Refocusing the Focus Group: AIRing as a Basis for Effective Workplace Planning
Rachael A. Eggins
School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and
Search for more papers by this authorKatherine J. Reynolds
School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and
Search for more papers by this authorS. Alexander Haslam
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAndrew S. Crocker
School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and
Search for more papers by this authorRachael A. Eggins
School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and
Search for more papers by this authorKatherine J. Reynolds
School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and
Search for more papers by this authorS. Alexander Haslam
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAndrew S. Crocker
School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Organizations commonly make use of focus groups for planning purposes while giving little thought to the dimensions on which those groups are formed. This paper argues that the dimensions of group formation have a significant effect on the ultimate success of any planning exercise. This is because in all organizations people necessarily self-categorize as members of groups that shape the way they think and act at work. However, there is often a lack of fit between the way organizations categorize employees and the way those employees categorize themselves. To the extent that there is a lack of fit between imposed and self-identified categories, we argue that organizations will fail to effectively harness group resources. Any planning strategy that makes use of groups should organize people in terms of identities that are most relevant to their work in order (a) to have an impact on the way people think and act and (b) to ensure that people have (and feel that they have) the opportunity to provide input that is relevant, useful and important for the organization. The paper discusses a technique, AIRing, that allows organizations to address this issue effectively. This is the first stage of the ASPIRe negotiation-based planning model (Eggins et al., Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice, pp. 241–260, Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis, 2003; Haslam et al., British Journal of Management, 14 (2003), pp. 357–369).
References
- Allen, N. J. and T. D. Hecht (2004). ‘The “romance of teams”: toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, pp. 439–461.
- Anderson, G. and L. Ford (1994). ‘Nominal group technique and the formation of competency standards’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 30, pp. 61–73.
10.1177/103841119403200105 Google Scholar
- Barreto, M. and N. Ellemers (2003). ‘The effects of being categorized: the interplay between internal and external social identities’, European Review of Social Psychology, 14, pp. 139–170.
10.1080/10463280340000045 Google Scholar
- Berry, J. W. (1991). ‘Understanding and managing multiculturalism: some possible implications of research in Canada’, Psychology and Developing Societies, 3, pp. 17–49.
10.1177/097133369100300103 Google Scholar
- Branscombe, N. R., N. Ellemers, R. Spears and B. Doosje (1999). ‘ The context and content of social identity threat’. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears and B. Doosje (eds), Social Identity, pp. 35–58. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Brewer, M. B., W. Von Hippel and M. P. Gooden (1999). ‘ Diversity and organizational identity: the problem of entrée after entry’. In D. A. Prentice and D. T. Miller (eds), Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict, pp. 337–363. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Copeland, M. P., K. J. Reynolds and J. Burton (2007). ‘Social identity and social relations: predictors of influence in a manufacturing facility’, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, Special issue on social network models, forthcoming.
- Diehl, M. and W. Stroebe (1991). ‘Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: tracking down the blocking effect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, pp. 392–403.
- D'Netto, B. (2000). ‘Migrant skill utilization: the untold story’, Mt Eliza Business Review, 3, pp. 65–71.
- Dovidio, J. F., S. L. Gaertner, A. Validzic, K. Matoka, B. Johnson and S. Frazier (1997). ‘Extending the benefits of recategorization: evaluations, self-disclosures, and helping’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, pp. 401–420.
- Duckitt, J. (2001). ‘ Reducing prejudice: an historical and multi-level approach’. In M. Augoustinos and K. J. Reynolds (eds), Understanding Prejudice, Racism and Social Conflict, pp. 253–272. London: Sage.
10.4135/9781446218877.n15 Google Scholar
- Eggins, R. A., S. A. Haslam and K. J. Reynolds (2002). ‘Social identity and negotiation: subgroup representation and superordinate consensus’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, pp. 887–899.
- Eggins, R. A., K. J. Reynolds and S. A. Haslam (2003). ‘ Working with identities: the ASPIRe model of organizational planning, negotiation and development’. In S. A. Haslam, D. Van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow and N. Ellemers (eds), Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice, pp. 241–260. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.
- Ellemers, N., D. De Gilder and S. A. Haslam (2004). ‘Motivating individuals and groups at work: a social identity perspective on leadership and group performance’, Academy of Management Review, 29, pp. 459–478.
- Ellemers, N., D. De Gilder and H. Van Den Heuvel (1999). ‘Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, pp. 717–730.
- Ellemers, N., P. Kortekaas and J. Ouwerkerk (1999). ‘Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, pp. 371–389.
