Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published November 1985

Texts as Knowledge Claims: The Social Construction of Two Biology Articles

Abstract

The procedures of review and revision of a scientific article can be seen as part of the negotiation of the status that the scientific community will assign to the text's knowledge claim. This study locates some textual features of this negotiation by considering two articles by two biologists, the comments referees and colleagues made on them, and the authors' responses to these comments. The articles illustrate contrasting problems in the creation of a persona-one author is a well-known researcher in his field, and the other is publishing his first article in what is for him a new area. But they both have disagreements with journal editors and referees over the placement of their findings in a hierarchy of claims. And they both revise their articles to make them more conventional in form. Each article was reviewed five times before being accepted: while the long review makes the cases atypical, the layers of criticisms and responses allow us to see in detail processes that are usually compressed and decisions that are usually unnoticed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communications, New York, March 1984; at the Discourse Analysis Workshop, University of Surrey, September 1984; and at the Sociology of Science Study Group, British Sociological Association, London, September 1984. I would like to thank Lester Faigley, Edward Smith, Charles Bazerman, Carolyn Miller, Susan Cozzens and Kenneth Bruffee for their comments on an ealier version, and Trevor Pinch for letting me see the manuscript of the article cited in note 8, and for helpful discussions of the levels of claims. One of the anonymous reviewers for this journal also made helpful suggestions. This study would not have been possible without the help of David Bloch and David Crews.
1.
1. B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific facts (Beverly Hills, Calif. and London: Sage, 1979)
2.
2. For my use of these terms, see G.N. Gilbert and M. Mulkay, `Contexts of Scientific Discourse: Social Accounting in Experimental Papers', in K. Knorr, R. Krohn and R. Whitley (eds), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Vol. 4 (Dordrecht, London and Boston, Mass.: D. Reidel, 1980), 269-94. In another study (J. Law and R. Williams, `Putting Facts Together: A Study of Scientific Persuasion', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 12 [1982], 535-58), Law and Williams reach conclusions similar to mine in an analysis of discussions among the co-authors of articles, and relate these conclusions to the concept of a network.
3.
3. D. Bloch, B. McArthur, R. Widdowson, D. Spector, R. Guimares and J. Smith, `tRNA-rRNA Sequence Homologies: Evidence for a Common Evolutionary Origin?', Journal of Molecular Evolution, Vol. 19 (1983), 420-28.
4.
4. D. Crews, `Gamete Production, Sex Hormone Secretion, and Mating Behavior Uncoupled', Hormones and Behavior, Vol. 18 (1984), 22-28.
5.
5. For my use of the term `network', see H.M. Collins, `The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks', Science Studies, Vol. 4 (1974), 165-86.
6.
6. G.N. Gilbert, `The Transformation of Research Findings into Scientific Knowledge', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 6 (1976), 281-306.
