Landmark Article
Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action supporting emergent ingroup members
Mark A. Ferguson,
Nyla R. Branscombe,
Katherine J. Reynolds,
Corresponding Author
Mark A. Ferguson
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to Mark A. Ferguson, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, 2100 Main Street, Stevens Point, WI 54481, USA (email: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorNyla R. Branscombe
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorKatherine J. Reynolds
Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Search for more papers by this author
Mark A. Ferguson,
Nyla R. Branscombe,
Katherine J. Reynolds,
Corresponding Author
Mark A. Ferguson
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to Mark A. Ferguson, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, 2100 Main Street, Stevens Point, WI 54481, USA (email: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorNyla R. Branscombe
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorKatherine J. Reynolds
Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Why does social psychological research on prejudice change across time? We argue that scientific change is not simply a result of empirical evidence, technological developments, or social controversies, but rather emerges out of social change-driven shifts in how researchers categorize themselves and others within their larger societies. As mainstream researchers increasingly recategorize former outgroup members as part of a novel ingroup, prejudice research shifts in support of emergent ingroup members against their emergent outgroup opponents. Although social change-driven science results in valuable opportunities for researchers, it also results in significant risks for research – collective, scientific biases in the inclusion and exclusion of social groups in prejudice research that are not readily detected or managed by traditional controls. We present the Emergent Ingroup Model (EIM) to encourage reflection on shared biases, as well as to spark a broader conversation on how to strengthen our field for a rapidly changing and increasingly global world.
References
- Allport, F. H. (1924). Social change: An analysis of Professor Ogburn's culture theory. Journal of Social Forces, 2, 671–676. https://doi.org/10.2307/3006207
10.2307/3006207 Google Scholar
- Allport, G. W. (1944). The bigot in our midst: An analysis of his psychology. Commonwealth, 40, 582–586.
- Allport, G. W. (1960). Prejudice in modern perspective. In G. W. Allport (Ed.), Personality and social encounter: Selected essays (pp. 219–235). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Allport, G. W., & Kramer, B. M. (1946). Some roots of prejudice. The Journal of Psychology, 22, 9–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917293
- Allport, G. W., & Schanck, R. L. (1936). Are attitudes biological or cultural in origin? Character and Personality, 4, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1936.tb02122.x
10.1111/j.1467-6494.1936.tb02122.x Google Scholar
- Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3800
- Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom ( 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
- Augoustinos, M. (2016). Re-theorizing prejudice in social psychology: From cognition to discourse. In C. Tileaga & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 243–256). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Benjamin, Jr, L. T., & Crouse, E. M. (2002). The American Psychological Association's response to Brown v. Board of Education: The case of Kenneth B. Clark. American Psychologist, 57, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.57.1.38
- Biernat, M., & Deaux, K. (2012). A history of social psychological research on gender. In A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 475–497). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Billig, M. (2012). The notion of “prejudice”: Some rhetorical and ideological aspects. In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 139–157). New York, NY: Cambridge.
- Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Lala, G., Berndsen, M., & Misajon, R. (2015). Public division about climate change rooted in conflicting socio-political identities. Nature Climate Change, 5, 226–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2507
- Boxer, A. M., & Carrier, J. M. (1998). Evelyn Hooker: A life remembered. Journal of Homosexuality, 36, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v36n01_01
- Brandt, M. J. (2017). Predicting ideological prejudice. Psychological Science, 28, 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617693004
- Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510932
- Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- J. Buchler (Ed.) (1940). The philosophy of Pierce: Selected writings. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
- Cartwright, D. (1979). Contemporary social psychology in historical perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033880
- Christie, D. J. (2006). What is peace psychology the psychology of? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00436.x
- Clark, K. B. (1965). Problems of power and social change: Toward a relevant social psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 21, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1965.tb00502.x
10.1111/j.1540-4560.1965.tb00502.x Google Scholar
- Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O'Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.359
- Crandall, C. S., Ferguson, M. A., & Bahns, A. J. (2013). When we see prejudice: The normative window and social change. In C. Stangor & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 53–69). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Crandall, C. S., Miller, J. M., & White, M. H. (2018). Changing norms following the 2016 U.S. presidential election: The Trump effect on prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617750735
- C. S. Crandall, & M. Schaller (Eds.) (2005). Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues. Lawrence, KS: Lewinian Press.