- Frantzreb, R. B. (1981). ‘Human resource planning: forecasting manpower needs’, Personnel Journal, November, pp. 850–857.
- Glassop, L. I. (2002). ‘The organizational benefits of teams’, Human Relations, 55, pp. 225–249.
- Greer, C. R. and D. Armstrong (1980). ‘Human resource forecasting and planning: a state-of-the-art investigation’, Human Resource Planning, 3, pp. 67–78.
- Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups That Work and Those That Don't: Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach. London: Sage.
- Haslam, S. A. and S. D. Reicher (2007). ‘ Social identity and the dynamics of organizational life: insights from the BBC Prison Study’. In C. Bartel, S. Blader and A. Wrzesniewski (eds), Identity and the Modern Organization, pp. 135–166. New York: Erlbaum.
- Haslam, S. A., R. A. Eggins and K. J. Reynolds (2003). ‘The ASPIRe model: actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes’, Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 76, pp. 83–113.
- Haslam, S. A., T. Postmes and N. Ellemers (2003). ‘More than a metaphor: organizational identity makes organizational life possible’, British Journal of Management, 14, pp. 357–369.
- Haslam, S. A., C. Powell and J. C. Turner (2000). ‘Social identity, self-categorization and work motivation: rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, pp. 319–339.
- Haslam, S. A., J. C. Turner, P. J. Oakes, C. McGarty and K. J. Reynolds (1998). ‘The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus’, European Review of Social Psychology, 9, pp. 203–239.
- Hogg, M. A. and D. J. Terry (2000). ‘Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts’, Academy of Management Review, 25, pp. 121–140.
- James, K. and J. Greenberg (1989). ‘Ingroup salience, intergroup comparison and individual performance and self-esteem’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, pp. 604–616.
- Kelly, C. and J. Kelly (1994). ‘Who gets involved in collective action? Social psychological determinants of individual participation in trade unions’, Human Relations, 47, pp. 63–88.
- Kramer, R. M. (1993). ‘ Cooperation and organizational identification’. In J. K. Murnigham (ed.), Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research, pp. 244–268. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Kramer, R. M., M. B. Brewer and B. A. Hanna (1996). ‘ Collective trust and collective action: the decision to trust as a social decision’. In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp. 357–389. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781452243610.n17 Google Scholar
- Leavitt, H. J. (1975). ‘ Suppose we took groups seriously …’. In E. L. Cass and F. G. Zimmer (eds), Man and Work in Society, pp. 67–77. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
- Lewin, K. (1956). ‘ Studies in group decision’. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (eds), Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 2nd edn, pp. 287–301. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
- Nicholas, S. (2000). ‘Corporate awareness of diversity in the Australian workplace: the mind of the CEO’. In 21st Century Business Delivering the Diversity Dividend. Research Reports of the Productive Diversity Partnership Program. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Multi-cultural Affairs.
- Oakes, P. J. (1987). ‘ The salience of social categories’. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher and M. S. Wetherell (eds), Rediscovering the Social Group, pp. 117–141. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Oakes, P. J., S. A. Haslam and J. C. Turner (1994). Stereotyping and Social Reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
- O'Brien, A. T., S. A. Haslam, J. Jetten, L. Humphrey, L. O'Sullivan, T. Postmes, R. Eggins and K. J. Reynolds (2004). ‘Cynicism and disengagement among devalued employee groups: the need to ASPIRe’, Career Development International, 9, pp. 28–44.
10.1108/13620430410518129 Google Scholar
- Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied Imagination. New York: Scribner.
- Ouwerkerk, J. W., N. Ellemers and D. De Gilder (1999). ‘ Social identification, affective commitment and individual effort on behalf of the group’. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears and B. J. Doosje (eds), Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content, pp. 184–204. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Postmes, T. (2003). ‘ A social identity approach to communication in organizations’. In S. A. Haslam, D. Van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow and N. Ellemers (eds), Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice, pp. 81–97. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
- Postmes, T., R. Spears and S. Cihangir (2001). ‘Quality of decision making and group norms’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, pp. 918–930.
- Postmes, T., M. Tanis and B. De Wit (2001). ‘Communication and commitment in organizations: a social identity approach’, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 43, pp. 227–246.
10.1177/1368430201004003004 Google Scholar
- Reynolds, K. J. and M. Platow (2003). ‘ On the social psychology of power and powerlessness: social power as a symptom of organizational division’. In S. A. Haslam, D. Van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow and N. Ellemers (eds), Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice, pp. 173–188. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.
