Advertisement
No access
Research Articles

Fusion-Competent Vaccines: Broad Neutralization of Primary Isolates of HIV

Science
15 Jan 1999
Vol 283, Issue 5400
pp. 357-362

Abstract

Current recombinant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) gp120 protein vaccine candidates are unable to elicit antibodies capable of neutralizing infectivity of primary isolates from patients. Here, “fusion-competent” HIV vaccine immunogens were generated that capture the transient envelope-CD4-coreceptor structures that arise during HIV binding and fusion. In a transgenic mouse immunization model, these formaldehyde-fixed whole-cell vaccines elicited antibodies capable of neutralizing infectivity of 23 of 24 primary HIV isolates from diverse geographic locations and genetic clades A to E. Development of these fusion-dependent immunogens may lead to a broadly effective HIV vaccine.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

2
Wrin T., Loh T. P., Charron-Vennari J., Schuitemaker H., Nunberg J. H., J. Virol. 69, 39 (1995).
3
J. P. Moore and D. D. Ho, AIDS 9 (suppl. A), S117 (1995);
Mascola J. R., et al., J. Infect. Dis. 173, 340 (1996);
Connor R. I., et al., J. Virol. 72, 1552 (1998);
Graham B. S., et al., J. Infect. Dis. 177, 310 (1998).
4
Belshe R. B., et al., J. Am. Med. Assoc. 272, 475 (1994);
Kahn J. O., et al., J. Infect. Dis. 170, 1288 (1994).
5
Cohen J., Science 262, 980 (1993);
; ibid. 264, 1839 (1994).
6
Mascola J. R., et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 12, 13198 (1996);
Moore J. P., et al., J. Virol. 70, 427 (1996);
; L. G. Kostrikis, Y. Cao, H. Ngai, J. P. Moore, D. D. Ho, ibid., p. 445; J. Weber, E. M. Fenyo, S. Beddows, P. Kaleebu, A. Bjorndal, ibid., p. 7827.
7
Reviewed in E. A. Berger, AIDS 11 (suppl. A), S3 (1997);
Moore J. P., Trkola A., Dragic T., Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9, 551 (1997);
Doranz B. J., Berson J. F., Rucker J., Doms R. W., Immunol. Res. 16, 15 (1997).
8
The molecularly cloned envelope gene of ACH168.10 was isolated by polymerase chain reaction with the pCR3.1-Uni plasmid (Invitrogen) [(2, 15);
Tersmette M., et al., J. Virol. 63, 2118 (1989)].
9
The plasmid encoding expression of the functional 168P envelope protein (168P23) was transfected into COS-7 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) by calcium phosphate precipitation (20 μg of DNA per 106 cells per 10-cm culture dish) [
Jordan M., Schallhorn A., Wurm F. M., Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 596 (1996);
]. Transiently expressing COS-7 cells were harvested 2 days later with 0.5 mM EDTA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and U87-CD4-CCR5 fusion partners [
Hill C. M., et al., J. Virol. 71, 6296 (1997);
] were prepared with 0.1 mM EDTA in PBS. Cocultures were initiated by mixing the two cell types (1.5 × 106 cells each) in 10-cm culture dishes. The time course of cell-cell fusion was monitored microscopically and by immunochemical staining (HIVIG) in parallel cocultures (15). Cocultures were harvested by formaldehyde fixation at 4 to 5 hours, when little or no overt syncytium formation was evident.
10
Cultures were fixed in situ with 0.2% formaldehyde in PBS at 4°C overnight [
Yamamoto J. K., et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 7, 911 (1991);
Verschoor E. J., et al., Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 46, 139 (1995);
]. Cells were subsequently scraped, washed twice with PBS, resuspended at a nominal density of 3 × 106 cells/0.1 ml in PBS containing 10% dimethyl sulfoxide, and frozen at −80°C.
11
J. D. Scarborough, W. Ellmeier, D. R. Littman, unpublished results. Construction of a CD4 targeted deletion and hu CD4 transgenic mouse has been described [
Killeen N., Sawada S., Littman D. R., EMBO J. 12, 1547 (1993);
]. Briefly, a hu CCR5 transgenic mouse was constructed by molecularly cloning a 1.15-kb hu CCR5 cDNA into an engineered Sal I site in exon 2 of a murine CD4 expression cassette [construct c in
Sawada S., Scarborough J. D., Killeen N., Littman D. R., Cell 77, 917 (1994);
]. This minigene contains the murine CD4 enhancer, the CD4 promoter, the first (noncoding) exon, and intron 1 with an internal deletion that eliminates the CD4 silencer. Transgenic founders were identified by flow cytometry with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) to CCR5. These animals were bred to hu CD4 transgenic mice to yield progeny expressing hu CD4, hu CCR5, and mouse CD4. Pups were screened for expression of hu CD4, hu CCR5, and mouse CD4 by flow cytometry with a Coulter EPICS ELITE flow cytometer. The following antibody reagents were used: mouse antibody to human CD4 conjugated to CyChrome (Pharmingen), mouse antibody to human CCR5 mAb 180 (R&D Systems) with goat antibody to mouse immunoglobulin conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (Caltag), and rat antibody to mouse CD4 L3T4 conjugated to phycoerythrin.
12
Vaccines comprised formaldehyde-fixed whole cells (3 × 106 cells/0.1 ml) formulated with an equal volume of Ribi adjuvant (R-700; reconstituted in half the recommended volume of PBS); in some experiments, the initial immunization was with adjuvant containing cell wall material (R-730). Mice received 0.05 ml of vaccine in four subcutaneous sites. Booster immunizations were at 3-week intervals, and mice were bled from the tail at 10 to 28 days after immunizations. Ultimately, mice were boosted and exsanguinated by cardiac puncture in order to obtain larger quantities of serum. Animal care was in accordance with institutional guidelines. Serum antibodies directed to gp120 were quantitated by gp120 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [
Moore J., Wallace L., Follett E., McKeating J., AIDS 3, 155 (1989)].
13
This rapid PI virus neutralization assay has been validated relative to our standard neutralization assay in peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) culture (15, 17) and performs well in the presence of mouse serum. All sera were heat inactivated before use in neutralization assays.
14
