigation wetlands. Each indicator was expressed as a percentile relative to the distribution of that indicator among >100 naturally occurring reference wetlands. Nonlinear regression was used to fit two alternative restoration trajectories to data from each site: an asymptotic (negative exponential) increase in the indicator over time and a peaked (double exponential) relationship. Depending on the particular indicator, between 48% and 76% of sites displayed trends that were at least moderately well described (R2 > 0.5) by one of the two models. Floristic indicators based on species richness, including native richness, number of native genera, and the floristic quality index, rapidly increased to asymptotes exceeding levels in a majority of reference wetlands. In contrast, indicators based on species composition, including mean coefficient of conservatism and relative importance of perennial species, increased very slowly. Thus, some indicators of restoration progress followed increasing trajectories and achieved or surpassed levels equivalent to high-quality reference sites within five years, whereas others appeared destined to either not reach equivalency or to take much longer than mitigation wetlands are typically monitored. Finally, some indicators of restoration progress, such as relative importance of native species, often increased over the first five to 10 years and then declined, which would result in a misleading assessment of progress if based on typical time scales of monitoring. Therefore, the assumption of simple, rapid, and predictable restoration trajectories that underlies wetland mitigation policy is unrealistic.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3294392 | Research data pertaining to this article is located at figshare.com: |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Literature Cited
- Anderson, K. J. 2007. Temporal patterns in rates of community change during succession. American Naturalist 169: 780–793.
- Aronson, J., S. Dhillion, and E. Le Floc'h . 1995. On the need to select an ecosystem of reference, however imperfect: a reply to Pickett and Parker. Restoration Ecology 3: 1–3.
- Aronson, J. and E. Le Floc'h . 1996. Vital landscape attributes: missing tools for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4: 377–387.
- Balcombe, C. K., J. T. Anderson, R. H. Fortney, and W. S. Kordek . 2005a. Vegetation, invertebrate, and wildlife community rankings and habitat analysis of mitigation wetlands in West Virginia. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13: 517–530.
10.1007/s11273-004-5074-7 Google Scholar
- Balcombe, C. K., J. T. Anderson, R. H. Fortney, J. S. Rentch, W. N. Grafton, and W. S. Kordek . 2005b. A comparison of plant communities in mitigation and reference wetlands in the mid-Appalachians. Wetlands 25: 130–142.
- Bourdaghs, M., C. A. Johnston, and R. R. Regal . 2006. Properties and performance of the Floristic Quality Index in Great Lakes coastal wetlands. Wetlands 26: 718–735.
- Bradshaw, A. D. 1984. Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Planning 11: 35–48.
- Brinson, M. M. and R. Rheinhardt . 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6: 69–76.
- Brooks, R. P., D. H. Wardrop, C. A. Cole, and D. A. Campbell . 2005. Are we purveyors of wetland homogeneity? A model of degradation and restoration to improve wetland mitigation performance. Ecological Engineering 24: 331–340.
- Brown, J. S. 1994. Restoration ecology: living with the Prime Directive. Pages 355–380. in M. L. Bowles and C. J. Whelan . Restoration of endangered species: conceptual issues, planning and implementation. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
10.1017/CBO9780511623325.019 Google Scholar
- Brown, S. C. 1999. Vegetation similarity and avifaunal food value of restored and natural marshes in northern New York. Restoration Ecology 7: 56–68.
- Cairns Jr, J. and J. R. Heckman . 1996. Restoration ecology: the state of an emerging field. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 21: 167–189.
- Campbell, D. A., C. A. Cole, and R. P. Brooks . 2002. A comparison of created and natural wetlands in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands Ecology and Management 10: 41–49.
- Carroll, C., C. Dassler, J. Ellis, G. Spyreas, J. B. Taft, and K. Robertson . 2002. Plant sampling protocols. Pages 11–19. in B. Molano-Flores Critical Trends Assessment Program monitoring protocols. Office of the Chief Technical Report 2002-2. Illinois Natural History Survey. Champaign, Illinois, USA.
- Choi, Y. D. 2004. Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: toward “futuristic” restoration. Ecological Research 19: 75–81.