- Reynolds, K. J., S. A. Haslam, J. C. Turner, R. A. Eggins and M. K. Ryan (2000). ‘A social psychological analysis of diversity: the importance of working with group differences’. Paper presented at the Current Research on Diversity in Australia Workshop, Canberra, October.
- Riketta, M. and R. Van Dick (2005). ‘Foci of attachment in organizations: a meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, pp. 490–510.
- Riordan, C. and L. Shore (1997). ‘Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: examination of relational demography within work units’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, pp. 342–358.
- Sinclair, A. and V. Britton Wilson (2000). ‘Diversity leadership’. In 21st Century Business Delivering the Diversity Dividend. Research Reports of the Productive Diversity Partnership Program. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Multi-cultural Affairs.
- Smith, H. J., T. R. Tyler and Y. Huo (2003). ‘ Interpersonal treatment, social identity and organizational behavior’. In S. A. Haslam, D. Van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow and N. Ellemers (eds), Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice, pp. 155–171. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
- Smith, H. J., T. R. Tyler, Y. J. Huo, D. J. Ortiz and E. A. Lind (1998). ‘The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, pp. 470–493.
- Spears, R., B. Doosje and N. Ellemers (1997). ‘Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: the role of group identification’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, pp. 538–553.
- Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
- Tajfel, H. and J. C. Turner (1979). ‘ An integrative theory of intergroup conflict’. In W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp. 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Tajfel, H., C. Flament, M. G. Billig and R. F. Bundy (1971). ‘Social categorization and intergroup behaviour’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, pp. 149–177.
- Terry, D. J. and V. J. Callan (1998). ‘Ingroup bias in response to an organizational merger’, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, pp. 67–81.
10.1037/1089-2699.2.2.67 Google Scholar
- Turner, J. C. (1982). ‘ Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group’. In H. Tajfel (ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, pp. 15–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Turner, J. C. (1985). ‘ Social categorization and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behaviour’. In E. J. Lawler (ed.), Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 2, pp. 77–121. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher and M. S. Wetherell (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
- Turner, J. C., P. J. Oakes, S. A. Haslam and C. McGarty (1994). ‘Self and collective: cognition and social context’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, pp. 454–463.
- Tyler, T. R. (1989). ‘The psychology of procedural justice: a test of the group-value model’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, pp. 830–838.
- Tyler, T. R. and S. Blader (2000). Co-operation in Groups: Social Identity, Procedural Justice, and Behavioural Engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
- Van Dick, R. (2001). ‘Identification in organizational contexts: linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, pp. 265–283.
- Van Dick, R. (2004). ‘ My job is my castle: identification in organizational contexts’. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 19, pp. 171–204. Chichester: Wiley.
- Van Dick, R., U. Wagner, J. Stellmacher and O. Christ (2004). ‘The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: which aspects really matter?’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 26, pp. 273–285.
- Van Knippenberg, D. and S. A. Haslam (2003). ‘ Realizing the diversity dividend: exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology and reality’. In S. A. Haslam, D. Van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow and N. Ellemers (eds), Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice, pp. 61–80. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.
- Van Knippenberg, D. and E. C. M. Van Schie (2000). ‘Foci and correlates of organizational identification’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, pp. 137–147.
- Van Knippenberg, D., C. K. W. De Dreu and A. C. Homan (2004). ‘Work group diversity and group performance: an integrated model and research agenda’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, pp. 1008–1022.
- Veenstra, K. and S. A. Haslam (2000). ‘Willingness to participate in industrial protest: exploring social identification in context’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, pp. 153–172.
- Vroom, V. H. and P. W. Yetton (1973). Leadership and Decision Making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10.2307/j.ctt6wrc8r Google Scholar
- Wagner, W., J. Pfeffer and C. O'Reilly (1984). ‘Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp. 74–92.
- Wegge, J. and S. A. Haslam (2005). ‘Improving work motivation and performance in brainstorming groups: the effects of three group goal-setting strategies’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, pp. 400–430.
- West, M. A. (2002). ‘Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: an integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, pp. 355–424.
- West, M. A., F. C. Brodbeck and A. W. Richter (2004). ‘Does the “romance of teams” exist? The effectiveness of teams in experimental and field settings’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, pp. 467–473.
- West, M. A., G. Hirst, A. Richter and H. Shipton (2004). ‘Twelve steps to heaven: successfully managing change through developing innovative teams’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, pp. 269–299.
10.1080/13594320444000092 Google Scholar
- Worchel, S., H. Rothgerber, A. Day, D. Hart and J. Butemeyer (1998). ‘Social identity and individual productivity within groups’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, pp. 389–413.