Self-perceptions on cognitive versus motor disability among neurologists

Abstract

Objective

The modified Rankin Scale is a functional outcome measure that disproportionately represents motor deficits. We hypothesize that among physicians who most commonly use the modified Rankin Scale to counsel patients on neurological treatment options, personal perception of acceptable or optimal outcome may be discordant with those described in clinical trials.

Methods

A three-question anonymous voluntary survey was emailed to academic and community practicing neurologists and board-eligible or board-certified neurology fellows inquiring about their personal perception of a better quality of life between two choices featuring clinical scenarios that would qualify as modified Rankin Scale 2 and 4 disability outcome scores.

Results

Sixty-nine percent of participants were 30–45 years old, 24% were 45–60 years old, and 7% were over 60 years old. Most responders were general neurologists (31.3%). The remaining responders represented multiple subspecialties including neurocritical care, vascular neurology, neurohospitalist medicine, neuromuscular neurology, neurophysiology, child neurology, neuro-oncology, headache, neuroimmunology, movement disorders, and palliative care medicine. Forty-four of 45 neurologists (97.7%) stated they would choose needing a wheelchair if still able to function at their cognitive baseline at work (p < 0.000001). One responder preferred to get around without assistance, despite new cognitive symptoms that would preclude them from working as a physician.

Conclusions

The modified Rankin Scale may not adequately represent preferred outcomes among neurology specialists, particularly with respect to cognitive symptoms. Future studies are needed to characterize long-term cognitive outcomes in patients with acute stroke-related conditions.