Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
|
Line 71:
::: Also, note that I have never hung out on the "opposing paradigm" pages, say Cultural Anthropology or social constructionism pages, and there attempt to suppress accurate information, add only criticism, and accuse those there of NPOV. Could be fun... but not too constructive. [[User:Memills|Memills]] ([[User talk:Memills|talk]]) 03:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Memills is to all intents and purposes a [[WP:SPA]] editor on the subject of [[Evolutionary Psychology]] and [[Men's Rights Movement]], two topics which appear to be linked philosophically and empirically. I have encountered him on the MRM pages, and have been appalled by the totally unapologetic misuse of sources. Having a POV is one thing, and pushing a point of view is bad enough, but falsifying sources to that end is inexcusable. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Men%27s_rights_movement&diff=547893663&oldid=547874025 this] for an example. I am strongly considering a [[WP:RFAR|request for arbitration]] about this editor as the misuse of sources strongly reminds me of the the [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Franco-Mongol alliance]] in which an editor was sanctioned for chronic misuse of sources to push a particular point of view. I am unfamiliar with the specific academic and sourcing issues regarding evolutionary psychology. [[User:Maunus]] and [[User:Sonicyouth86]], it seems like you may have more expertise in this area. Are there similar patterns of edits which falsify the sources in this area? If so I would be glad to work together to present a case to the Arbitration Committee about this editor.[[User:Slp1|Slp1]] ([[User talk:Slp1|talk]]) 00:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
:::{{ec}} The editor PHG worked on his own. By contrast as part of a non-approved educational project, Memills recently got his undergraduate class to create and recreate fork articles related to EP. Most of those articles were deleted. Memills admitted to being the responsible instructor. He had created qt least 2 alternative accounts to oversee the project. (See the report at [[WP:ANI]] [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive795#Spam_attack_on_Evolutionary_psychology|'''here''']].) That conflicted with his apparent [[WP:OWN|ownership]] of the two articles [[evolutionary psychology]] and [[criticism of evolutionary psychology]]. [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 01:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
:: Let me suggest that an underlying motive, per the above, of these editors is a strong, '''very strong,''' antipathy toward certain topics. This has been demonstrated repeatedly. This antipathy has led to incivility and edit warring with other editors with perspectives that differ from their own. There has also been an unwillingness to compromise and attempt to resolve conflicts in good faith. Slp1 in particular has relied on wikilawyering over discussion and compromise (the basics of AGF). More substantively, her objective here seems to be to suppress /censor information to which she has a strong aversion. This is counter-productive, and it is contrary to the mission of WP.
:: Again, I stand by my contributions to WP, and, I welcome a review by neutral parties. [[User:Memills|Memills]] ([[User talk:Memills|talk]]) 01:24, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
|
|||