Public harm or public value? Towards coproduction in research with communities
Abstract
This paper develops a critique of the current model of research governance ethics which casts communities as vulnerable subjects. The paper constructs an alternative approach to thinking about the twin challenges of research governance and reflexive research practice through reframing ideas of public value and rejecting a public harm model. We use the insights of coproduction as a way of positively rethinking the relationship between researchers and ‘the researched’ to create new ways of thinking about public value. We argue that reflexive research practice should draw upon the principles and examples of empowerment within governance. These aspire to work ‘with’ communities and create space for greater community control in defining and creating publically valuable research.
References
Alford J (2009) Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service Delivery to Coproduction, Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.
Armstrong F, Alsop A“Debate: co-production can contribute to research impact in the social sciences”. Public Money and Management20104: 208–210.
Arnstein S“A ladder of citizen participation”. Journal of the American Institute of Planners196935: 216–224.
Autonomous Geographies Collective. “Beyond scholar activism: making strategic interventions inside and outside the neoliberal university”. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies20109: 245–275.
Barnes M, Barnes M, Prior D“Alliances, contention and oppositional consciousness: can public participation generate subversion?”. Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistence in Public Service2009Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 33–48.
Beebeejaun Y, Grimshaw L“Is New Deal for Communities a new deal for equality? Getting women on board in neighbourhood governance”. Urban Studies201148: 1997–2011.
Beebeejaun Y, Durose C, Rees J, Richardson J, Richardson L“Beyond text: exploring ethos and method in co-producing research with communities”. Community Development Journal2013. (forthcoming).
Bennett F, Roberts M (2004) From Input to Influence: Participatory Approaches to Research and Inquiry into Poverty, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Bond R, Paterson L“Coming down from the Ivory Tower? Academics' civic and economic engagement with the community”. Oxford Review of Education200531: 331–351.
Bovens MAP (1998) The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
British Academy. Punching our Weight: The Humanities and Social Sciences in Public Policy making2008London.
Buchanan D, Boddy D, McCalman J, Bryman A“Getting in, getting on, getting out, and getting back”. Doing Research in Organizations1988London: Routledge, pp. 53–67.
Burawoy M“The critical turn to public sociology”. Critical Sociology200531: 313–326.
Chatterton P“The cultural role of universities in the community: revisiting the university-community debate”. Environment and Planning A200032: 165–181.
Collins H M, Evans R J“The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience”. Social Studies of Science200232: 235–296.
Cooke B, Kothari U (2001) Participation, the New Tyranny?, London: Zed Books.
Dickert N, Sugarman J“Ethical goals of community consultation in research”. American Journal of Public Health200595: 1123–1127.
Dinham A“Empowered or over-powered? The real experiences of local participation in the UK's New Deal for Communities”. Community Development Journal200540: 301–312.
Dowling R“Geographies of identity: labouring in the neoliberal university”. Progress in Human Geography200832: 812–820.
Durham Community Research Team, 2012, “Community-based participatory research: ethical challenges”, Arts and Humanities Research Council Connected Communities programme, Swindon.
Durose C, Rees J“The rise and fall of neighbourhood in the New Labour era”. Policy and Politics201240: 39–55.
Durose C, Beebeejaun Y, Rees J, Richardson J, Richardson L, 2012, “Towards co-production in research with communities”, Arts and Humanities Research Council Connected Communities Programme, Swindon.
Dyer S, Demeritt D“Un-ethical review? Why it is wrong to apply the medical model of research governance to human geography”. Progress in Human Geography200933: 46–64.
East St Louis Action Project, no date, “What we do”, http://www.eslarp.uiuc.edu/view/eslarp-in-the-community.aspx.
Falzone P“Transcendent ethnography”. Action Research20042: 326–344.
Fine M, Torre M E“Remembering exclusions: participatory action research in public institutions”. Qualitative Research in Psychology20041: 15–37.
Fischer F (2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fishkin J“Response to critics of when the people speak: the deliberative deficit and what to do about it”. The Good Society201019: 68–76.
Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, London: Continuum.
Gaventa J (2005) Claiming Citizenship: Rights, Participation and Accountability, London: Zed Books.
