Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Affirmative action program...: WP:Teahouse for new comers
Line 271:
::::::It might not be a bad idea to create more of a newcomers program instead, or have an opt-in function for women editors. While some editors might not like the idea of having their contributions "propped up", for others it would help them feel more comfortable and increase the incentive for contributing. I don't believe that affirmative action will solve the core of Wikipedia's gender troubles, but its not a bad start. I could also see such a policy benefitting non-Western contributors, as I have seen an appalling amount of non-Westerners begging white male editors not to delete their pages because the people or texts they are writing about don't conform to "our" standards of what constitutes a reliable or notable source. Of course, enforcement is also required but I don't think it needs to be one or the other.--[[User:Magsmacaulay|femmebot]] ([[User talk:Magsmacaulay|talk]]) 21:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
:::::::The [[WP:Teahouse]] came out of discussions about creating some sort of a women's wikiproject. I think this project is still finding it's way, but certain should be a place for women to come for advice about WP:Dispute resolution issues, since in the end that is what it is all about. Learning that system early would help a lot of women. <small>'''[[User:Carolmooredc|Carolmooredc]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc|Talkie-Talkie]])</small>''' 21:32, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
::::::::If our project is perceived as hostile or indiscriminately accusatory toward good-faith male and trans- editors here, we will fail ourselves and the larger mission of WP. [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 21:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 
==Civility board==