- Crandall, C. S., & Stangor, C. (2005). Conformity and prejudice. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 295–309). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Crawford, J. T. (2014). Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.002
- Cruwys, T., Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., Jetten, J., & Dingle, G. A. (2016). Social Identity Mapping: A procedure for visual representation and assessment of subjective multiple group memberships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 613–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12155
- Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Czopp, A. M., & Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2012). Interpersonal confrontations of prejudice. In D. W. Russell & C. A. Russell (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: Interdisciplinary perspectives on contemporary issues (pp. 175–201). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
- de la Sablonniere, R. (2017). Toward a psychology of social change: A typology of social change. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00397
- Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.56.1.5
- Dhont, K., & Hodson, G. (2014). Does lower cognitive ability predict greater prejudice? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414549750
- Dhont, K., Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Opening closed minds: The combined effects of intergroup contact and need for closure on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211399101
- Dixon, J. (2017). “Thinking ill of others without sufficient warrant?” Transcending the accuracy-inaccuracy dualism in prejudice and stereotyping research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12181
- Dixon, J., Cakal, H., Khan, W., Osmany, M., Majumdar, S., & Hassan, M. (2017). Contact, political solidarity and collective action: An Indian case study of relations between historically disadvantaged communities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2296
- Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., Thomae, M., Tredoux, C., Kerr, P., & Quayle, M. (2015). Divide and rule, unite and resist: Contact, collective action and policy attitudes among historically disadvantaged groups. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12129
- Dixon, J., Levine, M., Reicher, S. D., & Durrheim, K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11002214
- Does, S., Ellemers, N., Dovidio, J. F., Norman, J. B., Mentovich, A., van der Lee, R., & Goff, P. A. (2018). Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science. American Psychologist, 73, 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000199
- Dovidio, J. F. (2001). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The third wave. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 829–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00244
- Dovidio, J. F. (2016). Commentary: A big problem requires a foundational change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.008
- Dovidio, J. F. (2018). Where have we been, where are we now, and where should we be? Linking engagement to scholarship. In L. R. Tropp (Ed.), Making research matter: A psychologist's guide to public engagement (pp. 195–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000066-000
10.1037/0000066-013 Google Scholar
- Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Pearson, A. R. (2017). Aversive racism and contemporary bias. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 267–294). New York, NY: Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161579
10.1017/9781316161579.012 Google Scholar
- J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.) (2010). The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781446200919 Google Scholar
- Dovidio, J. F., Pearson, A. R., & Orr, P. (2008). Social psychology and neuroscience: Strange bedfellows or a healthy marriage? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207088041
- Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M., & Louis, W. R. (2016). Acting in solidarity: Cross-group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. Journal of Social Issues, 72, 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12168
- Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (2018). The conservative crowd? How participation in collective events transforms participants' understandings of collective action. In B. Wagoner, F. M. Moghaddam, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The psychology of radical social change: From rage to revolution (pp. 11–28). New York, NY: Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108377461
10.1017/9781108377461.003 Google Scholar
- Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e130. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x14000430
- Duckitt, J. H. (2010). Historical overview. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 29–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919
10.4135/9781446200919.n2 Google Scholar
- Durrheim, K., Quayle, M., & Dixon, J. (2016). The struggle for the nature of “prejudice”: “Prejudice” expression as identity performance. Political Psychology, 37, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12310
- Eagly, A. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance? Journal of Social Issues, 72, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12163
- Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19–35). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2014). The intuitive traditionalist: How biases for existence and longevity promote the status quo. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 53–104). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Elkins, D. N. (2016). The American Psychological Association and the Hoffman report. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167815619064
- Elms, A. C. (1975). The crisis of confidence in social psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 967–976. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.30.10.967
- Esses, V. M., Deaux, K., Lalonde, R. N., & Brown, R. (2010). Psychological perspectives on immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01667.x
- Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Reis, H. T. (2015). Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000007
- Fiske, S. T. (2015). Grolar bears, social class, and policy relevance: Extraordinary agendas for the emerging 21st century. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2117
- Fiske, S. T. (2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825
- Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46, 1049–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.10.1049
- Fiske, S. T., Harris, L. T., Lee, T. L., & Russell, A. M. (2016). The future of research on prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination ( 2nd ed., pp. 487–498). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Fiske, S. T., & North, M. S. (2015). Measures of stereotyping and prejudice: Barometers of bias. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 684–718). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00024-3
10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00024-3 Google Scholar