7.
7. Latour and Woolgar, op. cit. note 1, 78-86.
8.
8. T. Pinch, `Towards an Analysis of Scientific Observation: The Externality and Evidential Significance of Observational Reports in Physics' Social Studies of Science, Vol. 15 (1985), 3-36. H.M. Collins, Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (Beverly Hills, Calif. and London: Sage, in press), has a discussion of these approaches to presentation of claims in Chapter 6.
9.
9. D. Crews and W. Garstka, `The Ecological Physiology of a Garter Snake', Scientific American (November 1982), 159-68.
10.
10. M. Gordon, `The Role of Referees in Scientific Communication', in J. Hartley (ed.), The Psychology of Written Communication: Selected Readings (London: Kogan Page, 1980), 263-75.
11.
11. B. Latour and F. Bastide, `Writing Science-Fact and Fiction', in M. Callon and J. Law (eds), Qualitative Scientometrics (London: Macmillan, forthcoming).
12.
12. C. Bazerman, `What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples of Academic Discourse', Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 11 (1981), 361-87.
13.
13. For instance, P. Medawar, `Is the Scientific Paper Fraudulent?', Saturday Review (August 1964), 42-43.
14.
14. E. Mayr, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982).
15.
15. D. Bloch, C.-T. Fu and P. Dean, `DNA and Histone Synthesis Rate Change During the S. Period in Erlich Ascites Tumor Cells', Chromosoma, Vol. 82 (1981), 611-26.
16.
16. See the letter on this term from M. Gossler, `Numerology', Nature, Vol. 306 (8 December 1983), 530.
17.
17. D. Crews, `Psychobiology of Reptilian Reproduction', Science, Vol. 189 (26 September 1975), 1057-65.
18.
18. See Mayr, op. cit. note 14, 465, and M. Norell, `Homology Defined', Nature, Vol. 306 (8 December 1983), 530.
19.
19. D. Bloch, `tRNA-rRNA Sequence Homologies: A Model for the Origin of a Common Ancestral Molecule, and Prospects for Its Reconstruction', Origins of Life (in press).
20.
20. D. Crews, `Diversity of Hormone-Behavior Controlling Mechanisms', and `Alternative Reproductive Tactics in Reptiles', BioScience, Vol. 33 (1983), 545, 562-67.
21.
21. Mayr, op. cit. note 14, 494.
22.
22. See, for instance, C. Bazerman, `Physicists Reading Physics: Schema-Laden Purposes and Purpose-Laden Schemas', Written Communication, Vol. 2, No. 1 (January 1985), 3-23; and the articles surveyed in S. Cozzens, `Taking the Measure of Science: A Review of Citation Theories', International Society for the Sociology of Science Newsletter, Vol. 7 (1981), 21-60.
23.
23. See, for instance, C. Bazerman, `The Writing of Scientific Non-Fiction: Contexts, Choices, and Constraints', Pre/Text, Vol. 5, No. 1 (in press); K. Knorr-Cetina, The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (Oxford: Pergamon, 1981); Latour and Woolgar, op. cit. note 1; and M. Lynch, E. Livingston and H. Garfinkel, `Temporal Order in Laboratory Work', in Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science (London and Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1984), 205-38. Also G. Myers, `The Social Construction of Two Biologists' Proposals', Written Communication, Vol. 2, No. 3 (July 1985), 219-45, describes the process shaping Dr Bloch's and Dr Crews's applications for research grants.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: November 1985
Issue published: November 1985