- Cohen, M. J., S. Cartsenn, and C. R. Lane . 2004. Floristic quality indices for biotic assessment of depressional marsh condition in Florida. Ecological Applications 14: 784–794.
- Confer, S. R. and W. A. Niering . 1992. Comparison of created and natural freshwater emergent wetlands in Connecticut (USA). Wetlands Ecology and Management 2: 143–156.
10.1007/BF00215321 Google Scholar
- Craft, C., S. Broome, and C. Campbell . 2002. Fifteen years of vegetation and soil development after brackish-water marsh creation. Restoration Ecology 10: 248–258.
- Craft, C., P. Megonigal, S. Broome, J. Stevenson, R. Freese, J. Cornell, L. Zheng, and J. Sacco . 2003. The pace of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora marshes. Ecological Applications 13: 1417–1432.
- Cramer, V. A., R. J. Hobbs, and R. J. Standish . 2008. What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 104–112.
- Cronk, J. K. and M. S. Fennessy . 2001. Wetland plants: biology and ecology. Lewis. Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
10.1201/9781420032925 Google Scholar
- Daubenmire, R. 1959. A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Science 33: 43–64.
- Dawe, N. K., G. E. Bradfield, W. S. Boyd, D. E. C. Trethewey, and A. N. Zolbrod . 2000. Marsh creation in a northern Pacific estuary: Is thirteen years of monitoring vegetation dynamics enough? Conservation Ecology 4: 12.
- DeBerry, D. A. and J. E. Perry . 2004. Primary succession in a created freshwater wetland. Castanea 69: 185–193.
- DeKeyser, E. S., D. S. Kirby, and M. J. Ell . 2003. An index of plant community integrity: development of the methodology for assessing prairie wetland plant communities. Ecological Indicators 3: 119–133.
10.1016/S1470-160X(03)00015-3 Google Scholar
- Donath, T. W., N. Hözel, and A. Otte . 2003. The impact of site conditions and seed dispersal on restoration success in alluvial meadows. Applied Vegetation Science 6: 13–22.
- Edwards, K. R. and C. E. Proffitt . 2003. Comparison of wetland structural characteristics between created and natural salt marshes in southwest Louisiana, USA. Wetlands 23: 344–356.
- Engelman, L. 2005. Nonlinear models. Pages. 541–594. in. SYSTAT 11 statistics II. SYSTAT. Port Richmond, California, USA.
- Ervin, G. N., B. D. Herman, J. T. Bried, and D. C. Holly . 2006. Evaluating non-native species and wetland indicator status components of wetlands floristic assessment. Wetlands 26: 1114–1129.
- Fennessy, S., J. J. Mack, A. Rokosch, M. Knapp, and M. Micacchion . 2004. Integrated wetland assessment program. Part 5: biogeochemical and hydrological investigations of natural and mitigation wetlands. Technical Report WET/2004-5. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetland Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water. Columbus, Ohio, USA.
- Foster, B. L., C. A. Murphy, K. R. Keller, T. A. Aschenbach, E. J. Questad, and K. Kindscher . 2007. Restoration of prairie community structure and ecosystem function in an abandoned hayfield: a sowing experiment. Restoration Ecology 15: 652–661.
- Francis, C. M., M. J. W. Austen, J. M. Bowles, and W. B. Draper . 2000. Assessing floristic quality in southern Ontario woodlands. Natural Areas Journal 20: 66–77.
- Galatowitsch, S. M. 2006. Restoring prairie pothole wetlands: Does the species pool concept offer decision-making guidance for re-vegetation? Applied Vegetation Science 9: 261–270.
- Gutrich, J. J., K. J. Taylor, and M. S. Fennessy . 2009. Restoration of vegetation communities of created depressional marshes in Ohio and Colorado (USA): the importance of initial effort for mitigation success. Ecological Engineering 35: 351–368.
- Halle, S. and M. Fattorini . 2004. Advances in restoration ecology: insights from aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Pages 10–33. in V. M. Temperton, R. J. Hobbs, T. Nuttle, and S. Halle . Assembly rules and restoration ecology: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Island Press. Washington, D.C., USA.
