Volume 30, Issue 12 p. 2756-2761
Environmental Toxicology

Comparative toxicity of two glyphosate formulations (original formulation of Roundup® and Roundup WeatherMAX®) to six North American larval anurans

Latice Fuentes

Corresponding Author

Latice Fuentes

Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA

Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.Search for more papers by this author
Lindsay J. Moore

Lindsay J. Moore

Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
John H. Rodgers Jr.

John H. Rodgers Jr.

Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
William W. Bowerman

William W. Bowerman

Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gregory K. Yarrow

Gregory K. Yarrow

Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Wayne Y. Chao

Wayne Y. Chao

Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 September 2011
Citations: 36

Abstract

The toxicity of two glyphosate formulations (the original formulation of Roundup® and Roundup WeatherMAX®) to six species of North American larval anurans was evaluated by using 96-h static, nonrenewal aqueous exposures. The 96-h median lethal concentration values (LC50) ranged from 1.80 to 4.22 mg acid equivalent (ae)/L and 1.96 to 3.26 mg ae/L for the original formulation of Roundup and Roundup WeatherMAX, respectively. Judged by LC50 values, four species were more sensitive to Roundup WeatherMAX exposures, and two species were more sensitive to the original formulation. Two of six species, Bufo fowleri (p < 0.05, F = 14.89, degrees of freedom [df] = 1) and Rana clamitans (p < 0.05, F = 18.46, df = 1), had significantly different responses to the two formulations tested. Increased sensitivity to Roundup WeatherMAX likely was due to differences in the surfactants or relative amounts of the surfactants in the two formulations. Potency slopes for exposures of the original formulation ranged from 24.3 to 92.5% mortality/mg ae/L. Thresholds ranged from 1.31 to 3.68 mg ae/L, showing an approximately three times difference in the initiation of response among species tested. For exposures of Roundup WeatherMAX, slopes ranged from 49.3 to 84.2% mortality/mg ae/L. Thresholds ranged from 0.83 to 2.68 mg ae/L. Margins of safety derived from a simulated direct overspray were above 1, except for one species in exposures of Roundup WeatherMAX. Laboratory data based on aqueous exposures are conservative because of the lack of environmental ligands; however, these tests provide information regarding the relative toxicity between these two Roundup formulations. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:2756–2761. © 2011 SETAC