R. A. LaCasse et al., data not shown. Serum was adsorbed sequentially to protein A Sepharose (Sigma) and protein G agarose (Sigma) at 4°C. Adsorption of antibody was confirmed by gp120 ELISA. The solid supports were combined and antibodies were eluted with 100 mM glycine, pH 2.5. The eluate was neutralized and dialyzed by centrifugal ultrafiltration (Microcon-100; Amicon).
15
LaCasse R. A., et al., J. Virol. 72, 2491 (1998).
16
A. Trkola et al., ibid., p. 1876; D. C. Montefiori et al., ibid., p. 3427.
17
K. E. Follis, M. Trahey, R. A. LaCasse, J. H. Nunberg, ibid., p. 7603.
18
Envelope-expressing cultures were incubated with sCD4 [
Berger E. A., Fuerst T. R., Moss B., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 2357 (1988);
] (5 μg/ml; 1 hour at 37°C) and subsequently washed to remove unbound sCD4. All FI immunogens were fixed with formaldehyde as described in (10).
19
Envelope-defective HIV NL4-3-Luc-RE provirus was pseudotyped with amphotropic MLV envelope protein [
Deng H., et al., Nature 381, 661 (1996)].
20
A primary isolate of SIVmac251 [
Langlois A. L., et al., J. Virol. 72, 6950 (1998);
] was produced in rhesus PBLs.
21
A statistical comparison was performed on data comprising all experimental animals and all virus neutralization assays. A simple model for virus-antibody binding was used to calculate a “binding constant” K for each assay, and a mean K value was determined for each mouse. Two-sample unpooled t tests were performed on log-transformed K values to compare groups pairwise. Bonferroni-adjusted comparison demonstrated a significant difference in mean neutralization between FC and FI immunogens (P = 0.001). This analysis included 26 independent neutralization assays of FC sera, from all mice receiving FC immunogen, and similarly, 35 assays of FI sera. In all experiments, responses within experimental groups were consistent and uniform.
22
Cranage M. P., et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 9, 13 (1993);
Putkonen P., et al., J. Med. Primatol. 22, 100 (1993);
Arthur L. O., et al., Science 258, 1935 (1992).
23
Infectious proviruses ACH320.2A.1.2 (320SI) and ACH320.2A.2.1 (320NSI) [
Groenink M., et al., J. Virol. 65, 1968 (1991);
Guillon C., et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 11, 1537 (1995);
] were obtained through the National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls (NIBSC, United Kingdom) AIDS Reagent Program from Hanneke Schuitemaker (Netherlands Red Cross). HIV89.6 [
Collman R., et al., J. Virol. 66, 7517 (1992);
], SHIV89.6, and SHIV89.6P [
Reimann K. A., et al., ibid. 70, 3198 (1996);
] were provided with permission by D. Montefiori (Duke University Medical Center). All other primary isolates were obtained through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program and the UNAIDS Network for HIV-1 Isolation and Characterization. PI viruses were subjected to limited expansion in phytohemagglutinin-activated PBLs (2).
24
Thali M., et al., J. Virol. 67, 3978 (1993);
Sullivan N., et al., ibid. 72, 4694 (1998).
25
Gershoni J. M., et al., FASEB J. 7, 1185 (1993);
Lee S., et al., J. Virol. 71, 6037 (1997).
26
FC vaccine serum (1:10 dilution in cell culture medium) was sequentially adsorbed four times with ∼106 formaldehyde-fixed COS cells expressing 168P envelope protein. Incubations were for 1 hour at 4°C with rocking. Controls included prebleed serum and formaldehyde-fixed, mock-transfected COS cells. Adsorption of bulk anti-gp120 was monitored by gp120 ELISA. Final sera were tested for neutralization of HIV 168P with U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells. Parallel studies with intact but nonfixed cells yielded concordant results.
27
Pooled FC and FI sera (1:8 dilution) were incubated with attached U87-CD4-CCR5 cells (2 × 104 cells per 96-well microculture) for 1 hour at 37°C with occasional mixing. Supernatants were tested for neutralization of HIV 168P with U87-CD4-CCR5 cells.
28
Weissenhorn W., et al., Nature 387, 426 (1997);
Chan D. C., Fass D., Berger J. M., Kim P. S., Cell 89, 263 (1997);
Weissenhorn W., Calder L. J., Wharton S. A., Skehel J. J., Wiley D. C., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 6032 (1998).
29
Wild C., Oas T., McDanal C., Bolognesi D., Matthews T., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 10537 (1992);
Furuta R. A., Wild C. T., Weng Y., Weiss C. D., Nature Struct. Biol. 5, 276 (1998).
30
M. P. D'Souza et al., J. Infect. Dis.175, 1056 (1997).
31
Prince A. M., et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 7, 971 (1991);
Emini E. A., et al., Nature 355, 728 (1992);
Conley A. J., et al., J. Virol. 70, 6751 (1996);
Gauduin M. C., et al., Nature Med. 3, 1389 (1997).
32
Krause R. M., Dimmock N. J., Morens D. M., J. Infect. Dis. 176, 549 (1997).
33
J.H.N. was supported by targeted research grant 02560-23-RGV from the American Foundation for AIDS Research (AmFAR), funded in part by Concerned Parents for AIDS Research (CPFA). Additional funds were provided by The University of Montana, NIH AREA grant AI41165, and the M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust. D.R.L. was supported by NIH grant AI33856 and by a grant from AmFAR and is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. We thank E. Walker (Ribi ImmunoChem Research, Incorporated, Hamilton, MT) and L. Griggs for flow cytometry, C. Mackay (Leukosite) and M. Tsang for CCR5 mAbs, W. Ellmeier for the transgenic mouse CCR5 construct, D. Montefiori (Duke University Medical Center) for providing SIVmac251, HIV 89.6, and related SHIV viruses, and C. Weiss (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) for providing amphotropic MLV envelope protein pseudotyped HIV virions. Primary HIV isolates and other reagents were obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, the NIBSC (UK) AIDS Reagent Program, and the UNAIDS Network for HIV-1 Isolation and Characterization. We are grateful to D. A. Patterson (University of Montana, Department of Mathematics) for statistical analysis of neutralization data, and to J. Moore and D. Montefiori for constructive review of the manuscript. Discussions with C. Barbas III and E. Berger were important in the development of these studies.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 283 | Issue 5400
15 January 1999