- Forscher, P. S., & Devine, P. G. (2014). Breaking the prejudice habit: Automaticity and control in the context of a long-term goal. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 468–482). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Forscher, P. S., & Devine, P. G. (2016). The role of intentions in conceptions of prejudice: An historical perspective. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination ( 2nd ed., pp. 241–254). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Funder, D. C., Levine, J. M., Mackie, D. M., Morf, C. C., Sansone, C., Vazire, S., & West, S. G. (2014). Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: Recommendations for research and educational practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313507536
- Gaertner, S. L. (1973). Helping behavior and racial discrimination among liberals and conservatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034221
- Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Guerra, R., Hehman, E., & Saguy, T. (2016). A common ingroup identity: Categorization, identity, and intergroup relations. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination ( 2nd ed., pp. 433–454). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.708
- Garth, T. R. (1925). A review of racial psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 22, 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073112
10.1037/h0073112 Google Scholar
- Garth, T. R. (1934). The problem of race psychology: A general statement. Journal of Negro Education, 3, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2292376
10.2307/2292376 Google Scholar
- Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189–1206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025882
- Gordon, L. N. (2015). From power to prejudice: The rise of racial individualism in midcentury America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226238586.001.0001
10.7208/chicago/9780226238586.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Guilford, J. P. (1931). Racial preferences of a thousand American university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1931.9918966
10.1080/00224545.1931.9918966 Google Scholar
- Haidt, J. (2016). Why concepts creep to the left. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1115713
- Hameiri, B., Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2014). Challenges for peacemakers: How to overcome socio-psychological barriers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548428
10.1177/2372732214548428 Google Scholar
- Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: “What is strong objectivity”? In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Harding, J., Proshansky, H., Kutner, B., & Chein, I. (1969). Prejudice and ethnic relations. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology ( 2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 1–76). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- S. G. Harkins, K. D. Williams, & J. M. Burger (Eds.) (2017). The Oxford handbook of social influence. New York, NY: Oxford.
- Haslam, S. A. (2014). Making good theory practical: Five lessons for an applied social identity approach to challenges of organizational, health, and clinical psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12061
- Haslam, N. (2016). Concept creep: Psychology's expanding concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1082418
- Haslam, S. A., Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013). The collective origins of valued originality: A social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313498001
- Haslam, S. A., Ellemers, N., Reicher, S. D., Reynolds, K. J., & Schmitt, M. T. (2010). The social identity perspective today: An overview of its defining ideas. In T. Postmes & N. R. Branscombe (Eds.), Rediscovering social identity: Key readings (pp. 341–356). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). When prisoners take over the prison: A social psychology of resistance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 154–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311419864
- Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2015). Leadership: Theory and practice. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 67–94). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/14342-003 Google Scholar
- Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012). Identity, influence, and change: Rediscovering John Turner's vision for social psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02091.x
- Haslam, S. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012). All about us, but never about us: The three-pronged potency of prejudice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001215
- Herek, G. M. (2010). Sexual orientation differences as deficits: Science and stigma in the history of American psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 693–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388770
- Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612448792
- Jahoda, G. (2016). Seventy years of social psychology: A cultural and personal critique. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4, 364–380. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i1.621
10.5964/jspp.v4i1.621 Google Scholar
- Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., & Spears, R. (2006). Living on the edge: Dynamics of intragroup and intergroup rejection experiences. In R. Brown & D. Capozza (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional and cultural influences (pp. 92–107). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Jetten, J., & Postmes, T. (2006). Introduction: The puzzle of individuality and the group. In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 1–10). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781446211946.n1 Google Scholar
- Jetten, J., Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Garza, A. A., & Mewse, A. J. (2011). Group commitment in the face of discrimination: The role of legitimacy appraisals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.743
- Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.862
- Johnson, J. D., Ashburn-Nardo, L., & Lecci, L. (2013). Individual differences in discrimination expectations moderate the impact of target stereotypically Black physical features on racism-related responses in Blacks. Journal of Black Psychology, 39, 560–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798412469229
- Johnstone, M., Jetten, J., Dingle, G. A., Parsell, C., & Walter, Z. C. (2015). Discrimination and well-being amongst the homeless: The role of multiple group membership. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00739
- Jones, J. M. (2010). Toward a diversity science: The longest journey begins with the first step. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.487252
- Jones, E. E., & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Review, 76, 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031617
- Jussim, L., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., Stevens, S. T., & Duarte, J. L. (2016). Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.003
- Kagan, J. (2009). Historical selection. Review of General Psychology, 13, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014228
- Katz, D. (1974). Factors affecting social change: A social-psychological interpretation. Journal of Social Issues, 30, 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00732.x
- Katz, D., & Braly, K. W. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074049
- Klein, O., Spears, R., & Reicher, S. D. (2007). Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of SIDE. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294588
- Klineberg, O. (1935). Race differences. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2570339
- Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 330–344). New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
- Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5–55.
