Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
|
→Removal of permissions: yes, that makes sense
|
Enric Naval (talk | contribs)
→Support: comment on work on commons
|
||
|
Line 300:
* '''Support''' Practical, honest, recognizes the reality that GoRight shoul never edit here again. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 16:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
* '''Support''' - disruptive user that is a clear net loss to the project. If it was shown that the user has been contributing to another project constructively then I would reconsider allowing the user to contribute but only with a complete editing restriction on all the areas they were previously disruptive. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 17:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
* In the email posted here, GoRight points to his edits in Commons and says "''I believe that this demonstrates that I am capable of working constructively with others.''". However, [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/GoRight GoRight only made a few edits for a few days, 16-21 September 2009]. This is very deceptive, and it shows that GoRight hasn't really changed his style. He has to show real reform before the community considers even a restrictive unbanning. Also, naming a mentor would be a total waste of time for the mentor: wikipedia is not therapy, and I still have to see any real indication that GoRight is trying to reform for real. As for now, I only see him feeding false information to arbitrators in order to get a quick unban. He should go to some sister project and spend his own time in learning to work collaboratively and learning to not feed b*llsh*t to other editors in order to achieve the desired results. And that means actual real collaborative work over a period of time. --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 20:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
==== Oppose ====
|
|||