- Herman, K. D., L. A. Masters, M. R. Penskar, A. A. Reznicek, G. S. Wilhelm, and W. R. Brodowicz . 1997. Floristic quality assessment: development and application in the state of Michigan (USA). Natural Areas Journal 17: 265–279.
- Hobbs, R. J. 2007. Setting effective and realistic restoration goals: key directions for research. Restoration Ecology 15: 354–357.
- Hobbs, R. J. and D. A. Norton . 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4: 93–110.
- Holl, K. D. and J. Cairns Jr . 1994. Vegetational community development on reclaimed coal surface mines in Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 121: 327–337.
- Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.
10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 Google Scholar
- Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2001. Critical trends in Illinois ecosystems. Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Realty and Environmental Planning, Office of Scientific Research and Analysis. Springfield, Illinois, USA.
- Jarman, N. M., R. A. Dobberteen, B. Windmiller, and P. R. Lelito . 1991. Evaluation of created freshwater wetlands in Massachusetts. Restoration and Management Notes 9: 26–29.
- Johnston, C. A., D. M. Ghioca, M. Tulbure, B. L. Bedford, M. Bourdaghs, C. B. Frieswyk, L. Vaccaro, and J. B. Zedler . 2008. Partitioning vegetation response to anthropogenic stress to develop multi-taxa wetland indicators. Ecological Applications 18: 983–1001.
- Karr, J. R. and E. W. Chu . 1999. Restoring life in running waters: better biological monitoring. Island Press. Washington, D.C., USA.
- Kentula, M. E. 2000. Perspectives on setting success criteria for wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering 15: 199–209.
- Kentula, M. E., R. P. Brooks, S. E. Gwin, C. C. Holland, A. D. Sherman, and J. C. Sifneos . 1992. An approach to improving decision making in wetland restoration and creation. Island Press. Washington, D.C., USA.
- Kirkman, L. K., K. L. Coffey, R. J. Mitchell, and E. B. Moser . 2004. Ground cover recovery patterns and life-history traits: implications for restoration obstacles and opportunities in a species-rich savanna. Journal of Ecology 92: 409–421.
- Klötzli, F. and A. P. Grootjans . 2001. Restoration of natural and semi-natural wetland systems in central Europe: progress and predictability of developments. Restoration Ecology 9: 209–219.
- Lindig-Cisneros, R., J. Desmond, K. E. Boyer, and J. B. Zedler . 2003. Wetland restoration thresholds: Can a degradation transition be reversed with increased effort? Ecological Applications 13: 193–205.
- Lockwood, J. L. 1997. An alternative to succession: assembly rules offer guide to restoration efforts. Restoration and Management Notes 15: 45–50.
- Lopez, R. D. and M. S. Fennessy . 2002. Testing the floristic quality assessment index as an indicator of wetland condition. Ecological Applications 12: 487–497.
- Lougheed, V. L., C. A. Parker, and R. J. Stevenson . 2007. Using non-linear responses of multiple taxonomic groups to establish criteria indicative of wetland biological condition. Wetlands 97: 96–109.
- Mack, J. J., M. Micacchion, L. D. Augusta, and G. R. Sablak . 2000. Vegetation indices of biotic integrity (VIBI) for wetlands and calibration of the Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands v. 5.0. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Columbus, Ohio, USA.
- MacMahon, J. A. and K. D. Holl . 2001. Ecological restoration: a key to conservation biology's future. Pages 245–269. in M. E. Soulé and G. H. Orians . Conservation biology: research priorities for the next decade. Island Press. Washington, D.C., USA.
- Magee, T. K., T. L. Ernst, M. E. Kentula, and K. A. Dwire . 1999. Floristic composition of freshwater wetlands in an urbanizing environment. Wetlands 19: 517–534.
- Matthews, J. W. 2003. Assessment of the floristic quality index for use in Illinois, USA, wetlands. Natural Areas Journal 23: 53–60.
- Matthews, J. W. and A. G. Endress . 2008. Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands. Environmental Management 41: 130–141.
- Matthews, J. W., P. A. Tessene, S. M. Wiesbrook, and B. W. Zercher . 2005. Effect of area and isolation on species richness and indices of floristic quality in Illinois, USA wetlands. Wetlands 25: 607–615.