- Lippitt, R., & Radke, M. (1946). New trends in the investigation of prejudice. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 244, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624624400122
- Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9780691209753 Google Scholar
- Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9780691187013 Google Scholar
- Luguri, J. B., Napier, J. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). Reconstruing intolerance: Abstract thinking reduces conservatives' prejudice against nonnormative groups. Psychological Science, 23, 756–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611433877
- Maass, A., Arcuri, L., & Suitner, C. (2014). Shaping intergroup relations through language. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 157–176). New York, NY: Oxford.
- Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2015). Intergroup emotions. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. F. Dovidio, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 263–293). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/14342-010 Google Scholar
- Major, B., & Townsend, S. S. M. (2010). Coping with bias. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 410–425). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919
10.4135/9781446200919.n25 Google Scholar
- Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Biernat, M. (2010). Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 768–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210370031
- Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2017). Popularity as a poor proxy for utility: The case of implicit prejudice. In S. O. Lilienfeld & I. D. Waldman (Eds.), Psychological science under scrutiny: Recent challenges and proposed solutions (pp. 164–195). New York, NY: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119095910
10.1002/9781119095910.ch10 Google Scholar
- Monteith, M. J., Parker, L. R., & Burns, M. D. (2016). The self-regulation of prejudice. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination ( 2nd ed., pp. 409–432). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Morton, T. A., Haslam, S. A., Postmes, T., & Ryan, M. K. (2006). We value what values us: The appeal of identity-affirming science. Political Psychology, 27, 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00539.x
- Mullen, E., Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2003). Avoiding the pitfalls of politicized psychology. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3, 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00021.x
10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00021.x Google Scholar
- North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2014). Social categories create and reflect inequality: Psychological and sociological insights. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 243–265). New York, NY: Springer.
10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_12 Google Scholar
- Oakes, P. J. (2004). The root of all evil in intergroup relations? Unearthing the categorization process. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Social cognition (pp. 102–119). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
- O'Brien, L. T., Crandall, C. S., Horstman-Reser, A., Warner, R., Alsbrooks, A., & Blodorn, A. (2010). But I'm no bigot: How prejudiced White Americans maintain unprejudiced self-images. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 917–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00604.x
- Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
- Paluck, E. L. (2012). Interventions aimed at the reduction of prejudice and conflict. In L. R. Tropp (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 179–192). New York, NY: Oxford.
- Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2015). Current emotion research in social psychology: Thinking about emotions and other people. Emotion Review, 7, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590624
- Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Reflections on core themes in intergroup research. In U. Wagner, L. R. Tropp, G. Finchilescu, & C. Tredoux (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 283–303). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
10.1002/9781444303117.ch18 Google Scholar
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.1063/1.3050617 Google Scholar
- Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2010). Collaborative memory: Cognitive research and theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388763
- Reicher, S. D. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance, and change. Political Psychology, 25, 921–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00403.x
- Reicher, S. D. (2012). From perception to mobilization: The shifting paradigm of prejudice. In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 27–47). New York, NY: Cambridge.
- Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., & Smith, J. R. (2012). Working toward the experimenter: Reconceptualizing obedience within the Milgram paradigm as identification-based followership. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612448482
- Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., Spears, R., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012). A social mind: The context of John Turner's work and its influence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 344–385). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Reynolds, K. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (2012). Prejudice, social identity and social change: Resolving the Allportian problematic. In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 48–69). New York, NY: Cambridge.