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Greg Myers
Department of English Literature, University of Lancaster, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YT, UK.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Social Studies of Science.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 387

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 91 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. Topoi of Nonprofit Proposal Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The Influence of Disciplinary Variation and Speaker Characteristics on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Chapter 8. “The job requires considerable expertise”
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. „Ablehnungen gehören halt zum Geschäft.“ Lernprozesse in wissenschaftl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Research in Universities and Its Connection with Social Purpose
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Working with curiosity: Knowledge transfer practitioners’ ambivalence ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The language of evaluation in academic writing research in Ghana, 2000...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. “Everything Is in the Lab Book”: Multimodal Writing, Activity, and Gen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Research impact evaluation and academic discourse
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Words Are Essential, but Underexamined, Research Tools for Microbes an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A Hierarchy of Interests: Discursive Practices on the Value of Particl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. The Communication Turn in Philosophy of Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Scientific Communication and Codification
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. The rhetoric of invasive species: Managing belonging on a novel planet
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Geography of scientific knowledge: A proximity approach
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Bridging the divide between qualitative and quantitative science studi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. A typology of scientific breakthroughs
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Truth after post-truth: for a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Examining Structure in Scientific Research Articles: A Study of Themat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Is the Abstract a Mere Teaser? Evaluating Generosity of Article Abstra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. The Way We Ask for Money… The Emergence and Institutionalization of Gr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Références bibliographiques
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Why researchers publish in non-mainstream journals: Training, knowledg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Intervention and Revision: Expertise and Interaction in Text Mediation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Toward best practice framing of uncertainty in scientific publications...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Emergence of modern scientific discourse in the American continent: kn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Who, Me? An Inductive Study of Novice Experts in the Context of How Ed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Enrolling the Toggle Switch: Visionary Claims and the Capability of Mo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Frame Search and Re-search: How Quantitative Sociological Articles Cha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Open-access writing: An investigation into the online drafting and rev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Constructing Relationships Between Science and Practice in the Written...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Can intellectual processes in the sciences also be simulated? The anti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Revising as Reframing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Quantitative and Qualitative STS: The Intellectual and Practical Contr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Frame Search and Re-Search: How Quantitative Sociological Articles Cha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Rhetorical Moves in Applied Linguistics Articles and their Correspondi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. The Use of Hedging Devices in English and Persian Abstracts of Persian...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Structure of the Research Article in the Creation of Knowledge
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. The Sciences are Discursive Constructs: The Communication Perspective ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Les écrits scientifiques : des ressorts relationnels pour la recherche
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Le discours spécialisé à l’ONU : chances et défis pour le traducteur
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. A non-native student's experience on collaborating with native peers i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Radical Constructivism and Radical Constructedness: Luhmann’s Sociolog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Dynamiques relationnelles d'un article scientifique : « Roger et al. (...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Editorial Judgments: A Praxeology of ‘Voting’ in Peer Review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Alan Gross and the Rhetoric of Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. The Concept of Scientific Fact: Perelman and Beyond
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. The dynamics of exchanges and references among scientific texts, and t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. The genre of corporate history
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. The initiation of French PhD students into the international research ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. "Myth, Mask, Shield, and Sword": Dr. John H. Marburger III's Rhetoric ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Growing in Maturity : From First Draft to Final Version, a French doct...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Seeing Cells: Teaching the Visual/Verbal Rhetoric of Biology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Scientific Communication and Cognitive Codification...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Apprentice Scholarly Writing in a Community Of Practice: An Intraview ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. The Challenges of Scientific Literacy: From the viewpoint of second‐ge...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Bibliographie
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Developing and Evaluating a Web-based Resource for Writing Research Ar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Certifying Knowledge: The Sociology of a Logical Theorem in Artificial...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Analysing the Interviewer: The Joint Construction of Accounts of Psych...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Foreword
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Quelques spécificités de la modalisation dans le discours scientifique
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. The Versatile “Caveat” Section of an Epidemiology Paper...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Dissertation writing in action: The development of a dissertation writ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. English for specific purposes: The preservation of the species (some n...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. From author to reviewer to editor: Negotiating the claim in a scientif...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Scientific claims and community values: Articulating an academic cultu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. French researchers publishing in English
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. “Nondiscursive” Requirements in Academic Publishing, Material Resource...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Verbal reports of Japanese novices' research writing practices in Engl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Setting Boundaries between Science and Law: Lessons from Daubert v. Me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Talking to the Academy: Forms of Hedging in Science Research Articles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Expanding the Constructivist Metaphor: A Rhetorical Perspective on Lit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. After the autumn harvest: rhetoric and representation in an asian indu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Writing Biology. Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowle...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Success in research article writing and revision: A social-constructio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. À la recherche d'une sémiotique culturelle dans le discours scientifiq...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Reporting experiments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Aristotle's Rhetoric, Hitler's Program, and the Ideological Problem of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Research writing and NNSs: From the editors
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Context, Text, Intertext: Toward a Constructivist Semiotic of Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Ways of Knowing and Models of Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Collaborative Business Writing: A Burkean Perspective for Future Resea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Toward a dialectical theory of composing 1
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Persuasion and peer review in science: Habermas's ideal speech situati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. Discourse Analysis and Written Discourse Conventions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Words and Sentences Over Time: How Facts Are Built and Sustained in a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. An Engineer's Writing and the Corporate Construction of Knowledge
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. What do citations count? the rhetoric-first model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Citations: Indicators of significance?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Defining housing reality: Ideological hegemony and power in housing re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Literate acts and the emergent social structure of science: A critical...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Current Developments and Future Prospects
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub