This website is intended for healthcare professionals

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.12968/bjca.2018.13.3.121

Abstract

This second article, in a two-part series on stroke, will review and outline the importance of the initial assessment and management of patients with stroke in hospital. Stroke affects over 111 000 individuals per year, with almost 1 million individuals managing daily with its after-effects in England. The management of patients with stroke has rapidly developed in recent years, with widespread access to intravenous thrombolytic therapy for the preponderance (85%) of acute ischaemic stroke, while the remaining haemorrhagic strokes (15%) can potentially be managed with a decompressive hemicraniectomy procedure. Further developments include mechanical thrombectomy that treats large-vessel occlusive stroke using an interventional neuroradiology procedure called mechanical thrombectomy. Ensuring delivery of appropriate stroke treatments relies on the accurate assessment of the patient, with particular attention to their past medical history, cardiovascular risk factors and access to hyperacute stroke care. The key risks factors for stroke will also be discussed, as many of these may only present at stroke diagnosis. A range of stroke assessment tools, including their effectiveness, will be discussed in addition to differential stroke diagnosis and stroke mimics.

References

  • Abbott AL, Bladin CF, Donnan DA. Seizures and strokes. In: Bogousslasky JCaplan L, eds. Stroke Syndromes. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001: 182–191. Google Scholar
  • Association of Ambulance Service Chief Executives . UK Ambulance Services Clinical Practice Guidelines Bridgwater: Class Professional Publishing: 2016. Google Scholar
  • Berkhemer OA Fransen PSS, Beumer D, den Berg LAV, Lingsma HF et al.. A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke. New Engl J Med. 2015:372(1):11–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chernyshev OY, Martin-Schild S, Albright KC et al.. Safety of tPA in stroke mimics and neuroimaging-negative cerebral ischemia. Neurology. 2010;74(17): 1340–1345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conrad J, Pawlowski M, Dogan M, Kovac S, Ritter MA, Evers S. Seizures after cerebrovascular events: risk factors and clinical features. Seizure. 2013;22(4):275–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawson A, Cloud GC, Pereira AC, Moynihan BJ. Stroke mimic diagnoses presenting to a hyperacute stroke unit. Clinical Medicine. 2016;16(5):423–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Department of Health and Social Care . ASSET 2—Action on Stroke Services: an Evaluation Toolkit for commissioners. London: HMSO; 2006. Google Scholar
  • Dula DJ, DeNaples L. Emergency department presentation of patients with conversion disorder. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2:120–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Förster A, Griebe M, Wolfe ME, Szabo K, Hennerici MG, Kern R. How to identify stroke mimics in patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis? J Neurol. 2012;259(7):1347–1353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fothergill RT, Williams J, Edwards MJ, Russell IT, Gompertz P. Does Use of the Recognition Of Stroke In the Emergency Room Stroke Assessment Tool Enhance Stroke Recognition by Ambulance Clinicians? Stroke. 2013:44. Google Scholar
  • Gibson LM, Whiteley W. The differential diagnosis of suspected stroke: a systematic review. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2013. 43:114–118. http://tinyurl.com/yb4k9jcc ( accessed 13 February 2018 ) Google Scholar
  • Hand J, Kwan J, Lindley RI, Deniis MS & Wardlaw JM. Distinguishing Between Stroke and Mimic at the Bedside The Brain Attack Study. Stroke. 2016;37(3):769–775. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hankey GJ. Impact of treatment of people with transient ischaemic attack on stroke incidence and public health. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1996: 6(Suppl 1):26–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatano S. Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1976;54(5):541–553. Google Scholar
  • Hatzitolios A, Savopoulos C, Ntaios G et al.. Stroke and conditions that mimic it: a protocol secures a safe early recognition. Hippokratia. 2008;12(2):98–102. Google Scholar
  • Huff JS. Stroke Differential Diagnosis—Mimics and Chameleons. Foundation for Education and Research in Neurological Emergencies. 2014. http://tinyurl.com/y9mwlcnx ( accessed 13 February 2018 ) Google Scholar
  • Kothari R, Barsan W, Brott T et al.. Frequency and accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of acute stroke. Stroke. 1995. 26:937–941. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackay J, Mensah GA. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. WHO: Geneva; 2014. http://tinyurl.com/nx7pk ( accessed 13 February 2018 ) Google Scholar
  • Mohan KM, Wolfe CD, Rudd AG et al.. Risk and cumulative risk of stroke recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2011;42:1489–1494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Audit Office . Progress in improving stroke care. 2010. http://tinyurl.com/yde3mfjy ( accessed 13 February 2018 ) Google Scholar
  • NHS England . News: Stroke patients in England set to receive revolutionary new treatment. 2017. http://tinyurl.com/yb5u8lu6 ( accessed 13 February 2018 ) Google Scholar
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Stroke and transient ischaemic attack in over 16s: diagnosis and initial management. 2008. https://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CG68 ( accessed 13 February 2018 ) Google Scholar
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Mechanical clot retrieval for treating acute ischaemic stroke. 2016. http://tinyurl.com/y8cgy2yf ( accessed 13 February 2018 ) Google Scholar
  • Nor AM, Davis J, Sen B et al.. The Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) scale: development and validation of a stroke recognition instrument. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:727–734. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Royal College of Physicians . National clinical guideline for stroke. 5th edn. 2016. http://tinyurl.com/y95gwlwc ( accessed 13 February 2018 ) Google Scholar
  • Sandercock P, Wardlaw JM, Lindley RI et al.; IST3 Collaborative Group. The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the third international stroke trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012. 379:2352–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60768-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saver JL. Time is Brain—Quantified. Stroke. 2006;37:263–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith W, Massaro L. Is it a mimic or stroke? Key indicators to help your staff. Dallas: American Heart Association & American Stroke Association; 2015. http://tinyurl.com/y967x9z6 ( accessed 13 February 2018 ) Google Scholar
  • Spalice A, Del Balzo F, Papetti L et al.. Stroke and migraine is there a possible comorbidity? Ital J Pediatr. 2016:42.41 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sulter G, Steen C, Keyser JD. Use of the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in Acute Stroke Trials. Stroke. 1999;30:1538–1541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsivgoulis G, Alexandrov AV, Chang J et al.. Safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke mimics: a 6-year, single-care center study and a pooled analysis of reported series. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1771–1774. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker RA. Identifying disease that mimic stroke. JEMS. 2011;36:3. Google Scholar
  • Winkler DT, Fluri F, Fuhr P et al.. Thrombolysis in Stroke Mimics. Frequency, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcome. Stroke. 2009;40:1522–1525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young AW, Morris Z, Shuler K, Smith C, Wardlaw J. Acute symptomatic hypoglycaemia mimicking ischaemic stroke on imaging: a systemic review. BMC Neurol. 2013;12:139 CrossrefGoogle Scholar