Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
|
GiantSnowman (talk | contribs)
→Height: rsp
|
→Height: ::::::Uh, Yeah. Either way it proves you're obsessed only with the unit (only as long as ''I've'' edited the article, that is!) and not wih the height or the source quality.--~~~~
|
||
|
Line 132:
::::Totally absurd. But go for it. Should be as successful as the previous one. Correcting and referencing heights in [[WP:BLP]]s complete with referencing of [[WP:SOURCES]] is the opposite of what one does to get a topic ban (this was proven last time you tried, remember?). The number of times it has bothered anyone (as if it would!) is miniscule, and all those bothered editors are involved in this discussion. The current [[WP:CONSENSUS]] is that either unit is fine and common sense says reliable sources should be followed. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jiang_Ning&diff=615282996&oldid=615238096 Here] [[User:GiantSnowman]] replaces the height with reference to [http://www.goal.com goal.com] (178cm) with "1.78m" and a reference to [http://www.national-football-teams.com national-football-teams.com] which lists his height (probably erroneously) as 1.80m.--[[User:Gibson Flying V|Gibson Flying V]] ([[User talk:Gibson Flying V|talk]]) 21:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
:::::Oh, you mean the height of 1.80m that is also verified by [[China Daily]] [http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/olympian/2008-08/01/content_6896401.htm here] and [[Eurosport]] [http://asia.eurosport.com/football/ning-jiang_prs183532/person.shtml here]? [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 21:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
::::::Uh, Yeah. Either way it proves you're obsessed only with the unit (only as long as ''I've'' edited the article, that is!) and not wih the height or the source quality.--[[User:Gibson Flying V|Gibson Flying V]] ([[User talk:Gibson Flying V|talk]]) 21:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
== Should the 2014 Cup Final have its own article? ==
|
|||