Content deleted Content added
|
Light show (talk | contribs)
m →Trivia: ce
|
|||
|
Line 225:
:::::If Blofeld's doing in the sandbox, let him the time and patience to do his editors. Those edits aren't going to hurt this article. I will presume when the sandbox is ready, Blofeld will ask for comments, and then reviewing the changes makes sense, but arguably until then, it's far too early. (I will note that when the sandbox is ready to be moved back in I can help do the history merge appropriately). --[[User:Masem|M<font size="-3">ASEM</font>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 23:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
::::::As noted in the [[Talk:Stanley Kubrick/sandbox2|sandbox]], looking at just his few edits, they have already done damage to the article. Added to what I consider the "demolition" of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Peter_Sellers/Archive_2#Poor_paragraph_structure Sellers' article], the similarity between Blofeld's editing style to ''this'' article with Schrocat's to Sellers, is beyond coincidence. Can someone state categorically that it ''is'' only a coincidence? --[[User:Light show|Light show]] ([[User talk:Light show|talk]]) 00:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
:::::::Stop being so obnoxious to others, WikiWatcher. You really do have no idea how to develop and grow an article. Your efforts in development are poor, from what I've seen, and you have absolutely no idea what a decent article actually is: your constant mewling and puking about the Sellers article is utterly laughable, when it stands there as an FA, agreed upon by the community to be one of the best articles written, and all you can do is moan and complain. If you ever manage to do anything decent in terms of article development, peopl may start taking you seriously, but your ongoing sniping, whining and carping about improvements over "your" articles show just how low your standards actually are. Which brings me to... - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 00:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
==Quote farm==
Why are there so many overly-long and pointless quotes in here? A few well-chosen ones are all well and good, but we seem to have ones better selected to the respective film articles, rather than a biography. WW has gine to revert mode, rather than try and see other people's point of view, so I invite all comers to express their opinions of the excessive use use of overly-long quotes throughout. - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 00:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
|
|||