Volume 64, Issue 1 p. 89-136

WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE

MICHAEL S. CHRISTIAN

MICHAEL S. CHRISTIAN

Kenan-Flagler Business School
University of North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
ADELA S. GARZA

ADELA S. GARZA

Eli Broad College of Management
Michigan State University

Search for more papers by this author
JEREL E. SLAUGHTER

JEREL E. SLAUGHTER

Eller College of Management
University of Arizona

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 February 2011
Citations: 1,597
and requests for reprints should be addressed to Michael S. Christian, Organizational Behavior Department, Kenan-Flagler Business School, CB #3490, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3490; [email protected].

Author's note. A previous version of this article was presented at the 2007 meeting of the Academy of Management. We would like to acknowledge Jessica Siegel and Edgar Kausel for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Abstract

Many researchers have concerns about work engagement's distinction from other constructs and its theoretical merit. The goals of this study were to identify an agreed-upon definition of engagement, to investigate its uniqueness, and to clarify its nomological network of constructs. Using a conceptual framework based on Macey and Schneider (2008; Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30), we found that engagement exhibits discriminant validity from, and criterion related validity over, job attitudes. We also found that engagement is related to several key antecedents and consequences. Finally, we used meta-analytic path modeling to test the role of engagement as a mediator of the relation between distal antecedents and job performance, finding support for our conceptual framework. In sum, our results suggest that work engagement is a useful construct that deserves further attention.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.