- Reynolds, K. J., Jones, B. M., O'Brien, K., & Subašić, E. (2013). Theories of socio-political change and the dynamics of sub-group versus superordinate interests. European Psychologist, 18, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000159
- Reynolds, K. J., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., & Ryan, M. K. (2004). Social identity as the basis of group entitativity: Elaborating the case for the “science of social groups per se”. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 317–333). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Reynolds, K. J., Subašić, E., Batalha, L., & Jones, B. M. (2017). From prejudice to social change: A social identity perspective. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 47–64). New York, NY: Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161579
10.1017/9781316161579.003 Google Scholar
- Richards, G. (1998). Reconceptualizing the history of race psychology: Thomas Russell Garth (1872–1939) and how he changed his mind. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 34, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199824)34:1<15:AID-JHBS2>3.0.CO;2-I
- Ring, K. (1967). Experimental social psychology: Some sober questions about some frivolous values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90016-9
- Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J., & Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20, 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.20.4.294.19908
- Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., & Phelan, J. E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. In P. G. Devine & E. A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 167–227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Samelson, F. (1978). From “race psychology” to “studies in prejudice”: Some observations on the thematic reversal in social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(197807)14:3<265:AID-JHBS2300140313<3.0.CO;2-P
- Schofield, J. W. (1986). Causes and consequences of the colorblind perspective. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 231-253). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 95–150). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Shields, S. A. (2013). Gender and emotion: What we think we know, what we need to know, and why it matters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313502312
- Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J. B., Apfelbaum, E. P., Larsen, J. T., Galinsky, A. D., & Roese, N. J. (2014). Feeling more together: Group attention intensifies emotion. Emotion, 14, 1102–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037697
- Sidanius, J., Cotterill, S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Kteily, N., & Carvacho, H. (2017). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 149–187). New York, NY: Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161579
10.1017/9781316161579.008 Google Scholar
- Spears, R. (2008). Social identity, legitimacy, and intergroup conflict: The rocky road to reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 319–344). New York, NY: Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300314.001.0001
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300314.003.0015 Google Scholar
- Spears, R. (2010). Group rationale, collective sense: Beyond intergroup bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609x481308
- Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Rios, K. (2016). Intergroup threat theory. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination ( 2nd ed., pp. 255–278). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Stroebe, K., Wang, K., & Wright, S. C. (2015). Broadening perspectives on achieving social change. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12132
- Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Mohamed, M. S. (2015). Changing social identities to change society: Leadership as a contest for influence and collective mobilization. In K. J. Reynolds & N. R. Branscombe (Eds.), Psychology of change: Life contexts, experiences, and identities (pp. 246–263). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308323223
- Subašić, E., Schmitt, M. T., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). Are we all in this together? Co-victimization, inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02073.x
- Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (2007). Prejudice: The target's perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 69–119). Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Tetlock, P. E. (2012). Rational versus irrational prejudices: How problematic is the ideological lopsidedness of social psychology? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 519–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612454305
- Tetlock, P. E., & Arkes, H. A. (2004). The implicit prejudice exchange: Islands of consensus in a sea of controversy. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1504_03
- Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Lala, G., Stuart, A., Hall, L. J., & Goddard, A. (2015). Whatever happened to Kony 2012? Understanding a global Internet phenomenon as an emergent social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2094
- Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1919). The Polish peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an immigrant group. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Tileaga, C. (2014). Prejudice as collective definition: Ideology, discourse and moral exclusion. In C. Antaki & S. Condor (Eds.), Rhetoric, ideology and social psychology: Essays in honour of Michael Billig (pp. 71–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Toolis, E., & Hammack, P. (2015). “This is my community”: Reproducing and resisting boundaries of exclusion in contested public spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56, 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9756-5
- Tropp, L. R. (2018). Making research matter: A psychologist's guide to public engagement. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000066-000
10.1037/0000066-000 Google Scholar
- Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6–34). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.244
- Turner, J. C. (2006). Tyranny, freedom and social structure: Escaping our theoretical prisons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605x79840
- Turner, J. C., & Brown, R. J. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 201–234). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205002
- Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127184
- Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2010). The story of social identity. In T. Postmes & N. R. Branscombe (Eds.), Rediscovering social identity: Key readings (pp. 13–32). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012). Self-categorization theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 399–417). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222
10.4135/9781446249222.n46 Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R. (2015). Social justice. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. F. Dovidio, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 95–122). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/14342-004 Google Scholar
- van Kleef, G. A., & Fischer, A. H. (2016). Emotional collectives: How groups shape emotions and emotions shape groups. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1081349
- van Kleef, G. A., Van Doorn, E. A., Heerdink, M. W., & Koning, L. F. (2011). Emotion is for influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 22, 114–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2011.627192
- Waters, M. C., Kasinitz, P., & Asad, A. L. (2014). Immigrants and African Americans. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145449
- Watson, G. (1966). Psychology of social change. In G. Watson (Ed.), Social psychology: Issues and insights (pp. 532–561). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
- White, M. H., & Crandall, C. S. (2017). Science, democratic values, and the politics of research. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3, 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000130
10.1037/tps0000130 Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, S. (1988). The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women's Studies International Forum, 11, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(88)90024-6
- Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90059-6
- Wright, S. C., & Baray, G. (2012). Models of social change in social psychology: Collective action or prejudice reduction? Conflict or harmony? In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 225–247). New York, NY: Cambridge.
- Zhang, A., Jetten, J., Iyer, A., & Cui, L. (2013). “It will not always be this way”: Cognitive alternatives improve self-esteem in contexts of segregation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612452890
Citing Literature