Submission history

Received: 13 October 1998
Accepted: 10 December 1998
Published in print: 15 January 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rachel A. LaCasse
R. A. LaCasse, K. E. Follis, M. Trahey, J. H. Nunberg, The Montana Biotechnology Center and Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA. J. D. Scarborough and D. R. Littman, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Kathryn E. Follis
R. A. LaCasse, K. E. Follis, M. Trahey, J. H. Nunberg, The Montana Biotechnology Center and Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA. J. D. Scarborough and D. R. Littman, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Meg Trahey
R. A. LaCasse, K. E. Follis, M. Trahey, J. H. Nunberg, The Montana Biotechnology Center and Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA. J. D. Scarborough and D. R. Littman, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
John D. Scarborough*
R. A. LaCasse, K. E. Follis, M. Trahey, J. H. Nunberg, The Montana Biotechnology Center and Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA. J. D. Scarborough and D. R. Littman, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Dan R. Littman
R. A. LaCasse, K. E. Follis, M. Trahey, J. H. Nunberg, The Montana Biotechnology Center and Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA. J. D. Scarborough and D. R. Littman, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Jack H. Nunberg
R. A. LaCasse, K. E. Follis, M. Trahey, J. H. Nunberg, The Montana Biotechnology Center and Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA. J. D. Scarborough and D. R. Littman, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Notes

*
Present address: Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Retraction, Science, 296, 5570, (1025-1025), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.296.5570.1025b
    Abstract
  2. Protein Design of an HIV-1 Entry Inhibitor, Science, 291, 5505, (884-888), (2001)./doi/10.1126/science.1057453
    Abstract
  3. Magic of the Occult?, Science, 283, 5400, (336-337), (1999)./doi/10.1126/science.283.5400.336
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media