Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
|
Line 322:
* At this point, I consider Nikkimaria's actions to be both a) [[WP:INVOLVED|being involved]] and b) [[WP:WIKISTALK|wikistalking]]. Either an interaction ban needs to be requested at ANI, or a topic ban of their own needs to be implemented. This nitpicky crap like the above 2 threads is wholly unbecoming of anyone. The latter could, I believe, be decided here <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User talk:DangerousPanda|<font style="color:#ffffff;background:black;"> the panda </font><font style="color:#000000;background:white;"> ₯’</font>]]</span></small> 23:45, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
* I'm not a regular here but I did follow the Infoboxes arbitration case and have, as time permits, followed with interest the topic since. The three sections on this page show very clearly that Nikkimaria needs to stop having anything to do with infoboxes for the good of both her and especially the project. Personally I think that while a topic ban cannot be imposed at this venue, we can and should block Nikkimaria for one month for her appalling lack of professionalism displayed in all three sections (and many times previously). I read the Arbcom sanction as the equivalent of being [[bound over]] to act in a professional manner or face the consequences. She has demonstrably not done so, so really we have no choice but to enact those consequences. A topic ban discussion needs to be implemented at a suitable venue as well otherwise she and those she disagrees with will be back here early and often. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 07:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
*The edit-warring by Nikkimaria is a cause for concern. There are no enforceable remedies in the Committee's decision that would allow administrators to impose sanctions with arbitration enforcement authority, because the enforcement provision relates to "restrictions", and an admonishment is not a restriction. As such, this thread should be closed without action. However, administrators may impose normal blocks for edit-warring, which may be requested at [[WP:AN3]] (although this incident is probably too stale by now for a standard 24h block). Also, this may be a case where a request to amend the case at [[WP:ARCA]] by an interested party may lead the Committee to decide to impose sanctions such as a topic ban from infobox matters. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 09:20, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
==Ezzex==
|
|||