- Mayer, A. L. and M. Rietkerk . 2004. The dynamic regime concept for ecosystem management and restoration. BioScience 54: 1013–1020.
- McIver, J. and L. Starr . 2001. Restoration of degraded lands in the interior Columbia River basin: passive vs. active approaches. Forest Ecology and Management 153: 15–28.
- Miller, S. J. and D. H. Wardrop . 2006. Adapting the floristic quality assessment index to indicate anthropogenic disturbance in central Pennsylvania wetlands. Ecological Indicators 6: 313–326.
- Miller, S. J., D. H. Wardrop, W. M. Mahaney, and R. P. Brooks . 2006. A plant-based index of biological integrity (IBI) for headwater wetlands in central Pennsylvania. Ecological Indicators 6: 290–312.
- Mitsch, W. J., X. Wu, R. W. Nairn, P. E. Weihe, N. Wang, R. Deal, and C. E. Boucher . 1998. Creating and restoring wetlands. BioScience 48: 1019–1030.
- Mohlenbrock, R. H. 2002. Vascular flora of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press. Carbondale, Illinois, USA.
- Moore, H. H., W. A. Niering, L. J. Marsicano, and M. Dowdell . 1999. Vegetation change in created emergent wetlands (1988–1996) in Connecticut (USA). Wetlands Ecology and Management 7: 177–191.
- Morgan, P. A. and F. T. Short . 2002. Using functional trajectories to track constructed salt marsh development in the Great Bay Estuary, Maine/New Hampshire, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 10: 461–473.
- Mulhouse, J. M. and S. M. Galatowitsch . 2003. Revegetation of prairie pothole wetlands in the mid-continental US: twelve years post-reflooding. Plant Ecology 169: 143–159.
- Mushet, D. M., N. H. Euliss, and T. L. Shaffer . 2002. Floristic quality assessment of one natural and three restored wetland complexes in North Dakota, USA. Wetlands 22: 126–138.
- National Research Council. 2001. Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., USA.
- Nedland, T. S., A. Wolf, and T. Reed . 2007. A reexamination of restored wetlands in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. Wetlands 27: 999–1015.
- Nichols, J., J. Perry, and D. DeBerry . 2006. Using a floristic quality assessment technique to evaluate plant community integrity of forested wetlands in southeastern Virginia. Natural Areas Journal 26: 360–369.
- Noon, K. F. 1996. A model of created wetland primary succession. Landscape and Urban Planning 34: 97–123.
- Odum, E. P. 1985. Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. BioScience 35: 419–422.
- Pickett, S. T. A. and V. T. Parker . 1994. Avoiding old pitfalls: opportunities in a new discipline. Restoration Ecology 2: 75–79.
10.1111/j.1526-100X.1994.tb00044.x Google Scholar
- Race, M. S. 1985. Critique of present wetlands mitigation policies in the United States based on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay. Environmental Management 9: 71–82.
- Reed Jr., P. B. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Illinois. NERC-88/18.13. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory. Washington, D.C., USA.
- Reinartz, J. A. and E. L. Warne . 1993. Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeastern Wisconsin. Wetlands 13: 153–164.
- Reiss, K. C. 2006. Florida wetland condition index for depressional forested wetlands. Ecological Indicators 6: 337–352.
- Rheinhardt, R. D., R. C. Rheinhardt, M. M. Brinson, and K. E. Faser Jr . 1999. Application of reference data for assessing and restoring headwater ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 7: 241–251.
- Rooney, T. P. and D. A. Rodgers . 2002. The modified floristic quality index. Natural Areas Journal 22: 340–344.
- Seabloom, E. W. and A. G. van der Valk . 2003. Plant diversity, composition, and invasion of restored and natural prairie pothole wetlands: implications for restoration. Wetlands 23: 1–12.
- Sheil, D. and D. F. R. P. Burslem . 2003. Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 18–26.
- Shuwen, W., Q. Pei, L. Yang, and L. Xi-Ping . 2001. Wetland creation for rare waterfowl conservation: a project designed according to the principles of ecological succession. Ecological Engineering 18: 115–120.
