Pressing lawmakers to follow party lines?

입력2024.05.06. 오후 8:14
수정2024.05.07. 오전 12:57
기사원문
성별
말하기 속도

이동 통신망을 이용하여 음성을 재생하면 별도의 데이터 통화료가 부과될 수 있습니다.

글자 크기 변경하기
SNS 보내기
인쇄하기
In a meeting with newly-elected lawmakers of the Democratic Party (DP) last week, its leader Lee Jae-myung demanded they follow party lines when enacting proposals. “There were several cases where bills proposed by party consensus didn’t go through due to some members’ vote against them,” he said. “We are constitutionally independent bodies, but we are also members of a political party.”

It is “desirable” for DP members to comply with a decision agreed to by all other members as long as it does not go against their conviction or conscience, he said. He now wields almighty power in the majority party after removing his opponents by not nominating them in the April 10 parliamentary elections. Now Lee wants to tame them by telling them to follow party lines.

The Constitution mandates lawmakers to uphold national interests. The National Assembly Act also stipulates that lawmakers must cast their ballots according to their conscience. Pressing members to go along with their party decisions in lawmaking goes against the Constitution and the National Assembly Act.

Lee attached some conditions — “as long as it does not collide with their conviction and conscience.” But under the current power structure of the DP, Lee’s thoughts are the same as party lines.

The DP under Lee is poised to faithfully follow his command. Rep. Park Chan-dae, a Lee loyalist recently elected as new floor leader, even vowed DP chairmanship of both the legislation and judiciary committee and the steering committees. It was a long tradition that the two major parties share the roles of the house speaker and the chairman of the legislation and judiciary committee, while yielding the chairmanship of the steering committee to the floor leader of the governing party. After winning a supermajority in the last 2020 election, the DP broke the tradition and dominated chairs of all standing committees. The party eased the dominance after losing the by-elections to elect majors of Seoul and Busan in 2021.

The DP’s demand for the chairmanship of the two standing committees translates into an intention to open the legislature whenever it wants, and monopolize the chairs of the two key committees just like it did four years ago. The hard-won momentum of cooperative governance through the first face-to-face meeting between the president and Lee could be wasted. The DP’s election victory does not mean it can domineer over the Assembly. The DP must remember that its unilateral ways after its surprising legislative election victory four years ago had backlashed and ended up in its defeat in the 2022 presidential election. Arrogance can cost votes. The same rule applies to the DP as well as the PPP.

Copyright ⓒ 코리아중앙데일리. All rights reserved. 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지.

이 기사는 언론사에서 오피니언 섹션으로 분류했습니다.
기사 섹션 분류 안내

기사의 섹션 정보는 해당 언론사의 분류를 따르고 있습니다. 언론사는 개별 기사를 2개 이상 섹션으로 중복 분류할 수 있습니다.

닫기

주요뉴스해당 언론사에서 선정하며 언론사 페이지(아웃링크)로 이동해 볼 수 있습니다.

이 기사를 추천합니다
코리아중앙데일리 언론사홈 바로가기

코리아중앙데일리 헤드라인

3