Gillard S, Simons L, Turner K, Lucock M, Edwards C“Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study”. Qualitative Health Research201222: 1126–1137.
Goddard J (2009) Reinventing the Civic University, London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
Goss S (2001) Making Local Governance Work: Networks, Relationships and the Management of Change, Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.
Haggerty K D“Ethics creep: governing social science research in the name of ethics”. Qualitative Sociology200427: 391–414.
Hay I“Making moral imaginations: research ethics, pedagogy, and professional human geography”. Philosophy and Geography19981: 55–75.
Heron J (1971) Experience and Method: An Inquiry into the Concept of Experiential Research, Guildford, Surrey: Human Potential Research Project, University of Surrey.
Heron J, Reason P“A participatory inquiry paradigm”. Qualitative Inquiry19973: 274–294.
Heron J, Reason P, Reason P, Bradbury H“The practice of co-operative inquiry: research with rather than on people”. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice2001London: Sage, pp. 179–188.
Hupe P, Hill M“Street level bureaucracy and public accountability”. Public Administration200785: 279–299.
Kesby M“Spatialising participatory approaches: the contribution of geography to a mature debate”. Environment and Planning A200739: 2813–2831.
Lantz P M, Viruell-Fuentes E, Israel B A, Softley D, Guzman R“Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community based participatory research partnership in Detroit”. Journal of Urban Health200178: 495–507.
Lawless P“Understanding the scale and nature of outcome change in area-regeneration programmes: evidence from the New Deal for Communities programme in England”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy201129: 520–532.
Lawless P, Pearson S“Outcomes from community engagement in urban regeneration: evidence from England's New Deal for Community programme”. Planning Theory and Practice201213: 509–527.
Lewin K“Action research and minority problems”. Journal of Social Issues19462(4): 34–46.
Lowndes V, Sullivan H“How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighbourhood governance”. Public Administration200886: 53–74.
Macreavey R“Community regeneration: an elite or ‘real’ community space?”. International Planning Studies200914: 311–327.
Maginn P“Towards more effective representation: the potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography”. Qualitative Research2007, pp. 725–43.
Martin S“Co-production of social research: strategies for engaged scholarship”. Public Money and Management201030: 211–218.
Moore M (1996) Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
mrs kinspaisby. “Taking stock of participatory geographies: envisioning the communiversity”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series200833: 292–299.
Narayan D, Patel R, Schafft K, Rademacher A, Koch-Schulte S (1999) Can Anyone Hear Us? Voices from 47 Countries, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Newman J, Newman J“Participative governance and the remaking of the public sphere”. Remaking Governance: People, Politics and the Public Sphere2005Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 119–138.
Newman J (2012) Working the Spaces of Power: Activism, Neoliberalism and Gendered Labour, London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.
Orr K M, Bennett M“Reflexivity in the co-production of academic-practitioner research”. Qualitative Research in Organisations and Management20094: 85–102.
Ostrom E“Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy and development”. World Development199624: 1073–1088.
Pain R“Social geography: on action orientated research”. Progress in Human Geography200327: 649–657.
Pain R“Social geography: participatory research”. Progress in Human Geography200428: 652–663.
Pain R, Kesby M, Askins K“Geographies of impact: power, participation and potential”. Area201143: 183–188.
Pain R, Kesby M, Askins K“The politics of social justice in neoliberal times”. Area201244: 120–123.
Phillips A (1995) The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pitkin H (1967) The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Pohl C, Rist R, Zimmerman A, Fry P, Gurung G S, Schneider F, Speranza C I, Kiteme B, Boillat S, Serrano E, Hirsch Hadorn G, Weismann U“Researchers' roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal”. Science and Public Policy201037: 267–281.
Porter L (2010) Unlearning the Colonial Cultures of Planning, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Pouliot C“Using the deficit model, public debate model and co-production of knowledge models to interpret points of view of students concerning citizens' participation in socioscientific issues”. International Journal of Environment and Science Education20094: 49–73.
Reardon K“Enhancing the capacity of community-based organizations in East St. Louis”. Journal of Planning Education and Research199817: 323–333.