10.1016/S0925-8574(01)00062-3 Google Scholar
- Simenstad, C. A., D. Reed, and M. Ford . 2006. When is restoration not? Incorporating landscape-scale processes to restore self-sustaining ecosystems in coastal wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering 26: 27–39.
- Simenstad, C. A. and R. M. Thom . 1996. Functional equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi-Te estuarine wetland. Ecological Applications 6: 38–56.
- Spieles, D. J., M. Coneybeer, and J. Horn . 2006. Community structure and quality after 10 years in two central Ohio mitigation bank wetlands. Environmental Management 38: 837–852.
- Streever, W. J. 1999. Examples of performance standards for wetland creation and restoration in Section 404 permits and an approach to developing performance standards. TN WRP WG-RS-3.3. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA.
- Streever, W. J. 2000. Spartina alterniflora marshes on dredged material: a critical review of the ongoing debate over success. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8: 295–316.
10.1023/A:1008483203083 Google Scholar
- Stylinski, C. D. and E. B. Allen . 1999. Lack of native species recovery following severe exotic disturbance in southern California shrublands. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 544–554.
- Swink, F. and G. Wilhelm . 1994. Plants of the Chicago region. Fourth edition. Morton Arboretum. Lisle, Illinois, USA.
- Taft, J. B., C. Hauser, and K. R. Robertson . 2006. Estimating floristic integrity in tallgrass prairie. Biological Conservation 131: 42–51.
- Taft, J. B., G. S. Wilhelm, D. M. Ladd, and L. A. Masters . 1997. Floristic quality assessment for vegetation in Illinois, a method for assessing vegetation integrity. Erigenia 15: 3–95.
- Trowbridge, W. B. 2007. The role of stochasticity and priority effects in floodplain restoration. Ecological Applications 17: 1312–1324.
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experimental Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: using vegetation to assess environmental conditions in wetlands. EPA-822-R-022-020. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. Washington, D.C., USA.
- Weinstein, M. P., J. M. Teal, J. H. Balletto, and K. H. Strait . 2001. Restoration principles emerging from one of the world's largest tidal marsh restoration projects. Wetlands Ecology and Management 9: 387–407.
10.1023/A:1012058713910 Google Scholar
- Whigham, D., M. Pittek, K. H. Hofmockel, T. Jordan, and A. L. Pepin . 2002. Biomass and nutrient dynamics in restored wetlands on the outer coastal plain of Maryland, USA. Wetlands 22: 562–574.
- Whisenant, S. G. 1999. Repairing damaged wildlands: a process-oriented, landscape-scale approach. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
10.1017/CBO9780511612565 Google Scholar
- White, P. S. and J. L. Walker . 1997. Approximating nature's variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5: 338–349.
- Wilkins, S., D. A. Keith, and P. Adam . 2003. Measuring success: evaluating the restoration of grassy eucalypt woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, Australia. Restoration Ecology 11: 489–503.
- Wissinger, S. A., S. G. Ingmire, and J. L. Bogo . 2001. Plant and invertebrate communities as indicators of success for wetlands restored for wildlife. Pages 207–236. in R. B. Rader, D. P. Batzer, and S. A. Wissinger . Bioassessment and management of North American freshwater wetlands. John Wiley and Sons. New York, New York, USA.
- Yates, C. J. and R. J. Hobbs . 1997. Woodland restoration in the Western Australian wheatbelt: a conceptual framework using a state and transition model. Restoration Ecology 5: 28–35.
- Young, T. P., J. M. Chase, and R. T. Huddleston . 2001. Community succession and assembly: comparing, contrasting and combining paradigms in the context of ecological restoration. Ecological Restoration 19: 5–18.
- Zedler, J. B. 1996. Ecological issues in wetland mitigation: an introduction to the forum. Ecological Applications 6: 33–37.
- Zedler, J. B. and J. C. Callaway . 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: Do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restoration Ecology 7: 69–73.
- Zedler, J. B. and J. C. Callaway . 2000. Evaluating the progress of engineered tidal wetlands. Ecological Engineering 15: 211–225.