Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online November 11, 2015

Milgram’s shock experiments and the Nazi perpetrators: A contrarian perspective on the role of obedience pressures during the Holocaust

Abstract

In contrast to many scholars who believe that Milgram’s studies of obedience provide an incisive understanding of the Holocaust perpetrators, this article argues that pressures to obey authority had little role in the Holocaust. Unlike Milgram’s participants, most Nazi perpetrators showed no remorse or moral distress over the murders, severely compromising the explanatory necessity of obedience pressures; the excesses of the Nazis’ brutal and wanton cruelty, and the enthusiasm shown in the killing process, is entirely inconsistent with the behavior of the laboratory participants and with the concept of dutiful, but emotionless, obedience; and finally, when Milgram’s participants had the chance to evade giving shock, they frequently seized that opportunity; in contrast, although Nazi killers were often given the opportunity to withdraw from the killing operations, very few chose to do so. These arguments suggest that most of the Nazi perpetrators believed in what they were doing, and would have been willing, perhaps even eager to kill Jews, even in the absence of orders to do so.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Arendt H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York, NY: Viking.
Arendt H. (1966). Introduction. In Naumann B., Auschwitz: A report on the proceedings against Robert Karl Ludwig Mulka and others before the court at Frankfurt (Steinberg J., Trans.). New York, NY: Praeger.
Aronson E., Brewer M., Carlsmith J. M. (1985). Experimentation in social psychology. In Lindzey G., Aronson E. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 441–486). New York, NY: Random House.
Askenasy H. (1978). Are we all Nazis? Secaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart.
Bauer Y. (2001). Rethinking the Holocaust. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bauman Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Baumeister R. F. (1997). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. New York, NY: Freeman.
Baumrind D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “Behavioral studies of obedience.” American Psychologist, 19, 421–423.
Berger L. (1983). A psychological perspective on the Holocaust: Is mass murder part of human behavior? In Braham R. L. (Ed.), Perspectives on the Holocaust. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Blass T. (1992). The social psychology of Stanley Milgram. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 277–329). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Blass T. (2002). Perpetrator behavior as destructive obedience. In Newman L. S., Erber R. (Eds.), Understanding genocide (pp. 91–109). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Brannigan A. (2013). Beyond the banality of evil: Criminology and genocide. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Browning C. R. (1992). Ordinary men. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Cesarani D. (2004). Eichmann: His life and crimes. London, UK: Heinemann.
Charny I. W. (1982). Genocide: The human cancer. New York, NY: Hearst.
Darley J. M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 199–218.
Dawidowicz L. S. (1975). The war against the Jews. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Fenigstein A. (1998). Reconceptualizing the obedience of the perpetrators. In Shilling D. (Ed.), Lessons and legacies of the Holocaust (Vol. II). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Friedlander S. (1989). From anti-Semitism to extermination. In Furet F. (Ed.), Unanswered questions: Nazi Germany and the genocide of the Jews. New York, NY: Schocken.
Friedlander S. (1997). Nazi Germany and the Jews: The years of persecution, 1933–1939 (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Gilbert S. J. (1981). Another look at the Milgram obedience studies: The role of the gradated series of shocks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 690–695.
Goldhagen D. (1985). The cowardly executioner: On disobedience in the SS. Patterns of prejudice, 19, 19–32.
Goldhagen D. J. (1992, July 13–20). The evil of banality. The New Republic, 49–52.
Goldhagen D. J. (1996). Hitler’s willing executioners. New York, NY: Knopf.
Gordon S. (1984). Hitler, Germans, and the “Jewish question”. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Herf J. (2006). The Jewish enemy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hoffman E., Myerberg N. R., Morawski J. G. (2015). Acting otherwise: Resistance, agency, and subjectivities in Milgram’s studies of obedience. Theory & Psychology, 25, 670–689.
Kelman H. C., Hamilton V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Koonz C. (2003). The Nazi conscience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lifton R. J. (1986). The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Lipstadt D. E. (2011). The Eichmann trial. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
Lozowick Y. (2002). Hitler’s bureaucrats: The Nazi security police and the banality of evil. London, UK: Continuum.
Mandel D. R. (1998). The obedience alibi: Milgram’s account of the Holocaust reconsidered. Analyse & Kritik, 20(1), 74–79.
Mantell D. M., Panzarella R. (1976). Obedience and responsibility. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 239–245.
Mastroianni G. R. (2015). Obedience in perspective: Psychology and the Holocaust. Theory & Psychology, 25, 657–669.
Milgram S. (1963). Behavioral studies of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.
Milgram S. (1967). Obedience to criminal orders: The compulsion to do evil. Patterns of Prejudice, 1, 3–7.
Milgram S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Miller A. G. (1986). The obedience experiments: A case study of controversy in social science. New York, NY: Praeger.
Miller A. G., Collins B. E., Brief D. E. (1995). Perspectives on obedience to authority: The legacy of the Milgram experiments. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 1–20.
Mixon D. (1979). Understanding shocking and puzzling conduct. In Ginsburg G. P. (Ed.), Emerging strategies in social psychological research (pp. 155–176). New York, NY: Wiley.
Nicholson I. (2011). “Shocking” masculinity: Stanley Milgram, “Obedience to Authority,” and the crisis of manhood in Cold War America. ISIS, 102, 238–268.
Nicholson I. (2015). The normalization of torment: Producing and managing anguish in Milgram’s “obedience” laboratory. Theory & Psychology, 25, 639–656.
Nissani M. (1990). A cognitive reinterpretation of Milgram’s observations on obedience to authority. American Psychologist, 45, 1384–1385.
Orne M. T., Holland C. H. (1968). On the ecological validity of laboratory deceptions. International Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 282–293.
Perry G. (2012). Behind the shock machine: The untold story of the notorious Milgram psychology experiments. Melbourne, Australia: Scribe.
Reicher S. D., Haslam A., Smith J. R. (2012). Working toward the experimenter: Reconceptualizing the obedience with the Milgram paradigm as identification-based followership. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 315–324.
Robinson J. (1965). And the crooked shall be made straight: The Eichmann trial, the Jewish catastrophe, and Hannah Arendt’s narrative. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Ross L. D., Nisbett R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Sabini J. P., Silver M. (1980). Destroying the innocent with a clear conscience: A sociopsychology of the Holocaust. In Dimsdale J. E. (Ed.), Survivors, victims, and perpetrators: Essays on the Nazi Holocaust (pp. 329–358). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press.
Tajfel H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tilker H. A. (1970). Socially responsible behavior as a function of observer responsibility and victim feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 95–100.
Vetlesen A. J. (2005). Evil and human agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Biographies