Robinson J, Tansey J“Co-production, emergent properties and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basin Futures Project”. Science and Public Policy200633: 151–160.
Slater T“Impacted geographies: a response to Pain, Kesby and Askins”. Area201144: 117–119.
Stoecker R“Challenging institutional barriers to community-based research”. Action Research20086: 49–67.
Taylor M“Community participation in the real world: opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces”. Urban Studies200744: 297–317.
University of X, no date, “Committee on the ethics of research on human beings: application form for approval of a research project”; copy available from Y Beebeejaun.
Walker D“Debate: do academics know better or merely different?”. Public Money and Management20103: 204–206.
Young I (2000) Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2015
Issue published: June 2015
Keywords
Rights and permissions
© The Author(s) 2015.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 1887
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 51 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 0
-
The Opportunities, Challenges, and Rewards of “Community Peer Research...
-
Negotiating Narratives of ‘Good’: A Model of Public Value Adaptation i...
-
How ‘co’ can you go? A qualitative inquiry on the key principles of co...
-
The Value of Student Voice and Choice: A Guide for Trauma-Informed Par...
-
Dying 2 Talk: Generating a More Compassion Community for Young People
-
Making a Case for Afrofuturism as a Critical Qualitative Inquiry Metho...
-
Making the invisible, visible: older lesbian, gay and bisexual victim-...
-
Creating stories for impact: Co‐producing knowledge with young people ...
-
Coproducing Online Focus or Consultation Groups for Health and Social ...
-
How Should Universities Understand Their Social Impact?
-
Coproducing Online Focus or Consultation Groups for Health and Social ...
-
Teaching What Is “Real” About Science
-
“We’re already doing this work”: ethical research with community-based...
-
Building resilience through informal networks and community knowledge ...
-
Participation of older people in learning studies
-
Generational perspective on asthma self‐management in the Bangladeshi ...
-
From Urban Consumption to Production: Rethinking the Role of Festivals...
-
Who’s learning from whom? Grassroots International NGOs learning from ...
-
NGO Roles and Anticipated Outcomes in Environmental Participatory Proc...
-
Race, Gender, and Positionality in Urban Planning Research
-
The Movement toward Knowledge Democracy in Participatory and Action Re...
-
Nurturing the buffer zone: conducting collaborative action research in...
-
Optimising the impact of health services research on the organisation ...
-
Small talk matters! Creating allyship in mental health research
-
Conceptualising quality in co-produced research
-
Disability inclusive disaster risk reduction with culturally and lingu...
-
The co-productive imagination: a creative, speculative and eventful ap...
-
Urban history ‘on the go’: discovering and developing Leicester's cult...
-
Teaching Participatory Action Research: Fostering Impact
-
Talking to Migrants: Invisibility, Vulnerability, and Protection
-
The logic and integration of coproductive research approaches
-
Co-producing Research with Users and Communities
-
Using a Trauma-Informed, Socially Just Research Framework with Margina...
-
An analysis of the role of communities in care systems co-created with...
-
Knowledge Matters: The Potential Contribution of the Coproduction of R...
-
Establishing long-term research relationships with older people: explo...
-
Reflections from the field: Researchers’ experiences of co-production
-
“I felt some prejudice in the back of my head”: Nursing students’ pers...
-
Co‐producing research with youth: The NeurOx young people's advisory g...
-
Collaborative dynamics in street level work: Working in and with commu...
-
“I don't think we've quite got there yet”: The experience of allyship ...
-
How did I not see that? Perspectives of nonconsumer mental health rese...
-
Facilitating coproduction: the role of leadership in coproduction init...
-
Ethical ‘mess’ in co-produced research: reflections from a U.K.-based ...
-
Social research and co-production with older people: Developing age-fr...
-
Co-production: towards a utopian approach
-
Action heritage: research, communities, social justice
-
Going public? Re‐thinking visibility, ethics and recognition through p...
-
Social media, community development and social capital
-
Seeking outsider perspectives in interpretive research: young adults a...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
View options
PDF/ePub
View PDF/ePubGet access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