Allan Fenigstein is a professor of psychology at Kenyon College in Gambier, Ohio. His research interests include self-consciousness, paranoid thought and behavior, self-deception, media violence, aggression, and the psychology of genocide perpetrators.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: November 11, 2015
Issue published: October 2015

Keywords

  1. cruelty
  2. Holocaust
  3. morality
  4. obedience
  5. perpetrators

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2015.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Allan Fenigstein

Notes

Allan Fenigstein, Department of Psychology, Kenyon College, Gambier, OH 43022, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Theory & Psychology.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 6510

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 11 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. Clothing, Sublimation, and the Enjoyment of War
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Exploring the Discursive Construction of Obedience: An Analysis of App...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The good and the bad
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Obey the justice system or protect children? The moral dilemma posed b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Credibility and Incredulity in Milgram’s Obedience Experiments: A Rean...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Arguing, Obeying and Defying
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Adolf Eichmann und Josef Mengele
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Just following orders? The rhetorical invocation of ‘obedience’ in Sta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Introduction
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Academia’s Response to Milgram’s Findings and Explanation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. 50 Years of “Obedience to Authority”: From Blind Conformity to Engaged...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Situations and Dispositions: How to Rescue the Military Virtues from S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Values and indirect noncompliance in a Milgram-like paradigm
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Introduction to the special issue: Unplugging the Milgram machine
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. The normalization of torment: Producing and managing anguish in Milgra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text